Presented to you through Paradigm Publishing Services

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Home John Benjamins Publishing Company The implementation of the axiological parameter in a verbal subontology for natural language processing
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The implementation of the axiological parameter in a verbal subontology for natural language processing

  • and

Abstract

FunGramKB (FGKB), on the one hand, is a multipurpose lexico-conceptual knowledge base for natural language processing (NLP) systems and comprises three major interrelated knowledge level modules: lexical, grammatical and conceptual. At the conceptual level the core ontology is presented as a hierarchical catalogue of the concepts that a person has in mind and a repository where semantic knowledge is stored. Axiology, on the other hand, is widely considered to be a primitive, basic or key parameter, among others, in the architecture of meaning construction at different levels. This parameter can be traced back to the three subontologies into which FunGramKB can be split: #ENTITY for nouns, # EVENT for verbs, and #QUALITY for adjectives. Even if most of the specific research conducted so far has been devoted to the category #QUALITY, there is no reason to consider verbs as less of an axiological category. Consequently, in this chapter we shall concentrate on the subontology # EVENT and explore how the main categories and features of the axiological parameter (good-bad or positive-negative [+/−]) are represented and encoded within FunGramKB ontology, particularly inside semantic properties such as basic or terminal concepts and meaning postulates, or syntactic operators, such as modality or polarity.

Abstract

FunGramKB (FGKB), on the one hand, is a multipurpose lexico-conceptual knowledge base for natural language processing (NLP) systems and comprises three major interrelated knowledge level modules: lexical, grammatical and conceptual. At the conceptual level the core ontology is presented as a hierarchical catalogue of the concepts that a person has in mind and a repository where semantic knowledge is stored. Axiology, on the other hand, is widely considered to be a primitive, basic or key parameter, among others, in the architecture of meaning construction at different levels. This parameter can be traced back to the three subontologies into which FunGramKB can be split: #ENTITY for nouns, # EVENT for verbs, and #QUALITY for adjectives. Even if most of the specific research conducted so far has been devoted to the category #QUALITY, there is no reason to consider verbs as less of an axiological category. Consequently, in this chapter we shall concentrate on the subontology # EVENT and explore how the main categories and features of the axiological parameter (good-bad or positive-negative [+/−]) are represented and encoded within FunGramKB ontology, particularly inside semantic properties such as basic or terminal concepts and meaning postulates, or syntactic operators, such as modality or polarity.

Chapters in this book

  1. Prelim pages i
  2. Table of contents vii
  3. Acknowledgements ix
  4. Preface xi
  5. Section 1: Introduction
  6. The many faces and phases of evaluation 3
  7. Section 2: Theoretical considerations and approaches to evaluation
  8. The emergence of axiology as a key parameter in modern linguistics 27
  9. AFFECT and emotion, target-value mismatches, and Russian dolls 47
  10. Appraising Appraisal 67
  11. The evaluative palette of verbal irony 93
  12. The implementation of the axiological parameter in a verbal subontology for natural language processing 117
  13. The evaluative function of situation-bound utterances in intercultural interaction 137
  14. Prosody, information structure and evaluation 153
  15. The evaluation of intonation: pitch range differences in English and in Spanish 179
  16. Section 3: Evaluation in different contexts
  17. “An astonishing season of destiny!” Evaluation in blurbs used for advertising TV series 197
  18. Graduation within the scope of Attitude in English and Spanish consumer reviews of books and movies 221
  19. Register diversification in evaluative language: the case of scientific writing 241
  20. The role of negative-modal synergies in Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species 259
  21. Exploring academic argumentation in course-related blogs through ENGAGEMENT 281
  22. Multimodal analysis of controversy in the media 303
  23. The expression of evaluation in weekly news magazines in English 321
  24. Evaluative phraseological choice and speaker party/gender 345
  25. Evaluation in emotion narratives 367
  26. Evaluative discourse and politeness in university students' communication through social networking sites 387
  27. Index 413
Evaluation in Context
This chapter is in the book Evaluation in Context
Downloaded on 27.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/pbns.242.06fel/html
Scroll to top button