Home Philosophy Putnam on Trans-Theoretical Terms and Contextual Apriority
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Putnam on Trans-Theoretical Terms and Contextual Apriority

  • Gary Ebbs
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Engaging Putnam
This chapter is in the book Engaging Putnam

Abstract

A central goal of Putnam’s philosophy is to investigate and clarify the methodological roles of statements that are so central to an inquirer’s current theory of the topics they concern that she cannot specify any way in which the statements may actually be false. My goals in this paper are (first) to explain how the problem of clarifying the methodological roles of such statements arises in Putnam’s work, (second) to explain in synchronic practical terms why it is reasonable for an inquirer to accept such statements, and (third) to contrast this synchronic practical explanation with Putnam’s diachronic theoretical explanation, according to which such statements can be revised “only by conceiving of whole new theoretical structures.”

Abstract

A central goal of Putnam’s philosophy is to investigate and clarify the methodological roles of statements that are so central to an inquirer’s current theory of the topics they concern that she cannot specify any way in which the statements may actually be false. My goals in this paper are (first) to explain how the problem of clarifying the methodological roles of such statements arises in Putnam’s work, (second) to explain in synchronic practical terms why it is reasonable for an inquirer to accept such statements, and (third) to contrast this synchronic practical explanation with Putnam’s diachronic theoretical explanation, according to which such statements can be revised “only by conceiving of whole new theoretical structures.”

Downloaded on 9.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110769210-006/html
Scroll to top button