Home Linguistics & Semiotics The mass neuter of Praianese: new data and some insights
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The mass neuter of Praianese: new data and some insights

  • Pietro Milano
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Some Italo-Romance varieties of central-southern Italy present an agreement class called “mass neuter” which typically only hosts mass nouns that would otherwise be masculine in other varieties, e.g. o ffwokədef.n fire’ in Neapolitan. Previous literature has discussed whether the mass neuter is best formalised as a mark of gender, or rather as one of masshood. The most recent studies have opted for the former (cf. Loporcaro 2018). The Amalfi Coast, though, presents possible insights into this matter, but has only received few mentions in previous literature. The varieties spoken here are in fact interesting in that they have mass neuter nouns which previously were feminine nouns, e.g. o tterrədef.n dirt’ in Ravellese.

This research gathered new data from the variety of Praiano to formally describe its gender system. The data show that the mass neuter here is extremely productive, reaching to include all nouns denoting physical masses. Not all mass nouns denoting abstractions, though, can receive neuter agreement. The lack of a biunique relationship between masshood and neuter agreement makes the traditional analysis in which neuter is a gender value the most fitting, until stronger evidence against this notion can be found.

This study also reflects on how gender is assigned to Praianese nouns. In particular, it establishes that assignment to the mass neuter is solely dependent on semantic criteria, without any criteria related to the morphological or phonological form of the noun.

Abstract

Some Italo-Romance varieties of central-southern Italy present an agreement class called “mass neuter” which typically only hosts mass nouns that would otherwise be masculine in other varieties, e.g. o ffwokədef.n fire’ in Neapolitan. Previous literature has discussed whether the mass neuter is best formalised as a mark of gender, or rather as one of masshood. The most recent studies have opted for the former (cf. Loporcaro 2018). The Amalfi Coast, though, presents possible insights into this matter, but has only received few mentions in previous literature. The varieties spoken here are in fact interesting in that they have mass neuter nouns which previously were feminine nouns, e.g. o tterrədef.n dirt’ in Ravellese.

This research gathered new data from the variety of Praiano to formally describe its gender system. The data show that the mass neuter here is extremely productive, reaching to include all nouns denoting physical masses. Not all mass nouns denoting abstractions, though, can receive neuter agreement. The lack of a biunique relationship between masshood and neuter agreement makes the traditional analysis in which neuter is a gender value the most fitting, until stronger evidence against this notion can be found.

This study also reflects on how gender is assigned to Praianese nouns. In particular, it establishes that assignment to the mass neuter is solely dependent on semantic criteria, without any criteria related to the morphological or phonological form of the noun.

Downloaded on 13.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111485041-009/html
Scroll to top button