Home Intrathecal management of complex regional pain syndrome: A case report and literature
Article Publicly Available

Intrathecal management of complex regional pain syndrome: A case report and literature

  • Jonathan M. Hagedorn EMAIL logo and George Atallah
Published/Copyright: January 1, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background and purpose

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a painful condition typically resulting from a traumatic event. Pain control in these patients is often difficult and requires a multimodal approach. Our objectives are to present a single intrathecal pain management regimen for CRPS and provide a literature review of intrathecal pain management options in CRPS.

Methods

Case report from an academic pain management clinic.

Case report

We present the case of a 29-year-old female with a past medical history of multiple lumbar spine surgeries and lumbar post-laminectomy syndrome who presented to clinic with CRPS type II of the bilateral lower extremities. After failing conservative measures, she underwent placement of a successful intrathecal drug delivery system.

Conclusion

The use of intrathecal medications is useful for pain control in CRPS patients.

Implications

We provide a framework for treatment of CRPS, which could be useful for practitioners dealing with this difficult and painful condition.

1 Introduction

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a painful condition typically resulting from a traumatic event. CRPS type I often follows a minor injury, while CRPS II follows a known nerve injury. Pain persists beyond the typical time period that one would expect from the initial injury, and may be accompanied by allodynia and hyperalgesia. In addition to pain, patients will often experience oedema and sympathetic dysfunction, seen clinically by changes in skin colour, temperature, sweating, and hair and nail growth [1].

Pain control in these patients is often difficult and will require a multidisciplinary approach. Pharmacotherapy, interventional procedures, and nonpharmacological coping skills have all proven to be beneficial in obtaining satisfactory pain scores in these patients [1].

2 Case description

We present the case of a 29-year-old female with a past medical history of multiple lumbar spine surgeries and lumbar post-laminectomy syndrome who presented to clinic with CRPS type II of the bilateral lower extremities causing severe neuropathic pain, skin discoloration, profound temperature changes, and oedema. Initially, she was treated with multiple oral agents, including opioids, tramadol, pregabalin, gabapentin, amitriptyline, duloxetine, and topiramate, but did poorly due to medication side effects and drug ineffectiveness. She then underwent a failed spinal cord stimulator trial. Following this, the decision was made to attempt intrathecal options and she received an intrathecal injection of 75mcg fentanyl which was successful. At that point, a Medtronic SynchroMed II programmable intrathecal drug delivery system was placed without complications and she was started on a 0.2 mg/day morphine infusion. At her two week follow-up visit her pain was improved though still suboptimal so an infusion of bupivacaine was initiated. Over the course of several clinic visits and dosing adjustments, the patient found pain control with 0.5897 mg/day morphine and 3.334 mg/day bupivacaine. At the last follow-up visit, five months after placement of the intrathecal drug delivery system, her pain continued to be substantially improved, and she was happy with the outcome, improved quality of life, and greater functionality.

3 Comment

Intrathecal drug delivery systems have been used for various indications since the 1980s. It was not until 1991 that the Food and Drug Administration approved a programmable implantable infusion pump. Since that time, the indications and medications used for intrathecal drug delivery have expanded. Currently, intrathecal pumps are used for both malignant and nonmalignant chronic pain conditions [2]. Indications for intrathecal pain management include patients with failed back surgery syndrome, spinal cord injury-induced spasticity, CRPS, chronic pancreatitis, neuropathies, and rheumatoid arthritis. However, before any intrathecal device can be implanted, the patient must undergo psychiatric evaluation since the presence of depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, or personality disorder has been associated with poorer outcomes following intrathecal medication administration [3]. In addition to the above contraindications, intrathecal pumps are not indicated in patients who are unable to have the pump refilled, require anticoagulation with inability to discontinue, have significant coagulopathies, are hemodynamically unstable, have cerebrospinal fluid outflow obstruction, are septic, have intracranial hypertension, or have an infection at the site of catheter or pump insertion [3].

Intrathecal medications along with the recommended maximum concentrations, initiation doses, maximum doses, and side effects can be found in Table 1 [2,4]. Medications are selected based on the patient’s past medical history and response to the screening trial. Only morphine, baclofen, and ziconotide are approved for intrathecal use, though a variety of medications are used today [5]. Morphine is the standard medication for intrathecal opioid initiation [2].

Table 1

Intrathecal medications and the recommended maximum concentrations, initiation doses, maximum doses, and side effects.

Medication Maximum concentration Initiation dose perday Maximum dose per day Side effects
Morphine 20 mg/ml 0.1–0.5 mg 15 mg Granuloma formation, peripheral oedema, hormonal changes, respiratory depression, immunosuppression
Hydromorphone 15 mg/ml 0.02–0.5 mg 10 mg Granuloma formation, peripheral oedema, hormonal changes
Ziconotide 100 mcg/ml 0.5–2.4 mcg 19.2mcg Increased risk of suicidality, psychiatric changes, dizziness, headache, sleep changes, motor weakness, urine retention
Fentanyl 10 mg/ml 25–75 mcg No known upper limit Granuloma formation
Bupivacaine 30 mg/ml 1–4mg 10–30mg Weakness, urine retention, hypotension, respiratory depression
Clonidine 1000 mcg/ml 40–100mcg 600–1000 mcg Hypotension, sedation, peripheral oedema, arrhythmia, rebound hypertension
Sufentanil 5 mg/ml 10–20 mcg No known upper limit Granuloma formation
Baclofen 2 mg/ml 50 mcg 2mg Weakness, hypotonia, sedation, constipation, erectile dysfunction, loss of sphincter control, respiratory depression
  1. Source: Reproduced with permission from Deer et al. [4].

While there are distinct side effects from the medications, there are some adverse events due to the catheter/pump system. Postoperative subarachnoid haemorrhage is an uncommon complication and risk increases with the use of anticoagulant agents. To reduce this risk, it is important to get a thorough and accurate medication history from the patient before proceeding with the procedure. Catheter displacement and persistent cerebrospinal fluid leakage has been seen in as many as 20% of patients [3]. Catheter breakage can be identified clinically by increasing pain or withdrawal symptoms. Infection is most commonly seen at the abdominal surgical site. This risk can be decreased by the use of strict sterile technique and prophylactic antibiotics. Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common organism identified [2]. Infection rates range from 2% to 5% [3].

The literature surrounding use of intrathecal therapies for CRPS largely consists of case reports. Kapural et al. in 2009 reported on seven cases of intrathecal ziconotide for the treatment of CRPS [6]. The patients had an age range from 14 to 52 years with a mean of 32 years. Six out of seven patients suffered from CRPS type I. All but one patient had never received intrathecal therapy before undergoing a successful intrathecal trial. Three of the seven patients had ziconotide monotherapy, while the four other patients received ziconotide plus an opioid. Five patients had a >30% improvement of their pain scores and increased activity levels. Four patients were able to wean off of the intrathecal pump and manage their pain with oral agents alone. Three patients had skin or oedema changes after ziconotide initiation, which resolved spontaneously with continued infusion. Four patients experienced urinary retention.

That same year, Munts et al. described the use of intrathecal glycine for pain and dystonia in CRPS [7]. Nineteen patients with CRPS type I had an intrathecal pump placed with infusion of glycine over a four week time period and normal saline over a different four week time period. They found no difference in pain scores or dystonia between the use of intrathecal glycine and normal saline, and reported that the use of intrathecal glycine was ineffective for pain control and dystonia in CRPS.

In 2013 van der Plas et al. discussed the efficacy of intrathecal baclofen on different pain qualities in CRPS [8]. Every three months the 10 pain qualities of the neuropathic pain scale were evaluated in 42 patients receiving intrathecal baclofen. Results showed a significant improvement in global intense, dull, and sharp pains during the first six months. After this time period, scores plateaued despite increases in baclofen dosing.

Rauck et al. in 2015 reported on the use of intrathecal clonidine and adenosine in CRPS [9]. Twenty-two patients received either intrathecal clonidine (100 mcg) or adenosine (2 mg). They found no difference in pain scores between the two groups 2 h after injection. However, clonidine was associated with a greater reduction in pain scores over time. Both drugs reduced areas of hyperalgesia and allodynia by approximately 30%. Both medications were also found to inhibit induction of clinical hypersensitivity.

4 Conclusion

The use of long-term intrathecal infusion pumps is a relatively recent advancement in chronic pain management. Success with intrathecal drugs depend on a thorough understanding of the pain condition, appropriate patient selection, medication trialling, and discussions with the patient regarding appropriate expectations. The risks and complications associated with this treatment regimen make it appropriate for highly selected patients only. We present a case of intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine to treat CRPS, which to our knowledge has not been reported in the literature.

Highlights

  • Complex regional pain syndrome is a painful condition resulting from trauma.

  • Intrathecal drug delivery systems can provide significant pain relief.

  • Severe side effects from the medications and hardware failure are possible.

  • Only morphine, baclofen, and ziconotide are approved for intrathecal use.

  • Intrathecal pumps should only be used on highly selected patients.


DOI of refers to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.12.006.



Tel.: +1 713 798 7356; fax: +1 713 798 6374.

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

[1] Hsu ES. Practical management of complex regional pain syndrome. Am J Ther 2009;16:147–54.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Ghafoor VL, Epshteyn M, Carlson GH, Terhaar DM, Charry O, Phelps PK. Intrathecal drug therapy for long-term pain management. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2007;64:2447–61.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bottros MM, Christo PJ. Current perspectives on intrathecal drug delivery. J Pain Res 2014;7:615–26.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Deer TR, Prager J, Levy R, Rathmell J, Buchser E, Burton A, Caraway D, Cousins M, De Andres J, Diwan S, Erdek M, Grigsby E, Huntoon M, Jacobs M, Kim P, Kumar K, Leong M, Liem L, McDowell G, Panchal S, Rauck R, Saulino M, Sitzman T, Staats P, Willis K, Witt W, Yaksh T, Mekhail N. Polyanalgesic concensus conference 2012: recommendations for the management of pain by intrathecal (intraspinal) drug delivery: report of an interdisciplinary expert panel. Neuromodulation 2012;15:436–66.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bolash R, Mekhail N. Intrathecal pain pumps: indications, patient selection, techniques, and outcomes. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2014;25:735–42.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Kapural L, Lokey K, Leong MS, Fiekowsky S, Stanton-Hicks M, Sapienza-Crawford A, Webster L. Intrathecal ziconotide for complex regional pain syndrome: seven case reports. Pain Pract 2009;9:296–303.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Munts AG, van der Plas AA, Voormolen JH, Marinus J, Teepe-Twiss I, Onkenhout W, van Gerven J, van Hilten JJ. Intrathecal glycine for pain and dystonia in complex regional pain syndrome. Pain 2009;146:199–204.Search in Google Scholar

[8] van der Plas AA, van Rijn MA, Marinus J, Putter H, van Hilten JJ. Efficacy of intrathecal baclofen on different pain qualities in complex regional pain syndrome. Anesth Analg 2013;116:211–5.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Rauck RL, North J, Eisenach JC. Intrathecal clonidine and adenosine: effects on pain and sensory processing in patients with chronic regional pain syndrome. Pain 2015;156:88–95.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-05-03
Revised: 2016-05-24
Accepted: 2016-05-31
Published Online: 2017-01-01
Published in Print: 2017-01-01

© 2016 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Scandinavian Journal of Pain
  2. Editorial comment
  3. Patients with chronic neck-pain after trauma do not differ in type of symptoms and signs, but suffer more than patients with chronic neck pain without a traumatic onset
  4. Observational study
  5. Chronic neck pain patients with traumatic or non-traumatic onset: Differences in characteristics. A cross-sectional study
  6. Editorial Comment
  7. Re-enforcing therapeutic effect by positive expectations of pain-relief from our interventions
  8. Original experimental
  9. Effect of expectation on pain assessment of lower- and higher-intensity stimuli
  10. Editorial comment
  11. Objective methods for the assessment of the spinal and supraspinal effects of opioids
  12. Topical review
  13. Objective methods for the assessment of the spinal and supraspinal effects of opioids
  14. Editorial Comment
  15. Multi-target treatment of bone cancer pain using synergistic combinations of pharmacological compounds in experimental animals
  16. Original experimental
  17. Synergistic combinations of the dual enkephalinase inhibitor PL265 given orally with various analgesic compounds acting on different targets, in a murine model of cancer-induced bone pain
  18. Editorial comment
  19. Terminal cancer pain intractable by conventional pain management can be effectively relieved by intrathecal administration of a local anaesthetic plus an opioid and an alfa2-agonist into the cerebro-spinal-fluid
  20. Observational study
  21. Multimodal intrathecal analgesia in refractory cancer pain
  22. Editorial comment
  23. Treatment success in neck pain: The added predictive value of psychosocial variables in addition to clinical variables
  24. Observational study
  25. Treatment success in neck pain: The added predictive value of psychosocial variables in addition to clinical variables
  26. Editorial comment
  27. Why are some patients with chronic pain from anterior abdominal nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) refractory to peripheral treatment with neurectomy?
  28. Clinical pain research
  29. Treatment response and central pain processing in Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: An explorative study
  30. Editorial comment
  31. Gain in functions before pain reduction during intensive multidisciplinary paediatric pain rehabilitation programme
  32. Clinical pain research
  33. Physical and occupational therapy outcomes: Adolescents’ change in functional abilities using objective measures and self-report
  34. Editorial comment
  35. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): High risk of CRPS after trauma in another limb in patients who already have CRPS in one hand or foot: Lasting changes in neural pain modulating systems?
  36. Clinical pain research
  37. The risk of pain syndrome affecting a previously non-painful limb following trauma or surgery in patients with a history of complex regional pain syndrome
  38. Editorial Comment
  39. Positive affect could reduce the impact of pain
  40. Original experimental
  41. The buffering role of positive affect on the association between pain intensity and pain related outcomes
  42. Editorial comment
  43. The meaning and consequences of amputation and mastectomy from the perspective of pain and suffering – Lessons to be learned and relearned
  44. Clinical pain research
  45. The meaning and consequences of amputation and mastectomy from the perspective of pain and suffering
  46. Editorial comment
  47. Invasive intervention for “intractable” Complex Regional Pain Syndromes (CRPS)?
  48. Educational case report
  49. Intrathecal management of complex regional pain syndrome: A case report and literature
  50. Observational study
  51. Item response theory analysis of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
  52. Announcement
  53. Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain (SASP): Annual Meeting 2017
Downloaded on 17.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.05.040/html
Scroll to top button