Home Implementing an oral task in an EFL classroom with low proficient learners: a micro-evaluation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Implementing an oral task in an EFL classroom with low proficient learners: a micro-evaluation

  • Natsuko Shintani EMAIL logo , Sora Shioji and Takuro Fujita
Published/Copyright: February 17, 2025

Abstract

This study employed a micro-evaluation approach to investigate a task-based lesson in a Japanese secondary school with low-proficiency learners of English. A Japanese teacher implemented a task-based lesson in her four regular classes, which typically followed traditional teacher-centered instruction prior to the current investigation. The evaluation involved three components: response-based evaluation by examining language-related, meaning-related, and task-related episodes and their functions in the interactions; student-based evaluation through a questionnaire; and teacher-based evaluation via an interview. The results indicate that students valued the lesson, finding the task enjoyable and beneficial for their learning, though some found it challenging due to their limited proficiency. Students who viewed the task as an opportunity for communication in L2 tended to value the lesson, whereas those who saw the task as exercises for specific grammatical features felt otherwise. The teacher was surprised by how well her students communicated in English and expressed a desire to incorporate more tasks in the future. However, she also identified issues with the task materials and felt that pre-teaching vocabulary would have been necessary. Based on these findings, we propose several strategies to enhance the implementation of task-based lessons for young, low-proficiency students in Japan.


Corresponding author: Natsuko Shintani, Faculty of Foreign Language Studies, Kansai University, 3-3-35, Yamate-cho, Suita-shi, Osaka, Japan, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: The ethical review for this study was approved by the Faculty of Foreign Language Studies at Kansai University, where the researchers are affiliated.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

Appendix A: Handout for spot-the-difference task

Appendix B: The English translation of the interview protocols

  1. Questions about her teaching experience

    1. How many years have you taught English?

    2. Have you used any tasks in your classroom? If so, what was your experience?

  2. Questions about her regular teaching practice

    1. What do you pay attention to in your regular classes?

    2. What other activities do you do besides following the textbook?

  3. Questions about her perceptions about conducting the task

    1. How was the task today? Do you think it was successful or unsuccessful? In what ways?

    2. Did you find any difficulties in implementing the task?

    3. How did you see the students’ responses to the task?

    4. Do you think you would use tasks in your class in the future? Why?

References

Alcón Soler, Eva & María del Pilar García Mayo. 2008. Incidental focus on form and learning outcomes with young foreign language classroom learners. In Jnenefer Philp, Rhonda Oliver & Alison Mackey (eds.), Second language acquisition and the younger learner: Child’s play? 173–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.23.12solSearch in Google Scholar

Asier, Calzada & María del Pilar García Mayo. 2021. Child learners’ reflections about EFL grammar in a collaborative writing task: When form is not at odds with communication. Language Awareness 30(1). 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1751178.Search in Google Scholar

Bryfonski, Lara & Todd H. McKay. 2019. TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research 23(5). 603–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817744389.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Yuko Goto. 2011. The implementation of communicative and Task-Based Language Teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31. 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190511000122.Search in Google Scholar

Calzada, Asier & María del Pilar García Mayo. 2020. Child EFL learners’ attitudes towards a collaborative writing task: An exploratory study. Language Teaching for Young Learners 2(1). 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19008.cal.Search in Google Scholar

Carless, David. 2002. Implementing task-based learning with young learners. English Language Teaching Journal 56(4). 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.4.389.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, Vivian. 2001. Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review 57(3). 402–423. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402.Search in Google Scholar

Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 1997. The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal 51. 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.36.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2009. Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19(3). 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2011. Macro- and micro-evaluations of task-based teaching. In B. Tomlinson (ed.), Materials Development in Language Teaching, 212–235. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139042789.012Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2015. Teachers evaluating tasks. In M. Bygate (ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT, 247–270. John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.8.09ellSearch in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2020. Task-based language teaching for beginner-level young learners. Language Teaching for Young Learners 2(1). 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19005.ell.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Peter Skehan, Shaofeng Li, Natsuko Shintani & Craig Lambert. 2019. Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice, Cambridge applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108643689Search in Google Scholar

Foster, Pauline & Peter Skehan. 2013. Anticipating a post-task activity: The effects on accuracy, complexity, and fluency of second language performance. The Canadian Modern Language Review 69(3). 249–273. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.69.3.249.Search in Google Scholar

Fujita, Takuro. 2024. Evaluating task-based lessons for engineering students at the National Institute of Technology. Journal of the Council of College English Teachers 43. 169–178.Search in Google Scholar

García Mayo, María del Pilar & María Luquin. 2023. Does repeated pre-task planning have an impact on form-focused LREs? Language Teaching for Young Learners 5(2). 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00038.may.Search in Google Scholar

González-Lloret, Marta & Katharine B. Nielson. 2015. Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research 19(5). 525–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541745.Search in Google Scholar

Harper, John & Puji Widodo Handoyo. 2020. Perceptual mismatches in the interpretation of task-based ELT materials: A micro-evaluation of a task-based English lesson. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 14(2). 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1502773.Search in Google Scholar

Kato, Yuka., Masanori Matsumura, Paul Wicking, Yuri Yokoyama, Y. Tamura & Mami Kobayashi. 2020. Ideas and materials for communication through tasks: Connecting the English language classroom with the real world. Tokyo: Sanshusha.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, YouJin & Caroline Payant. 2014. A pedagogical proposal for task sequencing: An exploration of task repetition and task complexity on learning opportunity. In Melissa Baralt, Roger Gilabert & Peter Robinson (eds.), Task Sequencing and instructed second language learning, 151–178. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, YouJin, Hyejin Cho & Haoshan Ren. 2020. Collaborative writing tasks in an L3 classroom: Translanguaging, the quality of task outcomes and learners’ perceptions. In Craig Lambert & Rhonda Oliver (eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching, 255–280. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.2307/jj.22730569.18Search in Google Scholar

Kirkebæk, Mads Jakob & Rui Bao. 2013. Danish students’ perceptions of task-based teaching in Chinese. In Mads Jakob Kirkebæk, Xiang-Yun Du & Annie Aarup Jensen (eds.), Teaching and learning culture: Negotiating the context, 61–78. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.10.1007/978-94-6209-440-6_5Search in Google Scholar

Kopinska, Marta & Agurtzane Azkarai. 2020. Exploring young EFL learners’ motivation: Individual vs. pair work on dictogloss tasks. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 10. 607–630. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.10.Search in Google Scholar

Lambert, Craig, Judit Kormos & Danny Minn. 2017. Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39(1). 167–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263116000085.Search in Google Scholar

Leeser, Michael J. 2004. Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research 8(1). 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr134oa.Search in Google Scholar

Leow, Ronald. 2015. Explicit Learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315887074Search in Google Scholar

Loewen, Shawn. 2004. Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Language Learning 54(1). 153–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00251.x.Search in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H. 1991. Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In Kees de Bot, Ralph B. Ginsberg & Claire Kramsch (eds.), Foreign language rsearch in cross-cultural perspective, 39–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.2.07lonSearch in Google Scholar

Norris, John M. 2016. Language program evaluation. The Modern Language Journal 100. 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12307.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega, Lourdes. 2012. Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: One pragmatist’s view. In Plenary speech delivered at the JASELE conference. Aichi Gakuin University 4–5 August.Search in Google Scholar

Pinter, Annamaria. 2007. Some benefits of peer-peer interaction. 10-year-old children practising with a communication task. Language Teaching Research 11(2). 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807074604.Search in Google Scholar

Shak, Juliana & Sheena Gardner. 2008. Young learner perspectives on four focus-on-form tasks. Language Teaching Research 12(3). 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089923.Search in Google Scholar

Shintani, Natsuko. 2016. Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners, task-based langauge teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.9Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1177/003368829802900209Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 2009. Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047.Search in Google Scholar

Storch, Neomy & Ali Aldosari. 2010. Learners’ use of first language (Arabic) in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research 14(4). 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375362.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill. 2005. The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of Research in second language, 471–483. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Merrill & Sharon Lapkin. 2001. Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In Martin Bygate, Peter Skehan & Merrill Swain (eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing, 99–118. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Yan. 2022. Implementing tasks in young learners’ language classrooms: A collaborative teacher education initiative through task evaluation. Language Teaching Research 26(3). 530–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819894706.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-06-12
Accepted: 2025-01-20
Published Online: 2025-02-17
Published in Print: 2025-09-25

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Young L2 learners in diverse instructional contexts
  4. Research Articles
  5. Impact of post-task explicit instruction on the interaction among child EFL learners in online task-based reading lessons
  6. Can we train young EFL learners to ‘notice the gap’? Exploring the relationship between metalinguistic awareness, grammar learning and the use of metalinguistic explanations in a dictogloss task
  7. Exploring self-regulated learning behaviours of young second language learners during group work
  8. Developmental trajectories of discourse features by age and learning environment
  9. Implementing an oral task in an EFL classroom with low proficient learners: a micro-evaluation
  10. Exploring teacher-student interaction in task and non-task sequences
  11. Children learning Mongolian as an additional language through the implementation of a task-based approach
  12. “Black children are gifted at learning languages – that’s why I could do TBLT”: inclusive Blackness as a pathway for TBLT innovation
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Defining competencies for training non-native Korean speaking teachers: a Q methodology approach
  15. A cross-modal analysis of lexical sophistication: EFL and ESL learners in written and spoken production
  16. Using sentence processing speed and automaticity to predict L2 performance in the productive and receptive tasks
  17. Distance-invoked difficulty as a trigger for errors in Chinese and Japanese EFL learners’ English writings
  18. Exploring Chinese university English writing teachers’ emotions in providing feedback on student writing
  19. General auditory processing, Mandarin L1 prosodic and phonological awareness, and English L2 word learning
  20. Why is L2 pragmatics still a neglected area in EFL teaching? Uncovered stories from Vietnamese EFL teachers
  21. Validation of metacognitive knowledge in vocabulary learning and its predictive effects on incidental vocabulary learning from reading
  22. Anxiety and enjoyment in oral presentations: a mixed-method study into Chinese EFL learners’ oral presentation performance
  23. The influence of language contact and ethnic identification on Chinese as a second language learners’ oral proficiency
  24. An idiodynamic study of the interconnectedness between cognitive and affective components underlying L2 willingness to communicate
  25. “I usually just rely on my intuition and go from there.” pedagogical rules and metalinguistic awareness of pre-service EFL teachers
  26. Development and validation of Questionnaire for Self-regulated Learning Writing Strategies (QSRLWS) for EFL learners
  27. Language transfer in tense acquisition: new evidence from English learning Chinese adolescents
  28. A systematic review of English-as-a-foreign-language vocabulary learning activities for primary school students
  29. Using automated indices of cohesion to explore the growth of cohesive features in L2 writing
  30. The impact of text-audio synchronized enhancement on collocation learning from reading-while-listening: an extended replication of Jung and Lee (2023)
Downloaded on 20.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2024-0180/html
Scroll to top button