Home Philosophy Putnam on Radical Scepticism: Wittgenstein, Cavell, and Occasion- Sensitive Semantics
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Putnam on Radical Scepticism: Wittgenstein, Cavell, and Occasion- Sensitive Semantics

  • Duncan Pritchard
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Engaging Putnam
This chapter is in the book Engaging Putnam

Abstract

While there has been a lot of attention devoted to how Putnam applies content externalism to the problem of radical scepticism, there has been considerably less attention paid to his other writings on this subject. This paper examines Putnam’s wider treatment of radical scepticism. It looks at his critiques of such figures as P.F. Strawson, Barry Stroud, and Michael Williams, and considers how, under the influence of Wittgenstein, Austin, Stanley Cavell, and (more recently) Charles Travis, Putnam has developed an anti-sceptical line that is built around an occasion-sensitive semantics. While taking a generally sympathetic line to Putnam’s anti-scepticism, it is also argued on broadly Wittgensteinian grounds (albeit the Wittgenstein of On Certainty, rather than that of the Philosophical Investigations, which is the primary concern of Putnam and his key influences) that the need to adopt such a semantics in order to respond to radical scepticism is significantly overstated.

Abstract

While there has been a lot of attention devoted to how Putnam applies content externalism to the problem of radical scepticism, there has been considerably less attention paid to his other writings on this subject. This paper examines Putnam’s wider treatment of radical scepticism. It looks at his critiques of such figures as P.F. Strawson, Barry Stroud, and Michael Williams, and considers how, under the influence of Wittgenstein, Austin, Stanley Cavell, and (more recently) Charles Travis, Putnam has developed an anti-sceptical line that is built around an occasion-sensitive semantics. While taking a generally sympathetic line to Putnam’s anti-scepticism, it is also argued on broadly Wittgensteinian grounds (albeit the Wittgenstein of On Certainty, rather than that of the Philosophical Investigations, which is the primary concern of Putnam and his key influences) that the need to adopt such a semantics in order to respond to radical scepticism is significantly overstated.

Downloaded on 9.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110769210-012/html
Scroll to top button