Startseite The Paratactic Account of propositional attitude ascription
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Paratactic Account of propositional attitude ascription

  • Finn Spicer
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company
Consciousness in Interaction
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Consciousness in Interaction

Abstract

In this paper a new theory is offered of the concepts we use to think about thought-content in propositional attitude ascriptions – the Paratactic Account. According to the Paratactic Account, in a propositional attitude ascription a person is described as standing in an attitudinal relation to a representational entity – a content. In making a propositional attitude ascription, then, one refers to a content; according to the Paratactic Account, one does this by using a demonstrative concept, which demonstrates a tokening of the target content in one’s own thinking. The Paratactic Account is offered as a competitor to Peacocke’s Redeployment View, and to Russellian and Fregean accounts of the concepts used in propositional attitude ascriptions. It is defended as a superior account to these rivals in its capacity to explain subjects’ folk-psychological abilities and their intuitions about the correctness of propositional attitude reports. Keywords: propositional attitude ascription; representations; folk psychology; propositional attitude reports

Abstract

In this paper a new theory is offered of the concepts we use to think about thought-content in propositional attitude ascriptions – the Paratactic Account. According to the Paratactic Account, in a propositional attitude ascription a person is described as standing in an attitudinal relation to a representational entity – a content. In making a propositional attitude ascription, then, one refers to a content; according to the Paratactic Account, one does this by using a demonstrative concept, which demonstrates a tokening of the target content in one’s own thinking. The Paratactic Account is offered as a competitor to Peacocke’s Redeployment View, and to Russellian and Fregean accounts of the concepts used in propositional attitude ascriptions. It is defended as a superior account to these rivals in its capacity to explain subjects’ folk-psychological abilities and their intuitions about the correctness of propositional attitude reports. Keywords: propositional attitude ascription; representations; folk psychology; propositional attitude reports

Heruntergeladen am 17.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/aicr.86.14spi/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen