Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Is the truthfulness of a proposition verifiable through access to reference corpora?

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 6, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper reviews Louw’s (1993 and subsequent publications) deployment of reference corpora in the light of existing philosophical and linguistic milestones when it comes to the notion of the truthfulness of a proposition. Louw (William Ernest. 1993. Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair, 152–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins) resorts to reference corpora in order either to explicate a rhetorical device (in Louw 1993, that of irony) or to attempt to reveal the true attitude of the speaker to his/her own proposition (including instances of insincerity). Using two methods (co-selection and wildcarding), an author’s collocational patterns in context are checked against those in the reference corpus, also in context. The frequent lexical variables of grammar strings are taken to represent that string’s corpus-derived subtext. Recently, Louw’s Contextual Prosodic Theory (CPT) has revealed the mechanism of prospection, whereby the grammatical pattern in the first line of a poem anticipates by its most frequent lexical collocates the themes in the remainder of the poem (Louw, Bill & Milojkovic, Marija. 2016. Corpus stylistics as contextual prosodic theory and subtext, 176–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins). The philosophical background of Louw’s CPT is the works of Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein (Louw, William Ernest. 2010a. Collocation as instrumentation for meaning: A scientific fact. In Willie van Peer, Vander Viana & Sonia Zyngier (eds.), Literary education and digital learning: methods and technologies for humanities studies, 79–101. Hershey, PA: IGI Global and subsequent works) and could be said to be in need of further explanation and illustration. The paper discusses Louw’s take on insincerity (1993) as the speaker’s attitude to the truthfulness of her own statement from the point of view of Frege’s Sinn/Bedeutung distinction, Russell’s logical language, and Wittgenstein’s attitude to the relationship between language and reality. Since prospection may be considered objective proof of the effectiveness of Louw’s approach, an instance of prospection from a poem by Brodsky is used to show that Wittgenstein’s concern for the truthfulness of propositions may be viewed as both the guarantor and the beneficiary of Louw’s views. Additionally, the paper presents an example of prospection in the first line of a novel, Don DeLillo’s White Noise. However, other grammatical patterns in the passage studied in this paper do not contain deviations from the corpus norm, which conforms to the existing commentary on DeLillo in the field of literary criticism. The paper concludes by stating that reference corpora used inductively (Louw, William Ernest. 2017. Uneasy humour as discovery: Collocation and empathy as Whewellian consilience. Studying Humour: International Journal 4) may shed light on the speaker’s attitude to the truthfulness of their own statement.


To Bill Louw for his 70th birthday, with apologies for the delay.



Corresponding author: Marija Milojkovic, English Department, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia, E-mail:

References

Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia, reconstructed from the manuscript notes by Geoffrey James Warnock. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ayer, Alfred Jules. 1956. The problem of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, John Langshaw. 1950. Truth. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl Vol. 24, 111–128.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/24.1.111Search in Google Scholar

Cantor, Paul A. 1991. Adolf, we hardly knew you. In Frank Lentricchia (ed.), New essays on White Noise, 39–62. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511624476.004Search in Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. 1928. The logical structure of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008. The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/ (accessed 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Duvall, John Noel. 2008. Introduction: The power of history and the persistence of mystery. In John Noel Duvall (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Don DeLillo, 1–10. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CCOL9780521870658.001Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 2001. Irony as the defining principle of postmodernism. In Derek Maus (ed.), Postmodernism, 43–48. San Diego: Greenhaven Press.Search in Google Scholar

Firth, John Rupert. 1957. Papers in linguistics: 1934–1951. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann. 2005. A Wittgenstein dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical Review 66(3). 377–388. Published by: Duke University Press on behalf of Philosophical Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182440.Search in Google Scholar

Lentricchia, Frank. 1991. Tales of the electronic tribe. In Frank Lentricchia (ed.), New essays on White Noise, 87–113. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511624476.006Search in Google Scholar

Lodge, David. 1975. Changing places. London: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Lodge, David. 1984. Small world. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar

Louw, William Ernest. 1993. Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair, 152–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.64.11louSearch in Google Scholar

Louw, William Ernest. 2010a. Collocation as instrumentation for meaning: A scientific fact. In Willie van Peer, Vander Viana & Sonia Zyngier (eds.), Literary education and digital learning: methods and technologies for humanities studies, 79–101. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-60566-932-8.ch004Search in Google Scholar

Louw, William Ernest. 2010b. Automating the extraction of literary worlds and their subtexts from poetry of William Butler Yeats. In Marta Falces Sierra, Encarnacion Hidalgo Tenorio, Juan Santana  Lario & Salvador Valera Hernandez (eds.), Para por y Sobre Luis Quereda. Granada: GranadaUniversity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Louw, William Ernest. 2017. Uneasy humour as discovery: Collocation and empathy as Whewellian consilience. Studying Humour: International Journal 4.Search in Google Scholar

Louw, William Ernest & Marija Milojkovic. 2015. Shared logical form or shared metaphysics: In search of corpus-derived empathy in stylistics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier 198. 535–545. 7th international conference on corpus linguistics: Current work in corpus linguistics, working with traditionally-conceived corpora and beyond (CILC 2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.476.Search in Google Scholar

Louw, Bill & Milojkovic, Marija. 2016. Corpus stylistics as contextual prosodic theory and subtext. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lal.23Search in Google Scholar

Milojkovic, Marija. 2013. Is corpus stylistics bent on self-improvement? The role of reference corpora 20 years after the advent of semantic prosody. Journal of Literary Semantics 42(1). 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2013-0002.Search in Google Scholar

Milojkovic, Marija. 2019. Corpus-derived subtext and prospection in novel-writing: Examining Faulkner’s Absalom, Absalom! and DeLillo’s White Noise. In Ilya Nikolaev (ed.), Структурная и прикладная лингвистика, 129–139. St Petersburg: St Petersburg State University. [Структурная и прикладная лингвистика. Выпуск 13. СПб., Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та. 178 с.].Search in Google Scholar

Милойкович, Мария. 2019. Иосиф Бродский: модальность как прием// Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н. И. Лобачевского. № 6. Нижний Новгород. Изд-во ННГУ. 203–210.Search in Google Scholar

Morrison, Tony. 1994. Conversations with Toni Morrison. In Danille Taylor-Guthrie (ed.). Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Search in Google Scholar

Ruppersburg, Hugh & Tim Engles. 2000. Introduction. In Hugh Ruppersburg & Tim Engles (eds.), Critical essays on Don DeLillo, 1–28. New York: G. K. Hall and Co.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1956. In David Pears (ed.), Bertrand Russell: A collection of critical essays. New York: Anchor Books.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1996. An inquiry into meaning and truth. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John McHardy. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/ (accessed July 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludvig. 1922. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Trans. D. F. Pears & D. F. McGuiness, 1960. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludvig. 1969. On certainty. In Anscombe & Georg Henrik, von Wright (eds.). New York: Harper & Row. Available at: http://thatmarcusfamily.org/philosophy/Course_Websites/Readings/Wittgenstein%20On%20Certainty.pdf (accessed July 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-11-06
Published in Print: 2020-11-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.5.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jls-2020-2023/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button