Home Philosophy 5 Hegel and the Rationality of Nature
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

5 Hegel and the Rationality of Nature

  • Anton Kabeshkin
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this chapter I discuss the question whether Hegel believed that his philosophy of nature was supposed to play a beneficial role for empirical scientists and thus positively influence scientific progress. I first discuss the same issue in Schelling, in whose case it is generally agreed that he did believe that his philosophy of nature could (and, indeed, did) influence the progress of empirical sciences. I reconstruct his position on this issue in some detail. I then proceed to investigate whether Hegel’s position was similar to Schelling’s and, in the process, argue against the deflationary interpretation of Alison Stone who answered this question in the negative. I argue that Hegel did at least believe that general presuppositions about the rationality of nature are beneficial for natural scientists. I then consider whether and how his own philosophy of nature could provide guidance for science, according to his views.

Abstract

In this chapter I discuss the question whether Hegel believed that his philosophy of nature was supposed to play a beneficial role for empirical scientists and thus positively influence scientific progress. I first discuss the same issue in Schelling, in whose case it is generally agreed that he did believe that his philosophy of nature could (and, indeed, did) influence the progress of empirical sciences. I reconstruct his position on this issue in some detail. I then proceed to investigate whether Hegel’s position was similar to Schelling’s and, in the process, argue against the deflationary interpretation of Alison Stone who answered this question in the negative. I argue that Hegel did at least believe that general presuppositions about the rationality of nature are beneficial for natural scientists. I then consider whether and how his own philosophy of nature could provide guidance for science, according to his views.

Downloaded on 2.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111002453-005/html
Scroll to top button