Home Religion, Bible and Theology Augustine without a Theodicy of a Condemning God
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Augustine without a Theodicy of a Condemning God

His Misunderstanding of Romans and Resulting Transformations of Predestination, Original Sin, Freedom and Grace
  • Willibald Sandler
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Scripture and Theology
This chapter is in the book Scripture and Theology

Abstract

Augustine’s reading of Romans 9 radically transformed his theology. In Ad Simplicianum (397) he developed a new understanding of grace and freedom together with original sin and predestination, laying the foundations for his later anti-Pelagian theology. This theological transformation, however, is marred by a fatal misunderstanding of Rom 9. A misguided “theodicy of a condemning God” threw Augustine’s theology into an imbalance that led contemporary liberal theologians to reject his theological system and the Church’s teaching on it as a whole. This thesis is supported by an examination of recent exegesis on Romans 9-11, as well as a theological analysis of Simplician and Augustine’s earlier Propositions from the Epistle to the Romans. The liberal criticism of Kurt Flasch and Thomas Propper is thus partially confirmed. However, the polarising dilemma posed by Flasch between an irresponsible eclectic reception and a complete rejection of Augustine’s theology based on the Simplician by contemporary dogmatics is rejected. Instead, a third way of a transformative reception is methodically developed. Finally, a possible path for such a transformative reception of Augustine, based on a proper understanding of Romans 9, is outlined.

Abstract

Augustine’s reading of Romans 9 radically transformed his theology. In Ad Simplicianum (397) he developed a new understanding of grace and freedom together with original sin and predestination, laying the foundations for his later anti-Pelagian theology. This theological transformation, however, is marred by a fatal misunderstanding of Rom 9. A misguided “theodicy of a condemning God” threw Augustine’s theology into an imbalance that led contemporary liberal theologians to reject his theological system and the Church’s teaching on it as a whole. This thesis is supported by an examination of recent exegesis on Romans 9-11, as well as a theological analysis of Simplician and Augustine’s earlier Propositions from the Epistle to the Romans. The liberal criticism of Kurt Flasch and Thomas Propper is thus partially confirmed. However, the polarising dilemma posed by Flasch between an irresponsible eclectic reception and a complete rejection of Augustine’s theology based on the Simplician by contemporary dogmatics is rejected. Instead, a third way of a transformative reception is methodically developed. Finally, a possible path for such a transformative reception of Augustine, based on a proper understanding of Romans 9, is outlined.

Downloaded on 3.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110768411-008/html
Scroll to top button