Home Classical, Ancient Near Eastern & Egyptian Studies Von Argos nach Athen: Von Manipulation zu Polis-Rhetorik zwischen Aischylos’ Agamemnon und Eumeniden
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Von Argos nach Athen: Von Manipulation zu Polis-Rhetorik zwischen Aischylos’ Agamemnon und Eumeniden

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper explores how the portrayal of Argos and Athens in Aeschylus’ Oresteia is closely linked with and reinforced by differing concepts of rhetoric in each place. Whilst in Argos characters deceive each other and all honest communication must fail, Athens stands for a fair and discursive way of communicating, as the play’s description of Argos and Athens shows. It is noteworthy that Athenian persuasion and Argive manipulation work similarly on a linguistic level, whilst semantically, Athenian rhetoric uses terms positively coined in the contemporary audience’s perception and therefore makes Orestes’ trial convincing. To question the view of this trial as a criticism of Athenian oratorical practice, arguments will be presented that in the Eumenides, Athenian rhetoric is a field of discourse in favour of the strongest and most apt performance, not only the strongest argument. One possible interpretation of this fact is the Athenian view that Argos needed Athens in the Argive alliance, not vice versa.

Abstract

This paper explores how the portrayal of Argos and Athens in Aeschylus’ Oresteia is closely linked with and reinforced by differing concepts of rhetoric in each place. Whilst in Argos characters deceive each other and all honest communication must fail, Athens stands for a fair and discursive way of communicating, as the play’s description of Argos and Athens shows. It is noteworthy that Athenian persuasion and Argive manipulation work similarly on a linguistic level, whilst semantically, Athenian rhetoric uses terms positively coined in the contemporary audience’s perception and therefore makes Orestes’ trial convincing. To question the view of this trial as a criticism of Athenian oratorical practice, arguments will be presented that in the Eumenides, Athenian rhetoric is a field of discourse in favour of the strongest and most apt performance, not only the strongest argument. One possible interpretation of this fact is the Athenian view that Argos needed Athens in the Argive alliance, not vice versa.

Downloaded on 26.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110656893-004/html
Scroll to top button