Startseite Positive affect could reduce the impact of pain
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Positive affect could reduce the impact of pain

  • Silje Endresen Reme EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. Januar 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

In this issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Pain, Thong and coworkers investigate the buffering role of positive affect on the association between pain and pain-related outcomes [1]. Through a study of 101 patients with back or knee pain, they were able to demonstrate that more positive affect weakened the association between pain intensity, negative affect, and depression. Could positive affect be an unrecognized way to reduce the impact of pain for the individual chronic pain sufferer?

1 Target the consequences of chronic pain, not the pain itself

Chronic pain is often associated with negative affect in various types and forms, the most commonly reported being depression [2]. Furthermore, the consequences of pain may for many patients be a bigger burden than the pain itself. Qualitative studies lend support to this notion. In a recent phenomenological study the patients emphasized that it was not the physical pain itself but the psychosocial consequences – distress, loneliness, lost identity, and low quality of life – that bothered them the most [3]. If these reports are representative for the large group of chronic pain sufferers, larger efforts should be directed towards limiting the consequences of pain rather than trying to reduce the pain itself in patients with chronic pain. The paper by Thong and coworkers is a direct response to this gap through their demonstration of positive affect as a way to buffer the negative consequences of pain.

2 From pathogenesis to salutogenesis

Positive affect may be an undervalued asset in both pain rehabilitation and pain self-management. Although most clinical approaches aim to enhance positive affect indirectly, few treatments target positive affect directly. The most frequently used treatments in medicine and rehabilitation are based on a pathology model, where focus lies on reducing symptoms and alleviate pain. A different perspective has, however, been proposed based on Antonovsky’s earlier writings, resulting in the salutogenic model [4]. Here, focus is targeted towards tracing the origins of health and well-being rather than the causes of illness and disease. A similar theoretical perspective is offered by Thong and coworkers and involves Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build theory, where positive affect is assumed to build enduring personal resources that can function as reserves to be drawn on later to manage future threats[5].

3 Facilitating positive affect

The study has some limitations that the authors themselves fully acknowledge. First and foremost, the study population is relatively small and based on a convenience sample, thus limiting generalizability to larger groups of people with chronic pain. Further, the cross sectional nature of the data precludes any causal conclusions about the associations. The study therefor needs replications, both within the same patient group, but also across other groups of pain patients.

Nevertheless, if the findings are replicated, they entail important clinical implications. If positive affect is indeed a significant buffer between pain and pain-related outcomes, amplifying and facilitating positive affect in pain patients could be one way to improve the lives of the millions of people suffering from chronic pain. It could also open up for more “positive psychology” oriented interventions in the treatment of chronic pain, which inherently has a larger focus on the enhancement of positive affect. Clearly, we should not settle with the current psychosocial pain treatments, given the modest effect sizes produced by them [6]. A shift in perspective appears to be needed, and the one offered by Thong and coworkers could be a significant avenue to explore further.

In conclusion, the paper offers new insights about the buffering role of positive affect on pain-related outcomes. If the findings hold true in future replications, they clearly should result in clinical implications such as targeting positive affect to a larger degree in pain self-management and pain rehabilitation.


DOI of refers to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.09.008



Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

  1. Conflict of interest

    Conflict of interest Statement: None declared.

References

[1] Thong ISK, Tan G, Jensen MP. The buffering role of positive affect on the association between pain intensity and pain related outcomes. Scand J Pain 2017;14:91–7.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Fishbain DA, Cutler R, Rosomoff HL, Rosomoff RS. Chronic pain-associated depression: antecedent or consequence of chronic pain? A review. Clin J Pain 1997;13:116–37.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Ojala T, Hakkinen A, Karppinen J, Sipila K, Suutama T, Piirainen A. Chronic pain affects the whole person – a phenomenological study. Disabil Rehabil 2015;37:363–71.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Antonovsky A. Health stress and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1979.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol 2001;56: 218–26.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Williams AC, Eccleston C, Morley S. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:pCd007407.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-01-01
Published in Print: 2017-01-01

© 2016 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Scandinavian Journal of Pain
  2. Editorial comment
  3. Patients with chronic neck-pain after trauma do not differ in type of symptoms and signs, but suffer more than patients with chronic neck pain without a traumatic onset
  4. Observational study
  5. Chronic neck pain patients with traumatic or non-traumatic onset: Differences in characteristics. A cross-sectional study
  6. Editorial Comment
  7. Re-enforcing therapeutic effect by positive expectations of pain-relief from our interventions
  8. Original experimental
  9. Effect of expectation on pain assessment of lower- and higher-intensity stimuli
  10. Editorial comment
  11. Objective methods for the assessment of the spinal and supraspinal effects of opioids
  12. Topical review
  13. Objective methods for the assessment of the spinal and supraspinal effects of opioids
  14. Editorial Comment
  15. Multi-target treatment of bone cancer pain using synergistic combinations of pharmacological compounds in experimental animals
  16. Original experimental
  17. Synergistic combinations of the dual enkephalinase inhibitor PL265 given orally with various analgesic compounds acting on different targets, in a murine model of cancer-induced bone pain
  18. Editorial comment
  19. Terminal cancer pain intractable by conventional pain management can be effectively relieved by intrathecal administration of a local anaesthetic plus an opioid and an alfa2-agonist into the cerebro-spinal-fluid
  20. Observational study
  21. Multimodal intrathecal analgesia in refractory cancer pain
  22. Editorial comment
  23. Treatment success in neck pain: The added predictive value of psychosocial variables in addition to clinical variables
  24. Observational study
  25. Treatment success in neck pain: The added predictive value of psychosocial variables in addition to clinical variables
  26. Editorial comment
  27. Why are some patients with chronic pain from anterior abdominal nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) refractory to peripheral treatment with neurectomy?
  28. Clinical pain research
  29. Treatment response and central pain processing in Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: An explorative study
  30. Editorial comment
  31. Gain in functions before pain reduction during intensive multidisciplinary paediatric pain rehabilitation programme
  32. Clinical pain research
  33. Physical and occupational therapy outcomes: Adolescents’ change in functional abilities using objective measures and self-report
  34. Editorial comment
  35. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): High risk of CRPS after trauma in another limb in patients who already have CRPS in one hand or foot: Lasting changes in neural pain modulating systems?
  36. Clinical pain research
  37. The risk of pain syndrome affecting a previously non-painful limb following trauma or surgery in patients with a history of complex regional pain syndrome
  38. Editorial Comment
  39. Positive affect could reduce the impact of pain
  40. Original experimental
  41. The buffering role of positive affect on the association between pain intensity and pain related outcomes
  42. Editorial comment
  43. The meaning and consequences of amputation and mastectomy from the perspective of pain and suffering – Lessons to be learned and relearned
  44. Clinical pain research
  45. The meaning and consequences of amputation and mastectomy from the perspective of pain and suffering
  46. Editorial comment
  47. Invasive intervention for “intractable” Complex Regional Pain Syndromes (CRPS)?
  48. Educational case report
  49. Intrathecal management of complex regional pain syndrome: A case report and literature
  50. Observational study
  51. Item response theory analysis of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire
  52. Announcement
  53. Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain (SASP): Annual Meeting 2017
Heruntergeladen am 17.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.11.002/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen