Abstract
A fundamental assumption in relevance theory is that human cognition has evolved in the direction of increased efficiency and, as such, tends, as Sperber and Wilson (Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995: 38–46, 260–66) put it in their cognitive principle, to be naturally geared towards the maximisation of relevance. The cognitive principle inter alia explains the selectivity of human agency and attention: for an input to merit the attention of the human cognitive system, it must seem relevant enough to be worth attending to. But what makes an input relevant? The relevance-theoretic account proposes that relevance for an individual organism at any specific time involves a balancing of mental effort and a particular type of worthwhile modifications, cognitive effects, that are representational in nature and amount to improvements in knowledge. The type of relevance yielded by such effects could be described as a cognitive type of relevance. However, inputs such as artistic stimuli – including literary ones – invite us to widen the scope of the causal engineering behind the selective directedness of our mental lives. Artistic stimuli merit the attention of the human cognitive system at various time-scales (momentary, developmental, and evolutionary). Following Kolaiti (The limits of expression: Language, literature, mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019: 76–94) and drawing on neuroscientific evidence from the last 25 years, I will make tentative suggestions that artistic stimuli may also yield non-representational worthwhile modifications or effects. My discussion focuses on one such type of effects involving the human perceptual system: perceptual effects. Being partly or wholly embodied, perceptual effects could extend the machinery of relevance theory in an embodied direction and widen its interdisciplinary implications.
Funding source: Horizon2020
Award Identifier / Grant number: 785964
References
Allport, Alan. 1987. Selection for action: Some behavioural and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In Andries Sanders & Herbert Heuer (eds.), Perspectives on perception and action. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar
Asari, Tomoko, Seiki Konishi, Koji Jimura, Junichi Chikazoe, Noriko Nakamura & Yasusi Miyashitaa. 2008. Right temporopolar activation associated with unique perception. NeuroImage 41. 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.059.Suche in Google Scholar
Bal, Matthijs P. & Martijn Veltkamp. 2013. How does fiction reading influence empathy?. An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PloS One 8(1). e55341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.005534.Suche in Google Scholar
Bolens, Guillemette. 2012. The style of gestures: Embodiment and cognition in literary narrative. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9781421405186Suche in Google Scholar
Calvo-Merino, Beatrice, Daniel E. Glaser, Julie Grèzes, Richard E. Passingham & Patrick Haggard. 2005. Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex 15(8). 1243–1249. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhi007.Suche in Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. 2013. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(3). 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x12000477.Suche in Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. 2016. Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190217013.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. 2017. Predictions, precision, and agentive attention. Consciousness and Cognition 56. 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.013.Suche in Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda & John Tooby. 2000. Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In Michael Lewis & Jeannette Haviland-Jones (eds.), Handbook of emotions. New York: Guilford.Suche in Google Scholar
Djikic, Maja, Keith Oatley & Mihnea Moldoveanu. 2013. Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature 3(1). 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji.Suche in Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1975. The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1981. Representations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1983. The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernst. August 2013. How does the affective relate to ostensive-inferential communication? Unpublished ms.Suche in Google Scholar
Hogan, Patrick Colm. 2003. The mind and its stories: Narrative universals and human emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511499951Suche in Google Scholar
Hogan, Patrick Colm. 2011. What literature teaches us about emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511976773Suche in Google Scholar
Hohwy, Jacob. 2012. Attention and consciousness in the hypothesis testing brain. Frontiers in Psychology 3. 96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00096.Suche in Google Scholar
Hohwy, Jacob. 2013. The predictive mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
James, William. 1890. The principles of psychology. New York: Dover.10.1037/10538-000Suche in Google Scholar
Jola, Corinne, Angharad Davis & Patrick Haggard. 2011. Proprioceptive integration and body representation. Experimental Brain Research 213(2–3). 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2743-7.Suche in Google Scholar
Kidd, David Comer & Emanuele Castano. 2013. Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science 342(6156). 377–380. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918.Suche in Google Scholar
Kolaiti, Patricia. 2007. Celesteia. Athens: Nefeli Publishings.Suche in Google Scholar
Kolaiti, Patricia. 2009. The limits of expression: Language, poetry, thought. London: University College London PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Kolaiti, Patricia. 2019. The limits of expression: Language, literature, mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108290746Suche in Google Scholar
Mar, Raymond A, Keith Oatley, Jacob Hirsh, Jennifer de la Paz & Jordan B. Peterson. 2006. Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality 40(5). 694–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002.Suche in Google Scholar
Mercier, Hugo & Dan Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason?. Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34. 57–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x10000968.Suche in Google Scholar
Mercier, Hugo & Dan Sperber. 2017. The enigma of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.10.4159/9780674977860Suche in Google Scholar
Neumann, Odmar. 1987. Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In Andries Sanders & Herbert Heuer (eds.), Perspectives on perception and action. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar
Pantev, Christo, Bernhard Ross, Takako Fujioka, Laurel J. Trainor, Michael Schulte & Matthias Schulz. 2003. Music and learning-induced cortical plasticity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 999. 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1284.054.Suche in Google Scholar
Pilkington, Adrian. 2000. Poetic effects: A relevance theory perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.75Suche in Google Scholar
Putkinen, Vesa, Mari Tervaniemi, Katri Saarikivi, Pauliina Ojala & Minna Huotilainen. 2014. Enhanced development of auditory change detection in musically trained school-aged children: A longitudinal event-related potential study. Developmental Science 17(2). 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12109.Suche in Google Scholar
Ramachandran, Vilayanur S. & Sandra Blakeslee. 1998. Phantoms in the brain: Probing the mysteries of the human mind. New York: William Morrow.Suche in Google Scholar
Ramachandran, Vilayanur S. & William Hirstein. 1999. The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6. 15–51.Suche in Google Scholar
Rey, Georges. 1980. Functionalism and the emotions. In Amélie Rorty (ed.), Explaining emotions. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 2015. Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15. 132.Suche in Google Scholar
Strey, Claudia. 2016. The language of emotions. PhD thesis. Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, BR.Suche in Google Scholar
Tervaniemi, Mari. 2001. Musical sound processing in the human brain: Evidence from electric and magnetic recordings. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 930. 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05737.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Tervaniemi, Mari. 2009. Musicians: Same or different?. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1169. 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04591.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Tervaniemi, Mari, Lauri Janhunen, Stephanie Kruck, Vesa Putkinen & Minna Huotilainen. 2015. Auditory profiles of classical, jazz, and rock musicians: Genre-specific-sensitivity to musical sound features. Frontiers in Psychology 6. 1900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01900.Suche in Google Scholar
Tooby, John & Leda Cosmides. 2008. The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In Michael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones & Lisa Feldman Barrett (eds.), Handbook of emotions. New York: The Guilford Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Volpe, Gualtiero, Alessandro D’Ausilio, Luciano Badino, Antonio Camurri & Luciano Fadiga. 2016. Measuring social interaction in music ensembles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371(1693). 20150377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0377.Suche in Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim & Louis de Saussure. (forthcoming). Pragmatics and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim & Claudia Strey. 2019. Slave to the passions: Making emotions relevant. In Kate Scott, Billy Clark & Robyn Carston (eds.), Relevance: Pragmatics and Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290593.Suche in Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2018. Relevance theory and literary interpretation. In Terence Cave & Deirdre Wilson (eds.), Reading beyond the code. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198794776.003.0011Suche in Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston. 2019. Pragmatics and the challenge of ‘non-propositional’ effects. Journal of Pragmatics 145. 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005.Suche in Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 2002. Truthfulness and relevance. Mind 111. 583–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/111.443.583.Suche in Google Scholar
Wu, Wayne. 2011a. Confronting many-many problems: Attention and agentive control. Noûs 45(1). 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00804.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Wu, Wayne. 2011b. Attention as selection for action. In Christopher Mole, Declan Smithies & Wayne Wu (eds.), Attention: Philosophical and psychological essays. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Wu, Wayne. 2014. Attention. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315777603Suche in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Foreword
- Articles
- The status of the narrator in Modernist fiction
- Perceptual relevance and art: Some tentative suggestions
- Is the truthfulness of a proposition verifiable through access to reference corpora?
- Literary meaning as character conceptualization: Re-orienting the cognitive stylistic analysis of character discourse and Free Indirect Thought
- The tragic in Greek drama and conceptual blending
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Foreword
- Articles
- The status of the narrator in Modernist fiction
- Perceptual relevance and art: Some tentative suggestions
- Is the truthfulness of a proposition verifiable through access to reference corpora?
- Literary meaning as character conceptualization: Re-orienting the cognitive stylistic analysis of character discourse and Free Indirect Thought
- The tragic in Greek drama and conceptual blending