Home The tragic in Greek drama and conceptual blending
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The tragic in Greek drama and conceptual blending

  • Georgios Ioannou EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 6, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper examines the tragic sense permeating ancient Greek drama as a product of a special type of conceptual integration between two antithetic mental spaces, which prompts the simultaneous generation of two mutually exclusive emergent structures. The special tragic sense generated carries along the inferences of two equally impossible situations. The key-difference between this type of blend and other counterfactuals is argued to be found in the lack of reference scenario in the blend. In the context of theatrical enactment, the realisation of this special type of antithetic blend is based on the frame-clash between conceived and enacted space, matched by the emotions of pity and fear, respectively. The feeling of catharsis that follows the end of the play is analysed as a second level blend within the emergent structure that leads to the restoration of a single common space of cognitive compatibility between actors and audience.


Corresponding author: Georgios Ioannou, Department of Linguistics, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile, E-mail:

References

Arens, Hans. 1984. Aristotle’s theory of language and its tradition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/sihols.29Search in Google Scholar

Aristotle, Poetics, Translated by Stephen Halliwell. The Loeb Classics Library, 1995, Harvard University Press.10.4159/DLCL.aristotle-poetics.1995Search in Google Scholar

Aristotle, Art of rhetoric, Translated by J. H. Freese. The Loeb Classics Library, 1959, Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Peter A. 2010. Postdramatic Greek tragedy. Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 25. 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1353/dtc.2010.0017.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, Amy. 2016. King of shadows: early modern characters and actors. In Paul, Budra & Clifford Werier (eds.), Shakespeare and consciousness, 99–118. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-59541-6_5Search in Google Scholar

Coulson, Seana & Oakley, Todd. 2005. Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics 37. 1510–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.09.010.Search in Google Scholar

di Maria, Salvatore. 2002. The Italian tragedy in the Renaissance. Cultural realities and theatrical innovations. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dodds, Eric Robertson. 1966. On misunderstanding the Oedipus Rex. Greece and Rome 13(1). 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0017383500016144.Search in Google Scholar

Else, Gerald F. 1957. Aristotle’s Poetics: the argument. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674288089Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & Eve Sweetser (eds.). 1996. Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1975. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In Cathy Cogen et al.. (eds.), Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 123–131. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v1i0.2315Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1977. Scenes-and-frames semantics. In A. Zampolli (ed.), Linguistics structures processing, 55–81. Amsterdam and New York: North Holland Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Gallop, David. 1999. Aristotle’s aesthetics and philosophy of mind. In David J. Furley (ed.), The Routledge history of philosophy: From Aristotle to Augustine, vol. 2, 88–90. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Geeraerts, Dirk. 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198236528.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, Colin (ed.). 1997. Six Renaissance tragedies. New York: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-25800-0Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2016. Compositionality. In Nick Riemer (ed.), Routledge handbook of semantics, 419–433. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Golden, Leon. 1992. Aristotle on tragic and comic mimesis. Atlanta: Scholar’s Press.Search in Google Scholar

Golden, Leon. 2017. Aristotle and the arc of tragedy. New York: Radius Book Group.Search in Google Scholar

Goldhill, Simon. 2012. Sophocles and the language of tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199796274.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph Edward. 1997. Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph Edward, Todd, Oakley & Seana Coulson. 1997. Blending and metaphor. In Raymond W. GibbsJr. & Gerard J. Steen (eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, 101–124. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/cilt.175.07graSearch in Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, Kathryn. 2007. A guide to Hellenistic literature, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470690185Search in Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen. 1986. Aristotle’s Poetics. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Holland, John Henry. 1998. From chaos to order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198504092.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Keesey, Donald. 1979. On some recent interpretations of catharsis. The Classical World 72. 193–205.10.2307/4349034Search in Google Scholar

Kott, Jan. 1965. Shakespeare, our contemporary. UK: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

Kretzschmar, William A.Jr. 2015. Language and complex systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316179017Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 202–251. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Liddell, Henry George, Robert Scott, Henry Stuart Jones & Roderick McKenzie. 1843. A Greek–English dictionary, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lucas, Frank Laurence. 1968. Greek tragedy and comedy. USA/Canada: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

McConachie, Bruce & F. Elizabeth Hart (eds.). 2006. Performance and cognition. Theatre studies and the cognitive turn. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Meineck, Peter. 2017. Theatrocracy. Greek drama, cognition, and the imperative for theatre. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315466576Search in Google Scholar

Minati, Gianfranco & Eliano Pessa (eds.). 2012. Emergence in complex, cognitive, social, and biological systems. Berlin: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, Stephanie. 2016. Aristophanes and his tragic muse. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.10.1163/9789004310919Search in Google Scholar

Nicolis, Gregoire & Catherine Nicolis. 2012. Foundations of complex systems. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.10.1142/8260Search in Google Scholar

Pálinkás, István. 2014. Blending and folk theory in an explanation of irony. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12(1). 64–98. https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.12.1.03pal.Search in Google Scholar

Plato. 2013. Republic. Translated by C. E. Jones & W. Preddy. Loeb Classical Library. Harvard University Press.10.4159/DLCL.plato_philosopher-republic.2013Search in Google Scholar

Protevi, John. 1994. Time and exteriority: Aristotle, Heidegger, Derrida. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reeve, C. D. C. 2018. Aristotle, Rhetoric. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104(3). 192–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192.Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1977. Human categorization. In: Neil Warren (ed.), Studies in cross–cultural psychology I, 1–49. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Scodel, Ruth. 2010. An introduction to Greek tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511781230Search in Google Scholar

Sophocles, Oedipus Tyrannus. Translated by H. Lloyd Jones, Loeb Classical Library, vol. 20, 1994, Harvard University Press.10.4159/DLCL.sophocles-oedipus_tyrannus.1994Search in Google Scholar

Spring, Evelyn. 1917. A study of exposition in Greek tragedy. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 28. 135–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/310642.Search in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve. 1991. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2002. Linguistic categorization, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2002. Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tredell, Nicolas. 2015. Shakespeare. The tragedies. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-40490-9Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-11-06
Published in Print: 2020-11-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jls-2020-2025/html
Scroll to top button