Startseite Micro-roughening of polyamide fabric using protease enzyme for improving adhesion strength of rubber-polyamide composite
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Micro-roughening of polyamide fabric using protease enzyme for improving adhesion strength of rubber-polyamide composite

  • S. Periyasamy , G. Krishna Prasad EMAIL logo , Sajal Kumar Chattopadhyay , A.S.M. Raja , K. Raj Kumar und Santosh Jagadale
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. August 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The adhesion between rubber and the reinforcing textile plays an important role in ensuring the serviceability of composites. The present study aims to develop an enzyme based surface roughening process for nylon 6,6 fabric to improve its adhesion strength to rubber. Polyamide (nylon 6,6) fabric was micro-roughened through catalysed hydrolytic degradation of the surface chains, using a protease enzyme treatment. The concentration of the enzyme was optimized in terms of surface roughness measured by a KES-FB4 surface tester. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the protease treated fabric showed a heterogeneous rough appearance with cracks and pits. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis confirmed the surface hydrolysis of polyamide-6,6 due to the enzymatic treatment. Protease enzyme treated fabrics were then subjected to resorcinol formaldehyde latex (RFL) treatment, followed by a rubber moulding. Micro-roughening of nylon 6,6 fibre with an optimum surface roughness (SMD) of 20.3 μm was obtained for 3% enzyme concentration. Physicochemical mechanisms of the optimum effect and enzyme assisted hydrolysis were proposed. In line with surface roughness, peel strength also increased up to an enzyme concentration of 3% and then it decreased, however, the enzyme treated fabric showed higher peel strength than the control fabric.

References

[1] Durairaj RB. Resorcinol: Chemistry, Technology and Applications, Springer: Berlin, 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Pethrick RA. In Plasma Surface Modification of Polymers: Relevance to Adhesion, Strobel, M, Lyons, CS, Mittal, KL, Eds., VSP: Zeist, Netherlands, 1994.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Osman GA, Burçak KK, Hale CK, Fatma SG. Fibres Text. East. Eur. 2013, 3, 96–101.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Maher RR, Wardman Rh. The Chemistry of Textile Fibres, 2nd ed., Royal Society of Chemistry: UK, 2015.10.1039/9781782626534Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Pandiyaraj KN, Selvarajan V, Deshmukh RR, Changyou G. Vacuum 2008, 83, 332–339.10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.05.032Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Zhengmao Z, Kelleya MJ. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 252, 303–310.10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.12.056Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Dierk K, Wolfgang K, Eckhard S. Polym. Int. 1997, 43, 231–239.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199707)43:3<231::AID-PI797>3.0.CO;2-ESuche in Google Scholar

[8] Heumann S, Eberl A, Pobeheim H, Liebminger S, Fischer-Colbrie G, Almansa E, Cavaco-Paulo A, Gübitz GM. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2006, 69, 89–99.10.1016/j.jbbm.2006.02.005Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Morton WE, Hearle JWS. Physical Properties of Textile Fibres, 4th ed., Woodhead Publishing Limited: England, 2008.10.1533/9781845694425Suche in Google Scholar

[10] El-Bendary MA, Abo El-Ola SM, Moharam ME. Indian J. Fibre Tex. Res. 2012, 37, 273–279.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Aashrita R, Wolfgang K. Mater Today 2011, 14, 144–152.10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70086-4Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Gashti MP, Assefipour R, Kiumarsi A, Gashti MP. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 43, 798–814.10.1080/10826068.2013.805623Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Amir K, Mazeyar PG. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 116, 3140–3147.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Saville BP. Physical Testing of Textiles, Woodhead in Association with The Textile Institute: England, Cambridge, 2000.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Periyasamy S, Deepti G, Gulrajani ML. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 103, 4102–4106.10.1002/app.25558Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Silva C, Araujo R, Casal M, Gubitz GM, Artur CP. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 2007, 40, 1678–1685.10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.09.001Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Georg MG, Artur CP. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14, 577–582.10.1016/j.copbio.2003.09.010Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Urša K, Jožica F, Andrej K. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2003, 79, 99–104.10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00260-4Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Carla S, Artur CP. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2004, 22, 357–360.10.1080/10242420400025828Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-12-26
Accepted: 2016-6-10
Published Online: 2016-8-5
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 7.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2015-0541/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen