Photogénie as “the Other” of the semiotics of cinema: On Yuri Lotman’s concept of “the mythological”
-
Kim Soo Hwan
Abstract
One of the most problematic concepts in film theory, photogénie, refers to the dimension of “the Other,” which is not fully covered by the process of cultural signification, and obviously verges on a zone “beyond” the semiotics. Exactly in this site Epstein, Balazs, and Barthes ought to affirm the existence of the problematic “the Other” level of signification – an autonomous entity as a potential semiotic threat. Yuri Lotman’s view on cinema, in particular, his thought on “the mythological” essence of cinema, can provide productive insight into the question: how can the semiotics of cinema deal with this elusive and ineffable phenomenon, which is extremely difficult to manipulate? His thoughts on “the mythological” as another (asemiotic) level of semiosis, and his concepts of close-up as “proper name” can give us a chance to admit positively this essential “alterity” of cinematic signification, not just denying or transcendentalizing it as some mysterious “thing-in-itself.”
Funding statement: Funding: This work was supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund of 2014.
References
Aumont, J.1992. Du visage au cinema. Paris: Editions de l’Etoile.Search in Google Scholar
Balazs, B.1953. Theory of the film: Character and growth of a new art. New York: Roy.Search in Google Scholar
Balazs, B.2001 [1924]. Der sichtbare Mensch oder dei Kutur des Films. Frankfurt am Main: Surhkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, R.1972. Mythologies. New York: Hill & Wang.Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, R.1978. The third meaning: Research notes on some Eisenstein stills. In Image – music – text, 52–68. New York: Hill & Wang.Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, R.1981. Camera lucida: Reflections on photography. New York: Hill & Wang.Search in Google Scholar
Bazin, A.2004. The ontology of the photographic image. In P.Simpson, A.Utterson & K. J.Shepherdson (eds.), Film theory: Critical concepts in media and cultural studies, vol. 4, 19–24. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Bulgakova, O.2005. Factory of gestures [in Russian]. Мoscow: Н.L.О.Search in Google Scholar
Dawkins, R.2005. Deleuze, Peirce, and the cinematic sign. Semiotic Review of Books15(2). 8–12.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, G.1989. Cinema 2: The time-image, H. Tompson & R. Galeta (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Doane, M. A.2003. The close-up: Scale and detail in the cinema. Differences14(3). 89–111.10.1215/10407391-14-3-89Search in Google Scholar
Eagle, H.2006. Bipolar asymmetry, indeterminacy, and creativity in cinema. In A.Schönle (ed.), Lotman and cultural studies: Encounters and extensions, 229–247. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, U.1985. On the contribution of film to semiotics. In GeraldMast & MarshallCohen (eds.), Film theory and criticism: Introductory readings, 3rd edn., 194–214. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Epstein, J.1988a. On certain characteristics of Photogénie. In RichardAbel (ed.), French film theory and criticism: A history/anthology, vol. 1, 314–320. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Epstein, J.1988b. Magnification. In RichardAbel (ed.), French film theory and criticism: A history/anthology, vol. 1, 235–241. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fried, M.2005. Barthes’s Punctum. Critical Inquiry31. 539–574.10.1086/430984Search in Google Scholar
Iampolski, M.1993. The essential bone structure: Mimesis in Eisenstein. In Eisenstein Rediscovered, 177–188. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Iampolski, M.2004. Language – body – event: Cinematography and the pursuit of meaning [in Russian]. Мoscow: Н.L.О.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.1971. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings, vol. 2, 386–392. Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, S. H.2003. The fundamental aspects of the theoretical evolution of Yuri M. Lotman[in Russian]. Мoscow: Н.L.О.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Y. M.1976. Semiotics of cinema (Michigan Slavic Contributions 5), Mark E. Suino (trans.). Ann Arbor: Department of Slavic Language and Literatures, University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Y. M.1990. Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture, A. Shukman (trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Y. M.1994. Remarks on the Tartu semiotic school [in Russian]. InY. M. Lotman and the Tartu-Moscow Semiotic School, 497–501. Мoscow: Jazyka Semiokika Kul’tura.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Y. M.1998. The place of the art of cinema in the mechanism of culture [in Russian]. InOn art, 650–661. St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPb.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Y. M. & B. A.Uspenskij.1977. Myth – name – culture. In D. P.Lucid (ed.), Soviet semiotics: An anthology, 233–252. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S.1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C.Hartshorne, P.Weiss & A. W.Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Sports utility semiotics: A semantic differential study of symbolic potential in automobile design
- Making meaning in women’s spiritual autobiography: Language, materiality, and agency in colonial New Granada
- What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? VII: Sleight of hand
- Towards a semiotics of multilingualism
- In the arena: Communication between animals and Christians in damnatio ad bestias
- Dire l’indicible et décrire l’indescriptible: Ressources imagières et linguistiques des poilus
- Mathematics and Peirce’s semiotic
- Icarus ignored: Riffaterre and Eagleton on Auden’s Musée des Beaux Arts
- The “monster” of Seymour Avenue: Internet crime news and Gothic reportage in the case of Ariel Castro
- Kenneth L. Pike and science fiction
- Environmental communications: The reader’s perspective
- A Peircean typology of cultural prime symbols: Culture as category
- The poetry of sound and the sound of poetry: Navajo poetry, phonological iconicity, and linguistic relativity
- The language of fashion in postmodern society: A social semiotic perspective
- From Saussure to sociology and back to linguistics: Niklas Luhmann’s reception of signifiant/signifié and langue/parole as the basis for a model of language change
- The machine or the garden: Semiotics and the American yard
- Photogénie as “the Other” of the semiotics of cinema: On Yuri Lotman’s concept of “the mythological”
- Who said it? Voices in news translation, from a semiotic perspective
- Why semiotics, why poetry?
- How brands (don’t) do things: Corporate branding as practices of imagining “commens”
- Film space as mental space
- Netizen communicology: China daily and the Internet construction of group culture
- Questions toward a Peircean phenomenological description of association
- Colonial bodies: Slavery, wage-slavery, and the representation of race
- Discourse analysis with Peirce? Making sense of discursive regularities: The case of online university prospectuses
- Heidegger and the signs of history
- To be continued: meaning-making in serialized manga as functional-multimodal narrative
- Empiricism within the limits of postmodernism alone: On the emergence of the logically real within the multi-perspectival field
- Propaganda mala fide: Towards a comparative semiotics of violent religious persuasion
- Review article
- Peircean visual semiotics: Potentials to be explored
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Sports utility semiotics: A semantic differential study of symbolic potential in automobile design
- Making meaning in women’s spiritual autobiography: Language, materiality, and agency in colonial New Granada
- What is the proper characterization of the alphabet? VII: Sleight of hand
- Towards a semiotics of multilingualism
- In the arena: Communication between animals and Christians in damnatio ad bestias
- Dire l’indicible et décrire l’indescriptible: Ressources imagières et linguistiques des poilus
- Mathematics and Peirce’s semiotic
- Icarus ignored: Riffaterre and Eagleton on Auden’s Musée des Beaux Arts
- The “monster” of Seymour Avenue: Internet crime news and Gothic reportage in the case of Ariel Castro
- Kenneth L. Pike and science fiction
- Environmental communications: The reader’s perspective
- A Peircean typology of cultural prime symbols: Culture as category
- The poetry of sound and the sound of poetry: Navajo poetry, phonological iconicity, and linguistic relativity
- The language of fashion in postmodern society: A social semiotic perspective
- From Saussure to sociology and back to linguistics: Niklas Luhmann’s reception of signifiant/signifié and langue/parole as the basis for a model of language change
- The machine or the garden: Semiotics and the American yard
- Photogénie as “the Other” of the semiotics of cinema: On Yuri Lotman’s concept of “the mythological”
- Who said it? Voices in news translation, from a semiotic perspective
- Why semiotics, why poetry?
- How brands (don’t) do things: Corporate branding as practices of imagining “commens”
- Film space as mental space
- Netizen communicology: China daily and the Internet construction of group culture
- Questions toward a Peircean phenomenological description of association
- Colonial bodies: Slavery, wage-slavery, and the representation of race
- Discourse analysis with Peirce? Making sense of discursive regularities: The case of online university prospectuses
- Heidegger and the signs of history
- To be continued: meaning-making in serialized manga as functional-multimodal narrative
- Empiricism within the limits of postmodernism alone: On the emergence of the logically real within the multi-perspectival field
- Propaganda mala fide: Towards a comparative semiotics of violent religious persuasion
- Review article
- Peircean visual semiotics: Potentials to be explored
