Home Literary Studies Der Prater als Ideal und als Wirklichkeit oder Der (National-)Geist des Sports
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Der Prater als Ideal und als Wirklichkeit oder Der (National-)Geist des Sports

  • Artur R. Boelderl
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
2023/2024
This chapter is in the book 2023/2024

Abstract

In the context of The Man without Qualities, there is no explicit mention of the famous Prater, a vast recreational park area in Vienna within easy reach of the city centre, apart from an isolated passage in the novel’s precursor »Die Zwillingsschwester« from 1924/25. It is thus remarkable that a tribute to the Prater finds itself fully integrated into the 1931 sports commentary »Als Papa Tennis lernte« and is preserved in Musil’s estate under the title »Fragment einer Prater-Elegie« (the Prater also figures in the title of »Der Praterpreis«, probably Musil’s first tennis commentary, from 1923/24). With its statement that »at the Prater, ideals and reality were in harmony for once«, the »Fragment« is the only place in Musil’s entire œuvre where it is claimed (if possibly ironically) that ideals and reality are congruent and equal, converging affirmatively at this particular site, whereas the much-discussed essay »Die Nation als Ideal und als Wirklichkeit« from 1921 critically presents them as necessarily divergent from one another. Whence the question: what does/did the Prater have that the nation lacks?

Abstract

In the context of The Man without Qualities, there is no explicit mention of the famous Prater, a vast recreational park area in Vienna within easy reach of the city centre, apart from an isolated passage in the novel’s precursor »Die Zwillingsschwester« from 1924/25. It is thus remarkable that a tribute to the Prater finds itself fully integrated into the 1931 sports commentary »Als Papa Tennis lernte« and is preserved in Musil’s estate under the title »Fragment einer Prater-Elegie« (the Prater also figures in the title of »Der Praterpreis«, probably Musil’s first tennis commentary, from 1923/24). With its statement that »at the Prater, ideals and reality were in harmony for once«, the »Fragment« is the only place in Musil’s entire œuvre where it is claimed (if possibly ironically) that ideals and reality are congruent and equal, converging affirmatively at this particular site, whereas the much-discussed essay »Die Nation als Ideal und als Wirklichkeit« from 1921 critically presents them as necessarily divergent from one another. Whence the question: what does/did the Prater have that the nation lacks?

Downloaded on 5.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111617725-011/html
Scroll to top button