The influence of implant body and thread design of mini dental implants on the loading of surrounding bone: a finite element analysis
-
Arpad Toth
, Istabrak Hasan, Christoph Bourauel
, Torsten Mundt , Reiner Biffar and Friedhelm Heinemann
Abstract
Mini dental implants (MDI) were once thought of as transitional implants for treatment in selected clinical situations. Their reduced diameter makes them a very attractive option for patients with poor tolerance to maxillary and mandibular prostheses. Using the method of finite element analysis, a series of different designed MDI prototypes have been investigated. The prototypes differed in the geometry of implant body and/or design of implant head. The load transfer of the implant prototypes to the idealised alveolar bone has been regarded and the prototypes have been compared to each other and to a number of standard commercial implants. The prototype models have been virtually placed in the idealised bone with a cortical thickness of 1.5 mm and loaded laterally 30° from the implant's long axis. The condition of immediate loading was assumed for the numerical analyses through defining a contact interface between the implant and bone bed. The numerical analysis in this study showed that the design of the investigated prototype MDI of group 3 (mini-ball head) is the most advantageous design.
References
[1] Ahn MR, An KM, Choi JH, Sohn DS. Immediate loading with mini dental implants in the fully edentulous mandible. Implant Dent 2004; 13: 367–372.10.1097/01.id.0000148560.65514.3dSearch in Google Scholar
[2] Allum SR, Romalinson RA, Joshi R. The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 553–559.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01395.xSearch in Google Scholar
[3] Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M. The influence of implant diameter and lenght on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 100: 422–431.10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60259-0Search in Google Scholar
[4] Balkin BE, Steflik DE, Naval F. Mini-dental implant insertion with the auto-advance technique for ongoing applications. J Oral Implantol 2001; 27: 32–37.10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0032:MIIWTA>2.3.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
[5] Bourauel C, Aitlahrach M, Heinemann F, Hasan I. Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implants: extensive study of commercial implants. Biomed Tech 2012; 57: 21–32.10.1515/bmt-2011-0047Search in Google Scholar
[6] Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interinterface: review paper. Clin Mater 1992; 10: 153–201.10.1016/0267-6605(92)90049-YSearch in Google Scholar
[7] Dilek OC, Tezulas E. Treatment of narrow, single tooth edentulous area with mini-dental implants: a clinical report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Athol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 22–25.10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.08.029Search in Google Scholar
[8] Frost HM. Bone’s Mechanostat: a 2003 update. Ant Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2003; 275: 1081–1101.10.1002/ar.a.10119Search in Google Scholar
[9] Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 585–598.10.1067/mpr.2001.115251Search in Google Scholar
[10] Gibney JW. Minimally invasive implant surgery. J Oral Implantol 2001; 27: 73–76.10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0073:MIIS>2.3.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
[11] Griffitts TM, Collins CP, Collins PC. Mini dental implants: an adjunct for retention, stability, and comfort for the edentulous patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100: 81–84.10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.06.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[12] Hasan I, Bourauel C, Mundt T, Stark H, Heinemann F. Biomechanics and load resistance of small-diameter and mini dental implants: a review of literature. Biomed Tech 2013: 59: 1–5.10.1515/bmt-2013-0092Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] Hasan I, Heinemann F, Aitlahrach M, Bourauel C. Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implant. Biomed Tech 2010; 55: 341–350.10.1515/bmt.2010.049Search in Google Scholar
[14] Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, Konvickova S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 20–25.10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] Horiuchi K, Uchid H, Yamamoto K, Sugimura M. Immediate loading of Brånemark system implant following placement in edentulous patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 2: 85–92.Search in Google Scholar
[16] ISO 14801. Fatigue test for endosseous dental implants, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Efficiency test of current carotid embolic protection devices
- Influence of sizes of abutments and fixation screws on dental implant system: a non-linear finite element analysis
- Biomechanical evaluation of novel ultrasound-activated bioresorbable pins for the treatment of osteochondral fractures compared to established methods
- Fabrication of multifunctional CaP-TC composite coatings and the corrosion protection they provide for magnesium alloys
- An experimental study of shear-dependent human platelet adhesion and underlying protein-binding mechanisms in a cylindrical Couette system
- The influence of implant body and thread design of mini dental implants on the loading of surrounding bone: a finite element analysis
- RapidNAM: generative manufacturing approach of nasoalveolar molding devices for presurgical cleft lip and palate treatment
- Enamel shear bond strength of different primers combined with an orthodontic adhesive paste
- Biomechanical analysis of stiffness and fracture displacement after using PMMA-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation for sacrum fractures
- Regular research articles
- An investigation of the effects of suture patterns on mechanical strength of intestinal anastomosis: an experimental study
- Relationship between linear velocity and tangential push force while turning to change the direction of the manual wheelchair
- Analysis of voluntary opening Ottobock Hook and Hosmer Hook for upper limb prosthetics: a preliminary study
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Efficiency test of current carotid embolic protection devices
- Influence of sizes of abutments and fixation screws on dental implant system: a non-linear finite element analysis
- Biomechanical evaluation of novel ultrasound-activated bioresorbable pins for the treatment of osteochondral fractures compared to established methods
- Fabrication of multifunctional CaP-TC composite coatings and the corrosion protection they provide for magnesium alloys
- An experimental study of shear-dependent human platelet adhesion and underlying protein-binding mechanisms in a cylindrical Couette system
- The influence of implant body and thread design of mini dental implants on the loading of surrounding bone: a finite element analysis
- RapidNAM: generative manufacturing approach of nasoalveolar molding devices for presurgical cleft lip and palate treatment
- Enamel shear bond strength of different primers combined with an orthodontic adhesive paste
- Biomechanical analysis of stiffness and fracture displacement after using PMMA-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation for sacrum fractures
- Regular research articles
- An investigation of the effects of suture patterns on mechanical strength of intestinal anastomosis: an experimental study
- Relationship between linear velocity and tangential push force while turning to change the direction of the manual wheelchair
- Analysis of voluntary opening Ottobock Hook and Hosmer Hook for upper limb prosthetics: a preliminary study