Home Medicine Evaluation of pre-analytical factors impacting urine test strip and chemistry results
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Evaluation of pre-analytical factors impacting urine test strip and chemistry results

  • Mary Kathryn Bohn , Anselmo Fabros and Ashley Di Meo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 10, 2025

Abstract

Objectives

Careful consideration of the pre-analytical process for urine examination is essential to avoid errors and support accurate results and decision-making. Our objective was to assess the impact of various pre-analytical factors on urine test strip and quantitative chemistry results, including stability, tube type, fill volume, and centrifugation.

Methods

Residual random urine specimens were identified. Stability of 10 urine test strips and 13 quantitative chemistry parameters were assessed at eight time points (2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h) at room temperature (RT) and 2–8 °C (n=10–20 samples). The effect of additional pre-analytical variables was assessed, including using preservative tubes for urine chemistry as well as preservative tube underfilling and centrifugation on urine test strip results (n=10 samples).

Results

Seven of the ten urine tests strips evaluated met the minimal agreement criteria for stability (Cohen’s kappa >0.70) across all conditions. A Cohen’s kappa value of <0.70 was observed for pH (48 h), glucose (72 h), and protein (96 h) at RT. All 13 urine chemistry analytes remained stable at defined time points and conditions. Underfilling preservative tubes for urine test strips and centrifugation demonstrated no significant effect. The impact of using preservative tubes for urine chemistry was negligible with the exception of sodium and osmolality.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the pre-analytical factors that impact urine specimen evaluation and may be useful in informing clinical laboratory practices. Acceptable stability window for urine test strips should be considered in the context of the proportion of pathological samples evaluated.


Corresponding author: Ashley Di Meo, PhD, FCACB, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; and Division of Clinical Biochemistry, Laboratory Medicine Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the staff at Toronto General Hospital for their help with sample procurement and instrument time.

  1. Research ethics: The University Health Network’s Quality Improvement Review Committee determined this study as exempt from further review by the Research Ethics Board.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: The author states no conflict of interest.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Echeverry, G, Hortin, GL, Rai, AJ. Introduction to urinalysis: historical perspectives and clinical application. Methods Mol Biol 2010;641:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-711-2_1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Stankovic, AK, DiLauri, E. Quality improvements in the preanalytical phase: focus on urine specimen workflow. Clin Lab Med 2008;28:339–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2007.12.011.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Delanghe, JR, Speeckaert, MM. Preanalytics in urinalysis. Clin Biochem 2016;49:1346–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.10.016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Lippi, G, Becan-McBride, K, Behúlová, D, Bowen, RA, Church, S, Delanghe, J, et al.. Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:229–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2012-0597.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. GP16-A3. Urinalysis; approved guideline-third edition; 2009. [cited 2024 Jun 22]; Available from: www.clsi.org.Search in Google Scholar

6. Kouri, T, Gertsen, JB, Falbo, R, Merens, A, Oyaert, M, Pestel-Caron, M, et al.. The EFLM European Urinalysis Guideline 2023. Clin Chem Lab Med 2024;62:1653–786. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0070.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Kouri, T, Malminiemi, O, Penders, J, Pelkonen, V, Vuotari, L, Delanghe, J. Limits of preservation of samples for urine strip tests and particle counting. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:703–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2008.122.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Froom, P, Bieganiec, B, Ehrenrich, Z, Barak, M. Stability of common analytes in urine refrigerated for 24 h before automated analysis by test strips. Clin Chem 2000;46:1384–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/46.9.1384.Search in Google Scholar

9. Ekşioğlu, MK, Madenci, ÖÇ, Yücel, N, Elçi, A, Turhan, B, Orhan, G, et al.. The effectiveness of BD Vacutainer® Plus Urinalysis Preservative Tubes in preservation of urine for chemical strip analysis and particle counting. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2016;26:224. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2016.024.Search in Google Scholar

10. Ercan, M, Deniz Akbulut, E, Abuşoğlu, S, Meriç Yılmaz, F, Fırat Oğuz, E, Topçuoğlu, C, et al.. Stability of urine specimens stored with and without preservatives at room temperature and on ice prior to urinalysis. Clin Biochem 2015:13–14.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.05.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Veljkovic, K, Rodríguez-Capote, K, Bhayana, V, Pickersgill, R, Beattie, J, Clark, L, et al.. Assessment of a four hour delay for urine samples stored without preservatives at room temperature for urinalysis. Clin Biochem 2012;45:856–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.04.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Dolscheid-Pommerich, RC, Kiarmann-Schuiz, U, Conrad, R, Stoffel-Wagner, B, Zur, B. Evaluation of the appropriate time period between sampling and analyzing for automated urinalysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2016;26:82–9. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2016.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Zhou, J, Fabros, A, Lam, SJ, Coro, A, Selvaratnam, R, Brinc, D, et al.. The stability of 65 biochemistry analytes in plasma, serum, and whole blood. Clin Chem Lab Med 2024;62:1557–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1192.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Cornes, M, Simundic, AM, Cadamuro, J, Costelloe, SJ, Baird, G, Kristensen, GBB, et al.. The CRESS checklist for reporting stability studies: on behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;59:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0061.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Gomez-Rioja, R, Von Meyer, A, Cornes, M, Costelloe, S, Vermeersch, P, Simundic, AM, et al.. Recommendation for the design of stability studies on clinical specimens. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023;61:1708–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0221.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Carobene, A, Aarsand, AK, Bartlett, WA, Coskun, A, Diaz-Garzon, J, Fernandez-Calle, P, et al.. The European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS): a summary report. Clin Chem Lab Med 2022;60:505–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2021-0370.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Shephard, MDS, Penberthy, LA, Fraser, CG. Short- and long-term biological variation in analytes in urine of apparently healthy individuals. Clin Chem 1981;27:569–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/27.4.569.Search in Google Scholar

18. Ricós, C, Jiménez, CV, Hernández, A, Simón, M, Perich, C, Alvarez, V, et al.. Biological variation in urine samples used for analyte measurements. Clin Chem 1994;40:472–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/40.3.472.Search in Google Scholar

19. Adams, JD, Badolato, M, Pierce, E, Cantrell, A, Parker, Z, Farzam, D. Short-term stability of urine electrolytes: effect of time and storage conditions. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metabol 2022;32:111–3. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2021-0172.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Remer, T, Montenegro-Bethancourt, G, Shi, L. Long-term urine biobanking: storage stability of clinical chemical parameters under moderate freezing conditions without use of preservatives. Clin Biochem 2014;47:307–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.09.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Sureda-Vives, M, Morell-Garcia, D, Rubio-Alaejos, A, Valiña, L, Robles, J, Bauça, JM. Stability of serum, plasma and urine osmolality in different storage conditions: relevance of temperature and centrifugation. Clin Biochem 2017;50:772–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.03.019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Bezuidenhout, K, Rensburg, MA, Hudson, CL, Essack, Y, Davids, MR. The influence of storage time and temperature on the measurement of serum, plasma and urine osmolality. Ann Clin Biochem 2016;53:452–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563215602028.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Đuras, A, Cesar Kocijan, V, Rade, A, Lipovec, R, Ostroški, I, Radišić Biljak, V, et al.. Serum and urine osmolality: 8 hours, 24 hours and 1-month sample stability. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2022;82:283–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2022.2079094.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Herrington, W, Illingworth, N, Staplin, N, Kumar, A, Storey, B, Hrusecka, R, et al.. Effect of processing delay and storage conditions on urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016;11:1794–801. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.13341215.Search in Google Scholar

25. Brinkman, JW, De Zeeuw, D, Duker, JJ, Gansevoort, RT, Kema, IP, Hillege, HL, et al.. Falsely low urinary albumin concentrations after prolonged frozen storage of urine samples. Clin Chem 2005;51:2181–3. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.053777.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Miller, WG, Bruns, DE, Hortin, GL, Sandberg, S, Aakre, KM, McQueen, MJ, et al.. Current issues in measurement and reporting of urinary albumin excretion. Clin Chem 2009;55:24–38. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.106567.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Collins, ACG, Sethi, M, MacDonald, FA, Brown, D, Viberti, GC. Storage temperature and differing methods of sample preparation in the measurement of urinary albumin. Diabetologia: Clin Exp Diabetes Metabol 1993;36:993–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02374489.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Miki, K, Sudo, A. Effect of urine pH, storage time, and temperature on stability of catecholamines, cortisol, and creatinine. Clin Chem 1998;44:1759–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/44.8.1759.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1233).


Received: 2024-10-22
Accepted: 2024-12-26
Published Online: 2025-01-10
Published in Print: 2025-05-26

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. The Friedewald formula strikes back
  4. Liquid biopsy in oncology: navigating technical hurdles and future transition for precision medicine
  5. The neglected issue of pyridoxal- 5′ phosphate
  6. Reviews
  7. Health literacy: a new challenge for laboratory medicine
  8. Clinical applications of circulating tumor cell detection: challenges and strategies
  9. Opinion Papers
  10. Pleural effusion as a sample matrix for laboratory analyses in cancer management: a perspective
  11. Interest of hair tests to discriminate a tail end of a doping regimen from a possible unpredictable source of a prohibited substance in case of challenging an anti-doping rule violation
  12. Perspectives
  13. Sigma Metrics misconceptions and limitations
  14. EN ISO 15189 revision: EFLM Committee Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (C: A/ISO) analysis and general remarks on the changes
  15. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  16. Evaluation of current indirect methods for measuring LDL-cholesterol
  17. Verification of automated review, release and reporting of results with assessment of the risk of harm for patients: the procedure algorithm proposal for clinical laboratories
  18. Progranulin measurement with a new automated method: a step forward in the diagnostic approach to neurodegenerative disorders
  19. A comparative analysis of current С-peptide assays compared to a reference method: can we overcome inertia to standardization?
  20. Blood samples for ammonia analysis do not require transport to the laboratory on ice: a study of ammonia stability and cause of in vitro ammonia increase in samples from patients with hyperammonaemia
  21. A physio-chemical mathematical model of the effects of blood analysis delay on acid-base, metabolite and electrolyte status: evaluation in blood from critical care patients
  22. Evolution of autoimmune diagnostics over the past 10 years: lessons learned from the UK NEQAS external quality assessment EQA programs
  23. Comparison between monotest and traditional batch-based ELISA assays for therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab and adalimumab levels and anti-drug antibodies
  24. Evaluation of pre-analytical factors impacting urine test strip and chemistry results
  25. Evaluation of AUTION EYE AI-4510 flow cell morphology analyzer for counting particles in urine
  26. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  27. Estimation of the allowable total error of the absolute CD34+ cell count by flow cytometry using data from UK NEQAS exercises 2004–2024
  28. Establishment of gender– and age–related reference intervals for serum uric acid in adults based on big data from Zhejiang Province in China
  29. Cancer Diagnostics
  30. Tumor specific protein 70 targeted tumor cell isolation technology can improve the accuracy of cytopathological examination
  31. Cardiovascular Diseases
  32. Diagnostic performance of Mindray CL1200i high sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay compared to Abbott Alinity cardiac troponin I assay for the diagnosis of type 1 and 2 acute myocardial infarction in females and males: MERITnI study
  33. Infectious Diseases
  34. Evidence-based assessment of the application of Six Sigma to infectious disease serology quality control
  35. Letters to the Editor
  36. Evaluating the accuracy of ChatGPT in classifying normal and abnormal blood cell morphology
  37. Refining within-subject biological variation estimation using routine laboratory data: practical applications of the refineR algorithm
  38. Early rule-out high-sensitivity troponin protocols require continuous analytical robustness: a caution regarding the potential for troponin assay down-calibration
  39. Biochemical evidence of vitamin B12 deficiency: a crucial issue to address supplementation in pregnant women
  40. Plasmacytoid dendritic cell proliferation and acute myeloid leukemia with minimal differentiation (AML-M0)
  41. Failing methemoglobin blood gas analyses in a sodium nitrite intoxication
Downloaded on 5.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2024-1233/html
Scroll to top button