Startseite Investigating the ‘what’, ‘where’ and ‘why’ of global phonological typology
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Investigating the ‘what’, ‘where’ and ‘why’ of global phonological typology

  • Ian Maddieson EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. April 2023

Abstract

What? Where? and Why? are the principal questions to ask in relation to linguistic typological patterns, in phonology as elsewhere. However, assembling sufficient and reliable information on a large diverse sample of languages presents challenges. Some of these issues are discussed in this paper, based on the practices seen in various database projects, including WALS and LAPSyD and in the wider literature. The challenge of recognizing areal convergence can be aided by simple mapping techniques. The most scientifically challenging issue is explaining ‘why’ as this requires considering multiple physiological, psychological, social, and other effects. Recent efforts to correlate phonological features with climatic and environmental factors offer a further potentially interesting way forward.


Corresponding author: Ian Maddieson [ˈiən ˈmædɪsən], University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA; and University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, E-mail:

References

Atkinson, Quentin D. 2011. Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science 332. 346–349. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199295.Suche in Google Scholar

Bakker, Dik. 2010. Language sampling. In Jae J. Song (ed.), Handbook of linguistic typology, 100–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bell, Alan. 1978. Language samples. In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of language, l, 123–156. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthazar. 2015. Distributional typology: Statistical inquiries into the dynamics of linguistic diversity. In Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 2nd edn., 901–923. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar, Johanna Nichols, Taras Zakharko, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Kristine Hildebrandt, Michael Rießler, Lennart Bierkandt, Fernando Zúñiga & John B. Lowe. 2022. The AUTOTYP database (v1.0.0). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5931509.Suche in Google Scholar

Blasi, Damián E., Steven Moran, Scott R. Moisik, Paul Widmer, Dan Dediu & Balthasar Bickel. 2019. Human sound systems are shaped by post-Neolithic changes in bite configuration. Science 363. eaav3218. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav3218.Suche in Google Scholar

Burquest, Donald A. 2001. Phonological analysis: A functional approach, 2nd edn. Dallas: SIL International.Suche in Google Scholar

Chitoran, Ioana. 2001. The phonology of Romanian: A constraint-based approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110889185Suche in Google Scholar

Cho, Taehong & Peter Ladefoged. 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27. 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0094.Suche in Google Scholar

Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater. 2008. Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31. 489–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x08004998.Suche in Google Scholar

Clements, George N. 2003. Feature economy in sound systems. Phonology 20. 287–333. https://doi.org/10.1017/s095267570400003x.Suche in Google Scholar

Clements, George N. 2009. The role of features in phonological inventories. In E. Raimy & C. E. Cairns (eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonology, 19–68. Boston: MIT Press, Boston.10.7551/mitpress/7997.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Collins, Jeremy. 2016. Commentary: The role of language contact in creating correlations between humidity and tone. Journal of Language Evolution 1. 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzv012.Suche in Google Scholar

Coupé, Christophe, Egidio Marsico & Gérard Philippson. 2011. How economical are phonological inventories? Hong Kong: International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences.Suche in Google Scholar

de Boer, Bart. 2016. Commentary: Is the effect of dessication large enough? Journal of Language Evolution 1. 55–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzv008.Suche in Google Scholar

Dediu, Dan, Rick Janssen & Scott R. Moisik. 2017. Language is not isolated from its wider environment: Vocal tract influences on the evolution of speech and language. Language & Communication 54. 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2016.10.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig. 2022. Ethnologue, 25th edn. Dallas: SIL International.Suche in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2001. The last speaker is dead—long live the last speaker! In P. Newman & M. Ratcliff (eds.), Linguistic fieldwork, 250–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810206.013Suche in Google Scholar

Everett, Caleb. 2013. Evidence for direct geographic influences on linguistic sounds: The case of ejectives. PLoS One 8. e65275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065275.Suche in Google Scholar

Everett, Caleb. 2017. Languages in drier climates use fewer vowels. Frontiers in Communication: Language Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01285.Suche in Google Scholar

Everett, Caleb, D. Blasi & S. Roberts. 2015. Climate, vocal folds, and tonal languages: Connecting the physiological and geographic dots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112. 1322–1327. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417413112.Suche in Google Scholar

Everett, Caleb, Damián Blasi & Seán Roberts. 2016. Language evolution and climate: The case of desiccation and tone. Journal of Language Evolution 1. 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzv004.Suche in Google Scholar

Garve, Roland, Miriam Garve, Jens C. Türp & Christian C. Meyer. 2016. Labrets in Africa and Amazonia: Medical implications and cultural determinants. Tropical Medicine and International Health 22. 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12812.Suche in Google Scholar

GMI (Global Mapping International). 2017. World language mapping system. Available at: http://www.worldgeodatasets.com/language/.Suche in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H., Charles E. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.). 1978. Universals of human language; volume 2 phonology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Greenhill, Simon J. 2016. Overview: Debating the effect of environment on language. Journal of Language Evolution 1. 30–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzv007.Suche in Google Scholar

Hamann, Silke. 2003. The phonetics and phonology of retroflexes. PhD dissertation. University of Utrecht.Suche in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald. 2016. Commentary: There is no demonstrable effect of desiccation. Journal of Language Evolution 1. 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzv015.Suche in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank. 2021. Glottolog 4.5. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86. 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021.Suche in Google Scholar

Haudricourt, André-Georges. 1961. Richesse en phonèmes et richesse en locuteurs. L’Homme 1. 5–10. https://doi.org/10.3406/hom.1961.366337.Suche in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer & Laurie Bauer. 2007. Phoneme inventory size and population size. Language 83. 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0071.Suche in Google Scholar

Hayward, Katrina. 2000. Experimental phonetics. Harlow: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles. 1955. A manual of phonology. Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics (Memoir 11 of the International Journal of American Linguistics). Baltimore: University of Indiana.Suche in Google Scholar

Jones, Daniel. 1954. Falling and rising diphthongs in Southern English. In Miscellanea Phonetica II, 1–12. London: International Phonetic Association.Suche in Google Scholar

Jones, Daniel. 1960. An outline of English phonetics, 9th edn. Cambridge: Heffer.Suche in Google Scholar

Karlsson, Fred. 2018. Finnish: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315743547Suche in Google Scholar

Krueger, John R. 1962. Yakut manual. (Indiana University Publications, Uralic and Altaic Series 21). Bloomington: Indiana University.Suche in Google Scholar

Ladd, Robert D., Seán G. Roberts & Dan Dediu. 2015. Correlational Studies in typological and historical linguistics. Annual Review of Linguistics 1. 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124819.Suche in Google Scholar

Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson. 1996. Sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Lindblom, Björn. 1983. Economy of speech gestures. In Peter F. MacNeilage (ed.), Speech production, 217–246. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_10Suche in Google Scholar

Lindblom, Björn. 2000. Developmental origins of adult phonology: The interplay between phonetic emergents and the evolutionary adaptations of sound patterns. Phonetica 57. 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1159/000028482.Suche in Google Scholar

Lupyan, Gary & Rick Dale. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS One 5(1). e8559. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008559.Suche in Google Scholar

MacNeilage, Peter F. 1998. The Frame/Content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21. 499–548. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x98001265.Suche in Google Scholar

MacNeilage, Peter F., Barbara L. Davis, Ashlynn Kinney & Christine L. Matyear. 2000. The motor core of speech: A comparison of serial organization patterns in infants and languages. Child Development 71. 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00129.Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511753459Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 1995. Gestural economy. In Kjell Elenius & Peter Branderud (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, vol. 4, 574–577. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2005. Chapters 1-8, 11-13, 18-19, with accompanying maps. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil & B. Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2013a. Voicing and gaps in plosive systems. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2013b. Vowel quality inventories. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian, Sébastien Flavier Egidio Marsico & François Pellegrino. 2014–2022. LAPSyD: Lyon-Albuquerque phonological systems databases. Version 1.1. Available at: http://www.lapsyd.ddl.cnrs.fr/lapsyd/.10.21437/Interspeech.2013-660Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2015. Constructing a global cross-linguistic database of basic phonological properties: Principles and challenges. 18th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. Available at: https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0991.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2018a. Is phonological typology possible without (universal) categories? In L. M. Hyman & F. Plank (eds.), Phonological typology, 107–125. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110451931-004Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2018b. Language adapts to environment: Sonority and temperature. Frontiers in Communication: Language Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00028.Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian & Karl Benedict. 2020. Linguistic patterns and environmental factors: New tests. Paper presented at the High Desert Linguistics Society Conference, University of New Mexico, November 20–22, 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian & Christophe Coupé. 2015. Human language diversity and the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. POMA (Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics) 25. 060005.10.1121/2.0000198Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Eric D. Smith & William Croft. 2011. Geographical distribution of phonological complexity. Linguistic Typology 15. 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2011.020.Suche in Google Scholar

Marsico, Egidio, Ian Maddieson, Christophe Coupé & François Pellegrino. 2004. Investigating the “hidden” structure of phonological systems. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 30. 256–267. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v30i1.3427.Suche in Google Scholar

McElhannon, Kenneth A. 1967. Selepet vocoid sequences. Pacific Linguistics. In Series A, 12, 1–18. Canberra: Australian National University.Suche in Google Scholar

McElhannon, Kenneth A. 1970. Selepet phonology. (Pacific Linguistics, Series B 14). Canberra: Australian National University.Suche in Google Scholar

Michael, Lev, Tammy Stark, Emily Clem & Will Chang. 2015. South American phonological inventory database v1.1.4. Berkeley: Survey of California and Other Indian Languages, University of California. Digital resource. http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/∼saphon/en/ (accessed 15 June 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Mielke, Jeff. 2002–2018. P-base: A database of phonological patterns. http://pbase.phon.chass.ncsu.edu (accessed 30 Jan 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Moran, Steven & Daniel McCloy (eds.). 2019. PHOIBLE 2.0. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.Suche in Google Scholar

Moyse-Faure, Claire. 1983. Le Drehu, langue de Lifou. Paris: SELAF.Suche in Google Scholar

Nettle, Daniel. 1998. Explaining global patterns of language diversity. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 17. 354–374. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaar.1998.0328.Suche in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2010. On comparative concepts and descriptive categories: A reply to Haspelmath. Language 86. 688–695. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0000.Suche in Google Scholar

Nikolaev, Dmitry. 2018. The database of Eurasian phonological inventories: A research tool for distributional phonological typology. Linguistics Vanguard 20170050. Available at: https://eurphon.info (accessed 16 Jun 2021).10.1515/lingvan-2017-0050Suche in Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. 1980. Introduction to the symposium on phonetic universals in phonological systems and their explanation. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 3, 181–185. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen: Institute of Phonetics.Suche in Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In P. MacNeilage (ed.), The production of speech, 189–216. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_9Suche in Google Scholar

Ohala, John J. 2012. The role of the listener in sound change: An update. In M. J. Solé & D. Recasens (eds.), The initiation of sound change: Perception, production and social factors, 21–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.323.05ohaSuche in Google Scholar

Pakendorf, Brigitte, Hilde Gunnink, Bonny Sands & Koen Bostoen. 2017. Prehistoric Bantu-Khoisan language contact: A cross-disciplinary approach. Language Dynamics and Change 7. 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00701002.Suche in Google Scholar

Passy, Paul E. 1890. Étude sur les changements phonétiques et leurs caractères généraux. Paris: Firmin.Suche in Google Scholar

Perkins, Revere D. 1989. Statistical techniques for determining language sample size. Studies in Language 13. 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.2.04per.Suche in Google Scholar

Piercy, J. E., T. F. W. Embleton & L. G. Sutherland. 1977. Review of noise propagation in the atmosphere. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61. 1403–1418. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381455.Suche in Google Scholar

Rijkhoff, Jan & Dik Bakker. 1998. Language sampling. Linguistic Typology 2. 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.3.263.Suche in Google Scholar

Roberts, Seán G. & James Winters. 2012. Social structure and language structure: The new nomothetic approach. Psychology of Language and Communication 16. 89–112. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0008-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Round, R. 2013. The phonologically exceptional continent: Alternations yield new insight. Ms. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/4225867/The_phonologically_exceptional_continent_Alternations_yield_new_insighthttps://www.academia.edu/4225867/The_phonologically_exceptional_continent_Alternations_yield_new_insightSuche in Google Scholar

Round, Erich R. 2017. The AusPhon-Lexicon Project: Two million normalized segments across 300 Australian languages. Paper presented at the 47th Poznan Linguistics Meeting, 18–20 September 2017. Available at: http://wa.amu.edu.pl/plm_old/2017/files/abstracts/PLM2017_Abstract_Round.pdf (accessed 16 June 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

San, Duanmu. 2008. Syllable structure: The limits of variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267590.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Slabbekorn, Hans. 2004. Singing in the wild: The ecology of birdsong. In P. Marker & H. W. Slabbekorn (eds.), Nature’s music: The science of birdsong, 178–205. Amsterdam: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012473070-0/50009-8Suche in Google Scholar

Stevens, Kenneth N. 1989. On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics 17. 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-4470(19)31520-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Suomi, Kari, Juhani Toivanen & Riikka Ylitalo. 2008. Finnish sound structure: Phonetics, phonology, phonotactics and prosody (Studia Humaniora Ouluensa 9). Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu.Suche in Google Scholar

Sutherland, Louis C. & Gilles A. Daigle. 1998. Atmospheric sound propagation. In Malcom J. Crocker (ed.), Handbook of acoustics, 305–329. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Suche in Google Scholar

Trager, George L. & Henry Lee Smith. 1957. An outline of English structure. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.Suche in Google Scholar

Tryon, Darryl T. 1967. Dehu grammar (Pacific Linguistics B-7). Canberra: Australian National University.Suche in Google Scholar

Ubrjatova, Elizaveta I. 1966. Jakutskij Jazyk. In Viktor, V. Vinogradov (ed.), Jazyki Narodov SSSR: Vol. 2. Tjurkskie Jazyki. [Languages of the peoples of the USSR, Vol 2, Turkic languages], 403–427. Moscow and Leningrad: Nauka.Suche in Google Scholar

Urban, Matthias & Steven Moran. 2021. Altitude and the distributional typology of language structure: Ejectives and beyond. PLoS One 16. e0245522. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245522.Suche in Google Scholar

Vaïsse, Emilio, Félix Hoyos & Anibal Echeverría y Reyes. 1896. Glosario de la lengua Atacameña [Glossary of the Atacama language]. Annales de la Universidad de Chile 91. 527–556.10.5479/sil.266970.39088004560454Suche in Google Scholar

Vajda, Edward. 1994. Kazakh phonology. In Edward, H. & Donald, W. (eds.), Opuscula Altaica: Essays presented in honor of Henry Schwarz (East Asian Studies Press 18), 603–650. Bellingham: Center for East Asian Studies, Western Washington University.Suche in Google Scholar

Vaux, Bert. 2009. The role of features in a symbolic theory of phonology. In Eric Raimy & Charles E. Cairns (eds.), Contemporary views on architecture and representations in phonology, 75–97. Boston: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262182706.003.0004Suche in Google Scholar

Volodin, Aleksandr P. 1976. Itel’menskij jazyk [Itelmen language]. Leningrad: Nauka.Suche in Google Scholar

Watson, Janet C. E. 2002. The phonology and morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199257591.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Wiley, R. Haven & Douglas G. Richards. 1978. Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 3. 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00300047.Suche in Google Scholar

Wolfart, H. Christoph. 1973. Plains Cree: A grammatical study. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series, vol. 63, part 5. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.10.2307/1006246Suche in Google Scholar

Yigezu, Moges. 2001. Articulatory and acoustic effects of lip-plate speech in Chai and its implications for phonological theory. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31. 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025100301002031.Suche in Google Scholar

Zipf, George K. 1935. The psycho-biology of language. Cambridge, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-11-17
Accepted: 2022-12-15
Published Online: 2023-04-28
Published in Print: 2023-07-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 9.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingty-2022-0076/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen