Home Philosophy Die Relevanz des Biologischen
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Die Relevanz des Biologischen

Verkörperung als Leitmotiv eines Dialogs zwischen Neurowissenschaft und Pädagogik
  • Andreas Draguhn
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Learning and memory are major areas of research in modern neurobiology. Progress in this field has led to promises of a new scientific foundation for pedagogics. Many experts in psychology and education, however, have not embraced this input from the natural sciences, and the dialogue has been much less fruitful than anticipated. In this article, we discuss two possible reasons for this failure which may provide new perspectives on a more productive interaction between disciplines. First,we state that causal biological explanations of complex mental phenomena are rare and far from complete. The complexity of living organisms, the simplicity of model systems, and the multi-level nature of causal interactions set limits on the explanatory power of neurobiological explanations. Second, both neurobiology and pedagogics tend to reduce their respective phenomena to information processing or mental operations, respectively. Both approaches neglect the embodiment of processes, and therefore miss the chance to integrate all relevant biological boundary conditions of learning. Taking these limitations into account, we suggest a series of potential contributions from neurobiology to pedagogics and - most importantly - from pedagogics to neurobiology. Neurobiology and pedagogics have much to offer for each other, provided that they reflect on their limitations and specific differences.

Abstract

Learning and memory are major areas of research in modern neurobiology. Progress in this field has led to promises of a new scientific foundation for pedagogics. Many experts in psychology and education, however, have not embraced this input from the natural sciences, and the dialogue has been much less fruitful than anticipated. In this article, we discuss two possible reasons for this failure which may provide new perspectives on a more productive interaction between disciplines. First,we state that causal biological explanations of complex mental phenomena are rare and far from complete. The complexity of living organisms, the simplicity of model systems, and the multi-level nature of causal interactions set limits on the explanatory power of neurobiological explanations. Second, both neurobiology and pedagogics tend to reduce their respective phenomena to information processing or mental operations, respectively. Both approaches neglect the embodiment of processes, and therefore miss the chance to integrate all relevant biological boundary conditions of learning. Taking these limitations into account, we suggest a series of potential contributions from neurobiology to pedagogics and - most importantly - from pedagogics to neurobiology. Neurobiology and pedagogics have much to offer for each other, provided that they reflect on their limitations and specific differences.

Downloaded on 11.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110528626-015/html
Scroll to top button