Home Religion, Bible and Theology The Relationship of Scripture and Tradition in the Light of God’s Revelation
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Relationship of Scripture and Tradition in the Light of God’s Revelation

  • Elisabeth Maikranz
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Scripture and Theology
This chapter is in the book Scripture and Theology

Abstract

The question of the normativity and thus the critical function of Scripture is an unfinished debate in theology. It is precisely the plurality of biblical writings and inner-biblical traditions that makes an answer difficult. Moreover, different traditions are justified in recourse to the biblical testimony. The chapter adresses the complexity of the processes of tradition within the Bible and starting there it seeks to form an understanding of the critical function of Scripture. To this end, it takes up the debate within the ecumenical movement where a differentiated and comprehensive understanding of tradition has been developed. Compatible with this is the tradition-historical approach of the Lutheran theologian Wolfhart Pannenberg. For him, the New Testament record has a normative function, as it is the 'historical source' for the revelation of God in the story of Jesus of Nazareth. It documents the hermeneutical processes through which the first Christians interpreted the life and destiny of Jesus. Taking Pannenberg as a starting point, the chapter reinterprets the critical function of Scripture: The critical function of Scripture cannot be described as a static measure but is rather a dynamic process in which inner-biblical processes of interpretation are translated into the present in order to convey the special significance of the biblical events of revelation.

Abstract

The question of the normativity and thus the critical function of Scripture is an unfinished debate in theology. It is precisely the plurality of biblical writings and inner-biblical traditions that makes an answer difficult. Moreover, different traditions are justified in recourse to the biblical testimony. The chapter adresses the complexity of the processes of tradition within the Bible and starting there it seeks to form an understanding of the critical function of Scripture. To this end, it takes up the debate within the ecumenical movement where a differentiated and comprehensive understanding of tradition has been developed. Compatible with this is the tradition-historical approach of the Lutheran theologian Wolfhart Pannenberg. For him, the New Testament record has a normative function, as it is the 'historical source' for the revelation of God in the story of Jesus of Nazareth. It documents the hermeneutical processes through which the first Christians interpreted the life and destiny of Jesus. Taking Pannenberg as a starting point, the chapter reinterprets the critical function of Scripture: The critical function of Scripture cannot be described as a static measure but is rather a dynamic process in which inner-biblical processes of interpretation are translated into the present in order to convey the special significance of the biblical events of revelation.

Downloaded on 3.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110768411-019/html
Scroll to top button