Startseite Gain in functions before pain reduction during intensive multidisciplinary paediatric pain rehabilitation programme
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Gain in functions before pain reduction during intensive multidisciplinary paediatric pain rehabilitation programme

  • Harald Breivik EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. Januar 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain Heidi Kempert and co-workers report on their study of 78 children and adolescents (8–19 years) who took part in an intensive interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programme with focus on gain in function rather than reduction of pain [1]. Headache/migraine, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), amplified musculoskeletal pain syndrome (AMPS), back pain, and abdominal pain were the most common diagnoses. The 3 weeks intensive multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programme focused on improving strength and endurance, facilitating return to daily activities, and appropriate coping and pain management skills. They measure progress by improved physical functioning, even if pain and other symptoms continue without much immediate change.

Physical and occupational therapies were administered during 3–4 h daily, with individualized muscle strengthening and endurance, proprioceptive and sensory training. Parents were included and trained to assist in continuing appropriate activities at home.

Results at end of the programme were compared with baseline measurements. Self-evaluation with validated scales for upper and lower extremities was used during the programme. Objective measures were number of push-ups, crunches, prone extension, step ups, and jump rope repetitions during 60 s. These were measured weekly with the patients self-counting numbers of repetitions. Pain was recorded as pain severity in last 24 h using a 0–10 numeric rating scale [1,2].

These relatively simple assessments of gain in functions clearly show that the multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programme at the Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital for Rehabilitation definitely improve physical functions as measured objectively and as assessed by the patients themselves.

A moderate reduction in pain severity in last 24 h from NRS 6.7/10 at baseline to 5.5/10 at discharge after 3 weeks is not impressive, but was as expected by the authors. The striking gain in functions as evident from self-reports and the objective measures of the 5 exercises, indicate that patients understand and realize that gain in function comes before reduction of pain. The planned continuation of individualized activities at home is expected to maintain and continue the improvement in daily functioning and age related appropriate activities, improving the patients’ quality of life, ability to cope and tolerate remaining pain [1].


DOI of refers to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.10.004.



Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Pox 4950 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway.

  1. Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

[1] Kempert H, Benore E, Heines R. Physical and occupational therapy outcomes: adolescents ‘change in functional abilities using objective measures and self-report. Scand J Pain 2017;14:60–6.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] McGrath PJ, Walco GA, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Brown MT, Davidson K, Eccelston C, Finley GA, Goldschneider K, Haverkos L, Hertz SH, Ljungman G, Palermo T, Rapport BA, Rhodes T, Schechter N, Scott J, Sethna N, Svensson OK, Stinson J, VonBaeyer CL, Walker L, Weisman S, White RE, Zajicek A, Zeltzer L, PedIMMPAC T. Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrentpain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations. J Pain 2008;9:771–83.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-01-01
Published in Print: 2017-01-01

© 2016 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Scandinavian Journal of Pain
  2. Editorial comment
  3. Patients with chronic neck-pain after trauma do not differ in type of symptoms and signs, but suffer more than patients with chronic neck pain without a traumatic onset
  4. Observational study
  5. Chronic neck pain patients with traumatic or non-traumatic onset: Differences in characteristics. A cross-sectional study
  6. Editorial Comment
  7. Re-enforcing therapeutic effect by positive expectations of pain-relief from our interventions
  8. Original experimental
  9. Effect of expectation on pain assessment of lower- and higher-intensity stimuli
  10. Editorial comment
  11. Objective methods for the assessment of the spinal and supraspinal effects of opioids
  12. Topical review
  13. Objective methods for the assessment of the spinal and supraspinal effects of opioids
  14. Editorial Comment
  15. Multi-target treatment of bone cancer pain using synergistic combinations of pharmacological compounds in experimental animals
  16. Original experimental
  17. Synergistic combinations of the dual enkephalinase inhibitor PL265 given orally with various analgesic compounds acting on different targets, in a murine model of cancer-induced bone pain
  18. Editorial comment
  19. Terminal cancer pain intractable by conventional pain management can be effectively relieved by intrathecal administration of a local anaesthetic plus an opioid and an alfa2-agonist into the cerebro-spinal-fluid
  20. Observational study
  21. Multimodal intrathecal analgesia in refractory cancer pain
  22. Editorial comment
  23. Treatment success in neck pain: The added predictive value of psychosocial variables in addition to clinical variables
  24. Observational study
  25. Treatment success in neck pain: The added predictive value of psychosocial variables in addition to clinical variables
  26. Editorial comment
  27. Why are some patients with chronic pain from anterior abdominal nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) refractory to peripheral treatment with neurectomy?
  28. Clinical pain research
  29. Treatment response and central pain processing in Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: An explorative study
  30. Editorial comment
  31. Gain in functions before pain reduction during intensive multidisciplinary paediatric pain rehabilitation programme
  32. Clinical pain research
  33. Physical and occupational therapy outcomes: Adolescents’ change in functional abilities using objective measures and self-report
  34. Editorial comment
  35. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): High risk of CRPS after trauma in another limb in patients who already have CRPS in one hand or foot: Lasting changes in neural pain modulating systems?
  36. Clinical pain research
  37. The risk of pain syndrome affecting a previously non-painful limb following trauma or surgery in patients with a history of complex regional pain syndrome
  38. Editorial Comment
  39. Positive affect could reduce the impact of pain
  40. Original experimental
  41. The buffering role of positive affect on the association between pain intensity and pain related outcomes
  42. Editorial comment
  43. The meaning and consequences of amputation and mastectomy from the perspective of pain and suffering – Lessons to be learned and relearned
  44. Clinical pain research
  45. The meaning and consequences of amputation and mastectomy from the perspective of pain and suffering
  46. Editorial comment
  47. Invasive intervention for “intractable” Complex Regional Pain Syndromes (CRPS)?
  48. Educational case report
  49. Intrathecal management of complex regional pain syndrome: A case report and literature
  50. Observational study
  51. Item response theory analysis of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
  52. Announcement
  53. Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain (SASP): Annual Meeting 2017
Heruntergeladen am 17.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.11.015/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen