Abstract
In this article, we examine the imagining of homeland as one of the discursive practices of rearticulating belonging within new state borders. The study focuses on an under-researched diasporic group of the Dungan community in Kazakhstan and examines how the diaspora subjects make sense of shifting borders and legitimize their presence within an increasingly homogenizing nation-state. Specifically, our interrogation focuses on spatiotemporal frames for re-imagining the notion of homeland and belonging in the context of shifting borders and changing conditions of settlement. We show how the Dungan negotiate their social positioning by re-orienting themselves to their ancestral home and their current place by discursively constructing double loss – permanent dispersal from China, their ancestral homeland, and displacement from the home and ideal life they managed to build in the Soviet Union. This spatiotemporal perspective allows us to see that the notion of homeland, a defining feature of diaspora and often viewed as naturalized and fixed, is a fluid construct, and one which can be rooted in time just as much as in space. The study contributes to understanding of processes of diasporic imagination in response to sociopolitical changes, and shows us that feelings of displacement can arise without physical dispersal, that temporality is as important in the processes of constructing diasporas as spatial movement.
Funding source: Ministry of Science of Republic of Kazakhstan
Award Identifier / Grant number: IRN AP14869488
-
Research funding: The article was written within the framework of the project “Problems of interaction of interethnic communities at local levels in Kazakhstani Society (2014–2021): Dynamics of intercommunal violence and preventive methods” funded by the Ministry of Science of Republic of Kazakhstan [grant number IRN AP14869488].
References
ADC Memorial. 2020. The Korday Pogrom: The Dungan people of Kazakhstan seek justice. https://adcmemorial.org/en/articles/korday-pogrom/ (accessed 25 January 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2007. Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime. Language & Communication 27(3). 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.001.Search in Google Scholar
Albury, Nathan & Anne Schluter. 2021. Introduction: Reimagining language and belonging in the diaspora. Lingua 263. 103157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103157.Search in Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Michael. 1981. Forms of time and of the chronotope on the novel. In Michel Holquist (ed.), Dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar
Baronian, Marie-Aude, Stephan Besser & Yolande Jansen. 2006. Introduction: Diaspora and memory: Figures of displacement in contemporary literature, arts and politics. In Diaspora and memory, 9–16. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.10.1163/9789401203807_002Search in Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 1999. Language ideological debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808049Search in Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2015. Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology 44(1). 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014035.Search in Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2017. Commentary: Mobility, contexts, and the chronotope. Language in Society 46(1). 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404516000841.Search in Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2019. Are chronotopes helpful? In Sjaak Kroon & Jos Swane (eds.), Chronotopic identity work: Sociolinguistic analyses of cultural and linguistic phenomena in time and space, 16–24. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781788926621-003Search in Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan & Anna De Fina. 2017. Chronotopic identities. In Didem Ikizoglu, Jeremy Wegner & Anna De Fina (eds.), Diversity and super-diversity: Sociocultural linguistic perspectives, 1–15. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brah, Anvar. 1996. Cartographies of diaspora: Contesting identities. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2005. The ‘diaspora’ diaspora. Ethnic and Racial Studies 28(1). 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000289997.Search in Google Scholar
Burkhanov, Aziz & Yu-Wen Chen. 2016. Kazakh perspective on China, the Chinese, and Chinese migration. Ethnic and Racial Studies 39(12). 2129–2148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1139155.Search in Google Scholar
Busch, Brigitta. 2012. The linguistic repertoire revisited. Applied Linguistics 33(5). 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams056.Search in Google Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh & Sandra Silberstein. 2012. Diaspora identities and language. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 11(2). 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2012.667296.Search in Google Scholar
Chambers, Iain. 1994. Migrancy, culture, identity. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Clifford, James. 1994. Diasporas. Cultural Anthropology 9(3). 302–338. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1994.9.3.02a00040.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Robin. 1996. Diasporas and the nation-state: From victims to challengers. International Affairs 72(3). 507–520. https://doi.org/10.2307/2625554.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Robin. 2007. Solid, ductile and liquid: Changing notions of homeland and home in diaspora studies. In QEH Working papers, 156. Oxford: Queen Elizabeth House.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, Robin. 2019. Diasporas. Changing meaning and limits of the concept. In Jessica Retis & Roza Tsagarousianou (eds.), The handbook of diaspora, media and culture, 21–30. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781119236771.ch2Search in Google Scholar
Dave, Bhavna. 2018. Silk road economic belt: Effects of China’s soft power diplomacy in Kazakhstan. In Marlene Laruelle (ed.), China’s belt and road initiative and its impact in Central Asia, 97–108. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.Search in Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna. 2019. Insights and challenges of chronotopic analysis for sociolinguistics. In Sjaak Kroon & Jos Swane (eds.), Chronotopic identity work: Sociolinguistic analyses of cultural and linguistic phenomena in time and space, 190–200. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781788926621-012Search in Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna. 2022. The chronotope. Handbook of Pragmatics Online 25. 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.25.chr1.Search in Google Scholar
De Fina, Anna & Sabina Perrino. 2020. Introduction: Chronotopes and chronotopic relations. Language & Communication 70. 67–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.04.001.Search in Google Scholar
Dyer, Svetlana Rimsky-Korsakoff, V. Tsibuzgin & A. Shmakov. 1992. Karakunuz: An early settlement of the Chinese Muslims in Russia. Asian Folklore Studies 51(2). 243–278. https://doi.org/10.2307/1178334.Search in Google Scholar
Gal, Suzan. 1989. Language and political economy. Annual Review of Anthropology 18(1). 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.18.100189.002021.Search in Google Scholar
Imyarova, Zulfiya. 2022. Balancing between majorities: The negotiable identity of Osh Dungans. Central Asian Survey 41(3). 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2021.2013773.Search in Google Scholar
Isabayeva, Saule. 2020. From the Kazakh tolerance to violence: Who is responsible and what to do? [От казахской толерантности – к этническому насилию: кто виноват и что делать?] Central Asia Monitor. https://camonitor.kz/35079-ot-kazahskoy-tolerantnosti-k-etnicheskomu-nasiliyu-kto-vinovat-i-chto-delat.html (accessed 25 January 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Karimzad, Farzad. 2016. Life here beyond now: Chronotopes of the ideal life among Iranian transnationals. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(5). 607–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12211.Search in Google Scholar
Karimzad, Farzad & Lydia Catedral. 2021. Chronotopes and migration: Language, social imagination, and behavior. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351000635Search in Google Scholar
Kenny, Kevin. 2012. Diaspora: An introduction. In Conversation with Erik Owens. Boston: Boisi Center for Religious and American Public Life. Available at: https://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/centers/boisi/pdf/f12/Kenny_Interview.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Khakazov, Shakir. 2018. Finding the motherland [Обретение Родины]. Kazakhstanskaya Pravda. https://kazpravda.kz/n/obretenie-rodiny-s2/ (accessed 30 January 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Khan, Kamran. 2022. The securitisation of language borders and the (re)production of inequalities. TESOL Quarterly 56(4). 1458–1470. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3186.Search in Google Scholar
Klein, Gabriella. 2018. Applied linguistics to identify and contrast racist ‘hate speech’: Cases from the English and Italian language. Applied Linguistics Research Journal 2(3). 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2018.36855.Search in Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul. 2004. Language ideologies. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 496–517. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470996522.ch22Search in Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul. 2010. Language ideologies–Evolving perspectives. Society and Language Use 7(3). 192–205.10.1075/hoph.7.13kroSearch in Google Scholar
Kucherbayeva, Dina & Juldyz Smagulova. 2021. Critical discourse analysis of hate language. [Критический дискурс анализ языка вражды]. In Адиль Джалилов & Думан Смаков (ред.), Исследование языка вражды в Казахстане: Восприятие резонансных межэтнических конфликтов в соцсетях. Возможные решения, 42–66. Almaty: МЦЖ Medianet.Search in Google Scholar
Kudaibergenova, Diana. 2016. The use and abuse of postcolonial discourses in post-independent Kazakhstan. Europe-Asia Studies 68(5). 917–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2016.1194967.Search in Google Scholar
Kudaibergenova, Diana. 2020. Toward nationalizing regimes: Conceptualizing power and identity in the post-Soviet realm. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.10.2307/j.ctv1dv0w64Search in Google Scholar
Malkki, Liisa. 1992. National geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthropology 7(1). 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00030.Search in Google Scholar
Naficy, Hamid. 1999. Framing the exile: From homeland to homepage. In Hamid Naficy (ed.), Home, exile, homeland: Film, media and the politics of place, 1–13. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
National Statistics Bureau of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2022. Краткие итоги национальной переписи населения 2021 года в Республике Казахстан [Summary of the National Census 2021 in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. https://stat.gov.kz/ru/national/2021/ (accessed December 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Owen, Catherine. 2017. “The sleeping dragon is gathering strength”: Causes of sinophobia in Central Asia. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 3(1). 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2377740017500063.Search in Google Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul & Lionel Wee. 2017. Nation-state, transnationalism, and language. In Suresh Canagarajah (ed.), The Routledge handbook of migration and language, 47–62. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315754512-3Search in Google Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta. 2013. Language management in the Russian Empire, Soviet Union, and post-Soviet countries. In Robert Bayley & Richard Cameron (eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics, 651–679. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199744084.013.0032Search in Google Scholar
Paz, Alejandro. 2015. The deterritorialization of Latino educacion. In Rosina Marquez Reiter & Luisa Martin Rojo (eds.), A sociolinguistics of diaspora: Latino practices, identities, and ideologies, 151–165. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Peeren, Esther. 2006. Through the lens of the chronotope: Suggestions for a spatio-temporal perspective on diaspora. In Marie-Aude Baronian, Stephan Besser & Yolande Jansen (eds.), Diaspora and memory, 67–77. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.10.1163/9789401203807_007Search in Google Scholar
Perrino, Sabina. 2011. Chronotopes of story and storytelling event in interviews. Language in Society 40(1). 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404510000916.Search in Google Scholar
Perrino, Sabina & Gregory Kohler. 2020. Chronotopic identities: Narrating made in Italy across spatiotemporal scales. Language & Communication 70. 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.01.003.Search in Google Scholar
Peyrouse, Sébastien. 2016. Discussing China: Sinophilia and sinophobia in Central Asia. Journal of Eurasian Studies 7(1). 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2015.10.003.Search in Google Scholar
Reiter, Rosina Marquez & Luisa Martin Rojo. 2015. A sociolinguistics of diaspora: Latino practices, identities, and ideologies. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Safran, William. 1991. Diasporas in modern societies: Myths of homeland and return. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies 1(1). 83–99. https://doi.org/10.3138/diaspora.1.1.83.Search in Google Scholar
Safran, William. 2005. The Jewish diaspora in a comparative and theoretical perspective. Israel Studies 10(1). 36–60.10.1353/is.2005.0110Search in Google Scholar
Satpayev, Dosym. 2019. Шесть причин антикитайских настроений в Казахстане. Forbes Kazakhstan. https://forbes.kz/process/expertise/shest_prichin_antikitayskih_nastroeniy_v_kazahstane (accessed 12 November 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi, Kathryn Woolard & Paul Kroskrity. 1998. Language ideologies: Practice and theory, 317–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195105612.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Sideri, Eleni. 2008. The diaspora of the term diaspora: A working-paper of a definition. Transtext(e)s transcultures. Journal of Global Cultural Studies 4. 32–47. https://doi.org/10.4000/transtexts.247.Search in Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1998. Contemporary transformations of local linguistic communities. Annual Review of Anthropology 27(1). 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.401.Search in Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2000. Whorf and the linguistic imagination of nationality. In Paul Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 85–138. Santa Fe: School of American Research.Search in Google Scholar
Smagulova, Juldyz. 2015. The Dungans of Kazakhstan: Old minority in a new nation-state. In Li Wei (ed.), Multilingualism in the Chinese diaspora worldwide, 63–86. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315759371-5Search in Google Scholar
Suleimenova, Eleonora, Nursulu Shaimerdenova & Dana Akanova. 2007. The languages of people of Kazakhstan [Языки народов Казахстана]. Almaty: Arman-TB Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tölölyan, Khachig. 2005. Armenian diaspora. In Melvin Ember, Carol R. Ember & Ian Skoggard (eds.), Encyclopedia of diasporas, 35–46. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-29904-4_4Search in Google Scholar
Tseng, Amelia & Lars Hinrichs. 2021. Introduction: Mobility, polylingualism, and change: Toward an updated sociolinguistics of diaspora. Journal of Sociolinguistics 25(5). 649–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12532.Search in Google Scholar
Walling, Carrie. 2022. Human rights and justice for all. Demanding dignity in the United States and around the world. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003256939Search in Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. The russification of soviet minority languages. Problems of Communism 2(6). 46–57.Search in Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn & Bambi Schieffelin. 1994. Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology 23(1). 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.23.1.55.Search in Google Scholar
Zakon. 2018. Sinophobes distrupt the wedding of Kazakh girl with a Chinese [Синофобы сорвали свадьбу казашки с китайцем]. Available at: https://www.zakon.kz/4924992-sinofoby-sorvali-svadbu-kazashki-s.html.Search in Google Scholar
Zavyalova, Olga. 2017. Dungan language. In Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol. 2, 141–148. Leiden-Boston: Brill. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/42869092/Dungan_Language.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Mobile borders
- Using language in boundary-making: nation-state building in the early years of the Turkish Republic (1927–1965)
- Hong Kongers and their languages: bordering, scale and identity
- Mobile borders and chronotope of homeland
- Humanitarianism, victimisation, and bordering processes: debating the refugee experience in the classroom
- Varia
- Attitudes towards Sardinian and Italian finally compared via the Matched-Guise Technique
- The effect of language attitudes on proficiency in two heritage languages of Mountain Jews in Israel and the US
- Sociolinguistic challenges and new perspectives on determining French speakers in Creole communities: the case of Haiti
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Mobile borders
- Using language in boundary-making: nation-state building in the early years of the Turkish Republic (1927–1965)
- Hong Kongers and their languages: bordering, scale and identity
- Mobile borders and chronotope of homeland
- Humanitarianism, victimisation, and bordering processes: debating the refugee experience in the classroom
- Varia
- Attitudes towards Sardinian and Italian finally compared via the Matched-Guise Technique
- The effect of language attitudes on proficiency in two heritage languages of Mountain Jews in Israel and the US
- Sociolinguistic challenges and new perspectives on determining French speakers in Creole communities: the case of Haiti