Startseite Philosophie Fulfillability, Instability, and Incompleteness
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Fulfillability, Instability, and Incompleteness

  • Roy T Cook
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Engaging Putnam
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Engaging Putnam

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to publicize, and to a more limited extent, further develop, an alternate proof of Gödel’s incompleteness theorem due to Saul Kripke, based on a notion called fulfillability. Kripke’s work has been publicized in talks, but at the time of writing this essay the only published discussion of the material appears in Putnam (2000). Here, a more detailed and more accessible overview of the approach is given, centered on a novel generalization - the Instability Theorem. After setting up the technical machinery and demonstrating the Instability Theorem, we prove both the first incompleteness theorem and Lob’s theorem. We conclude with some observations regarding potential directions for future research along these lines.

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to publicize, and to a more limited extent, further develop, an alternate proof of Gödel’s incompleteness theorem due to Saul Kripke, based on a notion called fulfillability. Kripke’s work has been publicized in talks, but at the time of writing this essay the only published discussion of the material appears in Putnam (2000). Here, a more detailed and more accessible overview of the approach is given, centered on a novel generalization - the Instability Theorem. After setting up the technical machinery and demonstrating the Instability Theorem, we prove both the first incompleteness theorem and Lob’s theorem. We conclude with some observations regarding potential directions for future research along these lines.

Heruntergeladen am 10.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110769210-009/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen