Startseite Flexible epoxy composite coatings modified by reactive rubber with improvements in water and corrosive resistances
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Flexible epoxy composite coatings modified by reactive rubber with improvements in water and corrosive resistances

  • Jinwei Wang EMAIL logo , Xiangming Guo und Di Wu
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. Dezember 2019
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Epoxy composites were modified by reactive polybutadiene, and their resistance to T-bend and liquid permeation was evaluated to develop flexible epoxy composite coatings with good resistance to corrosive media. The composites’ resistance to bending on galvanic sheets was improved with the addition of up to around 15 wt.% amino liquid polybutadiene (ALPB) as reflected by the cross-section images after bending tests and bending times at break. The initial impedance increased with the addition of up to 15 wt.% ALPB in the composites, whereas the resistance reduced in a much slow rate with immersion time for the sample containing ALPB at around 10 wt.%. This result suggested that their resisting ability depended on the amount and dispersion of ALPB. The Rc and Cc parameters from the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements revealed that the improvement in resistance to electrolyte resulted from the compactness increment at certain range of ALPB additions, which was also supported by their water uptake trends. Moreover, the addition of ALPB above 20% resulted in severe aggregations and phase separations. The resulting reduced compactness reflects the fact that the excessive reactive rubber addition leads to the negative effects on their resisting ability upon both T-bend and liquid permeation.

  1. Research funding: The investigation is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFE0203600.

References

[1] Amoozadeh SM, Mahdavian M. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2015, 24, 2464–2472.10.1007/s11665-015-1526-xSuche in Google Scholar

[2] Shon M, Kwon H. Corros. Sci. 2009, 51, 650–657.10.1016/j.corsci.2008.11.022Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Yahyaie H, Ebrahimi M, Tahami HV, Mafi ER. Prog. Org. Coat. 2013, 76, 286–292.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.09.016Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Wu T, Irvinga PE, Ayrea D, Jackson P, Zhao F. Inter. J. Fatigue 2017, 99, 13–24.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.02.010Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Li X, Li GM, Su XH. J. Polym. Eng. 2019, 39, 10–15.10.1515/polyeng-2018-0056Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Sprenger S. Polymer 2013, 554, 4790–4797.10.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.011Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Kong J, Ning R, Tang Y. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 1639–1641.10.1007/s10853-005-1862-6Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Zhou H, Xu S. Mater. Lett. 2014, 121, 238–240.10.1016/j.matlet.2014.01.160Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Garg MS, Srivastava K, Srivastava D. Prog. Org. Coat. 2015, 78, 307–317.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.08.004Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Liu S, Fan X, He C. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 125, 132–140.10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.01.009Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Fröhlich J, Kautz H, Thomann R, Frey H, Mülhaupt R. Polymer 2004, 45, 2155–2164.10.1016/j.polymer.2004.01.065Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Muratoglu OK, Argon AS, Cohen RE, Weinberg M. Polymer 1995, 36, 921–930.10.1016/0032-3861(95)93590-ISuche in Google Scholar

[13] Khan H, Amin M, Ahmad A. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2018, 56, 91–123.10.1515/rams-2018-0040Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Szymanska J, Bakar M, Kostrzewa M, Lavorgna M. J. Polym. Eng. 2016, 36, 43–52.10.1515/polyeng-2014-0393Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Wu D, Wang J. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 45985.10.1002/app.45985Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Zhou Q, Jie S, Li B. Polymer 2015, 67, 208–215.10.1016/j.polymer.2015.04.078Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Yahyaei H, Ebrahimi M, Tahami HV, Mafi ER, Akbarinezhad E. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 113, 136–142.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.09.007Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Li T, Heinzer MJ, Redline EM, Zuo F, Bates FS, Francis LF. Prog. Org. Coat. 2014, 77, 1145–1154.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.03.015Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Barbakadze K, Brostow W, Datashvili T, Hnatchuk N, Lekishvili N. Wear 2018, 394–395, 228–235.10.1016/j.wear.2017.08.006Suche in Google Scholar

[20] ASTM D4145-10. Standard Test Method for Coating Flexibility of Prepainted Sheet, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018. DOI: 10.1520/D4151-10.10.1520/D4151-10Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Fortini A, Mazzanti V. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46674.10.1002/app.46674Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Luo H, Dong C, Li X, Xiao K. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 64, 211–220.10.1016/j.electacta.2012.01.025Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Zhang D, Qian H, Wang L, Li X. Corros. Sci. 2016, 103, 230–241.10.1016/j.corsci.2015.11.023Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Qian H, Xu D, Du C, Zhang D, Li X, Huang L, Deng L, Tu Y, Mol JMC, Terryn HA. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 2355–2364.10.1039/C6TA10903ASuche in Google Scholar

[25] Tang J, Wang J, He Y, Tong Z, Shen Z, Li X, Li B. Prog. Org. Coat. 2008, 63, 195–200.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.05.010Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Ramírez C, Rico M, Torres A, Barral L, López J, Montero B. Eur. Polym. J. 2008, 44, 3035–3045.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.07.024Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Spagnoli A, Terzano M, Brighenti R, Artoni F, Stahle P. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2018, 148, 554–564.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.013Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Chen L, Jia Z, Guo X, Zhong B, Chen Y, Luo Y, Jia D. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 336, 748–756.10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.044Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Deyab MA, Ouarsal R, Al-Sabagh AM, Lachkar M, Bali BE. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 107, 37–42.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.03.014Suche in Google Scholar

[30] Ghasemi-Kahrizsangi A, Shariatpanahi H, Neshati J, Akbarinezhad E. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 331, 115–126.10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.038Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Kordzangeneh S, Naghibi S, Esmaeili H. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2018, 27, 219–227.10.1007/s11665-017-3080-1Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Bakhshandeh E, Jannesari A, Ranjbar Z, Sobhani S, Saeb MR. Prog. Org. Coat. 2014, 77, 1169–1183.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.04.005Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Behzadnasab M, Mirabedini SM, Esfandeh M, Farnood RR. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 105, 212–224.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.01.006Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Dong Y, Zhou Q. Corros. Sci. 2014, 78, 22–28.10.1016/j.corsci.2013.08.017Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Khan H, Amin M, Yasin M, Ali M, Ahmad A. J.Polym. Eng. 2017, 37, 671–680.10.1515/polyeng-2016-0102Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Sharifi M, Jang C, Abrams CF, Palmese GR. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 7495–7500.10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00677Suche in Google Scholar

[37] Khan H, Amin M, Ahmad A, Yasin M. J. Elastom. Plast. 2018, 50, 501–519.10.1177/0095244317733769Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Trinh BM, Mekonnen T. Polymer 2018, 155, 64–74.10.1016/j.polymer.2018.08.076Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-08-22
Accepted: 2019-10-28
Published Online: 2019-12-06
Published in Print: 2019-12-18

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 28.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2019-0276/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen