Startseite The Homotopy Perturbation Method for Accurate Orbits of the Planets in the Solar System: The Elliptical Kepler Equation
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Homotopy Perturbation Method for Accurate Orbits of the Planets in the Solar System: The Elliptical Kepler Equation

  • Aisha Alshaery EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. September 2017

Abstract

Accurate trajectories for the orbits of the planets in our solar system depends on obtaining an accurate solution for the elliptical Kepler equation. This equation is solved in this article using the homotopy perturbation method. Several properties of the periodicity of the obtained approximate solutions are introduced through some lemmas. Numerically, our calculations demonstrated the applicability of the obtained approximate solutions for all the planets in the solar system and also in the whole domain of eccentricity and mean anomaly. In the whole domain of the mean anomaly, 0≤M≤2π, and by using the different approximate solutions, the residuals were less than 4×10−17 for e∈[0, 0.06], 4×10−9 for e∈[0.06, 0.25], 3×10−8 for e∈[0.25, 0.40], 3×10−7 for e∈[0.40, 0.50], and 10−6 for e∈[0.50, 1.0]. Also, the approximate solutions were compared with the Bessel–Fourier series solution in the literature. In addition, the approximate homotopy solutions for the eccentric anomaly are used to show the convergence and periodicity of the approximate radial distances of Mercury and Pluto for three and five periods, respectively, as confirmation for some given lemmas. It has also been shown that the present analysis can be successfully applied to the orbit of Halley’s comet with a significant eccentricity.

Acknowledgment

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no. G-528-363-38. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR for technical and financial support. I appreciate the referee for his close attention and the time spent to read my article in detail. The reviewer’s precise comments were insightful for making this paper more comprehensive.

References

[1] F. R. Moulton, An Introduction to Celestial Mechanics, 2nd revised edition, Dover, New York 1970.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] N. I. Ioakimids and K. E. Papadakis, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 35, 305 (1985).10.1007/BF01227827Suche in Google Scholar

[3] N. M. Swerdlow, J. Hist. Astron. 31, 339 (2000).10.1177/002182860003100404Suche in Google Scholar

[4] L. Stumpf, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astr. 74, 95 (1999).10.1023/A:1008339416143Suche in Google Scholar

[5] M. Palacios, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 138, 335 (2002).10.1016/S0377-0427(01)00369-7Suche in Google Scholar

[6] P. Colwell, Am. Math. Mon. 99, 45 (1992).10.2307/2324547Suche in Google Scholar

[7] P. Colwell, Solving Kepler’s Equation over Three Centuries, Willmann-Bell Ed., Richmond, 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] K. Boubaker, Am. Math. Mon. 17, 1 (2010).Suche in Google Scholar

[9] R. Esmaelzadeh and H. Ghadiri, Int. J. Comput. Appl. 89, 31 (2014).10.5120/15517-4394Suche in Google Scholar

[10] C. Mircea and C. Sorin, On the Precision of the Successive Approximations Method Tested on Kepler’s Equation from Astronomy, Analele Universit din Oradea, Fascicula Protecþia Mediului, Vol. XXII, 319, 2014.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] G. Adomian and R. Rach, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 105, 141 (1985).10.1016/0022-247X(85)90102-7Suche in Google Scholar

[12] G. Adomian and R. Rach, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 112, 136 (1985).10.1016/0022-247X(85)90280-XSuche in Google Scholar

[13] G. Adomian and R. Rach, 15, 33 (1986).10.1108/eb005727Suche in Google Scholar

[14] A. Ebaid, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 235, 1914 (2011).10.1016/j.cam.2010.09.007Suche in Google Scholar

[15] J. S. Duan and R. Rach, Appl. Math. Comput. 218, 4090 (2011).10.1016/j.amc.2011.09.037Suche in Google Scholar

[16] E. H. Ali, A. Ebaid, and R. Rach, Comput. Math. Appl. 63, 1056 (2012).10.1016/j.camwa.2011.12.010Suche in Google Scholar

[17] A. M. Wazwaz, R. Rach, and J. S. Duan, Appl. Math. Comput. 219, 5004 (2013).10.1016/j.amc.2012.11.012Suche in Google Scholar

[18] A. Ebaid, M. D. Aljoufi, and A. M. Wazwaz, Appl. Math. Lett. 46, 117 (2015).10.1016/j.aml.2015.02.017Suche in Google Scholar

[19] A. Patra and S. Saha Ray, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 76, 162 (2014).10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.04.020Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Z. Ayati and J. Biazar, J. Egyptian Math. Soc. 23, 424 (2015).10.1016/j.joems.2014.06.015Suche in Google Scholar

[21] J. M. A. Danby and T. M. Burkardt, Celestial Mech. 31, 303 (1987).10.1007/BF01235847Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-5-28
Accepted: 2017-8-20
Published Online: 2017-9-13
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 30.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zna-2017-0181/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen