Abstract
The present paper deals with a study of the thermal properties of bagasse fiber (BF)-reinforced epoxy composites. BFs are subjected to untreated and chemical treatments with 1% sodium hydroxide followed by 1% acrylic acid at ambient temperature before the composites are made. The thermal stability of the components was studied by thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry, as well as by differential thermal gravimetric analysis. Thermal analysis results of untreated BF-reinforced epoxy composite were compared with treated BF-reinforced epoxy composite. The chemical treatment of BF induces reasonable changes in the thermal stability of the polymer composites.
1 Introduction
Natural fibers mainly consist of cellulose, hemicelluloses, pectin, and lignin. The individual percentage of these components varies with dissimilar types of fiber. This variation can also be accomplished by growing and harvesting conditions. The main benefits of using natural fibers in composites are the cost of materials and their sustainability and low density as compared with synthetic fibers. Natural fibers can cost as little as USD 0.016–0.08/kg and can be grown in a short period of time [1], [2]. They are also easy to grow and have the potential to be a cash crop for local farmers. The treatment techniques of fibers are currently an area of research receiving substantial attention because these treatments may help to enhance the mechanical and thermal properties of the composites. The respective treatment methods that have been studied by various researcher are covered in [3], [4], [5]. From the various treatment methods, alkaline treatment has been selected due to it being inexpensive and the ease of the process [6], [7]. Acetylation is another treatment that is common with cellulose to form a hydrophobic thermoplastic and has the potential to have the same results on natural fibers [8]. Some of the natural fiber-based polymer composites are already being used in various applications like packaging, building, furniture, and automobile industries. Improvement of the thermal stability of the composite by suitable treatment provides higher temperature resistance if the respective composites are likely to attain higher temperatures than the designed limit. There is very little information available regarding the thermal behavior of natural fiber-based composite at high temperatures [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. Thus, for the current study, bagasse fiber (BF) was reinforced with epoxy with different fiber loadings to investigate its thermogravimetric stability up to 900°C, and compared with chemically treated BF-reinforced composite.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Material used
2.1.1 Bagasse fiber
Sugarcane residue was procured from a local sugar mill (Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. BF was sieved from the sugarcane residue for the removal of unwanted impurities. After separation, the moisture content of fiber was found to be 6–7%. The length of the BF varied from 5 to 10 mm with an average length of 8 mm. The fibers were washed with distilled water to remove any unwanted adhered impurities; this was followed by drying in a hot air oven at 70°C for 48 h to remove the moisture.
The epoxy resin (AW106) and the curing agent (HV953IN) are useful polymers and have good strength, toughness, and resilience. When both are mixed they have an excellent resistance to chemical and moisture attack, having outstanding electrical insulating properties and an absence of volatile matter on curing. It has a density 1.1 g/cm3. This was procured from M/S Petro Araldite Pvt. Limited (Manali, Chennai, India).
Sodium hydroxide (Min-assay 98%) was procured from M/S Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Limited (Mumbai, India).
Acrylic acid (Assay-min 99%) was procured from M/S Loba Chemie Pvt. Limited (Mumbai, India).
2.2 Method used
2.2.1 The treatment of the BF
BF was soaked with 1% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for 30 min, followed by 1% acrylic acid for 1 h at ambient temperature [17]. The treatment cost is very small because sodium hydroxide and acrylic acid are available for USD 6.3/kg and USD 13/kg, respectively. The fibers were washed with distilled water to remove any unwanted adhered impurities. This was followed by drying in a hot air oven at 70°C for 48 h. During this treatment, the liquor ratio was maintained at 20:1 in a bath tub. This treatment causes disruption of hydrogen bonding in the network structure, thereby increasing the surface roughness. It also removes a certain amount of lignin, wax, and oils covering the external layer of the fiber surface [18]. It increases the amount of cellulose exposed on the fiber surface, which is attributed to raising the number of possible reaction sites. Further, acrylation is initiated by free radicals of the cellulose molecule. This led to a strong covalent bond formation that improved the thermal stability of chemically treated fibers.
2.2.2 Preparation of composites
Epoxy resin (AW106) and curing agent (HV953IN) were mixed (as instructed by the manufacturer), followed by the addition (10, 20, 30, and 40 wt%) of untreated and treated BF, and stirred in a mixer for 10–15 min at a rotational speed of 2000 rpm to get a homogenous mixture. The mixture was poured into the mold, 300×300×10 mm3 and cured for 24 h at ambient temperature. A hand lay-up method was used to manufacture the composite material [19]. In order to avoid the problem of sticking of composite material, the mold was coated with a Teflon sheet; the formation of bubbles may create a problem. To overcome such problems, a rollover sheet with a heavy roller has been incorporated. Every composite cast was cured under a load of 25 kg for 24 h before it was removed from the mold.
2.2.3 Testing of thermal properties
The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential thermal gravimetric (DTG), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms were taken from EXSTAR TG/DTA 6300 (RT Instruments Inc., Woodland, CA, USA) in a nitrogen atmosphere (flow rate 200 ml/min) at a constant heating rate of 10°C/min from ambient temperature to 800°C. A composite weighing between 8 and 12 mg was used. Here we observed the behavior of the respective sample due to thermal degradation.
2.2.4 FTIR spectroscopy
FTIR spectroscopy was used to analyze any changes in the functional group of the cellulose fibers after the chemical treatment of the fibers. Fiber samples and KBr mixed in the ratio of 1:10 were pressed into a disk for (FTIR NICOLET 6700, LabX, Midland, ON, Canada) spectroscopy measurement. The spectra were recorded with 32 scans in the frequency range of 4000–400 cm-1 with a resolution of 40 cm-1.
2.2.5 SEM morphology
The SEM studies were conducted by using the LEO 435 VP (LEO, Austin, TX, USA) with an acceleration voltage specification up to 30 kV, magnification range (10× to 300,000×), detection mode (secondary & backscattered electrons) and the images were recorded by printer and camera. The test sample was mounted on that being fused with silver gel and gold coated to avoid electrical charging during the test.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Thermal properties
The thermal properties of all the untreated and treated BF reinforced epoxy composites were analyzed by TGA and DTG. The untreated and treated BFs were also analyzed by DSC. The variation observed when the untreated BF was compared with the treated BF confirms the connection between the presence of the peaks.
3.1.1 TGA and DTG analysis
TGA and DTG thermograms of neat epoxy, untreated BF, treated BF, untreated BF-epoxy composites, and treated BF-epoxy composites are shown in Figures 1–10. In TGA thermograms, there are three different zones of degradation. In the first zone (at temperature range 80–100°C), there is a small loss in weight due to the removal of moisture present in the sample. Because of the onset of the thermal decomposition process, there is a very high loss in weight in the mid zone of degradation and the last zone called the ultimate thermal degradation.

TGA thermogram of epoxy, untreated BF, and treated BF.

TGA thermogram of untreated and treated 10% BF-epoxy composites.

TGA thermogram of untreated and treated 20% BF-epoxy composites.

TGA thermogram of untreated and treated 30% BF-epoxy composites.

TGA thermogram of untreated and treated 40% BF-epoxy composites.

DTG thermogram of epoxy, untreated BF, and treated BF.

DTG thermogram of untreated and treated 10% BF-epoxy composites.

DTG thermogram of untreated and treated 20% BF-epoxy composites.

DTG thermogram of untreated and treated 30% BF-epoxy composites.

DTG thermogram of untreated and treated 40% BF-epoxy composites.
The TGA behavior of neat epoxy is shown in Figure 1 (curve A). A single-step decomposition process is observed for neat epoxy. It is observed that the degradation started at about 200°C. The range of the middle zone is 340–440°C of epoxy that have much rate of weight loss. From Figure 6 (curve A), the higher rate of weight reduction is (0.75 mg/min) observed at about 435°C due to degradation, and the degradation of the remaining part of the product for further degradation is observed at 650°C. The residue left after final degradation was 1.1%.
The TGA behavior of untreated and treated BFs is shown in Figure 1 (curves B and C, respectively). Untreated and treated BFs have 6–7% weight loss observed at 100°C, corresponding to the removal of moisture. The middle zone of the thermogram at around 260–450°C were almost the same, corresponding to the degradation of hemicelluloses. From Figure 6, (curves B and C), the higher rate of weight reduction is (1.93 mg/min) observed at about 329°C due to the degradation of hemicelluloses [20], and cellulose for untreated BF shifted to 333°C for treated BF; thereafter, a second decomposition step took place corresponding to the degradation of lignin and cellulose. The middle zone of the treated BF curve is more inclined as compared to the untreated BF curve; this is due to a lower content of lignin. The residue weight of untreated BF found 2.4%, and the treated BF is -2.7% due to presence of lignin in BF, which is responsible for the char.
The TGA behavior of untreated 10% BF-epoxy composite and treated 10% BF-epoxy composite is shown in Figure 2 (curves A and B, respectively). The starting weight of the reduced sample is observed at a temperature of 199°C; this is due to the removal of fiber present in the polymer matrix. The range of the middle zone is 300–440°C of the respective sample which has high rate of weight loss. From Figure 7 (curves A and B), the higher rate of weight reduction is (0.74 mg/min) observed at about 359°C for untreated 10% BF-epoxy composite and raised to 362°C for treated 10% BF-epoxy composite. The degradation of the remaining part of the product for the further degradation observed at 477°C for untreated composite raised to the 489°C for treated composite improved the thermal stability of the composite. The same type of observation was found in [21].
The TGA behavior of untreated 20% BF-epoxy composite and treated 20% BF-epoxy composite is shown in Figure 3 (curves A and B, respectively). The starting weight of the reduced sample observed at a temperature of 195°C corresponds to the removal of fiber present in the polymer matrix. The range of the middle zone is 320–430°C of the respective sample that has a large rate of weight loss. From Figure 8 (curves A and B), the higher rate of weight reduction is (0.85 mg/min) observed at about 359°C for the untreated 20% BF-epoxy composite and down to 356°C for the treated 20% BF-epoxy composite. The degradation of the remaining part of the product is observed at 500°C for the untreated composite and down to 483°C for the treated composite.
The TGA behavior of untreated 30% BF-epoxy composite and treated 30% BF-epoxy composite is shown in Figure 4 (curves A and B, respectively). The starting weight of the reduced sample observed at a temperature of 195°C corresponds to the removal of the fiber present in the polymer matrix. The range of the middle zone is 310–440°C of the respective sample that has a greater rate of weight loss. From Figure 9 (curves A and B), the higher rate of weight reduction (0.84 mg/min) is observed at about 354°C for the untreated 30% BF-epoxy composite and rose to 356°C for the treated 30% BF-epoxy composite; this improved the thermal stability of the composite. The degradation of the remaining part of the product for further degradation is observed at 500°C for the untreated composite and down to 484°C for the treated composite.
The TGA behavior of the untreated 40% BF-epoxy composite and the treated 40% BF-epoxy composite is shown in Figure 5 (curves A and B, respectively). The starting weight of the reduced sample observed at a temperature of 190°C corresponds to the removal of fiber present in the polymer matrix. The range of the middle zone is 310–440°C of the respective sample that has a greater rate of weight loss. From Figure 10 (curves A and B), the high rate of weight reduction is (0.89 mg/min) observed at about 354°C for the untreated 40% BF-epoxy composite and rose to 358°C for the treated 40% BF-epoxy composite; this improved the thermal stability of the composite. The degradation of the remaining part of the product for further degradation was observed at 500°C for the untreated composite and down to the 481°C for the treated composite.
Thus, from DTG analysis, it was observed that the thermal stability of the untreated BF composite was improved by the chemical treatment.
3.1.2 DSC analysis
The results of DSC thermogram of untreated BF and BF are shown in Figure 11. Both DSC thermograms have distinct exothermic peaks that can be seen in the respective figure. The corresponding ΔH value is given in Table 1.

DSC thermogram of untreated BF and treated BF.
Result of DSC analysis.
| Sample | Peak temperature (°C) | Nature of peak | ΔH (J/mg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated BF | 353 | Exothermic | -3.44±0.54 |
| 455 | Exothermic | -3.44±0.54 | |
| Treated BF | 364 | Exothermic | -3.66±0.68 |
| 448 | Exothermic | -3.66±0.68 |
From Figure 11, in the DSC thermogram, untreated BF (curve I) has two exothermic peaks at 353°C and 455°C; this is due to the decomposition of hemicelluloses and α-cellulose, respectively. But in the case of treated BF (curve II), the hemicellulose peak was shifted to a higher temperature at 364°C; this is because of the removal of non-cellulosic matter such as hemicelluloses, pectin, etc. During the chemical treatment of fiber, the destruction of the bonding that is present in the fiber might have some influence and shifted the peak. The exothermic peak at 448°C is due to the degradation of cellulose in BF and formation of char [22].
3.2 FTIR analysis
The FTIR spectra of the untreated and treated BFs in the range of 4000–400 cm-1 are shown in Figure 12. The untreated BF has the 899 cm-1 peak, which shows the presence of the N-H primary amine group and the CH2 group [23], [24]. The peak at 1431 cm-1 is related to the C-C stretching in aromatic rings, and the OH in bending shows the presence of lignin [25]. The peak at 1509 cm-1 arises from the N-O stretching. It can be seen that from the chemically treated BF graph, the absorption peaks are disappearing, which indicates that these functional groups are removed after the chemical treatments; thus, lignin concentration reduced the affect of the adhesion between the fiber and polymer surfaces, demonstrating the structure transformation induced by thermal stability.

FTIR spectra of (a) untreated BF and (b) treated BF.
3.3 SEM morphology
SEM analysis was performed for the untreated and treated BFs to support the observation that was obtained after the chemical treatment of BF, which in situ changed the surface structure. Figure 13 (A and B) represents the morphology of untreated and chemically treated BF, respectively. From Figure 13A, it was observed that the untreated BF has some impurities (lignin and wax) present, while the chemically treated BF (Figure 13B) has a cleaned surface, it can be concluded that the treated surface has more area available for adhesion between the fiber and the polymer that improved the thermal stability of the composites [26].

SEM micrograph of (A) untreated BF and (B) treated BF.
4 Conclusions
In the present study, the thermal properties of untreated and treated BF reinforced epoxy composites were investigated. From DTG thermograms, it was observed that the thermal stability of the treated BF composite is superior as compared to the untreated BF composites. It was found from DSC thermograms that there was a shifting of the exothermic peaks towards a high temperature of the treated fiber as compared to the untreated one. That proved that the surface structure of the fiber changed after the chemical treatment. It was reported that treatment of BF with NaOH and acrylic acid improved the thermal stability and an optimum value was attained at 10% BF reinforced epoxy composite, and at that point, we observed the 3% improvement in thermal properties as compared to the untreated fiber composite. From the morphology of SEM, it can be proved that the chemically treated BF has cleaner surface than the untreated BF.
Acknowledgments
The authors very gratefully acknowledge the Ministry of Human Resources and Development (MHRD), New Delhi, for providing the fellowship for this research work. The authors thank the Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT, Roorkee, for providing laboratory and chemical facilities for this research work.
References
[1] Bogoeva-Gaceva G. Polym. Compos. 2007, 28, 98–107.10.1002/pc.20270Search in Google Scholar
[2] Kumar V, Tyagi L, Sinha S. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2011, 27, 253–264.10.1515/REVCE.2011.006Search in Google Scholar
[3] Bledzki AK, Gassan J. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1999, 24, 221–274.10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5Search in Google Scholar
[4] Saheb DN, Jog JP. Adv. Polym. Tech. 1999, 18, 351–363.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199924)18:4<351::AID-ADV6>3.0.CO;2-XSearch in Google Scholar
[5] Li X, Tabil TG, Panigrahi S. J. Polym. Environ. 2007, 15, 25–33.10.1007/s10924-006-0042-3Search in Google Scholar
[6] Rowell RM. Sci. Technol. Polym. Adv. Mater. 1998, 717–732.10.1007/978-1-4899-0112-5_63Search in Google Scholar
[7] George J, Sreekala MS, Thomas S. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2001, 41, 1471–1485.10.1002/pen.10846Search in Google Scholar
[8] Khalil HPSA, Ismail H, Rozman HD, Ahmad MN. Eur. Polym. J. 2001, 37, 1037–1045.10.1016/S0014-3057(00)00199-3Search in Google Scholar
[9] Zheng YT, Cao DR, Wang DS, Chen JJ. Composites Part A 2007, 38, 20–25.10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.023Search in Google Scholar
[10] Vilay V, Mariatti M, Taib RM, Todo M. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 631–638.10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.005Search in Google Scholar
[11] Mulinari DR, Voorwald HJC, Cioffi MOH, Da Silva MLCP, Da Cruz TG, Saron C. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 214–219.10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.006Search in Google Scholar
[12] Mulinari DR, Voorwald HJC, Cioffi MOH, Rocha GJ, Da Silva MLCP. Bioresources 2010, 5, 661–671.10.15376/biores.5.2.661-671Search in Google Scholar
[13] Cerqueira EF, Baptista CARP, Mulinari DR. Procedia Eng. 2011, 10, 2046–2051.10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.339Search in Google Scholar
[14] Rodrigues EF, Maia TF, Mulinari DR. Procedia Eng. 2011, 10, 2348–2352.10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.387Search in Google Scholar
[15] Ashori A, Sheshmani S, Farhani F. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 865–871.10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.010Search in Google Scholar
[16] Arrakhiz FZ, Malha M, Bouhfid R, Benmoussa K, Qaiss A. Composites Part B 2013, 47, 35–41.10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.046Search in Google Scholar
[17] Li X, Panigrahi SA, Tabil LG, Crerar WJ. Soc. Eng. Agric. Food Biol. Syst. 2004, 1–11.Search in Google Scholar
[18] Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT. Compos. Interfaces 2001, 8, 313.10.1163/156855401753255422Search in Google Scholar
[19] Mishra P, Acharya SK. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2011, 2, 104–112.10.4314/ijest.v2i11.64558Search in Google Scholar
[20] Teng H, Wei Y. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 3806–3811.10.1021/ie980207pSearch in Google Scholar
[21] Saha SC, Ray PK, Padey SN, Goswami K. J. Polym. Sci. 1991, 42, 2767–2772.10.1002/app.1991.070421015Search in Google Scholar
[22] Hoareau W, Trindade WG, Siegmund B, Castellan A, Frollini E. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2004, 86, 567–576.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.07.005Search in Google Scholar
[23] Ouajai S, Shanks RA. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 89, 327–335.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.016Search in Google Scholar
[24] Colom X, Carrillo F, Nogués F, Garriga P. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2003, 80, 543–549.10.1016/S0141-3910(03)00051-XSearch in Google Scholar
[25] Corrales RCNR, Mendes FMT, Perrone CC, Anna CS, de Souza W, Abud Y, da Silva Bon EP, Ferreira-Leitão V. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5, 1–8.10.1186/1754-6834-5-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[26] Saw SK, Datta C. Bioresources 2009, 4, 1455–1476.10.15376/biores.4.4.1455-1476Search in Google Scholar
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original articles
- Effects of multiwalled carbon nanotube mass fraction on microstructures and electrical resistivity of polycarbonate-based conductive composites
- Preparation and fluid drag reduction properties of superhydrophobic paper-based films comprising carbon nanotubes and fluoropolymers
- Studies on the structural, thermal, and dielectric properties of fabricated Nylon 6,9/CaCu3Ti4O12 nanocomposites
- Metal-matrix composite fabricated with gas tungsten arc melt injection and precoated with NiCrBSi alloy to increase the volume fraction of WC particles
- Construction of polypropylene composite multifilaments filled with sodium perborate trihydrate-treated jute microparticles
- Damage detection of three-dimensional braided composite materials using carbon nanotube thread
- An exact solution for improved metal-composite joints reinforced by FG inter-layers
- Effect of chemical treatment on thermal properties of bagasse fiber-reinforced epoxy composite
- The superior ductility of fine SiCp/Al2014 composites after extrusion
- Optical properties and photocatalytic activity of CdS-TiO2/graphite composite
- Effects of bottom ash and granulated blast furnace slag as fine aggregate on abrasion resistance of concrete
- Surface modification of diamond and its effect on the mechanical properties of diamond/epoxy composites
- Numerical simulation of strain rate effect on the inelastic behavior of metal matrix composites
- Electromechanical characterization of multilayer graphene-reinforced cellulose composite containing 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethylphosphonate ionic liquid
- The effect of hydroxyapatite reinforcement and preparation methods on the structure and mechanical properties of Mg-HA composites
- The effect of yttrium incorporation on the formation and properties of α-Al2O3 coatings
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original articles
- Effects of multiwalled carbon nanotube mass fraction on microstructures and electrical resistivity of polycarbonate-based conductive composites
- Preparation and fluid drag reduction properties of superhydrophobic paper-based films comprising carbon nanotubes and fluoropolymers
- Studies on the structural, thermal, and dielectric properties of fabricated Nylon 6,9/CaCu3Ti4O12 nanocomposites
- Metal-matrix composite fabricated with gas tungsten arc melt injection and precoated with NiCrBSi alloy to increase the volume fraction of WC particles
- Construction of polypropylene composite multifilaments filled with sodium perborate trihydrate-treated jute microparticles
- Damage detection of three-dimensional braided composite materials using carbon nanotube thread
- An exact solution for improved metal-composite joints reinforced by FG inter-layers
- Effect of chemical treatment on thermal properties of bagasse fiber-reinforced epoxy composite
- The superior ductility of fine SiCp/Al2014 composites after extrusion
- Optical properties and photocatalytic activity of CdS-TiO2/graphite composite
- Effects of bottom ash and granulated blast furnace slag as fine aggregate on abrasion resistance of concrete
- Surface modification of diamond and its effect on the mechanical properties of diamond/epoxy composites
- Numerical simulation of strain rate effect on the inelastic behavior of metal matrix composites
- Electromechanical characterization of multilayer graphene-reinforced cellulose composite containing 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethylphosphonate ionic liquid
- The effect of hydroxyapatite reinforcement and preparation methods on the structure and mechanical properties of Mg-HA composites
- The effect of yttrium incorporation on the formation and properties of α-Al2O3 coatings