Startseite Naturwissenschaften Assessment of the usability conditions of Sb2O3–PbO–B2O3 glasses for shielding purposes in some medical radioisotope and a wide gamma-ray energy spectrum
Artikel Open Access

Assessment of the usability conditions of Sb2O3–PbO–B2O3 glasses for shielding purposes in some medical radioisotope and a wide gamma-ray energy spectrum

  • Ghada ALMisned , Duygu Sen Baykal , Gokhan Kilic , Gulfem Susoy , Hesham M. H. Zakaly , Antoaneta Ene EMAIL logo und Huseyin Ozan Tekin EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 31. Dezember 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

We report some fundamental gamma-ray shielding properties and individual transmission factors (TFs) of five distinct glass samples with a nominal composition of xSb2O3·(40 − x)PbO·60B2O3·0.5CuO and (where; 0 ≤ x ≤ 40 mol%). Phy-X/PSD and MCNPX (version 2.7.0) Monte Carlo code are utilized to determine several critical parameters, such as cross-sections, attenuation coefficients, half and tenth value layers, build-up factors, and TFs. A general transmission setup is designed using basic requirements. Accordingly, TFs are evaluated for several medical radioisotopes. Next, the gamma-ray shielding parameters and TFs are assessed together in terms of providing the validity of the findings. Our results showed that there is a positive contribution of increasing Sb2O3 amount in the glass matrix owing its direct effect to the density increment as well. This positive effect on gamma-ray shielding properties is also observed for decreasing mean free path values from S1 to S5 samples. The exposure build-up factor (EBF) and energy absorption build-up factor (EABF) values, increasing the quantity of Sb2O3 supplementation, resulted in a general reduction in EBF and EABF values (i.e., from 0.5 to 40 mfp). When the quantity of Sb2O3 rises from S1 to S5, the collision rate of incoming gamma rays in glass samples increases significantly. The TF figures reveal that S5 showed the least transmission behavior across all the above-mentioned studied glass thicknesses. It can be concluded that increasing the Sb2O3 additive is a beneficial and monotonic technique, when the gamma-ray shielding qualities or TF values must be further enhanced.

1 Introduction

Radiation shielding is not a matter of choice but rather a strictly regulated legal procedure. Selecting the most appropriate shielding barriers is also a very significant necessity, even though the functioning of this process is achievable with the enlightened knowledge of the employees and the society [1,2]. This is because ionizing radiation is being used more often in scientific and technological endeavors as well as in the treatment of disease in humans. The benefits of this radiation type are being employed in energy production, radiotherapy, medical diagnostics, nuclear power, and other industrial processes. Time, distance, and shielding are the three primary concepts in radiation protection. Increasing a shielding material’s capacity to soak up various forms of ionizing radiation [3] might improve its effectiveness. The most effective shielding materials have often been made of lead (Pb). Novel targeted radioisotopes have led to the widespread use of radioisotope therapy in nuclear medicine clinics, especially for the treatment of cancer. It is important for nuclear medicine facilities to have certain timing, distance, and shielding characteristics in place to reduce radiation exposure to both staff and patients [3,4]. These goals include increasing exposure to radioactive sources among workers, patients, and the public; keeping all radioisotope and radiopharmaceutical activity under tight supervision; and preventing the spread of contamination [5,6,7]. Because of these drawbacks, researchers have been working hard to manufacture next-generation shielding materials that could be an improvement over the current crop [8]. Glass is a valuable radiation barrier due to its ability to absorb gamma rays and neutrons, as well as its transparency and simplicity of compositional modification. Borate glasses are essential optical materials owing to their low melting temperatures, excellent transmittance, and good thermal stability [9]. Typically, they are used in the production of insulating and dielectric materials. Adding transition metal ions to their structure, however, results in semi-conductivity. Due to their existence in two or more valence states, which influences structural and optical properties [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], transition metals are widely employed in glasses at present. In addition to optical and structural properties of borate glasses, studies reported that their radiation shielding properties are quite satisfactory as proportional to their ratios when they are doped with transition metals [18,19,20]. Moreover, boron has neutron capture property and in addition to doping concrete with boron [21] and glasses also benefited from this property. Studies related to the binary glass that B2O3 forms when merged with PbO are mostly on the investigation of structural properties [22]. However, the unique property of PbO in respect to shielding gamma and X-rays, and furthermore, boron’s success in capturing neutrons revealed that the glass structure that these two elements form together might have an important place in radiation shielding. However, since the density of the final composition would be relatively lower compared to PbO, there are studies in the literature on the enrichment of glass by doping with different elements and especially improvement of the density is encountered [23,24]. Glasses containing heavy metal oxides such as Sb2O3 are frequently being investigated due to their unique transmittance properties in the infrared region in the field of optics [25]. Studies on the impact of glasses containing heavy metal oxides on radiation shielding are increasing with each passing day [26,27]. Studies on the impact of the presence of both PbO and Sb2O3 oxide compounds within the same glass structure on radiation shielding properties set forth interesting results [28,29]. In this work, we provide the results of a complete examination of the optically defined xSb2O3·(40 − x)PbO·60B2O3·0.5CuO (where, 0 ≤ x ≤ 40 mol%) glass systems. This study’s results provide insight into how the addition of Sb2O3 to the glass compositions under study led to a proportionate increase in absorption, which might be valuable in assessing the materials created in the cited article on a larger scale.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Glass characterization

Based on the previous research, seven samples of tungsten/barium/phosphate glasses having the chemical formula xSb2O3·(40 − x)PbO·60B2O3·0.5CuO and (where, 0 ≤ x ≤ 40 mol%) increments were chosen for this inquiry. A previous study of this class of materials [30] examined the parameters of gamma-ray absorption for a restricted energy range. The TF factors are estimated in this study by utilization of the gamma-ray energies of nuclear-type radioisotopes. This research will provide essential information for more practical applications by maintaining a much higher level for the photon energy range that is investigated in this research. This study takes into account several build-up factors as well as other essential shielding properties, both of which were omitted from earlier studies.

The following is a list of details regarding the glasses that were examined:

  • S1: 0.240740B + 0.385806O + 0.003974Cu + 0.36948Pb (ρ: 5.00 g/cm3).

  • S2: 0.200616B + 0.342811O + 0.003974Cu + 0.083118Sb + 0.369480Pb (ρ: 5.20 g/cm3).

  • S3: 0.160493B + 0.299816O + 0.003974Cu + 0.166237Sb + 0.369480Pb (ρ: 5.30 g/cm3).

  • S4: 0.120370B + 0.256821O + 0.003974Cu + 0.249355Sb + 0.369480Pb (ρ: 5.50 g/cm3).

  • S5: 0.080247B + 0.213826O + 0.003974Cu + 0.332474Sb + 0.369480Pb (ρ: 5.75 g/cm3).

Glass codes, elemental weight fractions, and density are tabulated in Table 1.

Table 1

Sample code, elemental weight fraction, and density of xSb2O3·(40 − x)PbO·60B2O3·0.5CuO: (0 ≤ x ≤ 40 mol%)

Sample code Elemental weight fraction (wt%) Density ρ (g/cm3) [30]
B O Cu Sb Pb
S1 0.240740 0.385806 0.003974 0 0.369480 5.00
S2 0.200616 0.342811 0.003974 0.083118 0.369480 5.20
S3 0.160493 0.299816 0.003974 0.166237 0.369480 5.30
S4 0.120370 0.256821 0.003974 0.249355 0.369480 5.50
S5 0.080247 0.213826 0.003974 0.332474 0.369480 5.75

2.2 Shielding parameters and gamma transmission factors (TFs)

The ability of radiation-shielding materials to absorb a part of the initial radiation quantity that impacts an attenuator is a further essential characteristic. This criterion may be expressed in terms of a value determined by primary and secondary radiation quantities. The term TF [1,31,32] is a crucial parameter that enables researchers to measure the attenuation of incident gamma rays as a function of secondary gamma-ray intensity. This research analyzed the TF values of glass samples tested for a variety of radioisotopes used for nuclear-type disease therapy and diagnostics. The radioisotopes indicated 67Ga (0.0086, 0.0093, 0.1840 MeV), 57Co (0.0144, 0.1221, 0.1365 MeV), 111In (0.0230, 0.1710, 0.2450 MeV), 133Ba (0.0532, 0.0796, 0.0810, 0.2764, 0.3029, 0.3560, 0.3838 MeV), 201Tl (0.0710, 0.1350, 0.1670 MeV), 99mTc (0.1405 MeV), 51Cr (0.3201), 131I (0.2843, 0.3645, 0.6370, 0.7229 MeV), 58Co (0.5110, 0.8108 MeV), 137Cs (0.6617 MeV), and 60Co (1.1732, 1.3325 MeV) specific energies [8]. This portion of the investigation simulates a large transmission assembly using the MCNPX method [33]. The MCNPX method’s resulting configuration is seen in three dimensions in Figure 1. The graphic illustrates that the quantity of gamma rays that are absorbed by the glass material between the two detection zones is the most important aspect that is considered when calculating the TF values. The modeling approach was predicated on the production of the MCNPX input file, and it was considered complete when the tally values were exported from the output file and the TF values were specified.

Figure 1 
                  (a) 2-D view of designed MCNPX simulation setup. (b) 3-D illustration of designed MCNPX setup (2-D and 3-D views are obtained from MCNPX Visual Editor VisedX22S).
Figure 1

(a) 2-D view of designed MCNPX simulation setup. (b) 3-D illustration of designed MCNPX setup (2-D and 3-D views are obtained from MCNPX Visual Editor VisedX22S).

3 Results and discussion

By computing the radiation absorption characteristics of glass materials in accordance with specified parameters, the direct contribution of structural changes to their absorption qualities may be analyzed [34–41]. The radiation attenuation properties of five different glass samples doped with varied amounts of Sb2O3 were investigated. The Sb2O3 additive ratio was raised to its highest level in the S5 sample after being raised gradually in numerous glass compositions from S1 to S5. The density of the glass samples that were examined varies as shown in Figure 2 depending on the proportion of Sb2O3 that is present in the overall glass composition. There was a 0.75 g/cm3 difference in glass density between the lowest and highest Sb2O3 reinforcements due to the increased weight caused by the increased composition of the components. A feature of materials that shields against gamma rays is the linear attenuation coefficient (µ), which increases with increasing material density [42,43]. For any gamma-ray energy, the linear attenuation coefficient of a material may be determined, making it a crucial metric for determining many others. Figure 3 displays the variation in linear attenuation coefficients as a function of gamma rays, as measured for five different glass samples. The highest linear attenuation coefficient values may be seen in the low-energy part of the presented diagram. The fact that the k-absorption edge reached its peak and then gradually started to fade following this significant decrease in the low-energy region is evidence that Compton scattering was the predominate interaction in the mid-energy region and that the fall was followed by a lower increase. The values of the linear attenuation coefficients have been strongly impacted by the elemental compositions of the five different glass samples that were evaluated. The linear attenuation coefficients for all investigated energies were found to be highest in S5 samples with the highest Sb2O3 addition rate. This demonstrates that the linear attenuation coefficient of multi-glass samples improves when density rises due to Sb2O3 addition rate. Figure 4 depicts the variation pattern of the mass attenuation coefficient (µ m). Overall, it was found that the linear and mass attenuation coefficients have a similar pattern. Since µ m is a density-independent characteristic, it can be said that as the quantity of Sb2O3 steadily rose from S1 to S5, a clear pattern of rising m values was also seen. The linear attenuation coefficient may be used to calculate the half-value layer (HVL), a critically important feature of gamma-ray shielding [44,45]. Figure 5 shows that the HVL is a tangible depiction of the thickness at which the energy of a photon impinging on a material is decreased by half. This indicates that the gamma-ray attenuation capabilities of materials with a small half-value thickness are preferable. In other words, a material’s ability to shield against a certain photon energy is improved by decreasing its HVL value. HVL values between 0.015 and 15 MeV are shown in Figure 5 for each of the seven glass samples that were analyzed. The graph shows that, although HVL values are rather small for low photon energies, they have begun to grow proportionally when photon energy is raised. Consequently, the HVL values for the S5 sample were the lowest of all the samples. For all glasses studied, the tenth value layer’s (TVL) variability as a function of photon energy in MeV is shown in Figure 6. In all cases, the TVL parameter follows the same pattern as the HVL. Changes in the mean free path as a function of the incoming photon energy for glasses S1 through S5 are shown in Figure 7. This graph demonstrates that the concentration of Sb2O3 has a negative influence on the evolution of mean free path, which is an obvious indication of enhanced gamma-ray shielding characteristics. This is because of the decrease in the value of the mean free path implies that the distance between two successive gamma-ray contacts in the material reduces, indicating that the absorption process will be more efficient at shorter distances. Therefore, for a photon energy of 15 MeV, the values are lowest for the S5 glass sample and maximum for the S1 glass sample. Figures 8 and 9 demonstrate the gamma-ray energy (MeV)-dependent changes in the exposure build-up factor (EBF) and the energy absorption build-up factor (EABF) throughout a range of mean free path values, respectively. Both the EBF and EABF values are small in the low gamma-ray energy band because photoelectric absorption is responsible for the vast majority of entering gamma rays. Our results show that both EBF and EABF values decreased when Sb2O3 dosage was increased (i.e., from 0.5 to 40 mfp). The rate at which incident gamma rays collide with glass samples increases dramatically as the amount of Sb2O3 increases from S1 to S5. The gamma-ray TF values, which is a critical metric for shielding materials, was computed for S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 glass samples for some well-known isotopes and their characteristic energies as 67Ga (0.0086, 0.0093, 0.1840 MeV), 57Co (0.0144, 0.1221, 0.1365 MeV), 111In (0.0230, 0.1710, 0.2450 MeV), 133Ba (0.0532, 0.0796, 0.0810, 0.2764, 0.3029, 0.3560, 0.3838 MeV), 201Tl (0.0710, 0.1350, 0.1670 MeV), 99mTc (0.1405 MeV), 51Cr (0.3201), 131I (0.2843, 0.3645, 0.6370, 0.7229 MeV), 58Co (0.5110, 0.8108 MeV), 137Cs (0.6617 MeV), 60Co (1.1732, 1.3325 MeV). The TF values of the glasses were calculated using two different methods. Initially, glass thicknesses were used to analyze the TF factors of samples S1 through S5. In addition, Figure 10 displays the radiation shielding parameters ACS and ECS. Figure 10 shows how the ECS varies as a function of the photon energy entering the system, whereas Figure 11 shows how the ACS varies. Figures 10 and 11 show that the ACS and ECS values decrease with increasing photon energy. In every glass tested, the ACS values are larger than the ECS values. This is because the likelihood of total atomic interaction in any material is greater than the probability of complete electrical contact with incoming photons. Figure 12 displays the transmission functions of the studied glasses as a function of radioisotope energy and glass thickness (MeV). As the radioisotope’s energy rises, the TF shifts from 0.0086 to 1.3325 MeV. For all measured thicknesses, glass samples showed the lowest TF values when tested at low energies. Thicker samples may have an easier time attenuating low-energy gamma rays due to their high attenuation capacity. As a result, there is a significant difference of about 0.1 MeV. Glass samples become more reactive at gamma-ray energies greater than 0.1 MeV. Maximum attenuation was calculated for all glass samples at a thickness of 3 cm (i.e., minimum transmission). Increases in shield thickness have a negative effect on gamma-ray attenuation because shield thickness affects the effectiveness of any shielding material. The TF values of the glasses were then carefully assessed by considering the attenuation capabilities of various glass thicknesses (0.5, 1.5, 2.5, and 3 cm). Figure 13 displays the relationship between the transmitted energy (in MeV) and the glass thickness used for the experiment. The graph demonstrates the decline in TF values when gamma-ray energies are increased. The TF values of the glass samples examined were lowest for the thickness of 3 cm.

Figure 2 
               Variation of glass densities.
Figure 2

Variation of glass densities.

Figure 3 
               Variations of linear attenuation coefficient (1/cm) with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.
Figure 3

Variations of linear attenuation coefficient (1/cm) with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.

Figure 4 
               Variations of mass attenuation coefficients (cm2/g) with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.
Figure 4

Variations of mass attenuation coefficients (cm2/g) with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.

Figure 5 
               Variations of HVL (cm) with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.
Figure 5

Variations of HVL (cm) with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.

Figure 6 
               Variations of TVL (cm) with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.
Figure 6

Variations of TVL (cm) with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.

Figure 7 
               Variations of mean free path (cm) with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.
Figure 7

Variations of mean free path (cm) with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.

Figure 8 
               Variation of EBF of investigated glasses at different mean free path values.
Figure 8

Variation of EBF of investigated glasses at different mean free path values.

Figure 9 
               Variation of EABF of investigated glasses at different mean free path values.
Figure 9

Variation of EABF of investigated glasses at different mean free path values.

Figure 10 
               Variations of atomic cross-section with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.
Figure 10

Variations of atomic cross-section with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.

Figure 11 
               Variations of electronic cross-section with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.
Figure 11

Variations of electronic cross-section with photon energy (MeV) for all S1–S5 glasses.

Figure 12 
               TFs of investigated glasses as a function of used radioisotope energy (MeV) at different glass thicknesses.
Figure 12

TFs of investigated glasses as a function of used radioisotope energy (MeV) at different glass thicknesses.

Figure 13 
               Comparison of the TFs as a function of used radioisotope energy (MeV) for different glass thicknesses.
Figure 13

Comparison of the TFs as a function of used radioisotope energy (MeV) for different glass thicknesses.

4 Conclusion

B2O3, which has the tendency to form glasses as combined with various compounds, is effectively being used in the making of new structures. Glass structures that B2O3 forms by uniting with heavy metal oxides make ground with their extraordinary properties in linear and nonlinear optics. In addition, combination of B2O3 with heavy metal PbO yields promising materials in radiation shielding. When Sb2O3 is used in industrial glasses at low ratios, it has the property to remove bubbles within the glass and decolorize special glasses. When they are found in the structure at high ratios, they have the property to rearrange the glass network; thus, it changes the physical, optical, and structural properties of the glass to a high extent. The impact of gradual substitution of PbO with another heavy metal Sb2O3 in the glass network having Sb2O3–PbO–B2O3–CuO composition is found in the literature studies in which the examination of structural properties is prioritized. The effect of PbO/Sb2O3 change in the specified structure on radiation shielding properties was examined in this study in detail. Examining all radiation shielding parameters, we conclude that

  1. The linear (µ) and mass attenuation (µ m) coefficients trends as: S5 µ,µm > S4 µ,µm > S3 µ,µm > S2 µ,µm > S1 µ,µm.

  2. HVL, TVL, and MFP trends as: S1HVL,TVLMFP > S2HVL,TVL,MFP > S3HVL,TVL,MFP > S4HVL,TVL,MFP > S5HVL,TVL,MFP.

  3. Increasing the amount of Sb2O3 supplementation decreased the EBF and EABF levels in general (i.e., from 0.5 to 40 mfp). When the amount of Sb2O3 rises from S1 to S5, the collision rate of coming gamma rays in glass samples considerably increases.

  4. The ACS and ECS values decrease when photon energy rises.

  5. The ACS parameter values for all glasses are greater than the ECS parameter values. This is because the chance of full electronic contact with incoming photons is lower than the probability of complete atomic interaction in any substance.

  6. According to the TF statistics, S5 exhibited the least transmission characteristic of all the investigated glass thicknesses.

Lastly, as a part of the scientific community’s ongoing work on the current promising glass system, we would like to provide some ideas for future study that may be performed. After taking several factors into account, we were able to present detailed results in our investigation. A few significant material properties relate to glass materials; thus, although the proposed glassy system shows potential, it will require ongoing optimization and development. Based on the data obtained, a broad overview of the Sb2O3-containing glass samples was presented. However, due to the important material qualities connected with glass components, continued work is required in terms of overall optimization and development of the suggested glass system.

  1. Funding information: The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia, for funding this research work through the project number RI-44-0042.

  2. Author contributions: Ghada ALMisned: writing, calculations, revision; Duygu Sen Baykal: calculations, writing, illustrations; Gokhan Kilic: calculations, writing; G. Susoy: calculations, writing, revision; Hesham M.H. Zakaly: calculations, writing; Antoaneta Ene: calculations, writing (the work of Antoaneta Ene and the APC were supported by Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania through the grant no. RF 3621/2021); and Huseyin Ozan Tekin: writing, calculation, supervision, revision.

  3. Conflict of interest: None.

  4. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

  5. Data availability statement: Data will be made available on request.

References

[1] Tekin HO, ALMisned G, Rammah YS, Susoy G, Ali FT, Sen Baykal D, et al. Mechanical properties, elastic moduli, transmission factors, and gamma-ray-shielding performances of Bi2O3–P2O5–B2O3–V2O5 quaternary glass system. Open Chem. 2022;20(1):314–29.10.1515/chem-2022-0145Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Kim JH. Three principles for radiation safety: time, distance, and shielding. Korean J Pain. 2018;31(3):145–6. 10.3344/kjp.2018.31.3.145.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] Tishkevich DI, Grabchikov SS, Grabchikova EA, Vasin DS, Lastovskiy SB, Yakushevich AS, et al. Modeling of paths andenergy losses of high-energy ions in single-layered and mul-tilayered materials. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020;848:012089. 10.1088/1757-899X/848/1/012089.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Saddeek YB. Ultrasonic and structural features of some borosilicate glasses. Bull Mater Sci. 2017;40(3):545–3.10.1007/s12034-017-1421-1Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards. IAEA Gen Saf Requir. 2014;3:10–1.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Lukoff J, Olmos J. Minimizing medical radiation exposure by incorporating a new radiation “Vital Sign” into the electronic medical record: Quality of care and patient safety. Perm J. 2017;21(4):17–007.10.7812/TPP/17-007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] Applying radiation safety standards in nuclear medicine. Safety reports series no. 40. Vienna: IAEA; 2005 (PDF) Diagnostic and therapeutic radioisotopes in nuclear medicine: Determination of gamma-ray transmission factors and safety competencies of high-dense and transparent glassy shields. Available from:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361445714_Diagnostic_and_therapeutic_radioisotopes_in_nuclear_medicine_Determination_of_gamma-ray_transmission_factors_and_safety_competencies_of_high-dense_and_transparent_glassy_shields [accessed Sep 04 2022].Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Erdemir RU, Kilic G, Sen Baykal D, ALMisned G, Issa SA, Zakaly HM, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic radioisotopes in nuclear medicine: Determination of gamma-ray transmission factors and safety competencies of high-dense and transparent glassy shields. Open Chem. 2022;20(1):517–24.10.1515/chem-2022-0167Suche in Google Scholar

[9] El-Batal HA, Ezz-El-Din FM. Interaction of γ-rays with Some alkali-alkaline-earth borate glasses containing chromium. J Am Ceram Soc. 1993;76(2):523–9.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03817.xSuche in Google Scholar

[10] Abdel-Baki M, El-Diasty F. Role of oxygen on the optical properties of borate glass doped with ZnO. J Solid State Chem. 2011;184(10):2762–9.10.1016/j.jssc.2011.08.015Suche in Google Scholar

[11] El-Falaky GE, Gaafar MS, Abd El-Aal NS. Ultrasonic relaxation in Zinc–Borate glasses. Curr Appl Phys. 2012;12(2):589–96.10.1016/j.cap.2011.09.009Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Sumalatha B, Omkaram I, Rajavardhana Rao T, Raju CL. Alkaline earth zinc borate glasses doped with Cu2+ ions studied by EPR, optical and IR techniques. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2011;357(16–17):3143–52.10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.05.005Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Kumar R, Rama AK, Bhatnagar J, Lakshmana R. EPR of vanadyl ions in alkali lead borate glasses. Mater Lett. 2002;57(1):178–82. 10.1016/S0167-577X(02)00726-7.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Rada M, Rada S, Pascuta P, Culea E. Structural properties of molybdenum-lead-borate glasses. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2010 Nov;77(4):832–7.10.1016/j.saa.2010.08.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Rao TR, Reddy CV, Krishna CR, Thampy UU, Raju RR, Rao PS, et al. Correlation between physical and structural properties of Co2+ doped mixed alkali zinc borate glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2011;357(18):3373–80.10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.06.004Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Singh GP, Kaur P, Kaur S, Singh DP. Role of WO3 in structural and optical properties of WO3–Al2O3–PbO–B2O3 glasses. Phys B. 2011;406(24):4652–6.10.1016/j.physb.2011.09.052Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Singh GP, Kaur S, Kaur P, Kumar S, Singh DP. Structural and optical properties of WO3–ZnO–PbO–B2O3 glasses. Phys B. 2011;406(10):1890–3.10.1016/j.physb.2011.02.049Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Tekin HO, Issa SA, Kilic G, Zakaly HM, Badawi A, Bilal G, et al. Cadmium oxide reinforced 46V2O5–46P2O5–(8−x)B2O3–xCdO semiconducting oxide glasses and resistance behaviors against ionizing gamma rays. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;13:2336–49.10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.020Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Tekin HO, Issa SA, Kilic G, Zakaly HM, Tarhan N, Sidek HA, et al. A systematical characterization of TeO2–V2O5 glass system using boron (III) oxide and neodymium (III) oxide substitution: Resistance behaviors against ionizing radiation. Appl Sci (Basel). 2021;11(7):3035.10.3390/app11073035Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Kilic G, Ilik E, Mahmoud KA, El-Mallawany R, El-Agawany FI, Rammah YS. Novel zinc vanadyl boro-phosphate glasses: ZnO–V2O5–P2O5–B2O3: Physical, thermal, and nuclear radiation shielding properties. Ceram Int. 2020;46(11, Part B):19318–27. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.272.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Kharita MH, Yousef S, AlNassar M. Review on the addition of boron compounds to radiation shielding concrete. Prog Nucl Energy. 2011;53(2):207–11. 10.1016/j.pnucene.2010.09.012.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Takaishi T, Jin J, Uchino T, Yoko T. Structural study of PbO–B2O3 glasses by X‐ray diffraction and 11B MAS NMR techniques. J Am Ceram Soc. 2000;83(10):2543–8.10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01588.xSuche in Google Scholar

[23] Alothman MA, Kurtulus R, Olarinoye IO, Kavas T, Mutuwong C, Al-Buriahi MS. Optical, elastic, and radiation shielding properties of Bi2O3-PbO-B2O3 glass system: A role of SnO2 addition. Opt (Stuttg). 2021;248:168047.10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168047Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Al-Buriahi MS, Kavaz E, Perişanoğlu U, Alalawi A, Çakıcı T, Alomairy S, et al. SrO effect on photon/particle radiation protection characteristics of SrO–PbO–B2O3 glasses. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater. 2021;31(12):4546–62.10.1007/s10904-021-02114-xSuche in Google Scholar

[25] Marzouk SY, Elbatal FH. Infrared and UV–visible spectroscopic studies of gamma-irradiated Sb2O3–B2O3 glasses. J Mol Struct. 2014;1063:328–5.10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.01.081Suche in Google Scholar

[26] ALMisned G, Tekin HO, Ene A, Issa SA, Kilic G, Zakaly HM. A closer look on nuclear radiation shielding properties of Eu3+ doped heavy metal oxide glasses: Impact of Al2O3/PbO substitution. Mater (Basel). 2021 Sep;14(18):5334.10.3390/ma14185334Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[27] ALMisned G, Tekin HO, Issa SA, Ersundu MÇ, Ersundu AE, Kilic G, et al. Novel HMO-glasses with Sb2O3 and TeO2 for nuclear radiation shielding purposes: A comparative analysis with traditional and novel shields. Mater (Basel). 2021 Aug;14(15):4330.10.3390/ma14154330Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Mostafa AM, Zakaly HM, Al-Ghamdi SA, Issa SA, Al-Zaibani M, Ramadan RM, et al. PbO–Sb2O3–B2O3–CuO glassy system: Evaluation of optical, gamma and neutron shielding properties. Mater Chem Phys. 2021;258:123937.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123937Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Al-Hadeethi Y, Sayyed M. Effect of Gd2O3 on the radiation shielding characteristics of Sb2O3–PbO–B2O3–Gd2O3 glass system. Ceram Int. 2020;46(9):13768–73. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.02.166.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Doweidar H, El-Egili K, Ramadan R, Al-Zaibani M. Structural investigation and properties of Sb2O3–PbO–B2O3 glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2018;497:93–101.10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.01.025Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Almatari M, Agar O, Altunsoy EE, Kilicoglu O, Sayyed MI, Tekin HO. Photon and neutron shielding characteristics of samarium doped lead alumino borate glasses containing barium, lithium and zinc oxides determined at medical diagnostic energies. Results Phys. 2019;12:2123–8.10.1016/j.rinp.2019.01.094Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Tekin HO, ALMisned G, Susoy G, Ali FT, Baykal DS, Ene A, et al. Transmission Factor (TF) behavior of Bi2O3–TeO2–Na2O–TiO2–ZnO glass system: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Sustainability (Basel). 2022;14(5):2893.10.3390/su14052893Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Computer Code Collection RS. MCNPX user’s manual version 2.4.0. Monte Carlo N-particle transport code system for mul-tiple and high energy applications, 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Tekin HO, Issa SAM, Kavaz E, Guclu EEA. The direct effect of Er2O3 on bismuth barium telluro borate glasses for nuclear security applications. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(11):115212.10.1088/2053-1591/ab4cb5Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Mahmoud IS, Issa SAM, Saddek YB, Tekin HO, Kilicoglu O, Alharbi T, et al. Gamma, neutron shielding and mechanical parameters for vanadium lead vanadate glasses. Ceram Int. 2019;45:14058–72.10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.105Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Tekin HO, Kassab LR, Kilicoglu O, Magalhães ES, Issa SA, da Silva Mattos GR. Newly developed tellurium oxide glasses for nuclear shielding applications: an extended investigation. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2020;528:119763.10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119763Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Sayyed MI, Kumar A, Tekin HO, Kaur R, Singh M, Agar O, et al. Evaluation of gamma-ray and neutron shielding features of heavy metals doped Bi2O3-BaO-Na2O-MgO-B2O3 glass systems. Prog Nucl Energy. 2020;118:103118.10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103118Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Rammah YS, Ashok Kumar KA, Mahmoud R, El-Mallawany F, El-Agawany I, Susoy G, et al. SnO reinforced silicate glasses and utilization in gamma radiation shielding applications. Emerg Mater Res. 2020;9(3):1000–8. 10.1680/jemmr.20.00150.Suche in Google Scholar

[39] Agar O, Kavaz E, Altunsoy EE, Kilicoglu O, Tekin HO, Sayyed MI, et al. Nevzat Tarhan. Er2O3 effects on photon and neutron shielding properties of TeO2-Li2O–ZnO-Nb2O5 glass system. Results Phys. 2019;13:102277.10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102277Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Rashad M, Tekin HO, Zakaly HMH, Pyshkina M, Issa SAM, Susoy G. Physical and nuclear shielding properties of newly synthesized magnesium oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles. Nucl Eng Technol. 2020;52(9):2078–84.10.1016/j.net.2020.02.013Suche in Google Scholar

[41] Sharma A, Sayyed MI, Agar O, Tekin HO. Simulation of shielding parameters for TeO2-WO3-GeO2 glasses using FLUKA code. Results Phys. 2019;13:102199.10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102199Suche in Google Scholar

[42] Rammah Y, Issa SAM, Zakaly H, Tekin HO, Yousef E, Abouhaswa AS. B2O3-Bi2O3-Li2O3-Cr2O3 glasses: fabrication, structure, mechanical, and gamma radiation shielding qualities. J Aust Ceram Soc. 2021;57(4):1057–69. 10.1007/s41779-021-00599-w.Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Issa SAM, Tekin HO, Hessien MM, Rammah YS. Investigation of the elastic moduli, optical characteristics, and ionizing radiation attenuation capacity of specific strontium borosilicate glasses. J Aust Ceram Soc. 2022;58(2):495–510. 10.1007/s41779-022-00706-5.Suche in Google Scholar

[44] Tekin HO, Rammah YS, Hessien MM, Zakaly HMH, Issa SAM. Evaluating the optical and gamma-ray protection properties of bismo-tellurite sodium titanium zinc glasses. J Aust Ceram Soc. 2022 Mar;26(3):851–66.10.1007/s41779-022-00732-3Suche in Google Scholar

[45] ALMisned G, Akkurt I, Tekin HO, Erdamar IYD, Dogan SO. Gamma ray shielding properties of CeO2-added hydroxyapatite composite. J Aust Ceram Soc. 2022;58(4):1209–17. 10.1007/s41779-022-00763-w.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-10-21
Revised: 2022-11-16
Accepted: 2022-11-21
Published Online: 2022-12-31

© 2022 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Modeling thixotropic break-down behavior of dense anaerobically digested sludge
  3. Structure of pumpkin pectin and its effect on its technological properties
  4. Free volumes in mixed-tacticity poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) determined by viscosimetry and their correlations with structural features and mechanical properties
  5. In-line measurement and modeling of temperature, pressure, and blowing agent dependent viscosity of polymer melts
  6. Determining the gas accumulation period using fluid inclusion observations: Xiang Zhong Basin, China
  7. Rheological thixotropy and pasting properties of food thickening gums orienting at improving food holding rate
  8. Evaluation of four different cogeneration cycles by using some criteria
  9. Effect of phosphogypsum and water-retaining in the stabilization and durability of stabilized mortars
  10. Determination of gamma-ray transmission factors of WO3–TeO2–B2O3 glasses using MCNPX Monte Carlo code for shielding and protection purposes
  11. Assessment of the usability conditions of Sb2O3–PbO–B2O3 glasses for shielding purposes in some medical radioisotope and a wide gamma-ray energy spectrum
  12. Exergy analyses of two and three stage cryogenic cycles
  13. Special Issue on Rheological Behavior and Engineering Stability of Rock Mass - Part I
  14. Mechanical properties of sandstone under hydro-mechanical coupling
  15. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and index of entropy models for She County of Anhui Province, China
  16. Reinforcement placement on mechanics and deformation of stepped reinforced retaining wall experimental study of characteristics
Heruntergeladen am 3.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/arh-2022-0133/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen