Startseite Sports utility semiotics: A semantic differential study of symbolic potential in automobile design
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Sports utility semiotics: A semantic differential study of symbolic potential in automobile design

  • Andrew Wilson und Małgorzata Haładewicz-Grzelak EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 24. September 2015

Abstract

The article aims to illuminate the issue of symbolic potential in postmodern society through a semiotic study of car design. In Baudrillard’s terminology, we explore the experience and sociological and psychological materiality of objects that, being above objects’ perceptible materiality, constantly modify the integrity of technological systems (Baudrillard 2005 [1968]: 6). The target concepts are analyzed through Baudrillard’s lens of symbolic capital and his technological system of objects, coupled with the method of semantic differential (SD; e.g., Osgood 1979, 1981) against the insights of Tartu semiotics. Such a complex framework helps to establish affective attitudes of the subjects towards scales selected for their perceptual saliency. The analysis is based on the responses of students in a Polish university who were administered an instrument comprising 14 concepts and 37 scales. The results of statistical analysis yield a semantic space with two factors: potency and activity/dynamism, which we shall call social prestige. At this stage of the analysis we could not determine the evaluation factor. The scales that loaded significantly showed that there is indeed an increment of perceptual saliency in both extracted factors in the case of target stimuli (pickups and SUVs).

References

Barthes, Roland.1986 [1964]. Elements of semiology. Paris: Editions de Seuil.Suche in Google Scholar

Baudrillard, Jean.1998 [1970]. The consumer society. Myths and structures. [trans. Chris Turner]. London: SAGE.10.4135/9781526401502Suche in Google Scholar

Baudrillard, Jean.2005 [1968]. The system of objects. London: Verso.Suche in Google Scholar

Costello, Anna B. & JasonOsborne.2005. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 10(7). http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7.pdf (accessed 28 May 2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Curran, James, M.2005. An introduction to Bayesian credible intervals for sampling error in DNA profiles. Law, Probability, and Risk4. 115126.Suche in Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel.2002. Understanding media semiotics. London: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel.2008 [1999]. Of cigarettes, high heels, and other interesting things: An introduction to semiotics. New York: Palgrave Macmillans.10.1057/9780230612785Suche in Google Scholar

Evans, Christopher & CarolineHumphrey.2002. After lives of a Mongolia yurt: The archeology of a Chinese tourist camp. Journal of Material Culture7(2). 189210.10.1177/1359183502007002639Suche in Google Scholar

Eves, Bob & MartinLefley.2002. The color concept generator: An adaptive fuzzy color semiotic design tool. Semiotica142(1/4). 91105.10.1515/semi.2002.087Suche in Google Scholar

Fleischer, Michael.2003. Wirklichkeitskonstruktion: Beitrage zur systemtheoretischen Konstruktivismusforschung. Dresden: Thelem.Suche in Google Scholar

Genosko, Gary.1994. Baudrillard and signs: Signification ablaze. London: Rutledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Gorsuch, Richard.1983. Factor analysis, 2nd edn. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Haddington, Pentti, MauriceNeville & TinaKeisanen.2012. Meaning in motion: Sharing the car, sharing the drive. Semiotica191(1/4). 101116.Suche in Google Scholar

Haładewicz-Grzelak, Małgorzata & AndrewWilson. 2013. Mapping skeuomorphic artefacts among Polish young adults: A semantic differential study of sculptures at the Licheń pilgrimage center. Polish Sociological Review181(1). 103128.Suche in Google Scholar

Hogenraad, Robert & RichardDavid.1971. Le différenciateur sémantique: Théorie, pratique, et programmes de traitement en ordinateur. Louvain: Université Catholique de Louvain, Centre de Calcul, Rapport no. 7, November 1971.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoshino, Katsumi.1987. Semiotic marketing and product conceptualization. In JeanUmiker-Sebeok (ed.), Marketing and semiotics: New directions in the study of signs for sale, 4156. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110853254.41Suche in Google Scholar

Hsu, Shang, Ming C.Chuang & Chien C.Chang. 2000. A semantic differential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics25. 375391.10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00026-8Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman O.1973. Essais de linguistique générale. Vol. II. Rapports internes et externs du language. Paris: Les Éditions de minuit.Suche in Google Scholar

Karjalainen, Toni-Matti. 2007. It looks like a Toyota: Educational approaches to designing for visual brand recognition. International Journal of Design1(1). 6781.Suche in Google Scholar

Lefebvre, Alain.1989. The decorative truck as a communicative device. Semiotica75(3/4). 215227.10.1515/semi.1989.75.3-4.215Suche in Google Scholar

Lotman, Mihhail.2002. Semiotika kul’tury v tartusko-moskovskoj semioticheskoj shkole. [Cultural Semiotics in Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics]. In Y.Lotman (ed.), Istorija i tipologija russkoj kul’tury [History and typology of Russian culture], 520. St. Peterburg: Iskusstvo.Suche in Google Scholar

Lotman, Yuri M. & AlexandrePjatigorskij. 1969. Le texte et la fonction. Semiotica1(2). 205217.Suche in Google Scholar

MacCallum, Robert, KeithWidaman, ShaoboZhang & SeheeHong. 1999. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods4(1). 8499.10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84Suche in Google Scholar

Minato, Saburoh.1983. Some mathematical attitudinal data on eight grade students in Japan measured by a semantic differential. Educational Studies in Mathematics14. 1938.10.1007/BF00704700Suche in Google Scholar

Mick, David Glen, James E.Burroughs, PatrickHetzel & Mary YokoBrannen. 2004. Pursuing the meaning of meaning in the commercial world: An international review of marketing and consumer research founded on semiotics. Semiotica152(1/4). 174.10.1515/semi.2004.2004.152-1-4.1Suche in Google Scholar

Mortelmans, Dimitri.2005. Sign values in processes of distinction: The concept of luxury. Semiotica157(1/4). 497520.10.1515/semi.2005.2005.157.1-4.497Suche in Google Scholar

Osgood, Charles,George Suci, Percy Tannenbaum. 1967[1956]. The measurement of meaning. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Osgood, Charles.1964. Semantic differential technique in the comparative study of cultures. American Anthropologist66(3). 171200.10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00880Suche in Google Scholar

Osgood, Charles.1979. Focus on meaning: Explorations in semantic space. Berline: Mouton.10.1515/9783110811179Suche in Google Scholar

Osgood, Charles.1981. The cognitive dynamics of synesthesia and metahphor. Review of Research in Visual Arts Education7(2). 5680.Suche in Google Scholar

Porphyrios, Demetri.1997 [1983]. Classicism is not a style. In CharlesJencks & KarlKropf (eds.), Theories and manifestoes in contemporary architecture, 179181. Chichester: Academy.Suche in Google Scholar

Solomon, Odile.1988. Semiotics and marketing: New directions in industrial design applications. International Journal of Research in Marketing4(3). 201215.10.1016/S0167-8116(88)80005-3Suche in Google Scholar

Velicer, Wayne F. & Joseph L.Fava.1998. Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods3(2). 231251.10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.231Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-9-24
Published in Print: 2015-10-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Sports utility semiotics: A semantic differential study of symbolic potential in automobile design
  3. Making meaning in women’s spiritual autobiography: Language, materiality, and agency in colonial New Granada
  4. What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? VII: Sleight of hand
  5. Towards a semiotics of multilingualism
  6. In the arena: Communication between animals and Christians in damnatio ad bestias
  7. Dire l’indicible et décrire l’indescriptible: Ressources imagières et linguistiques des poilus
  8. Mathematics and Peirce’s semiotic
  9. Icarus ignored: Riffaterre and Eagleton on Auden’s Musée des Beaux Arts
  10. The “monster” of Seymour Avenue: Internet crime news and Gothic reportage in the case of Ariel Castro
  11. Kenneth L. Pike and science fiction
  12. Environmental communications: The reader’s perspective
  13. A Peircean typology of cultural prime symbols: Culture as category
  14. The poetry of sound and the sound of poetry: Navajo poetry, phonological iconicity, and linguistic relativity
  15. The language of fashion in postmodern society: A social semiotic perspective
  16. From Saussure to sociology and back to linguistics: Niklas Luhmann’s reception of signifiant/signifié and langue/parole as the basis for a model of language change
  17. The machine or the garden: Semiotics and the American yard
  18. Photogénie as “the Other” of the semiotics of cinema: On Yuri Lotman’s concept of “the mythological”
  19. Who said it? Voices in news translation, from a semiotic perspective
  20. Why semiotics, why poetry?
  21. How brands (don’t) do things: Corporate branding as practices of imagining “commens
  22. Film space as mental space
  23. Netizen communicology: China daily and the Internet construction of group culture
  24. Questions toward a Peircean phenomenological description of association
  25. Colonial bodies: Slavery, wage-slavery, and the representation of race
  26. Discourse analysis with Peirce? Making sense of discursive regularities: The case of online university prospectuses
  27. Heidegger and the signs of history
  28. To be continued: meaning-making in serialized manga as functional-multimodal narrative
  29. Empiricism within the limits of postmodernism alone: On the emergence of the logically real within the multi-perspectival field
  30. Propaganda mala fide: Towards a comparative semiotics of violent religious persuasion
  31. Review article
  32. Peircean visual semiotics: Potentials to be explored
Heruntergeladen am 19.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2015-0044/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen