Using language in boundary-making: nation-state building in the early years of the Turkish Republic (1927–1965)

Elise S. Ahn

doi:10.1515/ijsl-2023-0015

Article

Using language in boundary-making: nation-state building in the early years of the Turkish Republic (1927–1965)

Elise S. Ahn

Published/Copyright: August 6, 2024

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal International Journal of the Sociology of Language Volume 2024 Issue 288

Abstract

In 1927, the nascent Turkish Republic engaged in its first endeavor as a nation-state to systematically account for all its citizens. Included on this census were a number of different attributes the Turkish government wanted to know about its citizenry, including language. In the Turkish context, examining the language categories on the census between 1927 and 1965 and how – they changed over time – provides insight into how the new republic was imagining its citizenry (and by extension, itself). The dynamic nature of the language categories not only reflected an ambiguity that the nascent nation-state had regarding what constituted salient ethnolinguistic category for governing purposes, it also reflected the realization and subsequent politicization of minoritized populations over time. After examining the history of the development of the Turkish census, the article outlines the use of running records like censuses to provide insight into how state apparatuses were creating taxonomies to realize (or visualize) its citizenry and the value of utilizing such unobtrusive measures in Durkheimian social facts such as those who are “Us” and those who are “Other”. This article then situates the census data in its geographical context and demonstrates how the delineation of historic parts of the country that were settled by non-Turkish communities were ones that were then later demarcated into smaller administrative borders, allowing for closer government and military oversight. While this article is an exploratory case study of the Turkish census as part of its state building process, I contend that looking at how language categories were used in the 1927–1965 censuses provides insight into the nature of the Turkish government’s imaginings regarding its citizenry. In particular, the use of language data as a proxy for ethnicity was concomitant with processes of internal border demarcation that was taking place to increase government oversight in particular non-Turkish contexts, resulting in a “new” form of minoritization and marginalization in the Turkish Republic.

Keywords: census; boundaries; language politics; governmentality; minoritization; nation-state building

Corresponding author: Elise S. Ahn, International Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 254 Bascom Hall, 500 Lincoln Dr., 53706 Madison, WI, USA, E-mail: elise.ahn@wisc.edu

References

Agnew, John. 2008. Borders on the mind: Re-framing border thinking. Ethics & Global Politics 1(4). 174–191. https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v1i4.1892.Search in Google Scholar

Ahn, Elise. 2011. Seeing Turkish state formation processes: Mapping language and education census data. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Ahn, Elise & Juldyz Smagulova (eds.). 2016. Language change in Central Asia. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614514534Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. 2006 [1991]. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Andrews, Peter A. 1989. Ethnic groups in the Republic of Turkey. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Andrews, Peter A. 2002. Ethnic groups in the Republic of Turkey. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Arel, Dominque. 2002. Language categories in censuses: Backward- or forward-looking? In David I. Kertzer & Dominique Arel (eds.), Census and identity. The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses, 92–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606045.005Search in Google Scholar

Barni, Monica & Guus Extra (eds.). 2008. Mapping linguistic diversity in multicultural contexts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207347Search in Google Scholar

Bingöl, Yilmaz. 2002. Revisiting Turkish language policy in light of the actor’s norms and identity model. Bloomington: Indiana University Unpublished dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Bodenhamer, David J., John Corrigan & Trevor M. Harris. 2010. The spatial humanities. GIS and the future of humanities scholarship. In David J. Bodenhamer, John Corrigan & Trevor M. Harris (eds.), The spatial humanities. GIS and the future of humanities scholarship, 14–30. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bodenhamer, David J., John Corrigan & Trevor M. Harris (eds.). 2015. Deep maps and spatial narratives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1zxxzr2Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Boston: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Braudel, Fernand. 1979 [1992]. The structures of everyday life. The limits of the possible. New York City: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

CIA World Factbook. 2024. Türkiye. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/turkey-turkiye/#people-and-society.Search in Google Scholar

Cooper, Robert. 1989. Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Çolak, Yilmaz. 2004. Language policy and official ideology in early Republican Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies 40(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/0026320042000282883.Search in Google Scholar

Dilaçar, Agop. 1964. Türk diline: Genel bir bakış. Ankara: Türkiye Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi [Turkey’s Turkish Historical Institution Printing Office].Search in Google Scholar

Duchêne, Alexandre & Phillipe N. Humbert. 2018. Surveying languages: The art of governing speakers with numbers. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 252. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0012.Search in Google Scholar

Emrence, Cem. 2011. Remapping the Ottoman Middle East. Modernity, Imperial bureaucracy and the Islamic state. London: I.B. Tauris.10.5040/9780755692828Search in Google Scholar

Fishman, Joshua. 1989. Language and ethnicity in minority sociolinguistic perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781800418066Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1970. The order of things. An archeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock Institute of Human Relations.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1977 [1995]. Discipline & punish. The birth of the prison. New York City: Vintage Books.Search in Google Scholar

Gambetti, Zeynep & Joost Jongerden (eds.). 2015. The Kurdish issue in Turkey. A spatial perspective. Oxfordshire: Routledge.10.4324/9781315740881Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, Richard G. (ed.). 2005. Ethnologue languages of the world, 15th edn. Texas, US: SIL International.Search in Google Scholar

Gregory, Ian. 2002. A place in history. A guide in using GIS in historical research. Available at: http://hds.essex.ac.uk/g2gp/gis/index.asp.Search in Google Scholar

Gregory, Ian. 2010. Exploiting time and space: A challenge for GIS in the digital humanities. In David J. Bodenhamer, John Corrigan & Trevor M. Harris (eds.), The spatial humanities. GIS and the future of humanities scholarship, 58–75. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gregory, Ian & Richard G. Healey. 2007. Historical GIS: Structuring, mapping, and analyzing geographies of the past. Progress in Human Geography 31(5). 638–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507081495.Search in Google Scholar

Gregory, Ian & Humphrey R. Southall. 2002. Mapping British population history. In Anne K. Knowles (ed.), Past time, past place. GIS for history, 117–130. Redlands: ESRI Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gulson, Kalervo N. 2007. Repositioning schooling in inner Sydney: Urban renewal, an education market, and the “absent presence” of the “middle classes”. Urban Studies 44(7). 1377–1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701302379.Search in Google Scholar

Gulson, Kalervo N. & Colin Symes. 2007. Knowing one’s place: Space, theory, education. Critical Studies in Education 48(1). 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480601123750.Search in Google Scholar

Hakim, Catherine. 1983. Research based on administrative records. Sociological Records 31(3). 489–519.10.1111/j.1467-954X.1983.tb00905.xSearch in Google Scholar

Heyd, Uriel. 1950. Foundations of Turkish nationalism. The life and teachings of Ziya Gokalp. London: Luzac and Co.Search in Google Scholar

Heyd, Uriel. 1954. Language reform in modern Turkey. London: The Israel Oriental Society.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, Robert & Robert Baldauf. 1997. Language planning from practice to theory. Oxfordshire: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781800418059Search in Google Scholar

Kaya, Zeynep N. 2020. Mapping Kurdistan. Territory, self-determination and nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108629805Search in Google Scholar

Kertzer, David I. & Dominique Arel. 2002a. Preface. In David I. Kertzer & Dominique Arel (eds.), Census and identity. The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses, ix–xi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606045.001Search in Google Scholar

Kertzer, David I. & Dominique Arel (eds.). 2002b. Census and identity. The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606045Search in Google Scholar

Kertzer, David I. & Dominique Arel. 2002c. Censuses, identity formation, and the struggle for political power. In David I. Kertzer & Dominique Arel (eds.), Census and identity. The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national censuses, 2–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606045.002Search in Google Scholar

Kezer, Zeynep. 2015. Building modern Turkey. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.10.2307/j.ctt19rmc9tSearch in Google Scholar

Knowles, Anne K. 2000. Introduction. Social Science History 24(3). 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1215/01455532-24-3-451.Search in Google Scholar

Knowles, Anne K. (ed.). 2002a. Past time, past place. GIS for history. Redlands: ESRI Press.Search in Google Scholar

Knowles, Anne K. 2002b. Introducing historical GIS. In Anne K. Knowles (ed.), Past time, past place. GIS for history, xi–xx. Redlands: ESRI Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kreager, Philip. 1997. Population and identity. In David I. Kertzer & Tom Fricke (eds.), Anthropological demography. Toward a new synthesis, 139–174. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kreager, Phillip. 2004. Objectifying demographic identities. In Simon Szreter, Hania Sholkamy & Arunachalam Dharmlingam (eds.), Categories and contexts: Anthropological and historical studies in critical demography, 33–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199270570.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Raymond. 2000. Unobtrusive methods in social research. Berkshire: Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Leeman, Jennifer. 2018. It’s all about English: The interplay between monolingual ideologies, language policies and the U.S. Census Bureau’s statistics on multilingualism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 252. 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0013.Search in Google Scholar

LeFebvre, Henri. 2003. Space and the state. In Neil Brenner, Bob Jessop, Martin Jones & Gordon Macleod (eds.), State/space. A reader, 84–100. Hoboken: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470755686.ch5Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Bernard. 2002. The emergence of modern Turkey, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Geoffrey. 2002. The Turkish language reform: A catastrophic success. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mango, Andrew. 1994. Turkey. The challenge of a new role. Westport: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Mango, Andrew. 1999. Atatürk. London: John Murray.Search in Google Scholar

Massey, Doreen. 1985. New directions in space. In Derek Gregory & John Urry (eds.), Social relations and spatial structures, 9–19. London: St. Martin’s Press.10.1007/978-1-349-27935-7_2Search in Google Scholar

Massey, Doreen. 1994. Double articulation: A place in the world. In Angelika Bammer (ed.), Displacements: Cultural identities, 110–121. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Massey, Doreen. 2005. For space. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

McDowall, David. 2021. A modern history of the Kurds. London: I.B. Tauris.10.5040/9780755600762Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Catherine. 2018. Language and ethnic censuses in twentieth century Sudanese censuses and surveys. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 252. 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0017.Search in Google Scholar

Moran, Joe. 2002. Interdisciplinarity. Oxfordshire: Routledge.10.4324/9780203458563Search in Google Scholar

Önder, Ali T. 2008. Türkiye’nin etnik yapısı. Ankara: Kripto Kitaplar.Search in Google Scholar

Ó’ Riagáin, Pádraig. 1997. Language policy and social reproduction: Ireland, 1893–1993. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oso/9780198235187.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Patriarca, Silvana. 1996. Numbers and nationhood: Writing statistics in nineteenth-century Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511523458Search in Google Scholar

Popescu, Gabriel. 2011. Bordering and ordering the twenty-first century. Understanding borders. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Porter, Theodore M. 1986. The rise of statistical thinking. 1820–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691210520Search in Google Scholar

Pred, Allan. 1985. The social becomes the spatial, the spatial becomes the social: Enclosures, social change and then becoming of places in Skane. In Derek Gregory & John Urry (eds.), Social relations and spatial structure, 337–365. London: MacMillan.10.1007/978-1-349-27935-7_14Search in Google Scholar

Rothstein, Richard. 2017. The color of law. A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. New York City: W.W. Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like a state. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shohamy, Elana. 2006. Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Oxfordshire: Routledge.10.4324/9780203387962Search in Google Scholar

Spolsky, Bernard. 2004. Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Soja, Edward W. 1985. The spatiality of social life: Towards a transformative retheorization. In Derek Gregory & John Urry (eds.), Social relations and spatial structure, 90–127. London: MacMillan.10.1007/978-1-349-27935-7_6Search in Google Scholar

Stake, Robert. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1937. Genel nüfus sayımı 1935. [General census 1935]. Ankara: Mehmet İhsan Basımevi.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1940. Genel nüfus sayımı 1940. [General census 1940]. Ankara: Hüsnütabiat Basımevi.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1950. Genel nüfus sayımı 1945. [General census 1945]. Ankara: Mehmet İhsan Basımevi.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1960. Genel nüfus sayımı 1960. [General census 1960]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1961a. Genel nüfus sayımı 1950. [General census 1950]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1961b. Genel nüfus sayımı 1955. [General census 1955]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1969. Genel nüfus sayımı. Nüfusun sosyal ve ekonomik nitelikleri 1965. [General census 1965]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1970. Genel nüfus sayım 1970. [General census 1970]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1984. Genel nüfus sayımı. Nüfusun sosyal ve ekonomik nitelikleri 1980. [General census 1980]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1989. Genel nüfus sayımı.Nüfusun sosyal ve ekonomik nitelikleri 1985. [General census 1985]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1991. İstatistik göstergeler 1923–1990 [Statistical indicators 1923–1990]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1993. Genel nüfus sayımı. Nüfusun sosyal ve ekonomik nitelikleri 1990. [General census 1990]. Ankara: DİE Matbaası.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık İstatistik Genel Direktörlüğü. 1996. Türkiye istatistik yıllığı (1995). [Statistical yearbook of Turkey 1995]. Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başbakanlık Devlet İstatistik Enstitüsü.Search in Google Scholar

Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. 2024. Available at: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=nufus-ve-demografi-109&dil=1.Search in Google Scholar

UN agrees to change Turkey’s official name to ‘Türkiye’. 2022. Al Jazeera.com. Available at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/6/2/un-registers-turkiye-as-new-country-name-for-turkey.Search in Google Scholar

Urla, Jacqueline & Christa Burdick. 2018. Counting matters: Quantifying the vitality and value of Basque. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 252. 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-0015.Search in Google Scholar

Virtanen, Özlem. 2003. Recent changes in Turkey’s language legislation. Working papers 11. Ciemen Mercator.Search in Google Scholar

Webb, Eugene J., Donald T. Campbell, Richard D. Schwartz & Lee Sechrest. 1966 [2000]. Unobtrusive measures. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, Eugene. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen: The modernization of rural France, 1870–1914. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804766036Search in Google Scholar

Wright, Sue. 2004. Language policy and language planning. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230597037Search in Google Scholar

Yağmur, Kutlay. 2001. Languages in Turkey. In Guus Extra & Durk Gorter (eds.), The other languages of Europe, 407–427. Oxfordshire: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Yin, Robert. 1994. Case study research: Designs and methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-02-09

Accepted: 2024-04-16

Published Online: 2024-08-06

Published in Print: 2024-07-26

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2023-0015

Keywords for this article

census; boundaries; language politics; governmentality; minoritization; nation-state building