Home Relationship between linear velocity and tangential push force while turning to change the direction of the manual wheelchair
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Relationship between linear velocity and tangential push force while turning to change the direction of the manual wheelchair

  • Seonhong Hwang , Yen-Sheng Lin , Nathan S. Hogaboom , Lin-Hwa Wang and Alicia M. Koontz EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 17, 2016

Abstract

Wheelchair propulsion is a major cause of upper limb pain and injuries for manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries (SCIs). Few studies have investigated wheelchair turning biomechanics on natural ground surfaces. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between tangential push force and linear velocity of the wheelchair during the turning portions of propulsion. Using an instrumented handrim, velocity and push force data were recorded for 25 subjects while they propel their own wheelchairs on a concrete floor along a figure-eight-shaped course at a maximum velocity. The braking force (1.03 N) of the inside wheel while turning was the largest of all other push forces (p<0.05). Larger changes in squared velocity while turning were significantly correlated with higher propulsive and braking forces used at the pre-turning, turning, and post-turning phases (p<0.05). Subjects with less change of velocity while turning needed less braking force to maneuver themselves successfully and safely around the turns. Considering the magnitude and direction of tangential force applied to the wheel, it seems that there are higher risks of injury and instability for upper limb joints when braking the inside wheel to turn. The results provide insight into wheelchair setup and mobility skills training for wheelchair users.


Corresponding author: Alicia M. Koontz, PhD, RET, Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, 6425 Penn Ave, Suite 400, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA, Phone: +412-822-3700, Fax: +412-822-3699

  1. Research funding: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (Project Number: B6252R). This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System. The contents of this abstract do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

  2. Conflict of interest: We declare that we have no commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

References

[1] Andersen JH, Kaergaard A, Frost P, et al. Physical, psychosocial, and individual risk factors for neck/shoulder pain with pressure tenderness in the muscles among workers performing monotonous, repetitive work. Spine 2002; 27: 660–667.10.1097/00007632-200203150-00017Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bayley JC, Cochran TP, Sledge CB. The weight-bearing shoulder. The impingement syndrome in paraplegics. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69: 676–678.10.2106/00004623-198769050-00006Search in Google Scholar

[3] Boninger ML, Baldwin M, Cooper RA, Koontz A, Chan L. Manual wheelchair pushrim biomechanics and axle position. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 608–613.10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90043-1Search in Google Scholar

[4] Boninger ML, Dicianno BE, Cooper RA, Towers JD, Koontz AM, Souza AL. Shoulder magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities, wheelchair propulsion, and gender. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1615–1620.10.1053/S0003-9993(03)00282-XSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Boninger ML, Koontz AM, Sisto SA, et al. Pushrim biomechanics and injury prevention in spinal cord injury: recommendations based on CULP-SCI investigations. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42(3 Suppl 1): 9–19.10.1682/JRRD.2004.08.0103Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Caspall JJ, Seligsohn E, Dao PV, Sprigle S. Changes in inertia and effect on turning effort across different wheelchair configurations. J Rehabil Res Dev 2013; 50: 1353–1362.10.1682/JRRD.2012.12.0219Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Collinger JL, Impink BG, Ozawa H, Boninger ML. Effect of an intense wheelchair propulsion task on quantitative ultrasound of shoulder tendons. PM R 2010; 2: 920–925.10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.06.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Cooper RA, Robertson RN, VanSickle DP, Boninger ML, Shimada SD. Methods for determining three-dimensional wheelchair pushrim forces and moments: a technical note. J Rehabil Res Dev 1997; 34: 162–170.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Desroches G, Aissaoui R, Bourbonnais D. Relationship between resultant force at the pushrim and the net shoulder joint moments during manual wheelchair propulsion in elderly persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 1155–1161.10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.040Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Frost P, Bonde JP, Mikkelsen S, et al. Risk of shoulder tendinitis in relation to shoulder loads in monotonous repetitive work. Am J Ind Med 2002; 41: 11–18.10.1002/ajim.10019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Gagnon D, Boninger M, Collinger JL, Impink B, Koontz AM. Do Stroke Characteristics Change During a High-Intensity 12-minutes Corridor Wheelchair Propulsion Test in Experienced Manual Wheelchair Users? Annual scientific congress of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America, Washington, District of Columbia, USA 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Gellman H, Chandler DR, Petrasek J, Sie I, Adkins R, Waters RL. Carpal tunnel syndrome in paraplegic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988; 70: 517–519.10.2106/00004623-198870040-00006Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hoozemans MJ, van der Beek AJ, Frings-Dresen MH, van der Woude LH, van Dijk FJ. Pushing and pulling in association with low back and shoulder complaints. Occup Environ Med 2002; 59: 696–702.10.1136/oem.59.10.696Search in Google Scholar

[14] Impink BG, Collinger JL, Boninger ML. The effect of symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome on ultrasonographic median nerve measures before and after wheelchair propulsion. PM R 2011; 3: 803–810.10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.04.009Search in Google Scholar

[15] Kotajarvi BR, Sabick MB, An KN, Zhao KD, Kaufman KR, Basford JR. The effect of seat position on wheelchair propulsion biomechanics. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004; 41: 403–414.10.1682/JRRD.2003.01.0008Search in Google Scholar

[16] Lin Y, Koontz AM, Hogaboom N, Boninger ML. Ultrasonographic-Measured Acromiohumeral Distance Associated with Wheelchair Pushrim Kinetics in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury. Pro. the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America Conference, Seattle, WA 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[17] MacPhee AH, Kirby RL, Bell AC, MacLeod DA. The effect of knee-flexion angle on wheelchair turning. Med Eng Phys 2001; 23: 275–283.10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00024-8Search in Google Scholar

[18] Masse LC, Lamontagne M, O’Riain MD. Biomechanical analysis of wheelchair propulsion for various seating positions. J Rehabil Res Dev 1992; 29: 12–28.10.1682/JRRD.1992.07.0012Search in Google Scholar

[19] Paralyzed Veterans of America Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Preservation of upper limb function following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. J Spinal Cord Med 2005; 28: 434–470.10.1080/10790268.2005.11753844Search in Google Scholar

[20] Rankin JW, Kwarciak AM, Mark Richter W, Neptune RR. The influence of altering push force effectiveness on upper extremity demand during wheelchair propulsion. J Biomech 2010; 43: 2771–2779.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.020Search in Google Scholar

[21] Rice I, Impink B, Niyonkuru C, Boninger M. Manual wheelchair stroke characteristics during an extended period of propulsion. Spinal Cord 2009; 47: 413–417.10.1038/sc.2008.139Search in Google Scholar

[22] Rodgers M, Gayle W, Figoni SF, Kobayashi M, Lieh J, Glaser RM. Biomechanics of wheelchair propulsion during fatigue. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 85–93.10.1016/0003-9993(94)90343-3Search in Google Scholar

[23] Roquelaure Y, Mechali S, Dano C, et al. Occupational and personal risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome in industrial workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 1997; 23: 364–369.10.5271/sjweh.233Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Sie IH, Waters RL, Adkins RH, Gellman H. Upper extremity pain in the postrehabilitation spinal cord injured patient. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 44–48.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Silverstein B, Fine L, Stetson D. Hand-wrist disorders among investment casting plant workers. J Hand Surg Am 1987; 12(5 Pt 2): 838–844.10.1016/S0363-5023(87)80245-9Search in Google Scholar

[26] Van der Woude LH, Veeger DJ, Rozendal RH, Sargeant TJ. Seat height in handrim wheelchair propulsion. J Rehabil Res Dev 1989; 26: 31–50.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Werner RA, Franzblau A, Albers JW, Armstrong TJ. Median mononeuropathy among active workers. Are there differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic workers. Am J Ind Med 1998; 33: 374–378.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199804)33:4<374::AID-AJIM7>3.0.CO;2-USearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-9-10
Accepted: 2016-7-27
Published Online: 2016-9-17
Published in Print: 2017-8-28

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2015-0173/html
Scroll to top button