Enamel shear bond strength of different primers combined with an orthodontic adhesive paste
-
Julia H. Seeliger
, Ute U. Botzenhart
Abstract
Aim:
The aim of this study was a comparison of shear bond strength (SBS) on tooth enamel of different primers combined with the adhesive paste Transbond XT.
Materials and methods:
Forty bovine teeth were used in order to create 40 test blocks. The blocks were divided into four groups of 10 blocks each: group A – sample primer (SP); group B – Opal Seal (OS); group C – Transbond Plus SEP (TSEP); group D – Transbond XT Primer (TXT). After surface preparation and application of the primer, respectively, two stainless steel brackets were fixed on each tooth by using Transbond XT. Accordingly, 80 brackets were debonded (n=20). Shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed by using the Student’s t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.
Results:
All tested groups revealed high shear bond strength in a similar size range. There were no significant differences between the groups concerning shear bond strength. The ARI scores of group C showed significantly lower ARI scores (0 and 1) than that of group D. Apart from that there was no statistical difference.
Conclusion:
In combination with the adhesive paste Transbond XT, all tested primers were suitable for fixing orthodontic brackets. The primers could be changed according to the clinical situation.
References
[1] Al-Saleh M, El-Mowafy O. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets with new self-adhesive resin cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 528–533.10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.027Suche in Google Scholar
[2] Al Shamsi A, Cunningham JL, Lamey PJ, Lynch E. Shear bond strength and residual adhesive after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 694–699.Suche in Google Scholar
[3] Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 333–340.10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8Suche in Google Scholar
[4] Baharava H, Cardash HS, Helft M, Langsam J. Penetration of etched enamel by bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 33–36.10.1016/0022-3913(88)90103-5Suche in Google Scholar
[5] Bishara SE, Soliman M, Laffoon J, Warren JJ. Effect of antimicrobial monomer-containing adhesive on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 397–399.Suche in Google Scholar
[6] Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 621–624.10.1067/mod.2001.113269Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] Boruziniat A, Khazaei Y, Motaghi S, Moghaddas M. Evaluation of bond strength of orthodontic brackets without enamel etching. J Clin Exp Dent 2015; 7: 519–523.10.4317/jced.52253Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[8] Brauchli L, Zeller M, Wichelhaus A. Shear bond strengths of seven self-etching primers after thermo-cycling. J Orofac Orthop 2011; 72: 371–380.10.1007/s00056-011-0041-4Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Buonocore MG. Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849–853.10.1177/00220345550340060801Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Galan J, Mondelli J, Coradazzi JL. Marginal leakage of two composite restorative systems. J Dent Res 1976; 55: 74–76.10.1177/00220345760550012701Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Graf I, Jacobi BE. Bond strength of various fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding systems – Experimental study. J Orofac Orthop 2000; 61: 191–198.10.1007/s000560050004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[12] Hellak A, Rusdea P, Schauseil M, Stein S. Enamel shear bond strength of two orthodontic self-etching bonding systems compared to Transbond™ XT. J Orofac Orthop 2016; 77: 391–399.10.1007/s00056-016-0046-0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 94: 476–483.10.1016/0889-5406(88)90005-4Suche in Google Scholar
[14] Knox J, Jones ML, Hubsch P, Middleton J, Kralj B. An evaluation of the stresses generated in a bonded orthodontic attachment by three different load cases using the Finite Element Method of stress analysis. J Orthod 2000; 27: 39–46.10.1093/ortho/27.1.39Suche in Google Scholar
[15] Knox J, Kralj B, Hubsch PF, Middleton J, Jones ML. An evaluation of the influence of orthodontic adhesive on the stresses generated in a bonded bracket finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 43–53.10.1067/mod.2001.110987Suche in Google Scholar
[16] Luscher B, Lutz F, Ochsenbein H, Muhleman HR. Microleakage and marginal adaptation in composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 409–413.10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80158-9Suche in Google Scholar
[17] Menini A, Cozzani M, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Cozzani P, Gandini P. A 15-month evaluation of bond failures of orthodontic brackets bonded with direct versus indirect bonding technique: a clinical trial. Prog Orthod 2014; 15: 1–6.10.1186/s40510-014-0070-9Suche in Google Scholar
[18] Mirzakouchaki B, Kimyai S, Hydari M, Shahrbaf S, Mirzakouchaki- Boroujeni P. Effect of self-etching primer/adhesive and conventional bonding on the shear bond strength in metallic and ceramic brackets. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17: 164–170.10.4317/medoral.17024Suche in Google Scholar
[19] Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 1076–1081.10.1177/00220345830620101501Suche in Google Scholar
[20] Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod 1965; 51: 901–912.10.1016/0002-9416(65)90203-4Suche in Google Scholar
[21] Northrup RG, Berzins DW, Bradley TG, Schuckit W. Shear bond strength comparison between two orthodontic adhesives and selfligating and conventional brackets. Angle Orthod 2007; 77: 701–706.10.2319/022406-79Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] O’Brien KD, Watts DC, Read MJ. Light cured direct bonding – is it necessary to use a primer? Eur J Orthod 1991; 13: 22–26.10.1093/ejo/13.1.22Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] Prabhakar AR, Dhanraj K, Sugandhan S. Comparative evaluation in vitro of caries inhibition potential and microtensile bond strength of two fluoride releasing adhesive systems. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2014; 15: 385–391.10.1007/s40368-014-0127-ySuche in Google Scholar
[24] Prasad M, Mohamed S, Nayak K, Shetty SK, Talapaneni AK. Effect of moisture, saliva, and blood contamination on the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a conventional bonding system and self-etched bonding system. J Nat Sci, Bio and Med 2014; 5: 123–129.10.4103/0976-9668.127305Suche in Google Scholar
[25] Penido SMMO, Penido CVSR, Pinto AS, Sakima T, Fontana CR. Estudo in vivo e in vitro com e sem termociclagem, da resistência ao cisalhamento de braquetes colados com fonte de luz halógena. Rev Dental Press Ortod Ortop Facial 2008; 13: 66–76.10.1590/S1415-54192008000300009Suche in Google Scholar
[26] Reicheneder CA, Gedrange T, Lange A, Baumert U, Proff P. Shear and tensile bond strength comparison of various contemporary orthodontic adhesive systems: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 422.e1–422.e6.10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.013Suche in Google Scholar
[27] Retamoso LB, Collares FM, Ferreira ES, Samuel SM. Shear bond strength of metallic brackets: influence of saliva contamination. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17: 190–194.10.1590/S1678-77572009000300011Suche in Google Scholar
[28] Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br Dent J 1975; 2: 171–178.10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666Suche in Google Scholar
[29] Rider M, Kenny B, Tanner AN. The effect of enamel bonding agent on in vitro composite bond strength. J Dent 1977; 5; 295–302.10.1016/0300-5712(77)90121-XSuche in Google Scholar
[30] Romano FL, Tavares SW, Nouer DF, Consani S, Borges de Araújo Magnani MB. Shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with Self-Etching Primer. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 849–853.Suche in Google Scholar
[31] Santos BM, Pithon MM, Ruellas AC, Sant’Anna EF. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded with hydrophilic and hydrophobic bond systems under contamination. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 963–967.10.2319/022310-113.1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[32] Sayinsu K, Isik F, Sezen S, Aydemir B. Light curing the primer: beneficial when working in problem areas? Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 310–313.Suche in Google Scholar
[33] Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Ohashi S, Yamamoto K. Effects of 6 self-etching primers on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 424.e1–7.10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.016Suche in Google Scholar
[34] Shahabi M, Heravi F, Mokhber N, Karamad R, Bisharae SE. Effects on shear bond strength and the enamel surface with an enamel bonding agent. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 375–378.10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.030Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
[35] Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG Jr, Hosier MJ. In vitro evaluation of matrix-bound fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 111: 276–282.10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70185-9Suche in Google Scholar
[36] Smith RA, Bellezza JJ, Capilouto ML, Bradley EL Jr, Denys FR, Retief DH. A clinical study of the composite/bonding resin-tooth interface. Dent Mater 1987; 3: 218–223.10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80036-2Suche in Google Scholar
[37] Tang AT, Bjorkman L, Lindback KF, Andlin-Sobocki A, Ekstrand J. Retrospective study of orthodontic bonding without liquid resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 300–306.10.1067/mod.2000.103772Suche in Google Scholar
[38] Thanos CE, Munholland T, Caputo AA. Adhesion of mesh-base direct-bonding brackets. Am J Orthod 1979; 75: 421–430.10.1016/0002-9416(79)90164-7Suche in Google Scholar
[39] Wang WN, Tarng TH. Evaluation of the sealant in orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100: 209–211.10.1016/0889-5406(91)70057-4Suche in Google Scholar
[40] Wendl B, Muchitsch P, Pichelmayer M, Droschl H, Lankmayr E, Maier E. In vitro release of phosphoric acid ester from self-etching primer. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 439–442.10.1177/0022034509336646Suche in Google Scholar
[41] Wickwire NA, Rentz D. Enamel pretreatment: a critical variable in direct bonding systems. Am J Orthod 1973; 64: 499–512.10.1016/0002-9416(73)90263-7Suche in Google Scholar
[42] Yamada R, Hayakawa T, Kasai K. Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2002; 72: 558–564.Suche in Google Scholar
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Efficiency test of current carotid embolic protection devices
- Influence of sizes of abutments and fixation screws on dental implant system: a non-linear finite element analysis
- Biomechanical evaluation of novel ultrasound-activated bioresorbable pins for the treatment of osteochondral fractures compared to established methods
- Fabrication of multifunctional CaP-TC composite coatings and the corrosion protection they provide for magnesium alloys
- An experimental study of shear-dependent human platelet adhesion and underlying protein-binding mechanisms in a cylindrical Couette system
- The influence of implant body and thread design of mini dental implants on the loading of surrounding bone: a finite element analysis
- RapidNAM: generative manufacturing approach of nasoalveolar molding devices for presurgical cleft lip and palate treatment
- Enamel shear bond strength of different primers combined with an orthodontic adhesive paste
- Biomechanical analysis of stiffness and fracture displacement after using PMMA-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation for sacrum fractures
- Regular research articles
- An investigation of the effects of suture patterns on mechanical strength of intestinal anastomosis: an experimental study
- Relationship between linear velocity and tangential push force while turning to change the direction of the manual wheelchair
- Analysis of voluntary opening Ottobock Hook and Hosmer Hook for upper limb prosthetics: a preliminary study
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Efficiency test of current carotid embolic protection devices
- Influence of sizes of abutments and fixation screws on dental implant system: a non-linear finite element analysis
- Biomechanical evaluation of novel ultrasound-activated bioresorbable pins for the treatment of osteochondral fractures compared to established methods
- Fabrication of multifunctional CaP-TC composite coatings and the corrosion protection they provide for magnesium alloys
- An experimental study of shear-dependent human platelet adhesion and underlying protein-binding mechanisms in a cylindrical Couette system
- The influence of implant body and thread design of mini dental implants on the loading of surrounding bone: a finite element analysis
- RapidNAM: generative manufacturing approach of nasoalveolar molding devices for presurgical cleft lip and palate treatment
- Enamel shear bond strength of different primers combined with an orthodontic adhesive paste
- Biomechanical analysis of stiffness and fracture displacement after using PMMA-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation for sacrum fractures
- Regular research articles
- An investigation of the effects of suture patterns on mechanical strength of intestinal anastomosis: an experimental study
- Relationship between linear velocity and tangential push force while turning to change the direction of the manual wheelchair
- Analysis of voluntary opening Ottobock Hook and Hosmer Hook for upper limb prosthetics: a preliminary study