Home Studies on the structural, thermal, and dielectric properties of fabricated Nylon 6,9/CaCu3Ti4O12 nanocomposites
Article Open Access

Studies on the structural, thermal, and dielectric properties of fabricated Nylon 6,9/CaCu3Ti4O12 nanocomposites

  • Ramaswami Sachidanandan Ernest Ravindran , Paramanandam Thomas and Sahadevan Renganathan EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 15, 2015

Abstract

Nylon 6,9/CaCu3Ti4O12 (CCTO) nanocrystal composites with relatively high dielectric permittivity (220 at 100 Hz) were fabricated by melt mixing followed by hot pressing. The CCTO nanoceramics were synthesized using the oxalate precursor route, and the transmission electron microscopy studies exhibited that the crystallites are in the range of 20–200 nm. The nanocomposites were characterized using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and impedance analyzer to study their structural, thermal, and dielectric properties. The introduction of CCTO nanoparticles into the matrix had influenced the thermal properties. The effective dielectric permittivity of the nanocomposite increased by the augmentation of CCTO content in the Nylon 6,9. Our experimental outcomes showed that the fixed dielectric permittivity of such two-phase composite was established above 200 when the CCTO concentration was closer to its percolation threshold. The room temperature dielectric permittivity as high as 220 at 100 Hz has been achieved when the CCTO content increased to 58 vol% in the polymer and this was increased to 3845 at 150°C. The increase in AC conductivity with the increase in the CCTO content in the polymer matrix supported the hopping of the charge carrier conduction mechanism.

1 Introduction

Universal electronic systems consist of both active and passive components. Among the passive components, the capacitor plays an important role due to its variety of functions, which includes storing, decoupling, bypassing, filtering, and timing. Although ceramics possess very high dielectric permittivity, they are brittle and suffer from poor mechanical strength, leading to the failure of the device. Owing to the continuous development towards the miniaturization of electronic devices, high dielectric permittivity polymer-ceramic composites have become promising materials for embedded capacitor applications. Hence, composite materials associated with high dielectric permittivity and breakdown strength to meet high volume efficiency and energy storage could be fabricated by combining the merits of both the polymers and the ceramics [1], [2], [3], [4].

In recent years, there are several investigations on the significance on high permittivity materials, particularly flexible composite materials made up of ceramic as a filler and polymer as a matrix for such applications. To achieve high permittivity, ferroelectric ceramics, such as Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 and Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3, were used [5], [6], [7]. Because the lead present in these ceramics is not environment friendly, lead-free ceramics, such as barium titanate [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] and CaCu3Ti4O12 (CCTO) [14], [15], have been used as fillers for the development of high dielectric permittivity ceramic-polymer composites [6], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27].

The CCTO ceramic has been used as a filler in various polymers, such as polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)-trifluoroethylene [16], epoxy [17], [18], [19], polyaniline [20], polystyrene [21], PVDF [23], [24], and poly(methylmethacrylate) [25], [26], [27], to explore the possibility of obtaining new-generation composites associated with high permittivity for capacitor applications. It is generally observed that the permittivity has increased as the CCTO content increased in the polymer matrix [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. However, by incorporating the highest possible volume fraction of CCTO crystallites into the polymer matrix, the effective permittivity that could be achieved is lower than that of ceramics and permittivity as high as 740 at 1 kHz has been achieved [6, 27]. The reason for increased low-frequency dispersion was attributed to high interfacial polarization triggered by high dielectric loss associated with CCTO [6]. The Nylon 6,9 is an engineering thermoplastic polymer with ferroelectric behavior and high thermal properties close to odd polyamides [28] and has been used in electrical applications [29]. The presence of an odd number of carbon atoms in constitutive unit improves the electroactive properties, and the presence of extra methylene groups in Nylon 6,9 improves the water resistance, dimensional stability, and electrical property in the system [29], [30]. The electrical properties of polymers can be altered by the addition of inorganic nanofillers due to the large surface area associated with the nanoparticles [31]. However, the final properties of nanocomposites usually depend on the method of preparation, particle size, and the effective dispersion of ceramic particles in the polymer matrix [32], [33], [34], [35]. As there are no reports pertaining to the development of composites based on Nylon 6,9, one could chose Nylon 6,9 combined with giant permittivity ceramics such as CCTO for the fabrication of composites with high permittivity.

In this present investigation, the synthesis of CCTO nanoceramic and the fabrication of Nylon 6,9/CCTO nanocomposite by melt mixing followed by hot pressing have been carried out. These composites were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and impedance analyzer to study their structural, thermal, and dielectric properties.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Synthesis of nano-CCTO ceramic

The CCTO nanoparticle was synthesized using the complex oxalate precursor route [36]. For the synthesis of CCTO nanocrystallites, chemicals such as TiCl4 (titanium tetrachloride, 99.98%; Merck, Germany), CaCO3 (calcium carbonate; BDH; A. R. grade, India), CuCl (cupric chloride; Fluka; proanalyse grade, India), oxalic acid (S.D. Fine Chemicals; analytical grade, Mumbai, India), and acetone (S.D. Fine Chemicals; analytical grade, Mumbai, India) were involved. In a typical preparation, titania gel was prepared from the aqueous TiOCl2 (0.05 m) by adding NH4OH (Merck, A. R. grade, Mumbai, India) (aqueous; at 25°C) until the pH reached 8.0, and NH4Cl was washed off on a filter funnel with Whatman filter paper using double-distilled water. The washing was continued several times until all NH4Cl content was fully removed. To this gel, 0.4 or 0.8 mole of oxalic acid (2 m solution) was added and then stirred continuously to form the clear solution. Then, the clear solution was kept warm (~40°C). CaCO3 was added to the obtained clear solution, in aliquots, and stirred well to obtain a clear aqueous solution. The aqueous solution containing titanyl oxalic acid together with calcium titanyl oxalate remained clear without any precipitate formation. This solution was cooled at 10°C in which CuCl dissolved in acetone along with water (80:20 volume ratio) was then added and stirred continuously. Subsequently, the formed precipitate was then filtered and washed several times with acetone to make it chloride-free and then dried in air atmospheric temperature to evaporate acetone. The precursor was isothermally heated at approximately 700°C to get nanocrystallites (20–200 nm) of phase-pure calcium copper titanate (CCTO) as confirmed using XRD and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies.

2.2 Preparation of Nylon 6,9/CCTO nanocomposite

Nylon 6,9 having a molecular weight (Mw) of 60,000 g/mol was used as matrix material (purchased from Nanoglobal Technology, Mumbai, India). For the fabrication of nanocomposites, initially Nylon 6,9 granules were heated at 220°C until the Nylon 6,9 granules were thoroughly melted in a Brabender plasticorder (Model PLE331, Germany). The CCTO nanoparticles (0–58% by volume) were slowly added to the melted polymer material and mixed for approximately 30 min with each composite at the same temperature for the complete distribution of CCTO nanoparticles into the polymer matrix. The mixture obtained from the Brabender plasticorder was then hot pressed at the same temperature to obtain a sheet of 150 mm2 with 0.5 mm thickness. To get flexible composites that could be made into a variety of shapes, the ceramic loading was restricted to a maximum of 58 vol%.

2.3 Characterization

To analyze the structure, size, and surface morphology of nano-CCTO, an XPERT-PRO diffractometer (XRD; Philips, The Netherlands), an FEI-Tecnai TEM (G-F30; Hillsboro, OR, USA) and an SEM (Cambridge Stereoscan S-360) were used, respectively. The thermal behavior of the composite was examined by TGA using TA Instrument (UK; Model TGA Q500). TGA was conducted in nitrogen atmosphere at a flow rate of 60 ml/min and a heating rate of 10°C/min. DSC (Mettler Toledo; Model DSC 821e, USA) was employed at a heating rate of 10°C/min under nitrogen atmosphere and a flow rate of 60 ml/min using aluminum pan to observe the glass transition and melting temperature of the composites. LCR meter (Model HP4194A, USA) was used for the capacitance measurements as a function of frequency (100 Hz–1 MHz).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 XRD

Figure 1A–F shows the XRD patterns obtained for the as-synthesized CCTO nanoparticles, pure Nylon 6,9, and Nylon 6,9/CCTO nanocomposites with 10, 20, 38, and 58 vol% CCTO. The XRD pattern (Figure 1B) indicates that the as-synthesized CCTO nanoparticles are of a single phase with a cubic pervoskite-related structure [6]. The XRD analysis for the pure Nylon 6,9 (Figure 1C) revealed a crystalline structure associated with the broad peak of 2θ centered around 22.4. In the Nylon 6,9/CCTO nanocomposites (Figure 1D–F), the diffraction peaks pertaining to both the Nylon 6,9 and CCTO were unchanged only with a small variation in the intensity for Nylon 6,9. However, for the Nylon 6,9/CCTO-58 vol% nanocomposite (Figure 1F), the diffraction pattern pertaining to the Nylon 6,9 peak disappeared, which is due to the predominant amounts of CCTO present in the nanocomposite. The appearance of peak corresponding to pure CCTO was observed in Nylon 6,9/CCTO-58 vol% nanocomposite. The intensities of diffraction peaks were slightly increased with the increase in CCTO content in the composite.

Figure 1: XRD diffraction patterns: (A) CCTO JCPDS, (B) as-prepared CCTO nanoceramic, (C) pure Nylon 6,9, (D) Nylon 6,9+CCTO-5 vol%, (E) Nylon 6,9+CCTO-20 vol%, and (F) Nylon 6,9+CCTO-58 vol%.
Figure 1:

XRD diffraction patterns: (A) CCTO JCPDS, (B) as-prepared CCTO nanoceramic, (C) pure Nylon 6,9, (D) Nylon 6,9+CCTO-5 vol%, (E) Nylon 6,9+CCTO-20 vol%, and (F) Nylon 6,9+CCTO-58 vol%.

3.2 TEM and SEM analyses

Figure 2 presents the bright-field TEM images of the phase-pure CCTO powders obtained from the thermal decomposition of the oxalate precursor. There are particles with curved edges and corners. The size of the particles, as measured by the intercept method from the micrographs, is in the range of 20–200 nm. Figure 3 shows the SEM image (cross-sectional view) of the broken sample of Nylon 6,9+CCTO-58 vol% nanocomposite. The SEM image clearly indicated that the CCTO nanoparticles are agglomerated in the Nylon 6,9 polymer matrix.

Figure 2: Bright-field TEM images of CCTO nanocrystals with dimensions ranging from 20 to 200 nm.
Figure 2:

Bright-field TEM images of CCTO nanocrystals with dimensions ranging from 20 to 200 nm.

Figure 3: SEM micrograph of Nylon 6,9/CCTO-58 vol% nanocomposite.
Figure 3:

SEM micrograph of Nylon 6,9/CCTO-58 vol% nanocomposite.

3.3 DSC

Figure 4 shows the DSC thermograms recorded for the Nylon 6,9 and Nylon 6,9+CCTO composites (0–58 vol%) in nitrogen atmosphere (flow rate 60 ml/min) at a heating rate of 10°C/min. There are three main thermal events such as glass transition temperature (Tg), a cold crystallization, and a melting around occurring for both pure Nylon 6,9 and nanocomposites.

Figure 4: DSC traces: (A) pure Nylon 6,9 and Nylon 6,9+CCTO-(B) 3, (C) 0, (D) 10, (E) 14, (F) 20, (G) 38, and (H) 58 vol%.
Figure 4:

DSC traces: (A) pure Nylon 6,9 and Nylon 6,9+CCTO-(B) 3, (C) 0, (D) 10, (E) 14, (F) 20, (G) 38, and (H) 58 vol%.

Nylon 6,9 had a double melting at the endothermic region with a weak endotherm in the range of 175°C–186°C combined with an exotherm at 179°C and a main endothermic range from 201°C to 215°C. After the addition of CCTO nanoparticles varying from 0 to 58 vol%, the Tg decreased with respect to the pure Nylon 6,9, and the value was reduced from 41°C to 40°C. The presence of CCTO nanoparticles induces the thermal interaction with the matrix material and reduces its Tg by changing the phase from one form to another form in crystalline structure. It is well established that the Tg either increases or decreases depending on the type of filler, its morphology, and the intercrystallite distance [6], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28].

The crystallization is influenced by the length of the repeated units and by the fact that Nylon 6,9 is an even-odd polyamide. For crystallization, the ability of the chains to form hydrogen bond to crystallize by the part was played by the even-odd status. The n-type polyamides with even number for n>8 generally crystallize in the γ phase. Either α or β phase is possible in polyamides 4 and 6, whereas the α phase is their foremost structure. The m,n-type polyamides with even-even carbon atom numbers mainly crystallize in the α phase; however, the even-odd, odd-odd, and odd-even numbers crystallize generally in the γ phase. Due to high distortions during the production process, the α phase can occur [37], [38]. As reported [36], [39], Nylon 6,9 has a greater propensity than that of other polyamides to crystallize mainly in metastable form. The Nylon 6,9 also has a stronger tendency than Nylon 6 to crystallize in the high temperature stable form. For Nylon 6,9/CCTO-58 vol% composites, the crystallization temperature of Nylon 6,9 decreased from 182.29°C to 180.29°C due to the presence of a predominant amount of CCTO nanocrystallites in Nylon 6,9.

3.4 TGA

Figure 5 shows the thermogravimetric curve recorded for the pure Nylon 6,9 and the Nylon 6,9+CCTO nanocomposites (0–58 vol%) in nitrogen atmosphere (flow rate 60 ml/min) at a heating rate of 10°C/min. The decomposition started gradually at 250°C, and the first weight loss temperature of thermal degradation was 505°C, which was due to the presence of the matrix material. Thereafter, a slight weight loss was observed, which started from 506°C to 580°C, which was due to the presence of Nylon 6,9 materials that require more temperature to achieve loss, and interaction bonding appeared from pure Nylon 6,9 to 38 vol% CCTO content in the composite and Nylon 6,9 disappeared when the CCTO content increased to 58 vol%. With the addition of 3–38 vol% CCTO nanoparticles, the weight loss was the same for both steps and thereafter, leaving behind the CCTO nanoparticles as residue. The decomposition temperature of onset (temperature at 10% weight loss) [23] was increased for 3 vol% CCTO in the nanocomposites under study. The onset decomposition temperature accompanied by 10% weight loss was 454.64°C for Nylon 6,9+CCTO-3 vol% and 445.96°C for the Nylon 6,9+CCTO-58 vol%. For the pure Nylon 6,9, the onset decomposition temperature was 452°C. The decrease in onset temperature for the composite may lead to less stability of the composite at high temperature.

Figure 5: TGA thermograph: (A) pure Nylon 6,9 and Nylon 6,9+CCTO-(B) 3, (C) 5, (D) 10, (E) 14, (F) 20, (G) 38, and (H) 58 vol%.
Figure 5:

TGA thermograph: (A) pure Nylon 6,9 and Nylon 6,9+CCTO-(B) 3, (C) 5, (D) 10, (E) 14, (F) 20, (G) 38, and (H) 58 vol%.

3.5 Frequency dependence of room temperature dielectric permittivity

The frequency dependence of the dielectric permittivity of the composite with different CCTO contents is shown in Figure 6A and B. As expected, the effective dielectric permittivity (εeff) increased with the increase in CCTO content in Nylon 6,9 at all frequencies under study. The εeff was obtained more than that of pure Nylon 6,9 but much lower than that of pure CCTO. The low-frequency dispersion increased with the increase in the CCTO content. The dielectric properties also partly originate from the electrode/sample contact effects, which depend on the surface resistivity of the samples [37], and the dielectric constant values vary with the electrode materials used [38]. Hence, to decipher the dielectric contribution, dielectric measurements were carried out using both silver and gold electrode samples, and the same is shown in Figure 7A and B. It is clearly visible that there is a difference in the dielectric behavior between the silver and gold electrode samples, indicating that the low-frequency dispersion is attributed to the space charge effect, which is due to the conductivity differences between the sample surface and the electrodes. The silver electrode samples show enhanced dielectric constant value compared to that of gold electrode samples (Figure 7A). Similarly, dielectric loss also varies with the electrode materials used (Figure 7B). From earlier studies, Nylon 6,9 was reported with three different polymorphisms designated as α, β, and γ, which were stable at room temperature, as discussed in Section 3.3 [36], [39], [40], [41]. The Nylon 6,9/CCTO nanocomposite had a low dielectric permittivity when compared to CCTO. This may be due to the following facts apart from the connectivity and particle size effects. At room temperature, the dielectric permittivity of pure Nylon 6,9 was 6 at 100 Hz and was reduced to 4 when the frequency was increased to 10 MHz. With the addition of CCTO into the polymer matrix, the dielectric permittivity was increased to 7 at 100 Hz for 3 vol% CCTO nanocomposites. The increase in the volume percentage of CCTO nanoparticles into the polymer matrix increased the dielectric permittivity to 25 for the maximum 20 vol% CCTO in the nanocomposite. Hence, a further increase in the CCTO content to 58 vol% has exhibited dielectric permittivity as high as 220 at 100 Hz, which is very high compared to that of PVDF/CCTO composite system [20] but less compared to that of PANI/CCTO nanocomposite system [16]. The dielectric loss for the pure Nylon 6,9 is 0.13 at 100 Hz and the composite dielectric loss is approximately 0.99 at 100 Hz.

Figure 6: Frequency-dependent (A) permittivity and (B) dielectric loss (tan δ) of Nylon 6,9/CCTO nanocomposite as a function of volume percent of CCTO at room temperature.
Figure 6:

Frequency-dependent (A) permittivity and (B) dielectric loss (tan δ) of Nylon 6,9/CCTO nanocomposite as a function of volume percent of CCTO at room temperature.

Figure 7: Frequency-dependent behavior of (A) dielectric constant and (B) dielectric loss of Nylon 6,9/CCTO-58 vol% composite using various electrode material at 300 K.
Figure 7:

Frequency-dependent behavior of (A) dielectric constant and (B) dielectric loss of Nylon 6,9/CCTO-58 vol% composite using various electrode material at 300 K.

The variation of dielectric permittivity at room temperature and 10 kHz for the Nylon 6,9/CCTO composite as a function of the volume percent of CCTO content is shown in Figure 8. The dielectric permittivity increased slowly up with the addition of 20 vol% CCTO nanocomposite, and with the further addition of CCTO, the dielectric permittivity was enhanced with more slope. Such behavior of the composite material could be described based on the percolation phenomenon, and this is called the percolation threshold [42], [43]. An increase in the dielectric permittivity of composites in the surrounding area of the percolation threshold was described by the well-known power law. It was broadly understood that, in the case of a percolative system, the ultrahigh dielectric permittivity of composites was not a direct concern of intrinsic dielectric permittivity value of fillers and host polymer as in the case of ceramic-polymer composites. The percolative system was very much concerned about the effect of interfacial polarization and high surface area due to the connection between the conductive particle clusters near the percolation threshold [44], [45], [46], [47], [48]. The interface between the matrix and filler is the most important in these systems, which can be made by controlling the variables such as the size and shape of fillers, the type of matrix, and the preparation process. The above-mentioned factors are interrelated with one another to develop a new material with high dielectric permittivity (k). The difference in the dielectric permittivity in the community of the percolation threshold could be explained based on the power law as given in Equation (1) [49], [50]:

Figure 8: Both permittivity and loss to their corresponding volume percent of filler addition at room temperature.
Figure 8:

Both permittivity and loss to their corresponding volume percent of filler addition at room temperature.

(1)εeffαε1(fc-fCCTO)-q

where εeff and ε1 are the dielectric permittivity of the composite and the matrix (6.4 at 100 Hz), respectively. fc is the percolation threshold, fCCTO is the volume fraction of the CCTO in the nanocomposite, and q is the critical exponent (q~1). Using Equation (1), there was a good understanding between the obtained and experimental values of εeff. The percolation threshold value was slightly more than that of the predicated value for the 58 vol% CCTO nanocomposites. The εeff obtained in the nanocomposite near the percolation threshold was 220 at 100 Hz (Figure 9). The εeff of the composite materials for higher frequency (10 kHz) was also measured using Equation (1) and was almost same as the experimental values (also plotted in Figure 9).

Figure 9: Variation of εeff (100 Hz and 10 kHz) of Nylon 6,9/CCTO nanocomposite as a function of volume fraction.Dark shaded denotes the fit of the experimental data using power law and cone denotes the experimental data.
Figure 9:

Variation of εeff (100 Hz and 10 kHz) of Nylon 6,9/CCTO nanocomposite as a function of volume fraction.

Dark shaded denotes the fit of the experimental data using power law and cone denotes the experimental data.

3.6 Temperature and frequency dependence of dielectric permittivity

The dielectric properties of Nylon 6,9/CCTO-58 vol% nanocomposites were studied with temperature dependence as shown in Figure 10A and B. The dielectric permittivity of Nylon 6,9/CCTO-58 vol% nanocomposite at room temperature was 220 at 100 Hz, which was increased to 3845 at 150°C (100 Hz). The value at 1 kHz was approximately 134 at room temperature, which was increased to 659 when the temperature increased to 150°C. The increase in dielectric permittivity with the increase in temperature decreased with the increase in the frequency, as shown in the Figure 10A. The most visible change was noticed in dielectric permittivity at the low-frequency region (100 Hz–10 kHz). This may be due to the influence of the space charge effect, which was due to the conductivity differences between the sample surface and the electrodes, as discussed in Section 3.5. The dielectric loss for the Nylon 6,9/CCTO-58 vol% nanocomposite is shown in Figure 10B. The increase in the temperature may lead to the increase in the dielectric loss.

Figure 10: Frequency-dependent (A) permittivity and (B) dielectric loss (tan δ) at various temperatures for Nylon 6,9+CCTO-58 vol% nanocomposite.
Figure 10:

Frequency-dependent (A) permittivity and (B) dielectric loss (tan δ) at various temperatures for Nylon 6,9+CCTO-58 vol% nanocomposite.

The variation of AC conductivity as a function of frequency for the composite material of different volume percent at room temperature is shown in Figure 11. The AC conductivity (σ) was derived from the dielectric data using Equation (2):

Figure 11: Frequency-dependent AC conductivity of Nylon 6,9+CCTO nanocomposite as a function of volume percent of CCTO-dependent AC conductivity for different volume percent of CCTO.
Figure 11:

Frequency-dependent AC conductivity of Nylon 6,9+CCTO nanocomposite as a function of volume percent of CCTO-dependent AC conductivity for different volume percent of CCTO.

(2)σ=εoωε

where εo=8.85×10-12 F/m is the dielectric permittivity of the free space and ω=2πf is the angular frequency. From the figure, the AC conductivity of the composite was increased with the increase in frequency as the CCTO content increased [49], [51]. This is due to the interfacial polarization and the increase in charge density of CCTO nanoparticles as a motion of polymer chain at low frequency. In the high-frequency region, AC conductivity was attributed to the electronic polarization to hop charge carrier over a small barrier of height [50]. The pure Nylon 6,9 has the conductivity of 4.96×10-12 Scm-1 at 100 Hz, which was increased to 1.18×10-9 Scm-1 when the CCTO content had increased to 58 vol% due to the better connectivity between the polymer and the CCTO in the composite and also to the increased charge density carriers. Thus, the increase in AC conductivity with the increase in CCTO content supports the hopping of the charge carrier conduction mechanism [26], [52].

4 Conclusion

CCTO nanoparticles were synthesized using the oxalate precursor route, and a two-phase composite containing CCTO nanoparticles dispersed into Nylon 6,9 polymer matrix was successfully fabricated with different volume fractions. In the present investigation, the Nylon 6,9/CCTO-58 vol% composite study was established, and a dielectric permittivity value of 220 was reported for the first time at room temperature, which has not been reported in the two-phase composite materials thus far. The SEM micrograms clearly showed the homogenous distribution of CCTO into Nylon 6,9. Thermal analysis showed that the Tg of composites slightly decreased from that of the pure Nylon 6,9. Dielectric permittivity increased with the increase in the CCTO nanoparticle content in Nylon 6,9. The 58 vol% nanocomposite showed higher dielectric permittivity than the pure Nylon 6,9 and the other composites. The polarization process observed at the low-frequency region was associated to a space charge effect. Although there was an improvement in the dielectric permittivity, the decrease in Tg may limit its usage for high-temperature applications. The increase in AC conductivity with the increase in CCTO nanoparticle content supports the better hopping of the charge carrier conduction mechanism. Due to its flexibility and easy fabrication route, these composites have a potential to become capacitors with required shapes.


Corresponding author: Sahadevan Renganathan, Department of Bio-Technology, A.C. Tech, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600025, India, e-mail:

References

[1] Newnham RE. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1986, 16, 47–68.10.1146/annurev.ms.16.080186.000403Search in Google Scholar

[2] Das-Gupta DK. Ferroelectric Polymer and Ceramic-Polymer Composites. Trans Tech: Aedermannsdorf, Switzerland, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Dias CJ, Das-Gupta DK. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 1996, 5, 706–734.10.1109/94.544188Search in Google Scholar

[4] Kuo DH, Chang CC, Su TY, Wang WK, Lin BY. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2001, 21, 1171–1177.10.1016/S0955-2219(00)00327-7Search in Google Scholar

[5] Chan HLW, Cheung MC, Choy CL. Ferroelectrics 1999, 224, 113–120.10.1080/00150199908210557Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bai Y, Cheng ZY, Bharti V, Xu HS, Zhang Q-M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 76, 3804–3806.10.1063/1.126787Search in Google Scholar

[7] Zhang ZM, Shen Y, Nan CW. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 4814–4816.10.1063/1.1532757Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kobayashi Y, Tanase T, Tabata T, Miwa T, Konno M. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 28, 117–122.10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.05.007Search in Google Scholar

[9] Dang ZM, Lin YQ, Xu HP, Shi CY, Li ST, Bai J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1509–1517.10.1002/adfm.200701077Search in Google Scholar

[10] Abothu IR, Lee BW, Raj PM, Engin E, Muthana P, Yoon CK, Swaminathan M, Tummala RR. Tailoring of temperature coefficient of capacitance (TCC) in nanocomposite capacitors. In 56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2006 Proceedings. 2006, 54, 1790–1794.10.1109/ECTC.2006.1645902Search in Google Scholar

[11] Choi SH, Kim ID, Hong JM, Park KH, Oh SG. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61, 2478–2481.10.1016/j.matlet.2006.09.040Search in Google Scholar

[12] Devaraju NG, Kim ES, Lee BI. Microelectron. Eng. 2005, 82, 71–83.10.1016/j.mee.2005.06.003Search in Google Scholar

[13] Yu JD, Paradis PF, Ishikawa T, Yoda S, Saita Y, Itoh M, Kano F. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 3973–3975.10.1021/cm0487526Search in Google Scholar

[14] Subramanian MA, Dong Li, Duan N, Reisner BA, Sleight AW. J. Solid State Chem. 2000, 151, 323–325.10.1006/jssc.2000.8703Search in Google Scholar

[15] Wu J, Nan CW, Lin Y, Deng Y. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 217601.10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.217601Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Arbatti M, Shan X, Cheng Z. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 1369–1372.10.1002/adma.200601996Search in Google Scholar

[17] Shriprakash B, Varma KBR. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67, 2363–2368.10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.010Search in Google Scholar

[18] Tuncer E, Sauers I, James DR, Alvin R, Ellis M, Paranthaman P, Tolga AT, Sathyamurthy S, Karren LM, Li J, Goyal A. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 25703–25706.10.1088/0957-4484/18/2/025703Search in Google Scholar

[19] Ramajo LA, Ramfrez MA, Bueno PR, Reboredo MM, Castro MS. Mater. Res. 2008, 11, 85–88.10.1590/S1516-14392008000100016Search in Google Scholar

[20] Thomas P, Dwarakanatha K, Varma KBR. Synth. Metals 2009, 159, 2128–2134.10.1016/j.synthmet.2009.08.001Search in Google Scholar

[21] Amaral F, Rubinger CPL, Henry F, Costa CL, Valente MA, Timmons AB. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 2008, 354, 47–51.10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.05.078Search in Google Scholar

[22] Patsidis A, Psarras GC. Exp. Polym. Lett. 2008, 2, 718–726.10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.85Search in Google Scholar

[23] Thomas P, Varughese KT, Dwarakanath K, Varma KBR. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 539–545.10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.014Search in Google Scholar

[24] Thomas P, Satapathy S, Dwarakanath K, Varma KBR. Exp. Polym. Lett. 2010, 4, 632–643.10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.78Search in Google Scholar

[25] Thomas P, Ernest Ravindran RS, Varma KBR. Dielectric properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/CaCu3Ti4O12 composites. In Proceedings of IEEE 10th ICPADM, July 24–28 2012, Bangalore, India.10.1109/ICPADM.2012.6319009Search in Google Scholar

[26] Thomas P, Ernest Ravindran RS, Varma KBR. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2014, 115, 1311–1319.10.1007/s10973-013-3500-xSearch in Google Scholar

[27] Thomas P, Ernest Ravindran RS, Varma KBR. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2014, 54, 551–558.10.1002/pen.23586Search in Google Scholar

[28] Capsal JF, Dantras E, Dandurand J, Lacabanne C. Polymer 2010, 51, 4606–4610.10.1016/j.polymer.2010.07.040Search in Google Scholar

[29] Sender C, Dantras E, Dantras L, Lacoste MH, Dandurand J, Mauzac M, Lacout, Lavergne C, Demont Ph, Berne A, Lacabanne C. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2007, 83, 628–635.10.1002/jbm.b.30930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Odian G. Principles of Polymerization. 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, 2004.10.1002/047147875XSearch in Google Scholar

[31] Nalwa HS. Handbook of Low and High Dielectric permittivity Materials and Their Applications, Phenomena, Properties and Applications. Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Chiang CK, Popielarz R. Ferroelectrics 2002, 275, 1–9.10.1080/00150190214285Search in Google Scholar

[33] Hsiang HI, Yin KY, Yen FS, Hwang CY. J. Mater. Sci. 2001, 36, 3809–3815.10.1023/A:1017946405447Search in Google Scholar

[34] Ishida H, Campbell S, Blackwell J. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 1260–1267.10.1021/cm990479ySearch in Google Scholar

[35] Kontos GA, Soulintzis AL, Karahaliou PK, Psarras GC, Georga SN, Krontiras CA, Pisanias MN. Exp. Polym. Lett. 2007, 1, 781–789.10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.108Search in Google Scholar

[36] Thomas P, Dwarakanath K, Varma KBR, Kutty TRN. J. Ther. Anal. Calorim. 2009, 95, 267–272.10.1007/s10973-007-8981-zSearch in Google Scholar

[37] Yang J, Shen M, Fang L. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 3990–3993.10.1016/j.matlet.2005.07.049Search in Google Scholar

[38] Vaish R, Varma KBR. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106.10.1063/1.3225583Search in Google Scholar

[39] Lewin M. Handbook of Fiber Chemistry. 3rd ed., Taylor & Frances Group, 2007.10.1201/9781420015270Search in Google Scholar

[40] Pockett J. Crystallinity in linear polyamides: a study using melt blending with small-molecule diluents. Ph.D. thesis, Ian Wark Research Institute, University of South Australia, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Aharoni SM. n-Nylons: Their Synthesis, Structure and Properties. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Grannan DM, Garland JC, Tanner DB. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1981, 46, 375–378.10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.375Search in Google Scholar

[43] Song Y, Noh TW, Lee S-I, Gaines JR. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 904–908.10.1103/PhysRevB.33.904Search in Google Scholar

[44] Nan CW. Prog. Mater. Sci. 1993, 37, 1–126.10.1016/0079-6425(93)90004-5Search in Google Scholar

[45] Nan CW. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 176201-1.10.1103/PhysRevB.63.176201Search in Google Scholar

[46] Sihvola AH, Pekonen OPM. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1996, 29, 514–521.10.1088/0022-3727/29/3/005Search in Google Scholar

[47] Jayasundere N, Smith BV. J. Appl. Phys. 1993, 73, 2462–2466.10.1063/1.354057Search in Google Scholar

[48] Kilbride BE, Coleman JN, Fraysse J, Fournet P, Cadek M, Drury. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 92, 4024–4026.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Bar-Cohen Y. Electroactive Polymer Actuators as Artificial Muscles. SPIE, Bellingham WA, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Immergut EH, Brandrup J, McDowell W. Polymer Handbook. Wiley Interscience: New York, 1975.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Hussien B. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 2011, 52, 236–242.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Harun MH, Saion E, Kassim A, Hussain MY, Mustafa IS, Omer MAA. Malaysian Polym. J. 2008, 3, 24–31.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-9-27
Accepted: 2015-5-24
Published Online: 2015-8-15
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original articles
  3. Effects of multiwalled carbon nanotube mass fraction on microstructures and electrical resistivity of polycarbonate-based conductive composites
  4. Preparation and fluid drag reduction properties of superhydrophobic paper-based films comprising carbon nanotubes and fluoropolymers
  5. Studies on the structural, thermal, and dielectric properties of fabricated Nylon 6,9/CaCu3Ti4O12 nanocomposites
  6. Metal-matrix composite fabricated with gas tungsten arc melt injection and precoated with NiCrBSi alloy to increase the volume fraction of WC particles
  7. Construction of polypropylene composite multifilaments filled with sodium perborate trihydrate-treated jute microparticles
  8. Damage detection of three-dimensional braided composite materials using carbon nanotube thread
  9. An exact solution for improved metal-composite joints reinforced by FG inter-layers
  10. Effect of chemical treatment on thermal properties of bagasse fiber-reinforced epoxy composite
  11. The superior ductility of fine SiCp/Al2014 composites after extrusion
  12. Optical properties and photocatalytic activity of CdS-TiO2/graphite composite
  13. Effects of bottom ash and granulated blast furnace slag as fine aggregate on abrasion resistance of concrete
  14. Surface modification of diamond and its effect on the mechanical properties of diamond/epoxy composites
  15. Numerical simulation of strain rate effect on the inelastic behavior of metal matrix composites
  16. Electromechanical characterization of multilayer graphene-reinforced cellulose composite containing 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethylphosphonate ionic liquid
  17. The effect of hydroxyapatite reinforcement and preparation methods on the structure and mechanical properties of Mg-HA composites
  18. The effect of yttrium incorporation on the formation and properties of α-Al2O3 coatings
Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/secm-2014-0342/html
Scroll to top button