Startseite Exploring the impact of a teacher development programme using a digital application on linguistic interactions in the classroom: a multiple case study
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Exploring the impact of a teacher development programme using a digital application on linguistic interactions in the classroom: a multiple case study

  • Marta Gràcia ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Ana Luisa Adam-Alcocer ORCID logo und Pamela Castillo Mardones ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. November 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This article reports on the use of a digital application (EVALOE-SSD) for the professional development of teachers to improve the linguistic competence of their students. We conducted a multiple case study that involved five teachers and their students from different schools. Over a period of three months, the teachers used the digital application to assess their classes, make decisions and introduce changes in their teaching practices. The results show that the change process includes stages of progress and stages of regression, but in general the trend was to a progressive increase in scores. Therefore, the use of the digital application improved the competences of teachers and students, regardless of the type of school or students’ age. This is shown in the cases of two teachers, which are analysed in greater depth. We believe that our findings are important as they document how self-reflection, stimulated by aids such as video recordings, reflective questions and pictures, facilitates a change in teaching practices. At the end of the programme, all the teachers stated that the experience of using the digital tool had clearly been enriching, and they had learnt and improved teaching practice linked to communicative competence.


Corresponding author: Marta Gràcia, Department of Cognition, Development and Psychology of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, E-mail:

Funding source: Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness http://www.mineco.gob.es/

Award Identifier / Grant number: EDU201563616-P

  1. Research funding: This article is part of the research project “Support systems for teaching decision-making (SSD) and the development of linguistic competence” (2016–2019), which is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness within the framework of the State Programme for the Promotion of Scientific and Technical Research of Excellence (Reference: EDU201563616-P).

References

Abdurrahman, Abdurrahman, Novinta Nurulsari, Hervin Maulina, Bujang Rahman, Rofiqul Umam & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert. 2019. Multi-level scaffolding: A novel approach of physics teacher development program for promoting content knowledge mastery. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 7(8). 71–89.Suche in Google Scholar

Applebee, Arthur, Judith Langer, Martin, Nystrand & Adam, Gamoran. 2003. Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal 40(3). 685–730. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003685.Suche in Google Scholar

Arnott, David & Graham Pervan. 2016. A critical analysis of decision support systems research. In Leslie Willcokcs, Chris Sauer & Mary Lacity (eds.), Formulating research methods for information systems, 127–168. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137509888_5Suche in Google Scholar

Bairagi, Vinayak & Mousami Munot. 2019. Research methodology. A practical and scientific approach. New York: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9781351013277Suche in Google Scholar

Baser, Derya, Theodore Kopcha & Yasar Ozden. 2016. Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment for preservice teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29(4). 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1047456.Suche in Google Scholar

Bean, Rita, Jason Draper, Virginia Hall, Jill Vandermolen & Naomi Zigmond. 2010. Coaches and coaching in reading first schools: A reality check. The Elementary School Journal 111(1). 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1086/653471.Suche in Google Scholar

Beauchamp, Catherine. 2015. Reflection in teacher education: Issues emerging form a review of current literature. Reflective Practice 16(1). 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.982525.Suche in Google Scholar

Beltran, Elina, Chris Abbott & Jan Jones (eds.). 2013. Inclusive Language Education and Digital Technology. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Suche in Google Scholar

Berson, Eric, Hilda Borko, Susan Million, Edit Khachatryan & Kerri Glennon. 2015. Practice what you teach: A video-based practicum model of professional development for elementary science teachers. Orbis Scholae 9(2). 35–53. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2015.79.Suche in Google Scholar

Billings, Laura & Jill Fitzgerald. 2002. Dialogic discussion and the paideia seminar. American Educational Research Journal 39(4). 907–941. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039004905.Suche in Google Scholar

Boyd, Maureen & William Markarian. 2011. Dialogic teaching: Talk in service of a dialogic stance. Language and Education 25(6). 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.597861.Suche in Google Scholar

Boyd, Maureen & William Markarian. 2015. Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research in the Teaching of English 49(3). 272–296.10.58680/rte201526870Suche in Google Scholar

Burns, Chris & Debra Myhill. 2004. Interactive or inactive? A consideration of the nature of interaction in whole class teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education 34(1). 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764042000183115.Suche in Google Scholar

Cartwright, Lesley. 2011. How consciously reflective are you? In Debra McGregor & Lesley Cartwright (eds.), Developing reflective practice: A guide for beginning teachers, 55–68. UK: Open University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cerbin, William & Bryan Kopp. 2006. Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching. The International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 18(3). 250–257.Suche in Google Scholar

Clarke, Sherice, Lauren Resnick & Carolyn Penstein-Rosé. 2016. Dialogic instruction: A new frontier. In Lyn Corno & Eric Anderman (eds.), Handbook of educational psychology, 378–389. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Compton, Lily. 2009. Preparing language teachers to teach language online: A look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning 22(1). 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802613831.Suche in Google Scholar

Creswell, John & John David Creswell. 2018. Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. EE.UU.: SAGE Publications, Inc.Suche in Google Scholar

Cutrim Schmeid, Euline. 2017. Teacher education in computer-assisted language learning: A sociocultural and linguistic perspective. New York: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Diani, Rahma, Irwandani Irwandani, Al-Hijrah Al-Hijrah, Yetri Yetri, Dwi Fujiani, Niken S. Hartati & Rofiqul Umam. 2019. Physics learning through active learning based interactive conceptual instructions (ALBICI) to improve critical thinking ability. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA 5(1). 48. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v5i1.3469.Suche in Google Scholar

Dickinson, David, Catherine Darrow & Titilayo Tinubu. 2008. Patterns of teacher–child conversations in head start classrooms: Implications for an empirically grounded approach to professional development. Early Education & Development 19(3). 396–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802065403.Suche in Google Scholar

Docking, Jim. 2000. New labour’s policies for schools. Raising the standard? London: David Fulton Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Dooly, Melinda & Claudia Vallejo. 2019. Bringing plurilingualism into teaching practice: A quixotic quest? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23(1). 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1598933.Suche in Google Scholar

Emanuelsson, Jonas & Fritjof Sahlstrom. 2008. The price of participation: Teacher control versus student participation in classroom interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 52(2). 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830801915853.Suche in Google Scholar

Ernest, Paulina, Montse Guitert, Regine Hampel, Sarah Heiser, Joseph Hopkins, Linda Murphy & Ursula Stickler. 2013. Online teacher development: Collaborating in a virtual learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning 26(4). 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.667814.Suche in Google Scholar

Fainholc, Beatriz, Hugo Nervi, Rosita Romero & Carol Halal. 2013. La formación del profesorado y el uso pedagógico de las TIC [Teacher training and pedagogical use of ICT]. RED Revista de Educación a Distancia 38. 1–14.Suche in Google Scholar

Felip, Rosamaria & Meritxell Estebanell. 2016. Las tecnologías como facilitadoras del aprendizaje y la comunicación en entornos AICLE: La formación permanente del profesorado AICLE en Cataluña [Technologies as facilitators of learning and communication in CLIL environments: The in-service CLIL teacher training in Catalonia]. In Rosabel Roig-Vila (ed.), Tecnología, innovación e investigación en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje, 398–408. Barcelona: Octaedro.Suche in Google Scholar

Foulger, Teresa, Kevin Graziano, Denise Schmidt-Crawford & David Slykhuis. 2017. Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 25(4). 413–448.Suche in Google Scholar

Gewerc, Adriana & Lourdes Montero. 2015. Conocimiento profesional y competencia digital en la formación del profesorado. El caso del Grado de Maestro en Educación Primaria [Professional knowledge and digital competence in teacher education. The case of the Master Degree in Primary Education]. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa 14(1). 31–43. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.14.1.31.Suche in Google Scholar

Girvan, Carina, Claire Conneely & Brendan Tangney. 2016. Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 58. 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Glatthorn, Allan. 1995. Teacher development: International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education. London: Pergamon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Golonka, Ewa, Anita Bowles, Victor Frank, Dorna Richardson & Suzanne Freynik. 2014. Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning 27(1). 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315.Suche in Google Scholar

González-Patiño, Javier & Moisès Esteban-Guitart. 2014. Some of the challenges and experiences of formal education in a Mobile-Centric Society (MCS). Digital Education Review 25. 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2014.25.64-86.Suche in Google Scholar

Gràcia, Marta. 2018. La EVALOE-SSD como herramienta de autoevaluación y de soporte a la toma de decisiones docentes para convertir las aulas de educación infantil y primaria en entornos comunicativos. In María T. Signes, Cintia Carreira & Marcin Kazmierczak (eds.), El rol central de la narración en el contexto educativo, 197–217. Vigo: Editorial Academia del Hispanismo.Suche in Google Scholar

Gràcia, Marta, Maria J. Galván-Bovaira, Rosa Vilaseca, Magda Rivero & Manel Sánchez-Cano. 2012. El cambio conceptual de dos maestras en relación con la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la lengua oral a través de un asesoramiento: un estudio de casos. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia 32(4). 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlfa.2012.05.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Gràcia, Marta (coord.), Maria J. Galván-Bovaira, Manel Sánchez-Cano, Fátima Vega, Rosa Vilaseca & Magda Rivero. 2015a. Valoración de la enseñanza de la lengua oral. Escala EVALOE. Barcelona: Graó.Suche in Google Scholar

Gràcia, Marta, Fàtima Vega & Maria J. Galván-Bovaira. 2015b. Developing and testing EVALOE: A tool for assessing spoken language teaching and learning in the classroom. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 31(3). 287–304.10.1177/0265659015593608Suche in Google Scholar

Gràcia, Marta, Maria J. Galván-Bovaira & Manel Sánchez-Cano. 2017. Análisis de las líneas de investigación y actuación en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje del lenguaje oral en contexto escolar. Revista Espanola de Linguistica Aplicada 30(1). 188–209.10.1075/resla.30.1.08graSuche in Google Scholar

Gràcia, Marta, Laura Amado, Sonia Jarque, Daniela Bitencourt, Fàtima Vega & Carles Riba. 2019. EVALOE-DSS as a self-assessment and decision-making tool on the teaching of oral language in a school context: Results of a pilot study. Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education 15(1). 55–78.10.35765/mjse.2019.0815.05Suche in Google Scholar

Gràcia, Marta, Josep Casanovas, Carles Riba, Maria Rosa Sancho, Maria Josep Jarque, Jordi Casanovas & Fàtima Vega. 2020a. Developing a digital application (EVALOE-DSS) for the professional development of teachers aiming to improve their students’ linguistic competence. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1707690.Suche in Google Scholar

Gràcia, Marta, Maria J. Jarque, Carles Riba & Fàtima Vega. 2020b. Uso de una herramienta digital como recurso de desarrollo profesional para mejorar la competencia comunicativa oral de alumnos de educación infantil y primaria. Revista de investigación en Logopedia 10(2). 135–149.10.5209/rlog.67125Suche in Google Scholar

Gràcia, Marta, Fàtima Vega, Sonia Jarque, Ana L. Adam & Maria J. Jarque. 2021. Teaching practices for developing oral language skills in Catalan schools. Cogent Education 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1935647.Suche in Google Scholar

Grossman, Pamela, Peter Smagorinsky & Sheila Valencia. 1999. Appropriating tools for teaching English: A theoretical framework for research on learning to teach. American Journal of Education 108(1). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/444230.Suche in Google Scholar

Gruba, Paul. 2004. Designing tasks for online collaborative language learning. Prospect 19(2). 72–81.Suche in Google Scholar

Hampel, Regine & Ursula Stickler. 2005. New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning 18(4). 311–326.10.1080/09588220500335455Suche in Google Scholar

Hamre, Bridget, Bridget Hatfield, Robert Pianta & Faiza Jamil. 2014. Evidence for general and domain specific elements of teacher-child interactions: Associations with preschool children’s development. Child Development 85(3). 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12184.Suche in Google Scholar

Harms, Thelma, Richard M. Clifford & Debby Cryer. 1998. Early childhood environment rating scale-revised edition. New York: Teachers College Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hartinah, Sitti, Putut Suharso, Rofiqul Umam, Muhamad Syazali, Bella Lestari, Roslina Roslina & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert. 2020. Teacher’s performance management: The role of principal’s leadership, work environment and motivation in Tegal City, Indonesia. Management Science Letters 10(1). 235–246. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.038.Suche in Google Scholar

Heikkinen, Hannu L. T., Jane Wilkinson, Jessica Aspfors & Laurette Bristol. 2018. Understanding mentoring of new teachers: Communicative and strategic practices in Australia and Finland. Teaching and Teacher Education 71. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.025.Suche in Google Scholar

Hopkins, Megan. 2013. Building on our teaching assets: The unique pedagogical contributions of bilingual educators. Bilingual Research Journal 36(3). 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2013.845116.Suche in Google Scholar

Howes, Carollee, Margaret Burchinal, Robert Pianta, Donna Bryant, Diane Early, Richard Clifford & Oscar Barbarin. 2008. Ready to learn? Children’s pre-academic achievements in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 23(1). 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.05.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Hubbard, Philip & Mike Levy. 2006. Teacher education in CALL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.14Suche in Google Scholar

Hudson, Peter. 2013. Mentoring as professional development: ‘growth for both’ mentor and mentee. Professional Development in Education 39(5). 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.749415.Suche in Google Scholar

Hughes, Joan E., Sa Liu & Mihyun Lim. 2016. Technological modeling: Faculty use of technologies in preservice teacher education from 2004 to 2012. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 16(2). 184–207.Suche in Google Scholar

Instefjord, Elen J. & Elaine Munthe. 2017. Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 67. 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016.Suche in Google Scholar

Jeong, Kyeong-Ouk. 2017. Preparing EFL student teachers with new technologies in the Korean context. Computer Assisted Language Learning 30(6). 488–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1321554.Suche in Google Scholar

Jones, Deborah. 2017. Talking about talk: Reviewing oracy in English primary education. Early Child Development and Care 187(3–4). 498–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1211125.Suche in Google Scholar

Kalay, Poria & David Chen. 2002. Integrating a decision support system into a school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 34(4). 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2002.10782360.Suche in Google Scholar

Koh, Joyce H. L. 2019. TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change. Educational Technology Research & Development 67(3). 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Könings, Karen D. & Wim H. Gijselaers. 2015. Bringing learning to the workplace: A smartphone app for reflection and increased authenticity of learning. In Amber Dailey-Hebert & Kay S. Dennis (eds.), Transformative perspectives and processes in higher education, 117–135. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-09247-8_7Suche in Google Scholar

Korthagen, Fred & Jos Kessels. 1999. Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher 28(4). 4–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028004004.10.3102/0013189X028004004Suche in Google Scholar

Korthagen, Fred, Jos Kessels, Bob Kosters, Bram Lagerwerf & Theo Wubbels. 2001. Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410600523Suche in Google Scholar

Kreps-Frisch, Jennifer, Neporcha Cone & Brendan Callahan. 2017. Using personal science story podcasts to reflect on language and connections to science. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 17(2). 205–228.Suche in Google Scholar

Kumpulainen, Kristiina & Lasse Lipponen. 2010. Productive interaction as agentic participation in dialogic enquiry. In Karen Littleton & Christine Howe (eds.), Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction, 48–63. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Lefstein, Adam. 2008. Changing classroom practice through the English national literacy strategy: A micro-interactional perspective. American Educational Research Journal 45(3). 701–737. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316256.Suche in Google Scholar

Lefstein, Adam. 2010. More helpful as problem than solution: Some implications of situating dialogue in classrooms. In Karen Littleton, & Christine Howe (eds.), Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction, 171–190. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Marcos, Juan J. M., Emilio Sánchez & Harm Tillema. 2009. Teacher reflection on action: What is said (in research) and what is done (in teaching). Reflective Practice 10(2). 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940902786206.Suche in Google Scholar

Marcos, Juan J. M., Emilio Sánchez & Harm Tillema. 2011. Promoting teacher reflection: What is said to be done. Journal of Education for Teaching 37(1). 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.538269.Suche in Google Scholar

Marinac, Julie V., Gall C. Woodyatt & Anne E. Ozanne. 2008. Investigating adult language input and young children’s responses in naturalistic environments: An observational framework. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 24(3). 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659008096293.Suche in Google Scholar

Marshall, Julie & Elizabeth Lewis. 2014. It’s the way you talk to them. ‘The child’s environment: Early years practitioners’ perceptions of its influence on speech and language development, its assessment and environment targeted interventions. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 30(3). 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659013516331.Suche in Google Scholar

Meiring, Lynne & Nigel Norman. 2013. Information and communication technology – An instrument for developing inclusive in the training of modern language teachers. In Elina V. Beltrán, Chris Abbott, & Jane Jones (eds.), Inclusive language education and digital technology, 103–123. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847699749-008Suche in Google Scholar

Mercer, Neil. 2010. The analysis of the classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology 1. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X479853.Suche in Google Scholar

Mercer, Neil & Christine Howe. 2012. Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 1(1). 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Mercer, Neil, Sara Hennessy & Paul Warwick. 2017a. Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research 97. 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Mercer, Neil, Paul Warwick & Ayesha Ahmed. 2017b. An oracy assessment toolkit: Linking research and development in the assessment of students’ spoken language skills at age 11–12. Learning and Instruction 48. 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.10.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Mercer, Neil, James Mannion & Paul, Warwick. 2020. Oracy education: The development of young people’s spoken language skills. In Neil Mercer, Rupert Wegerif & Louis Major (eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429441677-25Suche in Google Scholar

Millard, Will & Loic Menzies. 2016. Oracy: The state of speaking in our schools. UK: Voice 21.Suche in Google Scholar

Molinari, Luisa & Consuelo Mameli. 2013. Process quality of classroom discourse: Pupil participation and learning opportunities. International Journal of Educational Research 62. 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.05.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Molinari, Luisa & Consuelo Mameli. 2015. Triadické interakce ve výukové komunikaci [Triadic interactions in classroom discourse]. Studia Paedagogica 20(3). 9–28. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2015-3-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Molinari, Luisa, Consuelo Mameli & Augusto Gnisci. 2013. A sequential analysis of classroom discourse in Italian primary schools: The many faces of the IRF pattern. British Journal of Educational Psychology 83(3). 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02071.Suche in Google Scholar

Mosley-Wetzel, Melissa, Beth Maloch & James V Homan. 2017. Retrospective video analysis: A reflective tool for teachers and teacher educators. The Reading Teacher 70(5). 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1550.Suche in Google Scholar

Myhill, Debra A. & Pauline Warren. 2005. Scaffolds or straitjackets? Critical moments in classroom discourse. Educational Review 57(1). 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013191042000274187.Suche in Google Scholar

Nami, Fatemeh, Susan S. Marandi & Elaheh Sotoudehnama. 2016. CALL teacher professional growth through lesson study practice: An investigation into EFL teachers’ perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29(4). 658–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016439.Suche in Google Scholar

Neufeld, Barbara & Dana Roper. 2003. Expanding the work: Year II of collaborative coaching and learning in the effective practice schools. Boston: Education Matters, Inc.Suche in Google Scholar

Nystrand, Martin, Adam, Gamoran, Robert Kachur & Catherine Prendergast. 1997. Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Nystrand, Martin, Lawrence L. Wu, Adam Gamoran, Susie Zeiser & Daniel A Long. 2001. Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. London: National Research Center on English Learning & Achievement.Suche in Google Scholar

Ochoa, Carlos. 2015. Muestreo No Probabilístico Miedo Bola De Nieve. [en línea] Netquest.com. Recuperado el día 25 de mayo de 2020 a: https://www.netquest.com/blog/es/blog/es/muestreo-bola-nieve.Suche in Google Scholar

Ottestad, Geir, Marijana Kelentric & Gréta B. Guðmundsdóttir. 2014. Professional digital competence in teacher education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 9(4). 243–249. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-04-02.Suche in Google Scholar

Paredes, Joaquín, Montserrat Guitert & Bartolomé Rubia. 2015. La innovación y la tecnología educativa como base de la formación inicial del profesorado para la renovación de la enseñanza [Innovation and educational technology as the basis of initial teacher education for the renewal of teaching]. RELATEC: Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa 14(1). 101–114. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.14.1.101.Suche in Google Scholar

Parker, Mary & Jane Hurry. 2007. Teachers’ use of questioning and modeling comprehension skills in primary classroom. Educational Review 59(3). 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910701427298.Suche in Google Scholar

Pasternak, Dona, Heidi Hallman, Samantha Caughlan, Laura Renzi, Leslie Rush & Hannah, Meineke. 2016. Learning/teaching technology in English Teacher Education: Findings from a national study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 16(4). 373–387.Suche in Google Scholar

Pimentel, Diane S. & Katherine L. McNeill. 2013. Conducting talk in secondary science classrooms: Investigating instructional moves and teachers’ beliefs. Science Education 97(3). 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21061.Suche in Google Scholar

Prieto, Luis P., Paul Magnuson, Pierre Dillenbourg & Merike Saar. 2020. Reflection for action: Designing tools to support teacher reflection on everyday evidence. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 29(3). 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1762721.Suche in Google Scholar

Quintana-Lara, Marcela. 2014. Effect of acoustic spectrographic instruction on production of English /i/ and /I/ by Spanish pre-service English teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning 27(3). 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.724424.Suche in Google Scholar

Reid, David A., Elaina Simmt, Annie Savard, Christine Suurtamm, Dominic Manuel, Terry Wan Lin, Brenna Quigley & Christine Knipping. 2015. Observing observers: Using video to prompt and record reflections on teachers’ pedagogies in four regions of Canada. Research in Comparative and International Education 10(3). 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499915580425.Suche in Google Scholar

Rich, Peter J. & Michael Hannafin. 2009. Video annotation tools: Technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education 60(1). 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328486.Suche in Google Scholar

Romano, Molly & Jonathan Schwartz. 2005. Exploring technology as a tool for eliciting and encouraging beginning teacher reflection. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 5(2). 149–168.Suche in Google Scholar

Romero, Marc, Lourdes Guàrdia, Montse Guitert & Albert, Sangrà. 2014. Teachers professional development through learning ecologies: What are the experts views? In António M. Teixeira & András Szücs (eds.), Challenges for research into open & distance learning, conference proceedings eight EDEN research workshop, 27–36. Oxford, UK: EDEN.Suche in Google Scholar

Sadahiro, Yukio & Saiko Sadahiro. 2012. A decision support method for school relocation planning. International Journal of Urban Sciences 16(2). 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2012.702513.Suche in Google Scholar

Sedova, Klara. 2017. A case study of a transition to dialogic teaching as a process of gradual change. Teaching and Teacher Education 67. 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.018.Suche in Google Scholar

Sedova, Klara, Zuzana Salamounova & Roman Svaricek. 2014. Troubles with dialogic teaching. Learning Culture and Social Interaction 3(4). 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.04.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Sedova, Klara, Martin Sedlacek, Roman Svaricek, Martin Majcik, Jana Navratilova, Anna Drexlerova, Jakub Kychler & Zuzana Salamounova. 2019. Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement. Learning and Instruction 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101217.Suche in Google Scholar

Selwyn, Neyl. 2009. The digital native – Myth and reality. ASLIB Proceedings 61(4). 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910973776.Suche in Google Scholar

Sfard, Anna. 2008. Thinking as communicating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511499944Suche in Google Scholar

Shield, Lesley & Agnes Kukulska-Hulme. 2006. Are language learning websites special? Towards a research agenda for discipline-specific usability. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 15(3). 349–369.Suche in Google Scholar

Schön, Donald A. 1987. Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. London: Jossey-Bass.Suche in Google Scholar

Smagorinsky, Peter, Stephanie A. Shelton & Cynthia Moore. 2015. The role of reflexion in developing eupraxis in learning to teach English. Pedagogies: International Journal 10(4). 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2015.1067146.Suche in Google Scholar

Smit, Jantien, Martine Gijsel, Ann Hotze & Arthur Bakker. 2018. Scaffolding primary teachers in designing and enacting language-oriented science lessons: Is handing over to independence a fata morgana? Learning. Culture and Social Interaction 18. 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.03.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Smythe, Suzanne & Paul Neufeld. 2010. Podcast time: Negotiating digital literacies and communities of learning in a middle years ELL classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 53(6). 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.6.5.Suche in Google Scholar

Son, Jegong-Bae. 2018. Teacher development in technology-enhanced language teaching. Toowoomba, Australia: Palmgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-75711-7Suche in Google Scholar

Son, Jeong-Bae & Scott, Windeatt (eds.). 2017. Language teacher education and technology: Approaches and practices. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Suche in Google Scholar

Sotter, Anna O., Ian A. Wilkinson, P. Murphy Karen, Lucila Rudge, Kristin Reninger & Margaret Edwards. 2008. What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension. International Journal of Education Research 47(6). 372–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Suárez-Guerrero, Cristobal, Carmen Lloret-Catalá & Santiago Mengual-Andrés. 2016. Teachers’ perceptions of the digital transformation of the classroom through the use of tablets: A study in Spain. Comunicar 24(49). 81–89. https://doi.org/10.3916/C49-2016-08.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage based theory of language acquisition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Torsani, Simone. 2016. CALL teacher education: Language teachers and technology integration. Boston: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6300-477-0Suche in Google Scholar

Uerz, Dana, Monique Volman & Marijke Kral. 2018. Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education 70. 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Vallejo, Claudia & Melinda Dooly. 2019. Plurilingualism and translanguaging: Emergent approaches and shared concerns. Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23(1). 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1600469.Suche in Google Scholar

Veenman, Simon. 1995. The training of coaching skills: An implementation study. Educational Studies 21(3). 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569950210307.10.1080/0305569950210307Suche in Google Scholar

Veenman, Simon, Hanneke De Laat & Corine Staring. 1998. Evaluation of a coaching programme for mentors of beginning teachers. Journal of In-Service Education 24(3). 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674589800200061.Suche in Google Scholar

Veenman, Marcel, Bernardette Van Hout-Wolters & Peter Afflerbach. 2006. Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning 1(1). 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Villegas-Reimers, Eleonora. 2003. Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.Suche in Google Scholar

Walpole, Sharon & Michael C. McKenna. 2012. Literacy coach’s handbook: A guide to research based practice. New York: Guilford Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Walsh, Steve. 2003. Developing interactional awareness in the second language classroom through teacher self-evaluation. Language Awareness 12(2). 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410308667071.Suche in Google Scholar

Whitebread, David, Neil Mercer, Cristine Howe & Anne Tolmie (eds.). 2013. Self-regulation and dialogue in primary classrooms. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II: Psychological Aspects of Education – Current Trends, No. 10. BPS.10.53841/bpsmono.2013.cat1370Suche in Google Scholar

Wong, Lung-Hsian, Ching-Sing Chai & Guat Po-Aw. 2017. Seamless language learning: Second language learning with social media. Comunicar 50. 9–21. https://doi.org/10.3961/C50-2017-01.Suche in Google Scholar

Xu, Dongming & Huaiquing Wang. 2006. Intelligent agent supported personalization for virtual learning environments. Decision Support Systems 42(2). 825–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05. 033.10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.033Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-10-31
Accepted: 2021-10-21
Published Online: 2021-11-10
Published in Print: 2023-09-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Deaf signing diversity and signed language translations
  4. ‘Smelling’ diasporic: bargaining interactions and the problem of politeness
  5. Discursive strategies of self-promotion by doctors in online medical consultations in China: an e-commercialised practice
  6. Learning semantic and thematic vocabulary clusters through embedded instruction: effects on very young English learners’ vocabulary acquisition and retention
  7. Towards an understanding of multilingual investment: multilingual learning experiences among mainland Chinese students in Hong Kong
  8. The cognitive-conceptual, planning-organizational, affective-social and linguistic-discursive affordances of translanguaging
  9. Development and validation of the questionnaire on EFL students’ perceptions of authorial stance in academic writing
  10. Emergent LOTE motivation? The L3 motivational dynamics of Japanese-major university students in China
  11. Study abroad, human capital development, language commodification, and social inequalities
  12. Exploring the impact of a teacher development programme using a digital application on linguistic interactions in the classroom: a multiple case study
  13. Boredom in practical English language classes: a longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis-curve of factors model
  14. Medical students’ attention in EFL class: roles of academic expectation stress and quality of sleep
  15. Foreign language peace of mind: a positive emotion drawn from the Chinese EFL learning context
  16. Mutual intelligibility of a Kurmanji and a Zazaki dialect spoken in the province of Elazığ, Turkey
  17. Investigating the relationship between linguistic changes in L2 writers’ paraphrasing, paraphrasing performance and L2 proficiency
Heruntergeladen am 30.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2020-0132/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen