Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Chapter 7. Hungarian classifier constructions, plurality and the mass–count distinction
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Chapter 7. Hungarian classifier constructions, plurality and the mass–count distinction

  • Brigitta R. Schvarcz und Susan Rothstein
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company
Approaches to Hungarian
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Approaches to Hungarian

Abstract

We argue that Hungarian has both mass and count nouns, and a plural marker which is sensitive to the distinction, as well as a system of sortal classifiers. In English, most nouns are either mass (e.g mud) or count (e.g. book), and there are only a limited number of fully flexible nouns with both mass and count forms (e.g. stone/stones). In Hungarian, however, most count nouns are flexible, and a noun like rózsa ‘rose’ is ambiguous between a mass and a count item. This results in two ways of counting: rózsa as a count noun can be directly modified by a numeral as in két rózsa ‘two roses’, but if it is a mass noun counting uses a classifier construction as in két szál rózsa.

Abstract

We argue that Hungarian has both mass and count nouns, and a plural marker which is sensitive to the distinction, as well as a system of sortal classifiers. In English, most nouns are either mass (e.g mud) or count (e.g. book), and there are only a limited number of fully flexible nouns with both mass and count forms (e.g. stone/stones). In Hungarian, however, most count nouns are flexible, and a noun like rózsa ‘rose’ is ambiguous between a mass and a count item. This results in two ways of counting: rózsa as a count noun can be directly modified by a numeral as in két rózsa ‘two roses’, but if it is a mass noun counting uses a classifier construction as in két szál rózsa.

Heruntergeladen am 27.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/atoh.15.07sch/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen