Home Effects of tension fatigue on the structure and properties of carbon black filled-SBR and SBR/TPI blends
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effects of tension fatigue on the structure and properties of carbon black filled-SBR and SBR/TPI blends

  • Liu Yang ORCID logo , Kaikai Liu , Zijun Gu and Aihua Du EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 7, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the impact of tension fatigue on the structure and properties of filled SBR and SBR/TPI blends. The effect of tension fatigue on the dynamic properties of carbon black-filled styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) and SBR/trans-1,4-polyisoprene (SBR/TPI) blend vulcanizates were investigated by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The Mooney-Rivlin analysis of tensile stress-strain data is used for the determination of a rubber network crosslink density. The fatigue fracture surface of SBR/TPI vulcanizates was observed with a scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The crystallinity of TPI in carbon black-filled SBR/TPI (80/20) was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The results showed that the incorporation of TPI into SBR vulcanizates influences the fatigue properties of the blend vulcanizates. The blend vulcanizates showed optimum fatigue properties with 20 phr TPI. With increasing fatigue cycles, the tensile properties and crosslink density of SBR vulcanizates were decreased substantially. Compared with that of SBR vulcanizates, the tensile properties and crosslink density of SBR/TPI (80/20) blend vulcanizates changed little with the increase in fatigue cycles, and tan δ and E′ decreased gradually with the fatigue cycles. There was a sharp decrease in the E′ and tan δ curve in the temperature range of 40 ~ 60°C. The XRD diffraction peak corresponding to 3.9 Å broadened when the fatigue cycles were increased to 1 million times, and a new peak with inter-planar spacing at 7.6 and 4.7 Å appeared.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 51073085

Funding statement: The authors would like to acknowledge the National Natural Science Committee of China for their support (51073085) and the Shandong Province Educational Department (BS2009CL024)

References

[1] Gaurav A, Singh KK. Polym. Compos. 2016, 39, 1–24.10.1002/pc.23935Search in Google Scholar

[2] Li C, Huang F, Wang J, Liang X, Huang S, Gu J. J. Polym. Eng. 2017, 32, 137–146.10.1515/polyeng-2016-0382Search in Google Scholar

[3] Feizhou L, Lu ZL, Wang XS, Xi YT. J. Polym. Res. 2017, 24, 100.10.1007/s10965-017-1245-0Search in Google Scholar

[4] Hooreweder BV, Coninck FD, Moens D, Boonen R, Sas P. Polym. Test. 2010, 29, 319–326.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2009.12.006Search in Google Scholar

[5] Mahapatra SS. J. Polym. Eng. 2011, 29, 481–502.10.54648/ASAB2011059Search in Google Scholar

[6] Kim C, Dennis JD. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1987, 27, 271–276.10.1002/pen.760270406Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gent AN, Lindley PB, Thomas AG. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1964, 455, 455–466.10.1002/app.1964.070080129Search in Google Scholar

[8] Gent AN, Lindley PB. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1964, 455, 708–721.10.1002/app.1964.070080129Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zhang P, Zhao SG. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 10, 3535–3541.10.1002/app.30558Search in Google Scholar

[10] Li JG, Zhang P, Zhao SG. China Synthetic Rubber Industry 2008, 31, 127–129 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

[11] Huang YH, Liu JW, Zhang P. China Synthetic Rubber Industry 2009, 56, 464–467 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

[12] Yao H, Weng G, Liu Y, Sui GX. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 1–4.10.1002/app.41217Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ding Y, Cao X, Weng G, Yin Q, Wang L, Chen Z. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 44527.10.1002/app.44527Search in Google Scholar

[14] Wang Y, Xia L, Xin Z. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2017, 29, 190–197.10.1002/pat.4102Search in Google Scholar

[15] Yao L, Guo S, Kang HL, Yang F, Fang QH. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 33, 39–44.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zhang WY, Huang BC, Du AH. China Synthetic Rubber Industry 2001, 48, 709–712 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

[17] Zhang WY, Huang BC, Du AH. China Synthetic Rubber Industry 2002, 49, 69–72 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

[18] Wang FS, Du AH, Li XD, Liu YP, Zhao YX, Huang BC. China Synthetic Rubber Industry 2005, 52, 664–666 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

[19] Mullins L. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1959, 2, 257–263.10.1002/app.1959.070020601Search in Google Scholar

[20] Baboo M, Dixit M, Sharma K, Saxena NS. Int. J. Polymer. Mater. 2009, 58, 636–646.10.1080/00914030903146704Search in Google Scholar

[21] Wang H, Zhang X, Nie H, Wang R, He A. Compos. Part A 2018, 116, 197–205.10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.11.001Search in Google Scholar

[22] Fu X, Huang C, Zhu Y, Huang G, Wu J. Polymer 2019, 161, 41–48.10.1016/j.polymer.2018.12.005Search in Google Scholar

[23] Yang SB, Pu XX, Huang ZY, Wang QY. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 47528.10.1002/app.41113Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-09-04
Accepted: 2019-10-15
Published Online: 2019-12-07
Published in Print: 2019-12-18

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2019-0289/html
Scroll to top button