Home Effectiveness of different methods for anti-Sm antibody identification. A multicentre study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effectiveness of different methods for anti-Sm antibody identification. A multicentre study

  • María Jesús Llorente , Juana Jiménez , Concepción González , Inmaculada Alarcón , Monserrat Alsina , Luisa María Casas , José Enrique Benedito , José Luis Araquistain , Victor Farre and José Manuel González-Buitrago
Published/Copyright: September 21, 2011

Abstract

Methods for the measurement of autoantibodies frequently provide controversial results. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performance of Spanish Clinical Laboratories in the measurement of anti-Sm antibodies. A total of 23 laboratories participated, analysing 30 serum samples from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune and non-autoimmune diseases. The laboratories used four extractable nuclear antigen screens, eight enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) specific for anti-Sm, one line-blot, one dot-blot and one double immunodiffusion assay, from 15 different manufacturers. A total of 871 results were obtained. In general, very good sensitivity was obtained (95–100%), but specificity was moderate (52–86%) and must be improved. Most ELISAs and the line-blot were valid assays for anti-Sm detection and could serve as tests both for analysis and/or confirmation. The likelihood ratios indicated that both methods can be considered very useful or useful for the determination of anti-Sm antibodies. Nevertheless, the analytical quality of the methods for the measurement of anti-Sm antibodies could probably be improved by standardisation of the methods and the participation of laboratories in external quality control programs.


Corresponding author: Prof. José Manuel González-Buitrago, Servicio de Bioquímica, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain Fax: +34-923-291211, ; All authors are Members of Biochemistry Commission for Immunological Diseases of the Spanish Society of Clinical Chemistry

References

1. Zieve GW, Khusial P. The anti-Sm immune response in autoimmunity and cell biology. Autoimmun Rev 2003; 2: 235–40. 10.1016/S1568-9972(03)00018-1Search in Google Scholar

2. Habets WJ, Berden JH, Hoch SO, van Venrooij WJ. Further characterization and subcellular localization of Sm and U1 ribonucleoprotein antigens. Eur J Immunol 1985; 15: 992–7. 10.1002/eji.1830151006Search in Google Scholar

3. Hirakata M, Craft J, Hardin JA. Autoantigenic epitopes of the B and D polypeptides of U1 snRNP: analysis of domains recognized by the Y12 monoclonal anti-Sm antibody and by patient sera. J Immunol 1993; 150: 3592–601. 10.4049/jimmunol.150.8.3592Search in Google Scholar

4. Hoch SO, Eisenberg RA, Sharp GC. Diverse antibody recognition patterns of the multiple Sm-D antigen polypeptides. Clin Immunol 1999; 92: 204–8. 10.1006/clim.1999.4745Search in Google Scholar

5. Craft J. Antibodies to snRNPs in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1992; 18: 311–35. 10.1016/S0889-857X(21)00730-4Search in Google Scholar

6. Gulko PS, Reveille JD, Koopman WJ, Burgard SL, Bartolucci AA, Alarcón GS. Survival impact of autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 224–8. Search in Google Scholar

7. Peng SL, Craft JE. Spliceosomal snRNPs autoantibodies. In: Peter JB, Shoenfeld Y, editors. Autoantibodies. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV, 1996:774–82. Search in Google Scholar

8. Tan EM, Smolen JS, McDougal JS, Butcher BT, Conn D, Dawkins R, et al. A critical evaluation of enzyme immunoassays for detection of antinuclear antibodies of defined specificities. I. Precision, sensitivity, and specificity. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 455–64. 10.1002/1529-0131(199904)42:3<455::AID-ANR10>3.0.CO;2-3Search in Google Scholar

9. Tan EM, Smolen JS, McDougal JS, Fritzler MJ, Gordon T, Hardin SA, et al. A critical evaluation of enzyme immunoassays for detection of antinuclear antibodies of defined specificities. II. Potential for quantitation of antibody content. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 68–74. Search in Google Scholar

10. Fritzler MJ, Wiik A, Tan EM, Smolen JS, McDougal JS, Chan EK, et al. A critical evaluation of enzyme immunoassays for detection of antinuclear antibodies of defined specificities. III. Comparative performance characteristics of academic and manufacturers' laboratories. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 2374–81. Search in Google Scholar

11. Kavanaugh AF, Solomon DH, Schur P, Reveille JD, Sherrer Y, Lahita R, on behalf of the American College of Rheumatology ad hoc Committee on Immunologic Testing Guidelines. Guidelines for immunologic laboratory testing in the rheumatic diseases: an introduction. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 15: 429–33. Search in Google Scholar

12. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40: 1725. 10.1002/art.1780400928Search in Google Scholar

13. Alba P, Bento L, Cuadrado MJ, Karim Y, Turgekar MF, Abbs I, et al. Anti-dsDNA, anti-Sm antibodies, and the lupus anticoagulant: significant factors associated with lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 556–60. 10.1136/ard.62.6.556Search in Google Scholar

14. Arbuckle M, McClain MT, Rubertone MV, Scofield H, Dennis GJ, James JA, et al. Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupuserythematosus. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1526–33. 10.1056/NEJMoa021933Search in Google Scholar

15. Arbuckle MR, Reichlin M, Harley JB, James JA. Shared early autoantibody recognition events in the development of anti-Sm B/B′ in human lupus. Scand J Immunol 1999; 50: 447–55. 10.1046/j.1365-3083.1999.00640.xSearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2005-2-25
Accepted: 2005-4-29
Published Online: 2011-9-21
Published in Print: 2005-7-1

©2005 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Inter-individual variation of inflammatory markers of cardiovascular risks and diseases
  2. “Coelionomics”: towards understanding the molecular pathology of coeliac disease
  3. Gene expression profiling in human cardiovascular disease
  4. A common CYP1B1 polymorphism is associated with 2-OHE1/16-OHE1 urinary estrone ratio
  5. A quantitative RT-PCR method to determine topoisomerase I mRNA levels in human tissue samples
  6. Insulin sensitivity and counter-regulatory hormones in hypothyroidism and during thyroid hormone replacement therapy
  7. Linearity and detection limit in the measurement of serum M-protein with the capillary zone electrophoresis system Capillarys ®
  8. Quantitative measurement of ketone bodies in urine using reflectometry
  9. Quantification of voriconazole in plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
  10. Determination of the antioxidant capacity in blood
  11. High-workload endurance training may increase serum ischemia-modified albumin concentrations
  12. Advanced oxidation protein products in serum of patients with myotonic disease type I: association with serum γ-glutamyltransferase and disease severity
  13. Effectiveness of different methods for anti-Sm antibody identification. A multicentre study
  14. Quality control in neutrophil granulocyte (PMN) concentrates by flow cytometry
  15. Circadian variation of holo-transcobalamin (holo-TC) and related markers
  16. Elevated levels of plasma homocysteine in postmenopausal women in Burkina Faso
  17. Allergy testing on the IMMULITE 2000 Random-Access immunoanalyzer – a clinical evaluation study
  18. Evaluation of the ABX Pentra 400: a newly available clinical chemistry analyser
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2005.128/html
Scroll to top button