Home Philosophy Verkörpertes Wissen – verkörpertes Gedächtnis
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Verkörpertes Wissen – verkörpertes Gedächtnis

  • Thomas Fuchs
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The distinction between representational and embodied knowledge (knowing that versus knowing how) has been gaining new significance through the investigation of implicit memory. This kind of memory is formed as an organism and its environment interact over time: Recurring patterns of interaction are sedimented in the form of sensorimotor as well as affect-motor schemes.We may speak of an implicit “body memory” that underlies our habits and skills, connecting body and environment through cycles of perception and action. This embodied knowledge is actualized in appropriate situations or through overarching volitional acts, without necessarily being made explicit. In this article I analyze the structure of embodied knowledge by taking the example of learning social skills through dyadic interactions in early childhood. I argue that the non-representational, enactive knowledge acquired in these interactions is the basis of intercorporeality and empathy. Explicit or propositional forms of knowing others (“Theory of Mind”) are derived from later steps of development; they are not sufficient on their own to explain interactive and empathic human capacities. This is also borne out by a psychopathological example, namely, infantile autism where primary empathy is lacking due to disturbances of intercorporeality.

Abstract

The distinction between representational and embodied knowledge (knowing that versus knowing how) has been gaining new significance through the investigation of implicit memory. This kind of memory is formed as an organism and its environment interact over time: Recurring patterns of interaction are sedimented in the form of sensorimotor as well as affect-motor schemes.We may speak of an implicit “body memory” that underlies our habits and skills, connecting body and environment through cycles of perception and action. This embodied knowledge is actualized in appropriate situations or through overarching volitional acts, without necessarily being made explicit. In this article I analyze the structure of embodied knowledge by taking the example of learning social skills through dyadic interactions in early childhood. I argue that the non-representational, enactive knowledge acquired in these interactions is the basis of intercorporeality and empathy. Explicit or propositional forms of knowing others (“Theory of Mind”) are derived from later steps of development; they are not sufficient on their own to explain interactive and empathic human capacities. This is also borne out by a psychopathological example, namely, infantile autism where primary empathy is lacking due to disturbances of intercorporeality.

Downloaded on 11.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110528626-003/html
Scroll to top button