Startseite A cross-sectional survey exploring clinician perceptions of a novel Medicaid back pain policy
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A cross-sectional survey exploring clinician perceptions of a novel Medicaid back pain policy

  • Catherine J. Livingston ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Mary Gray , Kate LaForge und Esther K. Choo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 31. Oktober 2022

Abstract

Objectives

Oregon Medicaid (Oregon Health Plan, or OHP) implemented an innovative policy in 2016 that increased coverage of evidence-based non-pharmacologic therapies (NPT, including physical therapy, massage, chiropractic, and acupuncture) while restricting opioids, epidural steroid injections, and surgeries. The objective of this study was to compare the perspectives of clinicians who see back pain patients and can prescribe pharmacologic therapies and/or refer to NPTs and clinicians who directly provide NPT therapies affected by the policy.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was administered to Oregon prescribing clinicians and NPT clinicians between December 2019 and February 2020. The survey was completed by 107 prescribing clinicians and 83 NPT clinicians.

Results

Prescribing clinicians and NPT clinicians had only moderate levels of familiarity with core elements of the policy. Prescribing clinicians had higher levels of frustration caring for OHP patients with back pain than NPT clinicians (83 vs. 34%, p<0.001) and were less confident in their ability to provide effective care (73 vs. 85%, p = .025). Eighty-six percent of prescribing clinicians and 83% of NPT clinicians thought active NPT treatments were effective; 74 and 70% thought passive NPT treatments were effective. Forty percent of prescribing clinicians and 25% of NPT clinicians (p<0.001) thought medically-light therapies were effective, while 29% of prescribing clinicians and 10% of NPT clinicians thought medically-intensive treatments were effective (p=0.001). Prescribing clinicians thought increased access to NPTs improved outcomes, while opinions were less consistent on the impact of restricting opioid prescribing.

Conclusions

Prescribing clinicians and NPT clinicians had varying perspectives of a Medicaid coverage policy to increase evidence-based back pain care. Understanding these perspectives is important for contextualizing policy effectiveness.


Corresponding author: Catherine J. Livingston, MD, MPH, Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3930 SE Division Street, Portland, Oregon, 97202, USA, Phone: 97202 (503) 957-1392, E-mail:

Funding source: National Institute on Drug Abuse

Award Identifier / Grant number: 5 R01 DA047323-01A1

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Gillian Leichtling for editorial review, and Rani George and Diana Flores for project support.

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse (5 R01 DA047323-01A1).

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. CRediT author statement: Catherine Livingston: Writing – Original Draft, Formal analysis, Investigation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Mary Gray: Writing – Review & Editing, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Conceptualization. Kate LaForge: Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing. Esther Choo: Writing – Review & Editing, Methodology, Investigation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

  3. Competing interests: Dr. Livingston reports grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA/NIH) for this research and a previous contract with the Kaiser Permanente Health Research Institute for an advisory role of a research study on this back pain policy. Dr. Livingston previously served as the Associate Medical Director of the Health Evidence Review Commission and is currently employed as the Medical Director of Health Share of Oregon. This potential conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by Oregon Health & Science University.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the OHSU Institutional Review Board (IRB#18725).

References

1. Kim, LH, Vail, D, Azad, TD, Bentley, JP, Zhang, Y, Ho, AL, et al.. Expenditures and health care utilization among adults with newly diagnosed low back and lower extremity pain. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e193676. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3676.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Lucas, JW, Connor, EM, Bose, J. Back, lower limb, and upper limb pain among U.S. adults, 2019. NCHS Data Brief 2021;415:1–8. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:107894.10.15620/cdc:107894Suche in Google Scholar

3. Chou, R, Hartung, D, Turner, J, Chan, B, Levander, X, McDonagh, M, et al.. Opioid treatments for chronic pain. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2020.10.23970/AHRQEPCCER229Suche in Google Scholar

4. Krebs, EE, Gravely, A, Nugent, S, Jensen, AC, DeRonne, B, Goldsmith, ES, et al.. Effect of opioid vs. nonopioid medications on pain-related function in patients with chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain: the SPACE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;319:872–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.0899.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Feldman, DE, Carlesso, LC, Nahin, RL. Management of patients with a musculoskeletal pain condition that is likely chronic: results from a national cross sectional survey. J Pain 2020;21:869–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2019.11.014.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Ivanova, JI, Birnbaum, HG, Schiller, M, Kantor, E, Johnstone, BM, Swindle, RW. Real-world practice patterns, health-care utilization, and costs in patients with low back pain: the long road to guideline-concordant care. Spine J 2011;11:622–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.03.017.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Heyward, J, Jones, CM, Compton, WM, Lin, DH, Losby, JL, Murimi, IB, et al.. Coverage of nonpharmacologic treatments for low back pain among US public and private insurers. JAMA Netw Open 2018;1:e183044. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3044.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. National coverage determination (NCD 30.3.3): acupuncture for chronic low back pain (cLBP). Baltimore: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2020. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/ncd.aspx?NCDId=373 [Accessed 22 Oct 2022].Suche in Google Scholar

9. NORC, Healthcare. Healthcare payer strategies to reduce the harms of opioids. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago; 2017. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/download-reducing-harms-opioids-white-paper.pdf [Accessed 22 Oct 2022].Suche in Google Scholar

10. Choo, EK, Charlesworth, CJ, Gu, Y, Livingston, CJ, McConnell, KJ. Increased use of complementary and alternative therapies for back pain following statewide Medicaid coverage changes in Oregon. J Gen Intern Med 2021;36:676–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06352-6.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Oregon Health Authority. Prescribing and overdose data for Oregon. Oregon Health Authority; 2021. Available from: https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/PREVENTIONWELLNESS/SUBSTANCEUSE/OPIOIDS/Pages/data.aspx [Accessed 2 Sep 2022].Suche in Google Scholar

12. Hedberg, K, Bui, LT, Livingston, C, Shields, LM, Van Otterloo, J. Integrating public health and health care strategies to address the opioid epidemic: the Oregon health authority’s opioid initiative. J Publ Health Manag Pract 2019;25:214–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000000849.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Muench, J, Hoopes, M, Mayhew, M, Pisciotta, M, Shortreed, SM, Livingston, CJ, et al.. Reduction of long-term opioid prescribing for back pain in community health centers after a Medicaid policy change. J Am Board Fam Med 2022;35:352. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210306.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Eaves, ER, Hsu, CW, DeBar, LL, Livingston, CL, Ocker, LE, McDonald, SJ, et al.. Whole systems within whole systems: the Oregon health plan’s expansion of services for back and neck pain. J Alternative Compl Med 2019;25:S61-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2018.0431.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Gray, M, LaForge, K, Livingston, CJ, Leichtling, G, Choo, EK. Experiences of nonpharmacologic providers implementing the Oregon back pain policy expanding services for Medicaid recipients: a focus group study. J Alternative Compl Med 2021;27:868–75. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2021.0099.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Penney, LS, Ritenbaugh, C, DeBar, LL, Elder, C, Deyo, RA. Provider and patient perspectives on opioids and alternative treatments for managing chronic pain: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2017;17:164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0566-0.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. McCubbin, T, Kempe, KL, Beck, A. Complementary and alternative medicine in an integrated health care delivery system: users of chiropractic, acupuncture, and massage services. Perm J 2017;21:16–172. https://doi.org/10.7812/tpp/16-172.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Stussman, BJ, Nahin, RR, Barnes, PM, Ward, BW. U.S. physician recommendations to their patients about the use of complementary health approaches. J Alternative Compl Med 2019;26:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2019.0303.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Desveaux, L, Saragosa, M, Kithulegoda, N, Ivers, NM. Family physician perceptions of their role in managing the opioid crisis. Ann Fam Med 2019;17:345–51. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2413.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Pearson, AC, Moman, RN, Moeschler, SM, Eldrige, JS, Hooten, WM. Provider confidence in opioid prescribing and chronic pain management: results of the Opioid Therapy Provider Survey. J Pain Res 2017;10:1395–400. https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.S136478.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Esquibel, AY, Borkan, J. Doctors and patients in pain: conflict and collaboration in opioid prescription in primary care. Pain 2014;155:2575–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.018.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Henry, SG, Matthias, MS. Patient-clinician communication about pain: a conceptual model and narrative review. Pain Med 2018;19:2154–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Matthias, MS, Parpart, AL, Nyland, KA, Huffman, MA, Stubbs, DL, Sargent, C, et al.. The patient–provider relationship in chronic pain care: providers’ perspectives. Pain Med 2010;11:1688–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00980.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Roper, KL, Jones, J, Rowland, C, Thomas-Eapen, N, Cardarelli, R. Mixed methods study of patient and primary care provider perceptions of chronic pain treatment. Patient Educ Counsel 2021;104:585–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.038.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Tait, RC, Chibnall, JT, Kalauokalani, D. Provider judgments of patients in pain: seeking symptom certainty. Pain Med 2009;10:11–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00527.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Wyse, JJ, Ganzini, L, Dobscha, SK, Krebs, EE, Morasco, BJ. Setting expectations, following orders, safety, and standardization: clinicians’ strategies to guide difficult conversations about opioid prescribing. J Gen Intern Med 2019;34:1200–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-04983-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Ike, B, Baldwin, LM, Sutton, S, Van Borkulo, N, Packer, C, Parchman, ML. Staff and clinician work-life perceptions after implementing systems-based improvements to opioid management. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:715–23. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.05.190027.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. McCalmont, JC, Jones, KD, Bennett, RM, Friend, R. Does familiarity with CDC guidelines, continuing education, and provider characteristics influence adherence to chronic pain management practices and opioid prescribing? J Opioid Manag 2018;14:103–16. https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2018.0437.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Footracer, KG, Monaghan, M, Wisniewski, NP, Mandel, E. Attitudes and practices of massage therapists as related to conventional medicine. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork 2012;5:18–24. https://doi.org/10.3822/ijtmb.v5i1.149.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Gardner, T, Refshauge, K, Smith, L, McAuley, J, Hübscher, M, Goodall, S. Physiotherapists’ beliefs and attitudes influence clinical practice in chronic low back pain: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. J Physiother 2017;63:132–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2017.05.017.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Ross, M, Adams, K, Engle, K, Enser, T, Muehlemann, A, Schenk, R, et al.. The knowledge of low back pain management between physical therapists and family practice physicians. J Man Manip Ther 2018;26:264–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2018.1500772.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Harris, PA, Taylor, R, Minor, BL, Elliott, V, Fernandez, M, O’Neal, L, et al.. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inf 2019;95:103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Harris, PA, Taylor, R, Thielke, R, Payne, J, Gonzalez, N, Conde, JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf 2009;42:377–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2017.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Dowell, D, Haegerich, TM, Chou, R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain — United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep 2016;65:1–49. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1er.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Ebbert, JO, Philpot, LM, Clements, CM, Lovely, JK, Nicholson, WT, Jenkins, SM, et al.. Attitudes, beliefs, practices, and concerns among clinicians prescribing opioids in a large academic institution. Pain Med 2018;19:1790–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnx140.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Provenzano, DA, Kamal, KM, Giannetti, V. Evaluation of primary care physician chronic pain management practice patterns. Pain Physician 2018;21:E593–602. https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2018.6.e593.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Aveni, E, Bauer, B, Ramelet, A-S, Kottelat, Y, Decosterd, I, Finti, G, et al.. The attitudes of physicians, nurses, physical therapists, and midwives toward complementary medicine for chronic pain: a survey at an academic hospital. Explore 2016;12:341–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2016.06.001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Onishi, E, Kobayashi, T, Dexter, E, Marino, M, Maeno, T, Deyo, RA. Comparison of opioid prescribing patterns in the United States and Japan: primary care physicians’ attitudes and perceptions. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:248. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160299.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Song, MY, John, M, Dobs, AS. Clinicians’ attitudes and usage of complementary and alternative integrative medicine: a survey at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institute. J Alternative Compl Med 2007;13:305–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2006.5340.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Woodhouse, A, Pape, K, Romundstad, PR, Vasseljen, O. Health care contact following a new incident neck or low back pain episode in the general population; the HUNT study. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1326-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Guillaud, A, Allenet, B, Pinsault, N. Does dissatisfaction with physicians lead patients to alternative practitioners? Compl Ther Clin Pract 2020;39:101109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101109.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Hooten, WM, Dvorkin, J, Warner, NS, Pearson, AC, Murad, MH, Warner, DO. Characteristics of physicians who prescribe opioids for chronic pain: a meta-narrative systematic review. J Pain Res 2019;12:2261–89. https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.S202376.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Flannery, MA, Love, MM, Pearce, KA, Luan, JJ, Elder, WG. Communication about complementary and alternative medicine: perspectives of primary care clinicians. Alternative Ther Health Med 2006;12:56–63.Suche in Google Scholar

45. Foley, H, Steel, A, Cramer, H, Wardle, J, Adams, J. Disclosure of complementary medicine use to medical providers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2019;9:1573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38279-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Maha, N, Shaw, A. Academic doctors’ views of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and its role within the NHS: an exploratory qualitative study. BMC Compl Alternative Med 2007;7:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-7-17.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Patel, SJ, Kemper, KJ, Kitzmiller, JP. Physician perspectives on education, training, and implementation of complementary and alternative medicine. Adv Med Educ Pract 2017;8:499–503. https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.S138572.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-06-09
Accepted: 2022-10-03
Published Online: 2022-10-31

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Osteopathic structure/function models renovation for a person-centered approach: a narrative review and integrative hypothesis
  4. Exploring the scope of homoeopathy in combating the unfortunate consequences of post-COVID-19 survivors based on non-COVID conditions: a narrative review
  5. Efficacy and safety of Ayurveda interventions for sinusitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  6. Evening primrose oil for cervical ripening in term pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  7. Effect of cell phone use on salivary components; a review of literature
  8. Research Articles
  9. Bombax ceiba Linn. leaf extract rich in phenolic compounds to mitigate non-alcoholic fatty liver-related complications in experimental model
  10. Antidiabetic, antihyperlipidemic and protective effects of Gladiolus psittacinus on hyperglycemia-mediated oxidative stress in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats
  11. In vitro immunomodulatory activity study of Garcinia cowa Roxb. fraction
  12. Crude extract from Euphorbia prostrata extended curative period of glibenclemide in alloxan-induced diabetic rats
  13. Milicia excelsa (Moraceae) reversed the effects of letrozole-induced aromatase inhibition in rats with polycystic ovary syndrome
  14. Protective effects of cinnamon on acetylcholinesterase activity and memory dysfunction in diabetic rats
  15. Anti-osteoporotic effect of Terminalia arjuna (Roxb.) Wight & Arn. in bilateral ovariectomized induced post-menopausal osteoporosis in experimental rats
  16. Anti-inflammatory effect of polyherbal composition with hepatoprotective and choleretic properties on LPS-stimulated murine macrophages
  17. Degradation product of curcumin restrain Salmonella typhimurium virulent protein L-asparaginase
  18. β-Elemene regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transformation and inhibits invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer cells
  19. Palpatory tests in manual therapies: an international survey on osteopathic clinical practice
  20. A cross-sectional survey exploring clinician perceptions of a novel Medicaid back pain policy
  21. A neurotherapy protocol to remediate cognitive deficits after adjuvant chemotherapy: a pilot study
  22. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Lactuca Sativa syrup in controlling pain after periodontal flap surgery: a split-mouth, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial
  23. Variation determinants within massage therapists’ professional identity
  24. Effects of complementary spiritual therapy on stress, anxiety, burnout syndrome and hematological parameters of professionals in a public hospital: a randomized controlled trial
  25. Effects of Yogic practices on cardiovascular system and salivary alpha amylase on Indian healthy jail inmates
  26. Short-term effects of a maqui-based nutraceutical on heart rate variability, psycho-physical resilience and on a few metabolic biomarkers: a randomized controlled study
  27. Screening and validation of the iris manifestation among patients with hemiplegia – an observational study
  28. Case Report
  29. Case study of clinical improvement of atopic dermatitis in a patient treated with herbal-based parapharmaceuticals
  30. Congress Abstracts
  31. Abstracts from 2020 INCAM Research Symposium: Integrative Health at the Crossroads: Learning from the Past, Co-Creating the Future
Heruntergeladen am 5.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcim-2022-0213/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen