Home Linguistics & Semiotics Chapter 7. Hungarian classifier constructions, plurality and the mass–count distinction
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 7. Hungarian classifier constructions, plurality and the mass–count distinction

  • Brigitta R. Schvarcz and Susan Rothstein
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Approaches to Hungarian
This chapter is in the book Approaches to Hungarian

Abstract

We argue that Hungarian has both mass and count nouns, and a plural marker which is sensitive to the distinction, as well as a system of sortal classifiers. In English, most nouns are either mass (e.g mud) or count (e.g. book), and there are only a limited number of fully flexible nouns with both mass and count forms (e.g. stone/stones). In Hungarian, however, most count nouns are flexible, and a noun like rózsa ‘rose’ is ambiguous between a mass and a count item. This results in two ways of counting: rózsa as a count noun can be directly modified by a numeral as in két rózsa ‘two roses’, but if it is a mass noun counting uses a classifier construction as in két szál rózsa.

Abstract

We argue that Hungarian has both mass and count nouns, and a plural marker which is sensitive to the distinction, as well as a system of sortal classifiers. In English, most nouns are either mass (e.g mud) or count (e.g. book), and there are only a limited number of fully flexible nouns with both mass and count forms (e.g. stone/stones). In Hungarian, however, most count nouns are flexible, and a noun like rózsa ‘rose’ is ambiguous between a mass and a count item. This results in two ways of counting: rózsa as a count noun can be directly modified by a numeral as in két rózsa ‘two roses’, but if it is a mass noun counting uses a classifier construction as in két szál rózsa.

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/atoh.15.07sch/html
Scroll to top button