Illuminating insights into subjectivity: Q as a methodology in applied linguistics research

References

Akhtar-Danesh, Noori, Andrea Baumann & Lis Cordingley. 2008. Q-methodology in nursing research: A promising method for the study of subjectivity. Western Journal of Nursing Research 30(6). 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945907312979.Suche in Google Scholar

Alkhateeb, Hadeel, Muntasir Al Hamad & Eiman Mustafawi. 2020. Revealing stakeholders’ perspectives on educational language policy in higher education through Q-methodology. Current Issues in Language Planning 21(4). 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741237.Suche in Google Scholar

Alkhateeb, Hadeel & Yousef Alshaboul. 2022. Teachers’ understanding of the importance of students’ mother tongue(s) in Qatar’s international English-medium primary schools: findings from Q method research. Current Issues in Language Planning 23(1). 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.1925456.Suche in Google Scholar

Araral, Eduardo, Alberto Asquer & Yahua Wang. 2017. Regulatory constructivism: Application of Q methodology in Italy and China. Water Resources Management 31. 2497–2521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1496-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, Rachel, Carl Thompson & Mannion Russell. 2006. Q methodology in health economics. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 11(1). 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1258/135581906775094217.Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, Rachel, Job van Exel, Helen Mason & Michael Stricklin. 2010. Connecting Q & surveys: Three methods to explore factor membership in large samples. Operant Subjectivity: The International Journal of Q Methodology 34(1). 38–58.10.22488/okstate.10.100583Suche in Google Scholar

Banasick, Shawn. 2019. KADE: A desktop application for Q methodology. Journal of Open Source Software 4(36). 1360. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01360.Suche in Google Scholar

Bennett, Spencer & Bowers David. 1976. An introduction to multivariate techniques for social and behavioural sciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-15634-4Suche in Google Scholar

Benson, Phil. 2021. Space in narrative inquiry on second language learning. System 102. 102602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102602.Suche in Google Scholar

Brewer-Deluce, Danielle, Bhanu Sharma, Noori Akhtar-Danesh, Thomas Jackson & Bruce C. Wainman. 2020. Beyond average information: How Q‐methodology enhances course evaluations in anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education 13(2). 137–148.10.1002/ase.1885Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, James D. 2014. Mixed methods research for TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748698059Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Steven R. 1978. The importance of factors in Q methodology: Statistical and theoretical considerations. Operant Subjectivity 1(4). 117–124.10.22488/okstate.78.100516Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Steven R. 1980. Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Steven R. 1993. A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity 16(3/4). 91–138.10.22488/okstate.93.100504Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Steven R. 1996. Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research 6(4). 561–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600408.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Steven R. 2008. Q methodology. In Lisa M. Given (ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, 700–704. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Caruso, Marinella & Nicola Fraschini. 2021. A Q methodology study into vision of Italian L2 university students: An Australian perspective. The Modern Language Journal 105(2). 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12713.Suche in Google Scholar

Cook, Guy. 2003. Applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Corr, Susan. 2001. An introduction to Q methodology, a research technique. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 64(6). 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260106400605.Suche in Google Scholar

Cunnings, Ian & Ian Finlayson. 2015. Mixed effects modelling and longitudinal data analysis. In Luke Plonsky (ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research, 159–181. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315870908-8Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Alan & Catherine Elder (eds.). 2004. Handbook of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470757000Suche in Google Scholar

de Bot, Kees. 2015. A history of applied linguistics: From 1980 to the present. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315743769Suche in Google Scholar

Dennis, Karen E. 1986. Q methodology: Relevance and application to nursing research. Advances in Nursing Science 8(3). 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198604000-00003.Suche in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Zoltián. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Duff, Patricia A. 2008. Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Duff, Patricia A. 2010. Research approaches in applied linguistics. In Robert B. Kaplan (ed.), Oxford handbooks of applied linguistics, 2nd edn, 45–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195384253.013.0003Suche in Google Scholar

Ellingsen, Ingunn T., Ingunn Storksen & Paul Stephens. 2010. Q methodology in social work research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 13(5). 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570903368286.Suche in Google Scholar

Fontein-Kuipers, Yvonne. 2016. Development of a Q-set for a Q-method study about midwives’ perspectives of woman-centered care. Health Education and Care 1(2). 31–36. https://doi.org/10.15761/HEC.1000107.Suche in Google Scholar

Fraschini, Nicola & Hyunjin Park. 2021. Anxiety in language teachers: Exploring the variety of perceptions with Q methodology. Foreign Language Annals 54(2). 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12527.Suche in Google Scholar

Greene, Sheila & Malcolm Hill. 2005. Researching children’s experience: Methods and methodological issues. In Sheila Greene & Diane Hogan (eds.), Researching children’s experience, 1–21. London: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Guba, Egon G. & Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1994. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 105–117. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Gyenes, Adam. 2021. Student perceptions of critical thinking in EMI programs at Japanese universities: A Q-methodology study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 54. 101053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101053.Suche in Google Scholar

Hashemi, Mohammad R. & Esmat Babaii. 2013. Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal 97(4). 828–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Haua, Robert, Amanda Wolf, Jeff Harrison & Trudi Aspden. 2021. Q methodology: An underutilised tool in pharmacy practice research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 18(1). 2178–2183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Hu, Yuhang & Luke Plonsky. 2021. Statistical assumptions in L2 research: A systematic review. Second Language Research 37(1). 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319877433.Suche in Google Scholar

Irie, Kay, Stephen Ryan & Sarah Mercer. 2018. Using Q methodology to investigate pre-service EFL teachers’ mindsets about teaching competences. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 8(3). 575–598. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.3.3.Suche in Google Scholar

Ivankova, Nataliya V. & Jennifer L. Greer. 2015. Mixed methods research and analysis. In Brian Paltridge & Aek Phakiti (eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource, 63–81. London: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Killam, Laura A., Sharolyn Mossey, Phyllis Montgomery & Katherine Timmermans. 2013. First year nursing students’ viewpoints about compromised clinical safety. Nurse Education Today 33(5). 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Kirschbaum, Melissa, Tony Barnett & Merylin Cross. 2019. Q sample construction: A novel approach incorporating a Delphi technique to explore opinions about codeine dependence. BMC Medical Research Methodology 19. 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0741-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Kline, Paul. 1994. An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Lu, Xiuchuan, Yongyan Zheng & Wei Ren. 2019. Motivation for learning Spanish as a foreign language: The case of Chinese L1 speakers at university level. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 79. 79–98. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.65649.Suche in Google Scholar

McCarthy, Michael. 2001. Issues in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McKeown, Bruce & Dan Thomas. 1988. Q methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412985512Suche in Google Scholar

McKeown, Bruce & Dan Thomas. 2013. Q methodology, 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483384412Suche in Google Scholar

Mohr, Susanne. 2020. Language choices among South African migrants in the tourist space of Zanzibar. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 38(1). 60–72. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2020.1750966.Suche in Google Scholar

Newman, Isadore & Carolyn Benz. 1998. Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Norouzian, Reza, Michael de Miranda & Luke Plonsky. 2018. The Bayesian revolution in second language research: An applied approach. Language Learning 68(4). 1032–1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12310.Suche in Google Scholar

Øverland, Klara, Ingunn Størksen, Edvin Bru & Arlene Arstad Thorsen. 2014. Daycare staff emotions and coping related to children of divorce: A Q methodological study. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 58(3). 361–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.732606.Suche in Google Scholar

Paige, Jane B. & Karen H. Morin. 2016. Q-sample construction: A critical step for a Q-methodological study. Western Journal of Nursing Research 38(1). 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945914545177.Suche in Google Scholar

Phakiti, Aek, Peter De Costa, Luke Plonsky & Sue Starfield (eds.). 2018. The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistic research methodology. London: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1Suche in Google Scholar

Plonsky, Luke & Hessameddin Ghanbar. 2018. Multiple regression in L2 research: A methodological synthesis and guide to interpreting R2 values. The Modern Language Journal 102(4). 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12509.Suche in Google Scholar

Plonsky, Luke, Jesse Egbert & Geoffrey T. LaFlair. 2015. Bootstrapping in applied linguistics: Assessing its potential using shared data. Applied Linguistics 36(5). 591–610. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu001.Suche in Google Scholar

Postlethwaite, Adam, Stephen Kellett & Nathan Simmonds-Buckley. 2020. Exploring emotions and cognitions in hoarding: A Q-methodology analysis. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 48(6). 672–687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465820000181.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramlo, Susan. 2015. Theoretical significance in Q methodology: A qualitative approach to a mixed method. Research in the Schools 22(1). 73–87.Suche in Google Scholar

Riazi, Mehdi. 2016. Innovative mixed-methods research: Moving beyond design technicalities to epistemological and methodological realizations. Applied Linguistics 37(1). 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv064.Suche in Google Scholar

Ridenour, Carolyn & Isadore Newman. 2008. Mixed methods research: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sale, Joanna E. M., Lynne H. Lohfeld & Kevin Brazil. 2002. Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality and Quantity 36(1). 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014301607592.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Norbert. 2002. An introduction to applied linguistics. London: Arnold.10.4324/9780203783726Suche in Google Scholar

Sechrest, Lee & Sidani Sidana. 1995. Quantitative and qualitative methods: Is there an alternative? Evaluation and Program Planning 18(1). 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(94)00051-X.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmolck, Peter. 2014. PQ Method. Neubiberg: University of the Bundeswehr Munich. Version 2.35.Suche in Google Scholar

Slaughter, Yvette, Gary Bonar & KearyAnne. 2022. The role of membership viewpoints in shaping language teacher associations: A Q methodology analysis. TESOL Quarterly 56(1). 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3068.Suche in Google Scholar

Sleenhoff, Susanne, Eefje Cuppen & Patricia Osseweijer. 2014. Unravelling emotional viewpoints on a bio-based economy using Q methodology. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 24(7). 858–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513517071.Suche in Google Scholar

Sneegas, Gretchen, Sydney Beckner, Christian Brannstrom, Wendy Jepson, Kyungsun Lee & Lucus Seghezzo. 2021. Using Q-methodology in environmental sustainability research: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Ecological Economics 180. 106864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106864.Suche in Google Scholar

Stainton Rogers, Rex. 1995. Q methodology. In Jonathan A. Smith, Rom Harre’ & Luk van Langenhove (eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology, 178–192. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781446221792.n12Suche in Google Scholar

Stenner, Paul. 2009. Between method and ology: Introduction to special issue. Operant Subjectivity 32(1). 1–5.10.22488/okstate.08.100568Suche in Google Scholar

Stenner, Paul & Rex Stainton Rogers. 2004. Q methodology and qualiquantology: The example of discriminating between emotions. In Zazie Todd, Briggitte Nerlich, Suzanne McKeown & David D. Clarke (eds.), Mixing methods in psychology, 99–118. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Stephenson, William. 1961. Scientific creed, 1961: Philosophical credo. Abductory principles. The centrality of self. The Psychological Record 11. 1–26.10.1007/BF03393381Suche in Google Scholar

Stephenson, William. 1980. Newtons’s fifth rule and Q methodology: Application to educational psychology. American Psychologist 35(10). 882–889.10.1037/0003-066X.35.10.882Suche in Google Scholar

Stephenson, William. 2014. General theory of communication. Operant Subjectivity 37(3). 38–56. https://doi.org/10.15133/j.os.2014.011.Suche in Google Scholar

Stickl, Jaimie, Kelly L. Wester & Carrie A. Wachter Morris. 2018. Making sense of subjectivity: Q methodology in counseling research. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation 10(2). 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2017.1419425.Suche in Google Scholar

Sung, Priscilla & Nameera Akhtar. 2017. Exploring preschool teachers’ perspectives on linguistic diversity: A Q study. Teaching and Teacher Education 65(1). 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Talbott, Albert D. 2010. The Q-block method of indexing Q typologies. Operant Subjectivity: The International Journal of Q Methodology 34(1). 6–24.10.22488/okstate.10.100585Suche in Google Scholar

Tarrow, Sidney. 2004. Bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide. In Henry E. Brady & David Collier (eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards, 171–179. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Suche in Google Scholar

Tashakkori, Abbas & Charles Teddlie. 1998. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Tashakkori, Abbas & Charles Teddlie. 2003. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Teddlie, Charles & Abbas Tashakkori. 2009. Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. London: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Thumvichit, Athip. 2022. Unfolding the subjectivity of foreign language enjoyment in online classes: A Q methodology study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2050917.Suche in Google Scholar

van Exel, Job & Gjalt De Graaf. 2005. Q methodology: A sneak preview. Available at: http://www.qmethod.org/articles/vanExel.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Vanbuel, Marieke. 2022. How stakeholders see the implementation of language education policy: A Q-study. Current Issues in Language Planning 23(1). 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2021.1928427.Suche in Google Scholar

Watts, Simon & Paul Stenner. 2005. Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2(1). 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088705qp022oa.Suche in Google Scholar

Watts, Simon & Paul Stenner. 2012. Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446251911Suche in Google Scholar

Wigger, Ulrike & Robert G. Mrtek. 1994. Use of Q-technique to examine attitudes of entering pharmacy students toward their profession. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 58. 8–15.10.1016/S0002-9459(24)02602-0Suche in Google Scholar

Woods, Charlotte. 2012. Exploring emotion in the higher education workplace: Capturing contrasting perspectives using Q methodology. Higher Education 64. 891–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9535-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, Peng & Yanyan Wang. 2021. Investigating business English teachers’ belief about online assessment: Q methodology conducted during COVID-19 period. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 30(6). 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00604-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Zheng, Yongyan, Xiuchuan Lu & Wei Ren. 2019. Profiling Chinese university students’ motivation to learn multiple languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 40(7). 590–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1571074.Suche in Google Scholar

Zheng, Yongyan, Xiuchuan Lu & Wei Ren. 2020. Tracking the evolution of Chinese learners’ multilingual motivation through a longitudinal Q methodology. The Modern Language Journal 104(4). 781–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12672.Suche in Google Scholar