Startseite Philosophie Was ist ein philosophisches Problem?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Was ist ein philosophisches Problem?

Eine formale und begriffliche AnnÀherung
  • Jens Harbecke
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 12. Juni 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper approximates a definitional distinction between philosophical problems and scientific problems. It defends the claim that philosophical problems can be defined as certain inconsistent sets 𝕄 of propositions. This set is characterised by its minimality, the plausibility of its individual propositions, the non-empirical character of some of these propositions, and by the fact that a discursive context exists within which some of 𝕄’s non-mathematical non-empirical assumptions are rejected by argument. In particular, this extrinsic and pragmatic criterion constitutes the novel character of the definition presented. Starting from the concept of philosophical problem, a classification of philosophy as an academic and intellectual discipline is presented. The last part of the paper deals with the question whether such an analytical understanding of philosophy is to be understood exclusively, or whether other kinds of philosophy should still be considered possible.

Literatur

Baffour, B., King, T., u. Valente, P. (2013). The modern census: evolution, examples and evaluation, in: International Statistical Review 81.3, 407–425.10.1111/insr.12036Suche in Google Scholar

Baumgartner, M., u. Lampert, T. (2008), Adequate formalization, in: Synthese 164, 93–115.10.1007/s11229-007-9218-1Suche in Google Scholar

Bieri, P. (2007), Analytische Philosophie des Geistes, Weinheim u. Basel.Suche in Google Scholar

Brun, G. (2003), Die richtige Formel: Philosophische Probleme der logischen Formalisierung (Logos 2), Berlin u. Boston, Mass.10.1515/9783110323528Suche in Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1928), Scheinprobleme in der Philosophie, Berlin.Suche in Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1968), Logische Syntax der Sprache, Wien u. New York.10.1007/978-3-662-25376-2Suche in Google Scholar

Hahn, H., Neurath, O., u. Carnap, R. (1929), Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung. Der Wiener Kreis, Wien.Suche in Google Scholar

Catana, L. (2013), Philosophical Problems and the History of Philosophy: What are they?, in: Lérke, M., Smith, J. E., u. Schliesser, E. (Hg.), Philosophy and its history: Aims and methods in the study of early modern philosophy, Oxford, 115–133.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199857142.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar

Floridi, L. (2013), What is a philosophical question?, in: Metaphilosophy 44.3, 195–221.10.1111/meta.12035Suche in Google Scholar

Harbecke, J. (2013), On the Distinction between Cause-Cause Exclusion and Cause-Supervenience Exclusion, in: Philosophical Papers 42.2, 209–238, 10.1080/05568641.2013.806288.Suche in Google Scholar

Harbecke, J. (2014), Counterfactual Causation and Mental Causation, in: Philosophia 42.2, 363–385.10.1007/s11406-013-9496-4Suche in Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. (2006), What is a philosophical problem?, in: Think 4.12, 17–28.10.1017/S1477175600001664Suche in Google Scholar

Harper, D. (o. J.), Etymology of „problem“, in: Online Etymology Dictionary, URL: https://www.etymonline.com/de/word/problem (19.4.2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1986), Enzyklopaedie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse (= Werke 8–10, Frankfurt am Main.Suche in Google Scholar

Jablonka, E., u. Lamb, M. J. (2017), Evolution in vier Dimensionen. Wie Genetik, Epigenetik, Verhalten und Symbole die Geschichte des Lebens prÀgen, Leipzig.Suche in Google Scholar

Laland, K., et al. (2014), Does evolutionary theory need a rethink?, in: Nature 514, 161–164, 10.1038/514161a.Suche in Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. (1952), The nature of philosophical problems and their roots in science, in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3.10, 124–156.10.1093/bjps/III.10.124Suche in Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1999). Two dogmas of empiricism [1953], in: Margolis, E., u. Laurence, S. (Hg.), Concepts: Core Readings, Cambridge, Mass., 153–169.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosenberg, J. F. (2009), Philosophieren: ein Handbuch fĂŒr AnfĂ€nger, Frankfurt am Main.10.5771/9783465140696Suche in Google Scholar

Russell, B. (2001), The problems of philosophy, Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar

Schneider, J. (2022), Alles ganz prechtig, in: Zeit Online (7.10.2022), URL: https://www.zeit.de/kultur/2022-10/richard-david-precht-tv-philosoph (19.4.2024).Suche in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1999), The future of philosophy, in: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 354.1392, 2069–2080.10.1098/rstb.1999.0544Suche in Google Scholar

Turnbull, M. G. (2018), Underdetermination in science: What it is and why we should care, in: Philosophy Compass 13.2, e12475.10.1111/phc3.12475Suche in Google Scholar

Waltz, K. N. (2010), Theory of international politics, Long Grove, Ill.Suche in Google Scholar

Williamson, T. (2021), The philosophy of philosophy, Hoboken, N. J.10.1002/9781119616702Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-06-12
Published in Print: 2024-06-25

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 8.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dzph-2024-0015/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen