Using language in boundary-making: nation-state building in the early years of the Turkish Republic (1927–1965)
-
Elise S. Ahn
Abstract
In 1927, the nascent Turkish Republic engaged in its first endeavor as a nation-state to systematically account for all its citizens. Included on this census were a number of different attributes the Turkish government wanted to know about its citizenry, including language. In the Turkish context, examining the language categories on the census between 1927 and 1965 and how – they changed over time – provides insight into how the new republic was imagining its citizenry (and by extension, itself). The dynamic nature of the language categories not only reflected an ambiguity that the nascent nation-state had regarding what constituted salient ethnolinguistic category for governing purposes, it also reflected the realization and subsequent politicization of minoritized populations over time. After examining the history of the development of the Turkish census, the article outlines the use of running records like censuses to provide insight into how state apparatuses were creating taxonomies to realize (or visualize) its citizenry and the value of utilizing such unobtrusive measures in Durkheimian social facts such as those who are “Us” and those who are “Other”. This article then situates the census data in its geographical context and demonstrates how the delineation of historic parts of the country that were settled by non-Turkish communities were ones that were then later demarcated into smaller administrative borders, allowing for closer government and military oversight. While this article is an exploratory case study of the Turkish census as part of its state building process, I contend that looking at how language categories were used in the 1927–1965 censuses provides insight into the nature of the Turkish government’s imaginings regarding its citizenry. In particular, the use of language data as a proxy for ethnicity was concomitant with processes of internal border demarcation that was taking place to increase government oversight in particular non-Turkish contexts, resulting in a “new” form of minoritization and marginalization in the Turkish Republic.
References
Agnew, John. 2008. Borders on the mind: Re-framing border thinking. Ethics & Global Politics 1(4). 174–191. https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v1i4.1892.Suche in Google Scholar
Ahn, Elise. 2011. Seeing Turkish state formation processes: Mapping language and education census data. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Ahn, Elise & Juldyz Smagulova (eds.). 2016. Language change in Central Asia. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614514534Suche in Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 2006 [1991]. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Suche in Google Scholar
Andrews, Peter A. 1989. Ethnic groups in the Republic of Turkey. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Andrews, Peter A. 2002. Ethnic groups in the Republic of Turkey. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar
Arel, Dominque. 2002. Language categories in censuses: Backward- or forward-looking? In David I. Kertzer & Dominique Arel (eds.), Census and identity. The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses, 92–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606045.005Suche in Google Scholar
Barni, Monica & Guus Extra (eds.). 2008. Mapping linguistic diversity in multicultural contexts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207347Suche in Google Scholar
Bingöl, Yilmaz. 2002. Revisiting Turkish language policy in light of the actor’s norms and identity model. Bloomington: Indiana University Unpublished dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Bodenhamer, David J., John Corrigan & Trevor M. Harris. 2010. The spatial humanities. GIS and the future of humanities scholarship. In David J. Bodenhamer, John Corrigan & Trevor M. Harris (eds.), The spatial humanities. GIS and the future of humanities scholarship, 14–30. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Bodenhamer, David J., John Corrigan & Trevor M. Harris (eds.). 2015. Deep maps and spatial narratives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1zxxzr2Suche in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Boston: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. 1979 [1992]. The structures of everyday life. The limits of the possible. New York City: Harper & Row.Suche in Google Scholar
CIA World Factbook. 2024. Türkiye. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/turkey-turkiye/#people-and-society.Suche in Google Scholar
Cooper, Robert. 1989. Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Çolak, Yilmaz. 2004. Language policy and official ideology in early Republican Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies 40(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/0026320042000282883.Suche in Google Scholar
Dilaçar, Agop. 1964. Türk diline: Genel bir bakış. Ankara: Türkiye Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi [Turkey’s Turkish Historical Institution Printing Office].Suche in Google Scholar
Duchêne, Alexandre & Phillipe N. Humbert. 2018. Surveying languages: The art of governing speakers with numbers. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 252. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0012.Suche in Google Scholar
Emrence, Cem. 2011. Remapping the Ottoman Middle East. Modernity, Imperial bureaucracy and the Islamic state. London: I.B. Tauris.10.5040/9780755692828Suche in Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua. 1989. Language and ethnicity in minority sociolinguistic perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781800418066Suche in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The order of things. An archeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.Suche in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977 [1995]. Discipline & punish. The birth of the prison. New York City: Vintage Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Gambetti, Zeynep & Joost Jongerden (eds.). 2015. The Kurdish issue in Turkey. A spatial perspective. Oxfordshire: Routledge.10.4324/9781315740881Suche in Google Scholar
Gordon, Richard G. (ed.). 2005. Ethnologue languages of the world, 15th edn. Texas, US: SIL International.Suche in Google Scholar
Gregory, Ian. 2002. A place in history. A guide in using GIS in historical research. Available at: http://hds.essex.ac.uk/g2gp/gis/index.asp.Suche in Google Scholar
Gregory, Ian. 2010. Exploiting time and space: A challenge for GIS in the digital humanities. In David J. Bodenhamer, John Corrigan & Trevor M. Harris (eds.), The spatial humanities. GIS and the future of humanities scholarship, 58–75. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Gregory, Ian & Richard G. Healey. 2007. Historical GIS: Structuring, mapping, and analyzing geographies of the past. Progress in Human Geography 31(5). 638–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507081495.Suche in Google Scholar
Gregory, Ian & Humphrey R. Southall. 2002. Mapping British population history. In Anne K. Knowles (ed.), Past time, past place. GIS for history, 117–130. Redlands: ESRI Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Gulson, Kalervo N. 2007. Repositioning schooling in inner Sydney: Urban renewal, an education market, and the “absent presence” of the “middle classes”. Urban Studies 44(7). 1377–1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701302379.Suche in Google Scholar
Gulson, Kalervo N. & Colin Symes. 2007. Knowing one’s place: Space, theory, education. Critical Studies in Education 48(1). 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480601123750.Suche in Google Scholar
Hakim, Catherine. 1983. Research based on administrative records. Sociological Records 31(3). 489–519.10.1111/j.1467-954X.1983.tb00905.xSuche in Google Scholar
Heyd, Uriel. 1950. Foundations of Turkish nationalism. The life and teachings of Ziya Gokalp. London: Luzac and Co.Suche in Google Scholar
Heyd, Uriel. 1954. Language reform in modern Turkey. London: The Israel Oriental Society.Suche in Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert & Robert Baldauf. 1997. Language planning from practice to theory. Oxfordshire: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781800418059Suche in Google Scholar
Kaya, Zeynep N. 2020. Mapping Kurdistan. Territory, self-determination and nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108629805Suche in Google Scholar
Kertzer, David I. & Dominique Arel. 2002a. Preface. In David I. Kertzer & Dominique Arel (eds.), Census and identity. The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses, ix–xi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606045.001Suche in Google Scholar
Kertzer, David I. & Dominique Arel (eds.). 2002b. Census and identity. The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606045Suche in Google Scholar
Kertzer, David I. & Dominique Arel. 2002c. Censuses, identity formation, and the struggle for political power. In David I. Kertzer & Dominique Arel (eds.), Census and identity. The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses, 2–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606045.002Suche in Google Scholar
Kezer, Zeynep. 2015. Building modern Turkey. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.10.2307/j.ctt19rmc9tSuche in Google Scholar
Knowles, Anne K. 2000. Introduction. Social Science History 24(3). 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1215/01455532-24-3-451.Suche in Google Scholar
Knowles, Anne K. (ed.). 2002a. Past time, past place. GIS for history. Redlands: ESRI Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Knowles, Anne K. 2002b. Introducing historical GIS. In Anne K. Knowles (ed.), Past time, past place. GIS for history, xi–xx. Redlands: ESRI Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kreager, Philip. 1997. Population and identity. In David I. Kertzer & Tom Fricke (eds.), Anthropological demography. Toward a new synthesis, 139–174. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kreager, Phillip. 2004. Objectifying demographic identities. In Simon Szreter, Hania Sholkamy & Arunachalam Dharmlingam (eds.), Categories and contexts: Anthropological and historical studies in critical demography, 33–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199270570.003.0002Suche in Google Scholar
Lee, Raymond. 2000. Unobtrusive methods in social research. Berkshire: Open University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Leeman, Jennifer. 2018. It’s all about English: The interplay between monolingual ideologies, language policies and the U.S. Census Bureau’s statistics on multilingualism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 252. 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0013.Suche in Google Scholar
LeFebvre, Henri. 2003. Space and the state. In Neil Brenner, Bob Jessop, Martin Jones & Gordon Macleod (eds.), State/space. A reader, 84–100. Hoboken: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470755686.ch5Suche in Google Scholar
Lewis, Bernard. 2002. The emergence of modern Turkey, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey. 2002. The Turkish language reform: A catastrophic success. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Mango, Andrew. 1994. Turkey. The challenge of a new role. Westport: Praeger.Suche in Google Scholar
Mango, Andrew. 1999. Atatürk. London: John Murray.Suche in Google Scholar
Massey, Doreen. 1985. New directions in space. In Derek Gregory & John Urry (eds.), Social relations and spatial structures, 9–19. London: St. Martin’s Press.10.1007/978-1-349-27935-7_2Suche in Google Scholar
Massey, Doreen. 1994. Double articulation: A place in the world. In Angelika Bammer (ed.), Displacements: Cultural identities, 110–121. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Massey, Doreen. 2005. For space. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Suche in Google Scholar
McDowall, David. 2021. A modern history of the Kurds. London: I.B. Tauris.10.5040/9780755600762Suche in Google Scholar
Miller, Catherine. 2018. Language and ethnic censuses in twentieth century Sudanese censuses and surveys. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 252. 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0017.Suche in Google Scholar
Moran, Joe. 2002. Interdisciplinarity. Oxfordshire: Routledge.10.4324/9780203458563Suche in Google Scholar
Önder, Ali T. 2008. Türkiye’nin etnik yapısı. Ankara: Kripto Kitaplar.Suche in Google Scholar
Ó’ Riagáin, Pádraig. 1997. Language policy and social reproduction: Ireland, 1893–1993. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198235187.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Patriarca, Silvana. 1996. Numbers and nationhood: Writing statistics in nineteenth-century Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511523458Suche in Google Scholar
Popescu, Gabriel. 2011. Bordering and ordering the twenty-first century. Understanding borders. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Suche in Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore M. 1986. The rise of statistical thinking. 1820–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691210520Suche in Google Scholar
Pred, Allan. 1985. The social becomes the spatial, the spatial becomes the social: Enclosures, social change and then becoming of places in Skane. In Derek Gregory & John Urry (eds.), Social relations and spatial structure, 337–365. London: MacMillan.10.1007/978-1-349-27935-7_14Suche in Google Scholar
Rothstein, Richard. 2017. The color of law. A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. New York City: W.W. Norton & Company.Suche in Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like a state. New Haven: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Shohamy, Elana. 2006. Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Oxfordshire: Routledge.10.4324/9780203387962Suche in Google Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard. 2004. Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Soja, Edward W. 1985. The spatiality of social life: Towards a transformative retheorization. In Derek Gregory & John Urry (eds.), Social relations and spatial structure, 90–127. London: MacMillan.10.1007/978-1-349-27935-7_6Suche in Google Scholar
Stake, Robert. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1937. Genel nüfus sayımı 1935. [General census 1935]. Ankara: Mehmet İhsan Basımevi.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1940. Genel nüfus sayımı 1940. [General census 1940]. Ankara: Hüsnütabiat Basımevi.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1950. Genel nüfus sayımı 1945. [General census 1945]. Ankara: Mehmet İhsan Basımevi.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1960. Genel nüfus sayımı 1960. [General census 1960]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1961a. Genel nüfus sayımı 1950. [General census 1950]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1961b. Genel nüfus sayımı 1955. [General census 1955]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1969. Genel nüfus sayımı. Nüfusun sosyal ve ekonomik nitelikleri 1965. [General census 1965]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1970. Genel nüfus sayım 1970. [General census 1970]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1984. Genel nüfus sayımı. Nüfusun sosyal ve ekonomik nitelikleri 1980. [General census 1980]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1989. Genel nüfus sayımı.Nüfusun sosyal ve ekonomik nitelikleri 1985. [General census 1985]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1991. İstatistik göstergeler 1923–1990 [Statistical indicators 1923–1990]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1993. Genel nüfus sayımı. Nüfusun sosyal ve ekonomik nitelikleri 1990. [General census 1990]. Ankara: DİE Matbaası.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1996. Türkiye istatistik yıllığı (1995). [Statistical yearbook of Turkey 1995]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Suche in Google Scholar
Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. 2024. Available at: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=nufus-ve-demografi-109&dil=1.Suche in Google Scholar
UN agrees to change Turkey’s official name to ‘Türkiye’. 2022. Al Jazeera.com. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/6/2/un-registers-turkiye-as-new-country-name-for-turkey.Suche in Google Scholar
Urla, Jacqueline & Christa Burdick. 2018. Counting matters: Quantifying the vitality and value of Basque. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 252. 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0015.Suche in Google Scholar
Virtanen, Özlem. 2003. Recent changes in Turkey’s language legislation. Working papers 11. Ciemen Mercator.Suche in Google Scholar
Webb, Eugene J., Donald T. Campbell, Richard D. Schwartz & Lee Sechrest. 1966 [2000]. Unobtrusive measures. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Suche in Google Scholar
Weber, Eugene. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen: The modernization of rural France, 1870–1914. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804766036Suche in Google Scholar
Wright, Sue. 2004. Language policy and language planning. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230597037Suche in Google Scholar
Yağmur, Kutlay. 2001. Languages in Turkey. In Guus Extra & Durk Gorter (eds.), The other languages of Europe, 407–427. Oxfordshire: Multilingual Matters.Suche in Google Scholar
Yin, Robert. 1994. Case study research: Designs and methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Mobile borders
- Using language in boundary-making: nation-state building in the early years of the Turkish Republic (1927–1965)
- Hong Kongers and their languages: bordering, scale and identity
- Mobile borders and chronotope of homeland
- Humanitarianism, victimisation, and bordering processes: debating the refugee experience in the classroom
- Varia
- Attitudes towards Sardinian and Italian finally compared via the Matched-Guise Technique
- The effect of language attitudes on proficiency in two heritage languages of Mountain Jews in Israel and the US
- Sociolinguistic challenges and new perspectives on determining French speakers in Creole communities: the case of Haiti
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Mobile borders
- Using language in boundary-making: nation-state building in the early years of the Turkish Republic (1927–1965)
- Hong Kongers and their languages: bordering, scale and identity
- Mobile borders and chronotope of homeland
- Humanitarianism, victimisation, and bordering processes: debating the refugee experience in the classroom
- Varia
- Attitudes towards Sardinian and Italian finally compared via the Matched-Guise Technique
- The effect of language attitudes on proficiency in two heritage languages of Mountain Jews in Israel and the US
- Sociolinguistic challenges and new perspectives on determining French speakers in Creole communities: the case of Haiti
