Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik 3. Fundamentals of Urban Semiotics: Exemplified by Examples taken from the Chinese City
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

3. Fundamentals of Urban Semiotics: Exemplified by Examples taken from the Chinese City

  • Dieter Hassenpflug
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Following the influential studies on sociological and spatio-political analysis by Henri Lefebvre (1991), sociology focuses on the semiotics of urban space as advocated for by Mark Gottdiener (1994). The production of urban space is primarily regarded as the result of cultural negotiations, ideological orientations, and political conflicts. Urban semiotics is thus part of theorizing in urban sociology. Rather than following urban sociology and its concept of space, this article presents an intercultural approach that leans heavily on the practices employed in architecture, urban planning, and construction. The sociocultural aspects of the physical and architecturally structured urban space are especially important here. Urban semiotics must therefore move in the direction of morphogenetic and theoretic architectural approaches as proposed by Wolfgang Wildgen (2013) and Umberto Eco (1979). This article sketches a conceptual framework for urban semiotics that includes intercultural perspectives and ideas from urban planning theory. Urban planning and construction in China will exemplify and stress the socio-cultural dimension in the analysis of the urban space. The resulting contrastive perspective on urban planning theory can thus be seen as a constitutive part of a theory of urban planning that includes the relevance of space.

Abstract

Following the influential studies on sociological and spatio-political analysis by Henri Lefebvre (1991), sociology focuses on the semiotics of urban space as advocated for by Mark Gottdiener (1994). The production of urban space is primarily regarded as the result of cultural negotiations, ideological orientations, and political conflicts. Urban semiotics is thus part of theorizing in urban sociology. Rather than following urban sociology and its concept of space, this article presents an intercultural approach that leans heavily on the practices employed in architecture, urban planning, and construction. The sociocultural aspects of the physical and architecturally structured urban space are especially important here. Urban semiotics must therefore move in the direction of morphogenetic and theoretic architectural approaches as proposed by Wolfgang Wildgen (2013) and Umberto Eco (1979). This article sketches a conceptual framework for urban semiotics that includes intercultural perspectives and ideas from urban planning theory. Urban planning and construction in China will exemplify and stress the socio-cultural dimension in the analysis of the urban space. The resulting contrastive perspective on urban planning theory can thus be seen as a constitutive part of a theory of urban planning that includes the relevance of space.

Heruntergeladen am 21.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110296334-004/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen