Validating the conceptual domains of elementary school teachers’ knowledge and needs vis-à-vis the CLIL approach in Chinese-speaking contexts

References

Alarcón, David & José Sánchez. 2015. Assessing convergent and discriminant validity in the ADHD-R IV rating scale: User-written commands for Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Composite Reliability (CR), and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). In Spanish STATA meeting, 1–39. Sevilla: Universidad Pablo de Olavide.Search in Google Scholar

Arribas, Mario. 2016. Analysing a whole CLIL school: Students’ attitudes, motivation, and receptive vocabulary outcomes. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 9(2). 267–292. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.2.Search in Google Scholar

Baetens-Beardsmore, Hugo. 1986. Bilingualism: Basic principles. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781800418196Search in Google Scholar

Bagozzi, Richard & Youjae Yi. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(1). 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02723327.Search in Google Scholar

Bandalos, Darío Luis. 2002. The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling 9. 78–102. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0901_5.Search in Google Scholar

Banegas, Darío Luis. 2018. Learning subject-specific content through ESP in a geography teaching programme: An action research story in Argentina. English for Specific Purposes 50(1). 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

Banegas, Darío Luis. 2020. Teacher professional development in language-driven CLIL: A case study. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 12(2). 242–264. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2019.12.2.3.Search in Google Scholar

Banegas, Darío Luis, Kathleen Corrales & Paige Poole. 2020. Can engaging L2 teachers as material designers contribute to their professional development? Findings from Colombia. System 91. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102265.Search in Google Scholar

Banegas, Darío Luis & Marta del Pozo Beamud. 2020. Content and language integrated learning: A duoethnographic study about CLIL pre-service teacher education in Argentina and Spain. RELC Journal 53(1). 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220930442.Search in Google Scholar

Bentler, Peter & Douglas Bonett. 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88(3). 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.Search in Google Scholar

Bertaux, Pat, Carmel Mary Coonan, María Jesús Frigols-Martín & Peeter Mehisto. 2010. The CLIL teacher’s competences grid. Available at: http://tplusm.net/CLIL_Competences_Grid_31.12.09.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Biçaku, Rozeta Çekrezi. 2011. CLIL and teacher training. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 15. 3821–3825.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.379Search in Google Scholar

Borsa, Juliane Callegaro, Bruno Figueiredo Damasio & Denise Ruschel Bandeira. 2012. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: Some considerations. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto): Cadernos de Psicologia e Educação 22(3). 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-863x2012000300014.Search in Google Scholar

Borsboom, Denny, Gideon Mellenbergh & Jaap van Heerden. 2004. The concept of validity. Psychological Review 111(4). 1061. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.1061.Search in Google Scholar

Bruton, Anthony. 2011. Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System 39(4). 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002.Search in Google Scholar

Bruton, Anthony. 2013. CLIL: Some of the reasons why … and why not. System 41(3). 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001.Search in Google Scholar

Byrne, Barara. 2005. Factor analytic models: Viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. Journal of Personality Assessment 85(1). 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_02.Search in Google Scholar

Byrne, Barbara. 2008. Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cao, Yining. 2021. Exploring content and language integrated learning (CLIL) teaching. Materials in Chinese universities: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions and reflections. International Journal of English and Literature 12(3). 23–32.10.5897/IJEL2021.1444Search in Google Scholar

Cenoz, Jasone, Fred Genesee & Durk Gorter. 2014. Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics 35(3). 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011.Search in Google Scholar

Coyle, Do. 2018. The place of CLIL in (bilingual) education. Theory into Practice 57(3). 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1459096.Search in Google Scholar

Coyle, Do. 2011. Teacher education and CLIL methods and tools. In Unpublished seminar presented in Milan, Italy. Available at: http://www.cremit.it/public/documenti/seminar.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Coyle, Do. 2010. Foreword. In David Lasagabaster & Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe (eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training, 7–8. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Coyle, Do, Bernardette Holmes & Lid King. 2009. Towards an integrated curriculum – CLIL national statement and guidelines. Edmond: The Languages Company.Search in Google Scholar

Coyle, Do, Philip Hood & David Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549.Search in Google Scholar

Czura, Anna & Ada Anklewicz. 2018. Pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of CLIL in primary school: A case study. Linguodidactica 22. 47–63. https://doi.org/10.15290/lingdid.2018.22.03.Search in Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2007. Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms, 20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.20.Search in Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2008. Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In Werner Delanoy & Laurenz Volkmann (eds.), Future perspectives for English language teaching, 139–157. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Doiz, Aintzane, David Lasagabaster & Juan Manuel Sierra. 2014. CLIL and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. The Language Learning Journal 42(2). 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889508.Search in Google Scholar

Fornell, Claes & David Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1). 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Keith, Yunkyeong Choi, Amin Davoodi, Shakiba Razmeh & Quentin Dixon. 2018. Language and content outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A systematic review. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 11(1). 19–37. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.2.Search in Google Scholar

Hair, Joseph, William Black, Barry Balin & Rolph Anderson. 2010. Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey, NJ: Maxwell Macmillan International Editions.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Rosalie, Andrea Snell & Michelle Singer-Foust. 1999. Item parcelling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods 2. 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819923002.Search in Google Scholar

Heggestad, Eric, David Scheaf, George Banks, Mary Monroe Hausfeld, Scott Tonidandel & Eleanor Williams. 2019. Scale adaptation in organizational science research: A review and best-practice recommendations. Journal of Management 45(6). 2596–2627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319850280.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Li‐Tze & Peter Bentler. 1999. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1). 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.Search in Google Scholar

Ikeda, Makoto, Shinichi Izumi, Yoshinori Watanabe, Richard Pinner & Matthew Davis. 2021. Soft CLIL and English language teaching: Understanding Japanese policy, practice and implications. Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9780429032332Search in Google Scholar

Infante, Debora., Benvenuto, Guido., & Lastrucci, Emilio. 2009. The effects of CLIL from the perspective of experienced teachers. In David Marsh, Peeter, Mehisto, Dieter Wolff, Rosa Aliaga, Tuula Asikainen, María Jesús Frigols-Martin, Sue Hughes & Gisella Langé (eds.), CLIL practice: Perspectives from the field, 156–163. Finland: University of Jyväskylä.Search in Google Scholar

Karabassova, Laura. 2020. Is top-down CLIL justified? A grounded theory exploration of secondary school science teachers’ experiences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1828426.Search in Google Scholar

Kong, Mengxia & Rining Wei. 2019. EFL learners’ attitudes toward English-medium instruction in China: The influence of sociobiographical variables. Linguistics and Education 52. 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Wonkey. 2010. Insights from South Korea. In Richard Johnstone (ed.), Learning through English: Policies, challenges and prospects. Insights from East Asia, 47–68. London: The British Council.Search in Google Scholar

Lightbown, Patsy & Nina Spada. 2006. Explaining second language learning. How languages are learned, 28–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, Angel Mei-Yi. 2016. Language across the curriculum & CLIL in English as an additional language (EAL) contexts: Theory and practice. Singapore: Springer Nature.10.1007/978-981-10-1802-2Search in Google Scholar

Little, Todd, William Cunningham, Golan Shahar & Keith Widaman. 2002. To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modelling 9(2). 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1.Search in Google Scholar

López, Almenta Estefania. 2011. CLIL teacher training across Europe: Current state of the art, good practices and guidelines for the future. Available at: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/39594770/clil-teachers-competence-grid.Search in Google Scholar

Lo, Yuen Yi. 2020. Professional development of CLIL teachers. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-2425-7Search in Google Scholar

Lo, Yuen Yi & Angel Mei-Yi Lin. 2019. Content and language integrated learning in Hong Kong. In Xuesong Gao (ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching, 963–982. Cham: Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_50Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, David. 2000. Using languages to learn and learning to use languages. Finland: University of Jyväskylä.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, David, Anne Maljers & Aini-Kristiina Hartiala. 2001. Profiling European CLIL classrooms. Jyväskylä, Finland: Centre for Applied Language Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, David, Peeter Mehisto, Dieter Wolff & María Jesús Frigols Martín. 2010. European framework for CLIL teacher education: A framework for the professional development of CLIL teachers, European center of modern languages. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.Search in Google Scholar

Mayo, María del Pilar García & María de los Ángeles Hidalgo. 2017. L1 use among young EFL mainstream and CLIL learners in task-supported interaction. System 67. 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

McDougald, Jermaine. 2015. Teachers’ attitudes, perceptions and experiences in CLIL: A look at content and language. Colombia Applied Linguistics Journal 17(1). 25–41. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.calj.2015.1.a02.Search in Google Scholar

Morton, Bruce & Sarah Harper. 2007. What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science 10(6). 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00623.x.Search in Google Scholar

National Development Council. 2020. Highlights on implementation results of central government agencies in 2019. Available at: https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzExL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xMjE2OS82ZjFkNzk2OS1iMGIxLTQyYjEtOWQyMC0yZjZkZTZlZTM3YmEucGRm&n=SGlnaGxpZ2h0cyBvbiBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbiByZXN1bHRzIGluIDIwMTktMTA5MDUxNC5wZGY%3d&icon=.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Navés, Teresa & Mia, Victori. 2010. CLIL in Catalonia: An overview of research studies. In David Lagasabaster and Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe (eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training, 30–54. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

NDC (National Development Council). 2018. Bilingual 2030. https://www.ndc.gov.tw/en/Content_List.aspx?n=BF21AB4041BB5255&upn=9633B537E92778BB.Search in Google Scholar

Papaja, Katarzyna. 2013. The role of a teacher in a CLIL classroom. Glottodidactica. An International Journal of Applied Linguistics 40(1). 147–153. https://doi.org/10.14746/gl.2013.40.1.11.Search in Google Scholar

Pavón Vázquez, Victor. 2014. Enhancing the quality of CLIL: Making the best of the collaboration between language teachers and content teachers. Encuentro 23. 115–127.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez Cañado, María Luisa. 2012. CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15(3). 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez Cañado, María Luisa. 2014. Teacher training needs for bilingual education: In-service teacher perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19(3). 266–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.980778.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez Cañado, María Luisa. 2016a. Evaluating CLIL programmes: Instrument design and validation. Pulso. Revista de Educación 39. 79–112.10.58265/pulso.5078Search in Google Scholar

Pérez Cañado, María Luisa. 2016b. Teacher training needs for bilingual education: In-service teacher perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19(3). 266–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.980778.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez Cañado, María Luisa. 2016c. Are teachers ready for CLIL? Evidence from a European study. European Journal of Teacher Education 39(2). 202–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1138104.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez Cañado, María Luisa. 2018. Innovations and challenges in CLIL teacher training. Theory into Practice 57(3). 1–10.10.1080/00405841.2018.1492238Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Vidal, Carmen. 2011. Language acquisition in three different contexts of learning: Formal instruction, stay abroad, and semi-immersion (CLIL). Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts, 103–128. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Porc, Gabriela & Luisa Bundy. 2020. The effectiveness of CLIL for English language learning in Swedish primary schools. Available at: https://muep.mau.se/bitstream/handle/2043/31439/Examensarbete%20%20Bundy%20Porc.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.Search in Google Scholar

Steiger, James & John Lind. 1980, May. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.Search in Google Scholar

Suwannoppharat, Khwanchit & Sumalee Chinokul. 2015. Applying CLIL to English language teaching in Thailand: Issues and challenges. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning 8(2). 237–254. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2015.8.2.8.Search in Google Scholar

Swisher, Laura, Jason Beckstead & Muriel Bebeau. 2004. Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis using a professional role orientation inventory as an example. Physical Therapy 84(9). 784–799. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/84.9.784.Search in Google Scholar

Tabachnick, Barbara G. & Linda S. Fidell. 2007. Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

Tachaiyaphum, Nutthida & Apisak Sukying. 2017. EFL pre-service teachers’ perceptions of CLIL. Asian Education Studies 2(4). 44. https://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v2i4.283.Search in Google Scholar

To, Thi Thu Hunog. 2010. Insights from Vietnam. In Richard Johnstone (ed.), Learning through English: Policies, challenges and prospects. Insights from East Asia, 96–114. London: The British Council.Search in Google Scholar

Tsuchiya, Keiko & María Dolores Pérez Murillo. 2019. Content and language integrated learning in Spanish and Japanese contexts: Policy, practice and pedagogy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27443-6.Search in Google Scholar

Tucker, Ledyard & Charles Lewis. 1973. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38(1). 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02291170.Search in Google Scholar

Van de Vijver, Fons & Norbert Tanzer. 2004. Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology 54. 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2003.12.004.Search in Google Scholar

Van Mensel, Luk, Philippe Hiligsmann, Laurence Mettewie & Benoît Galand. 2020. CLIL, an elitist language learning approach? A background analysis of English and Dutch CLIL pupils in French-speaking Belgium. Language, Culture and Curriculum 33(1). 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2019.1571078.Search in Google Scholar

Vázquez, Víctor Pavón & María del Carmen Méndez García. 2017. Analysing teachers’ roles regarding cross-curricular coordination in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Journal of English Studies 15. 235–260.10.18172/jes.3227Search in Google Scholar

Vilkancienė, Lilija & Inga Rozgienė. 2017. CLIL teacher competences and attitudes. Sustainable Multilingualism 11(1). 196–218.10.1515/sm-2017-0019Search in Google Scholar

Wei, Rining. 2011. Parental support for Chinese-English bilingual education: A survey of parents of primary and secondary students in Shanghai. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 32(5). 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2011.592588.Search in Google Scholar

Wei, Rining. 2013. Chinese-English bilingual education in China: Model, momentum, and driving forces. Asian EFL Journal 15(4). 184–200.Search in Google Scholar

Wei, Rining & Jieyun Feng. 2015. Implementing CLIL for young learners in an EFL context. Beyond Europe: Grassroots support and language policy in China. English Today 31(1). 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266078414000558.Search in Google Scholar

Wei, Rining & Yuhang Hu. 2019. Exploring the relationship between multilingualism and tolerance of ambiguity: A survey study from an EFL context. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22(5). 1209–1219. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728918000998.Search in Google Scholar

Wei, Rining, Yuhang Hu & Jianhui Xiong. 2019. Effect size reporting practices in applied linguistics research: A study of one major journal. Sage Open 9(2). 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019850035.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Wenhsien. 2015. Content and language integrated learning next in Asia: Evidence of learners’ achievement in CLIL education from a Taiwan tertiary degree programme. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18. 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.904840.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Wenhsien. 2016. An investigation of learning efficacy, management difficulties and improvements in tertiary CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) programmes in Taiwan: A survey of stakeholder perspectives. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning 9(1). 64–109. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.1.4.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Wenhsien. 2020. Toward a bilingual Taiwan by 2030: How can CLIL help? The Journal of the Japan CLIL Pedagogy Association 2. 15–21.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Wenhsien. 2022. CLIL in Taiwan. In Darío Luis Banegas & Sandra Zappa-Hollman (eds.), The Routledge handbook of content and language integrated learning, forthcoming. Oxon: Taylor & Francis.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Wenhsien & Mark Gosling. 2013. National appraisal and stakeholders’ perceptions of a tertiary CLIL programme in Taiwan. International CLIL Research Journal 2(1). 67–81.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Wenhsien & Mark Gosling. 2014. What makes a Taiwan CLIL programme highly recommended or not recommended? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 17(4). 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.808168.Search in Google Scholar