Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Discrete Solitons and Bäcklund Transformation for the Coupled Ablowitz–Ladik Equations

  • , EMAIL logo , and
Published/Copyright: September 26, 2017

Abstract

Under investigation in this paper are the coupled Ablowitz–Ladik equations, which are linked to the optical fibres, waveguide arrays, and optical lattices. Binary Bell polynomials are applied to construct the bilinear forms and bilinear Bäcklund transformation. Bright/dark one- and two-soliton solutions are also obtained. Asymptotic analysis indicates that the interactions between the bright/dark two solitons are elastic. Amplitudes and velocities of the bright solitons increase as the value of the lattice spacing increases. Increasing value of the lattice spacing can lead to the increase of both the bright solitons’ amplitudes and velocities, and the decrease of the velocities of the dark solitons. The lattice spacing parameter has no effect on the amplitudes of the dark solitons. Overtaking interaction between the unidirectional bright two solitons and a bound state of the two equal-velocity solitons is presented. Overtaking interaction between the unidirectional dark two solitons and the two parallel dark solitons is also plotted.

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 11772017, 11272023 and 11471050, by the Fund of State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications), and by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China under Grant No. 2011BUPTYB02.

References

[1] W. M. Moslem, P. K. Shukla, and B. Eliasson, Europhys. Lett. 96, 25002 (2011).10.1209/0295-5075/96/25002Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. Chabchoub, N. P. Hoffmann, and N. Akhmediev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 204502 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.204502Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Z.Z. Lan, Y.T. Gao, J.W. Yang, C.Q. Su, B.Q. Mao, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat. 44, 360 (2017).10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.07.013Search in Google Scholar

[4] T. Xu, H. Li, H. Zhang, M. Li, S. Lan, Appl. Math. Lett. 63, 88 (2017).10.1016/j.aml.2016.07.024Search in Google Scholar

[5] L. F. Mollenauer, R. H. Stolen, and J. P. Gordon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1095 (1980).10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.1095Search in Google Scholar

[6] X. Y. Gao, Appl. Math. Lett. 73, 143 (2017).10.1016/j.aml.2017.03.020Search in Google Scholar

[7] K. E. Strecker, G. B. Partridge, A. G. Truscott, and R. G. Hulet, Nature 417, 150 (2002).10.1038/nature747Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, Acad., San Diego, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Li, T. Xu, D. X. Meng, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 124001 (2016).10.7566/JPSJ.85.124001Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. Li, T. Xu, L. Wang, F. H. Qi, Appl. Math. Lett. 60, 8 (2016)10.1016/j.aml.2016.03.014Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. J. Su and Y. T. Gao, Superlattices Microstruct. 104, 498 (2017).10.1016/j.spmi.2016.12.056Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. J. Su, Y. T. Gao, and S. L. Jia, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 50, 128 (2017).10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.01.028Search in Google Scholar

[13] T. T. Jia, Y. Z. Chai, and H. Q. Hao, Math. Problems Eng. 2016, 1741245 (2016) .10.1155/2016/1741245Search in Google Scholar

[14] T. T. Jia, Y. Z. Chai, and H. Q. Hao, Superlattices Microstruct. 105, 172 (2017).10.1016/j.spmi.2016.10.091Search in Google Scholar

[15] P. Marquie, J. M. Bilbault, and M. Remoissenet, Phys. Rev. E 51, 6217 (1995).10.1103/PhysRevE.51.6127Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] M. J. Ablowitz and J. F. Ladik, J. Math. Phys. 17, 1011 (1975).10.1063/1.523009Search in Google Scholar

[17] Y. Ohta, Chaos Soliton. Fract. 11, 13 (2000).10.1016/S0960-0779(98)00272-0Search in Google Scholar

[18] Y. Ohta, Stud. Appl. Math. 122, 427447 (2009).10.1111/j.1467-9590.2009.00443.xSearch in Google Scholar

[19] V. V. Konotop and V. E. Vekslerchik, J. Phys. A 25, 4037 (1992).10.1088/0305-4470/25/14/018Search in Google Scholar

[20] D. J. Kaup, Math. Comput. Simulat. 69, 322 (2005).10.1016/j.matcom.2005.01.015Search in Google Scholar

[21] A. Chowdury, A. Ankiewicz, and N. Akhmediev, Phys. Rev. E 90, 012902 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012902Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] X. Y. Wen and Z. Yan, Chaos 26, 120110 (2016).10.1063/1.4972111Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] P. G. Kevrekidis, G. J. Herring, S. Lafortune, and Q. E. Hoq, Phys. Lett. A 376, 982 (2012).10.1016/j.physleta.2011.11.023Search in Google Scholar

[24] Z. Y. Yan and D. M. Jiang, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 395, 542 (2012).10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.05.058Search in Google Scholar

[25] F. Yu, Phys. Rev. E 91, 032914 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevE.91.032914Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] A. Ankiewicz, N. Devine, M. Ünal, A. Chowdury, and N. Akhmediev, J. Opt. 15, 064008 (2013).10.1088/2040-8978/15/6/064008Search in Google Scholar

[27] E. T. Bell, Ann. Math. 35, 258 (1934).10.2307/1968431Search in Google Scholar

[28] C. Gilson, F. Lambert, J. Nimmo, and R. Willox, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 452, 223 (1996).10.1098/rspa.1996.0013Search in Google Scholar

[29] M. Li, T. Xu, Physical Review E 91, 033202 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevE.91.033202Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] X. Y. Gao, Ocean Eng. 96, 245 (2015).10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.12.017Search in Google Scholar

[31] P. Jin, C. A. Bouman, and K. D. Sauer, IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 1, 200 (2015).10.1109/TCI.2015.2461492Search in Google Scholar

[32] W. R. Sun, B. Tian, H. Zhong, and H. L. Zhen, Stud. Appl. Math. 132, 65 (2014).10.1111/sapm.12021Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-6-7
Accepted: 2017-8-23
Published Online: 2017-9-26
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zna-2017-0196/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button