Home Flexible epoxy composite coatings modified by reactive rubber with improvements in water and corrosive resistances
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Flexible epoxy composite coatings modified by reactive rubber with improvements in water and corrosive resistances

  • Jinwei Wang EMAIL logo , Xiangming Guo and Di Wu
Published/Copyright: December 6, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Epoxy composites were modified by reactive polybutadiene, and their resistance to T-bend and liquid permeation was evaluated to develop flexible epoxy composite coatings with good resistance to corrosive media. The composites’ resistance to bending on galvanic sheets was improved with the addition of up to around 15 wt.% amino liquid polybutadiene (ALPB) as reflected by the cross-section images after bending tests and bending times at break. The initial impedance increased with the addition of up to 15 wt.% ALPB in the composites, whereas the resistance reduced in a much slow rate with immersion time for the sample containing ALPB at around 10 wt.%. This result suggested that their resisting ability depended on the amount and dispersion of ALPB. The Rc and Cc parameters from the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements revealed that the improvement in resistance to electrolyte resulted from the compactness increment at certain range of ALPB additions, which was also supported by their water uptake trends. Moreover, the addition of ALPB above 20% resulted in severe aggregations and phase separations. The resulting reduced compactness reflects the fact that the excessive reactive rubber addition leads to the negative effects on their resisting ability upon both T-bend and liquid permeation.

  1. Research funding: The investigation is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China 2016YFE0203600.

References

[1] Amoozadeh SM, Mahdavian M. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2015, 24, 2464–2472.10.1007/s11665-015-1526-xSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Shon M, Kwon H. Corros. Sci. 2009, 51, 650–657.10.1016/j.corsci.2008.11.022Search in Google Scholar

[3] Yahyaie H, Ebrahimi M, Tahami HV, Mafi ER. Prog. Org. Coat. 2013, 76, 286–292.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.09.016Search in Google Scholar

[4] Wu T, Irvinga PE, Ayrea D, Jackson P, Zhao F. Inter. J. Fatigue 2017, 99, 13–24.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.02.010Search in Google Scholar

[5] Li X, Li GM, Su XH. J. Polym. Eng. 2019, 39, 10–15.10.1515/polyeng-2018-0056Search in Google Scholar

[6] Sprenger S. Polymer 2013, 554, 4790–4797.10.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.011Search in Google Scholar

[7] Kong J, Ning R, Tang Y. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 1639–1641.10.1007/s10853-005-1862-6Search in Google Scholar

[8] Zhou H, Xu S. Mater. Lett. 2014, 121, 238–240.10.1016/j.matlet.2014.01.160Search in Google Scholar

[9] Garg MS, Srivastava K, Srivastava D. Prog. Org. Coat. 2015, 78, 307–317.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[10] Liu S, Fan X, He C. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 125, 132–140.10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.01.009Search in Google Scholar

[11] Fröhlich J, Kautz H, Thomann R, Frey H, Mülhaupt R. Polymer 2004, 45, 2155–2164.10.1016/j.polymer.2004.01.065Search in Google Scholar

[12] Muratoglu OK, Argon AS, Cohen RE, Weinberg M. Polymer 1995, 36, 921–930.10.1016/0032-3861(95)93590-ISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Khan H, Amin M, Ahmad A. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2018, 56, 91–123.10.1515/rams-2018-0040Search in Google Scholar

[14] Szymanska J, Bakar M, Kostrzewa M, Lavorgna M. J. Polym. Eng. 2016, 36, 43–52.10.1515/polyeng-2014-0393Search in Google Scholar

[15] Wu D, Wang J. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 45985.10.1002/app.45985Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zhou Q, Jie S, Li B. Polymer 2015, 67, 208–215.10.1016/j.polymer.2015.04.078Search in Google Scholar

[17] Yahyaei H, Ebrahimi M, Tahami HV, Mafi ER, Akbarinezhad E. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 113, 136–142.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.09.007Search in Google Scholar

[18] Li T, Heinzer MJ, Redline EM, Zuo F, Bates FS, Francis LF. Prog. Org. Coat. 2014, 77, 1145–1154.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.03.015Search in Google Scholar

[19] Barbakadze K, Brostow W, Datashvili T, Hnatchuk N, Lekishvili N. Wear 2018, 394–395, 228–235.10.1016/j.wear.2017.08.006Search in Google Scholar

[20] ASTM D4145-10. Standard Test Method for Coating Flexibility of Prepainted Sheet, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018. DOI: 10.1520/D4151-10.10.1520/D4151-10Search in Google Scholar

[21] Fortini A, Mazzanti V. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46674.10.1002/app.46674Search in Google Scholar

[22] Luo H, Dong C, Li X, Xiao K. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 64, 211–220.10.1016/j.electacta.2012.01.025Search in Google Scholar

[23] Zhang D, Qian H, Wang L, Li X. Corros. Sci. 2016, 103, 230–241.10.1016/j.corsci.2015.11.023Search in Google Scholar

[24] Qian H, Xu D, Du C, Zhang D, Li X, Huang L, Deng L, Tu Y, Mol JMC, Terryn HA. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 2355–2364.10.1039/C6TA10903ASearch in Google Scholar

[25] Tang J, Wang J, He Y, Tong Z, Shen Z, Li X, Li B. Prog. Org. Coat. 2008, 63, 195–200.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.05.010Search in Google Scholar

[26] Ramírez C, Rico M, Torres A, Barral L, López J, Montero B. Eur. Polym. J. 2008, 44, 3035–3045.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.07.024Search in Google Scholar

[27] Spagnoli A, Terzano M, Brighenti R, Artoni F, Stahle P. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2018, 148, 554–564.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.013Search in Google Scholar

[28] Chen L, Jia Z, Guo X, Zhong B, Chen Y, Luo Y, Jia D. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 336, 748–756.10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.044Search in Google Scholar

[29] Deyab MA, Ouarsal R, Al-Sabagh AM, Lachkar M, Bali BE. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 107, 37–42.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.03.014Search in Google Scholar

[30] Ghasemi-Kahrizsangi A, Shariatpanahi H, Neshati J, Akbarinezhad E. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 331, 115–126.10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.038Search in Google Scholar

[31] Kordzangeneh S, Naghibi S, Esmaeili H. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2018, 27, 219–227.10.1007/s11665-017-3080-1Search in Google Scholar

[32] Bakhshandeh E, Jannesari A, Ranjbar Z, Sobhani S, Saeb MR. Prog. Org. Coat. 2014, 77, 1169–1183.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.04.005Search in Google Scholar

[33] Behzadnasab M, Mirabedini SM, Esfandeh M, Farnood RR. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 105, 212–224.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.01.006Search in Google Scholar

[34] Dong Y, Zhou Q. Corros. Sci. 2014, 78, 22–28.10.1016/j.corsci.2013.08.017Search in Google Scholar

[35] Khan H, Amin M, Yasin M, Ali M, Ahmad A. J.Polym. Eng. 2017, 37, 671–680.10.1515/polyeng-2016-0102Search in Google Scholar

[36] Sharifi M, Jang C, Abrams CF, Palmese GR. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 7495–7500.10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00677Search in Google Scholar

[37] Khan H, Amin M, Ahmad A, Yasin M. J. Elastom. Plast. 2018, 50, 501–519.10.1177/0095244317733769Search in Google Scholar

[38] Trinh BM, Mekonnen T. Polymer 2018, 155, 64–74.10.1016/j.polymer.2018.08.076Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-08-22
Accepted: 2019-10-28
Published Online: 2019-12-06
Published in Print: 2019-12-18

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2019-0276/html
Scroll to top button