Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Chapter 7 Hiding in plain sight: Methodological ideologies in discourse research in applied linguistics
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Chapter 7 Hiding in plain sight: Methodological ideologies in discourse research in applied linguistics

  • Elizabeth R. Miller
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This chapter discusses a methodological ideology that often is (re)constructed in and informs many discourse-focused research practices. Its primary focus is on the often-unnoticed contradictions between discourse researchers’ interpretive, post-foundational, and non-essentialist theoretical frameworks and their materializing and essentializing methodological practices that are (seemingly) necessary for conducting data collection and discourse analysis. I demonstrate this contradiction by re-examining many familiar methodological and analytical practices that I have adopted in my own research as an applied linguist. The chapter then offers a brief exploration of recent contributions to discursive research by a still-small but growing body of scholars whose work aligns with new materialist perspectives and whose efforts seem to achieve ideological alignment across theory and methods. In highlighting this alignment, I do not suggest that new materialist approaches should be taken up in all discourse research, however, as they introduce many new complexities and research dilemmas. I close the chapter by acknowledging that many post-foundational discourse scholars (including myself) may well choose to persist with familiar and standardized data-generating practices but must recognize them as often based in positivist practices and human-centric perspectives.

Abstract

This chapter discusses a methodological ideology that often is (re)constructed in and informs many discourse-focused research practices. Its primary focus is on the often-unnoticed contradictions between discourse researchers’ interpretive, post-foundational, and non-essentialist theoretical frameworks and their materializing and essentializing methodological practices that are (seemingly) necessary for conducting data collection and discourse analysis. I demonstrate this contradiction by re-examining many familiar methodological and analytical practices that I have adopted in my own research as an applied linguist. The chapter then offers a brief exploration of recent contributions to discursive research by a still-small but growing body of scholars whose work aligns with new materialist perspectives and whose efforts seem to achieve ideological alignment across theory and methods. In highlighting this alignment, I do not suggest that new materialist approaches should be taken up in all discourse research, however, as they introduce many new complexities and research dilemmas. I close the chapter by acknowledging that many post-foundational discourse scholars (including myself) may well choose to persist with familiar and standardized data-generating practices but must recognize them as often based in positivist practices and human-centric perspectives.

Heruntergeladen am 23.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781501513602-007/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen