Startseite Medizin Optimizing measurement of misdiagnosis-related harms using symptom-disease pair analysis of diagnostic error (SPADE): comparison groups to maximize SPADE validity
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Optimizing measurement of misdiagnosis-related harms using symptom-disease pair analysis of diagnostic error (SPADE): comparison groups to maximize SPADE validity

  • Ava L. Liberman ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Zheyu Wang , Yuxin Zhu , Ahmed Hassoon , Justin Choi , J. Matthew Austin , Michelle C. Johansen und David E. Newman-Toker
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. April 2023
Diagnosis
Aus der Zeitschrift Diagnosis Band 10 Heft 3

Abstract

Diagnostic errors in medicine represent a significant public health problem but continue to be challenging to measure accurately, reliably, and efficiently. The recently developed Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE) approach measures misdiagnosis related harms using electronic health records or administrative claims data. The approach is clinically valid, methodologically sound, statistically robust, and operationally viable without the requirement for manual chart review. This paper clarifies aspects of the SPADE analysis to assure that researchers apply this method to yield valid results with a particular emphasis on defining appropriate comparator groups and analytical strategies for balancing differences between these groups. We discuss four distinct types of comparators (intra-group and inter-group for both look-back and look-forward analyses), detailing the rationale for choosing one over the other and inferences that can be drawn from these comparative analyses. Our aim is that these additional analytical practices will improve the validity of SPADE and related approaches to quantify diagnostic error in medicine.


Corresponding author: Ava L. Liberman, MD, Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute and Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 420 East 70th Street, NY, 10021, USA, Phone: 212-746-0225, Fax: 646-962-0126, E-mail:

Funding source: NIH research grant

Award Identifier / Grant number: K23NS107643

Award Identifier / Grant number: K23NS112459

Funding source: AHRQ research grant

Award Identifier / Grant number: R01HS27614

Funding source: Armstrong Institute Center for Diagnostic Excellence

  1. Research funding: NIH research grant K23NS107643 supports Dr. Liberman. NIH research grant K23NS112459 supports Dr. Johansen. AHRQ research grant R01HS27614 supports Drs. Wang, Zhu, Hassoon, Austin, and Newman-Toker. Dr. Newman-Toker’s effort was also partially supported by the Armstrong Institute Center for Diagnostic Excellence. No financial support for this study was provided by contract with any other agency, foundation, company, institute, or philanthropic foundation.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Dr. Newman-Toker conducts research related to diagnosis of dizziness and stroke, as well as diagnostic error (including the SPADE method). He serves as the principal investigator for multiple grants and contracts on these topics. Johns Hopkins has been loaned research equipment (video-oculography [VOG] systems) by two companies for use in Dr. Newman-Toker’s research; one of these companies has also provided funding for research on diagnostic algorithm development related to dizziness, inner ear diseases, and stroke. Dr. Newman-Toker has no other financial interest in these or any other companies. Dr. Newman-Toker is an inventor on a provisional patent (US No. 62/883,373) for smartphone-based stroke diagnosis in patients with dizziness. He gives frequent academic lectures on these topics and occasionally serves as a medico-legal consultant for both plaintiff and defense in cases related to dizziness, stroke, and diagnostic error. There are no other conflicts of interest. None of the authors have any financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Balogh, EP, Miller, BT, Ball, JR, editors Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington; 2015.10.17226/21794Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Graber, ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:ii21–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001615.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Liberman, AL, Newman-Toker, DE. Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE): a conceptual framework and methodological approach for unearthing misdiagnosis-related harms using big data. BMJ Qual Saf 2018;27:557–66. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007032.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Newman-Toker, DE. A unified conceptual model for diagnostic errors: underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, and misdiagnosis. Diagnosis 2014;1:43–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2013-0027.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Newman-Toker, DE, Pronovost, PJ. Diagnostic errors--the next Frontier for patient safety. JAMA 2009;301:1060–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.249.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Kerber, KA, Newman-Toker, DE. Misdiagnosing dizzy patients: common pitfalls in clinical practice. Neurol Clin 2015;33:565–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2015.04.009.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Dubosh, NM, Edlow, JA, Goto, T, Camargo, CAJr., Hasegawa, K. Missed serious neurologic conditions in emergency department patients discharged with nonspecific diagnoses of headache or back pain. Ann Emerg Med 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.01.020.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Kim, AS, Fullerton, HJ, Johnston, SC. Risk of vascular events in emergency department patients discharged home with diagnosis of dizziness or vertigo. Ann Emerg Med 2011;57:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.06.559.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Newman-Toker, DE, Moy, E, Valente, E, Coffey, R, Hines, AL. Missed diagnosis of stroke in the emergency department: a cross-sectional analysis of a large population-based sample. Diagnosis 2014;1:155–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2013-0038.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Liberman, AL, Gialdini, G, Bakradze, E, Chatterjee, A, Kamel, H, Merkler, AE. Misdiagnosis of cerebral vein thrombosis in the emergency department. Stroke 2018;49:1504–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.118.021058.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Atzema, CL, Grewal, K, Lu, H, Kapral, MK, Kulkarni, G, Austin, PC. Outcomes among patients discharged from the emergency department with a diagnosis of peripheral vertigo. Ann Neurol 2016;79:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24521.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Grewal, K, Austin, PC, Kapral, MK, Lu, H, Atzema, CL. Missed strokes using computed tomography imaging in patients with vertigo: population-based cohort study. Stroke 2015;46:108–13. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.114.007087.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Chang, TP, Bery, AK, Wang, Z, Sebestyen, K, Ko, YH, Liberman, AL, et al.. Stroke hospitalization after misdiagnosis of “benign dizziness” is lower in specialty care than general practice: a population-based cohort analysis of missed stroke using SPADE methods. Diagnosis 2021;9:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0124.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Cifra, CL, Westlund, E, Ten Eyck, P, Ward, MM, Mohr, NM, Katz, DA. An estimate of missed pediatric sepsis in the emergency department. Diagnosis 2021;8:193–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0023.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Horberg, MA, Nassery, N, Rubenstein, KB, Certa, JM, Shamim, EA, Rothman, R, et al.. Rate of sepsis hospitalizations after misdiagnosis in adult emergency department patients: a look-forward analysis with administrative claims data using Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE) methodology in an integrated health system. Diagnosis 2021;8:479–88. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0145.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Miller, AC, Arakkal, AT, Koeneman, S, Cavanaugh, JE, Gerke, AK, Hornick, DB, et al.. Incidence, duration and risk factors associated with delayed and missed diagnostic opportunities related to tuberculosis: a population-based longitudinal study. BMJ Open 2021;11:e045605. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045605.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Miller, AC, Polgreen, LA, Cavanaugh, JE, Hornick, DB, Polgreen, PM. Missed opportunities to diagnose tuberculosis are common among hospitalized patients and patients seen in emergency departments. Open Forum Infect Dis 2015;2. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofv171.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Nassery, N, Horberg, MA, Rubenstein, KB, Certa, JM, Watson, E, Somasundaram, B, et al.. Antecedent treat-and-release diagnoses prior to sepsis hospitalization among adult emergency department patients: a look-back analysis employing insurance claims data using Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE) methodology. Diagnosis 2021;8:469–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0140.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Sharp, AL, Baecker, A, Nassery, N, Park, S, Hassoon, A, Lee, MS, et al.. Missed acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department-standardizing measurement of misdiagnosis-related harms using the SPADE method. Diagnosis 2021;8:177–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0049.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Miller, AC, Koeneman, SH, Arakkal, AT, Cavanaugh, JE, Polgreen, PM. Incidence, duration, and risk factors associated with missed opportunities to diagnose herpes simplex encephalitis: a population-based longitudinal study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021;8:ofab400. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab400.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Miller, AC, Polgreen, PM. Many opportunities to record, diagnose, or treat injection drug-related infections are missed: a population-based cohort study of inpatient and emergency department settings. Clin Infect Dis 2019;68:1166–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy632.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Tarnutzer, AA, Lee, SH, Robinson, KA, Wang, Z, Edlow, JA, Newman-Toker, DE. ED misdiagnosis of cerebrovascular events in the era of modern neuroimaging: a meta-analysis. Neurology 2017;88:1468–77. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000003814.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Newman-Toker, DE, Wang, Z, Zhu, Y, Nassery, N, Saber Tehrani, AS, Schaffer, AC, et al.. Rate of diagnostic errors and serious misdiagnosis-related harms for major vascular events, infections, and cancers: toward a national incidence estimate using the “Big Three”. Diagnosis (Berl) 2021;8:67--84. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2019-0104.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Newman-Toker, DE, Schaffer, AC, Yu-Moe, CW, Nassery, N, Saber Tehrani, AS, Clemens, GD, et al.. Serious misdiagnosis-related harms in malpractice claims: the “Big Three” – vascular events, infections, and cancers. Diagnosis 2019;6:227–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2019-0019.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Amarenco, P, Lavallee, PC, Labreuche, J, Albers, GW, Bornstein, NM, Canhao, P, et al.. One-year risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1533–42. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1412981.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Amarenco, P, Lavallee, PC, Monteiro Tavares, L, Labreuche, J, Albers, GW, Abboud, H, et al.. Five-year risk of stroke after TIA or minor ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2182–90. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1802712.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Karras, DJ. Statistical methodology: II. Reliability and validity assessment in study design, Part B. Acad Emerg Med 1997;4:144–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03723.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Savitz, SI, Caplan, LR, Edlow, JA. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of cerebellar infarction. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14:63–8. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.060.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Newman-Toker, DE. Missed stroke in acute vertigo and dizziness: it is time for action, not debate. Ann Neurol 2016;79:27–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24532.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Tuna, MA, Rothwell, PM, Oxford Vascular, S. Diagnosis of non-consensus transient ischaemic attacks with focal, negative, and non-progressive symptoms: population-based validation by investigation and prognosis. Lancet 2021;397:902–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31961-9.Suche in Google Scholar

31. Newman-Toker, DE, Hsieh, YH, Camargo, CAJr., Pelletier, AJ, Butchy, GT, Edlow, JA. Spectrum of dizziness visits to US emergency departments: cross-sectional analysis from a nationally representative sample. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:765–75. https://doi.org/10.4065/83.7.765.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Zhu, Y, Wang, Z, Liberman, AL, Chang, TP, Newman-Toker, D. Statistical insights for crude-rate-based operational measures of misdiagnosis-related harms. Stat Med 2021;40:4430–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.9039.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Pearl, J. Simpson’s paradox, confounding, and collapsibility in causality: models, reasoning and inference, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.Suche in Google Scholar

34. Rosenman, MB, Oh, E, Richards, CT, Mendelson, S, Lee, J, Holl, JL, et al.. Risk of stroke after emergency department visits for neurologic complaints. Neurol Clin Pract 2020;10:106–14. https://doi.org/10.1212/cpj.0000000000000673.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Tolles, J, Lewis, RJ. Time-to-Event analysis. JAMA 2016;315:1046–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.1825.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Hess, KR. Graphical methods for assessing violations of the proportional hazards assumption in cox regression. Stat Med 1995;14:1707–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780141510.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Schober, P, Vetter, TR. Survival analysis and interpretation of time-to-event data: the tortoise and the hare. Anesth Analg 2018;127:792–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000003653.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Zhu, Y, Wang, Z, Newman-Toker, D. Misdiagnosis-related harm quantification through mixture models and harm measures. Biometrics 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13759.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Austin, PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011;46:399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Harder, VS, Stuart, EA, Anthony, JC. Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychol Methods 2010;15:234–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019623.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

41. Liberman, AL, Wang, C, Friedman, BW, Prabhakaran, S, Esenwa, CC, Rostanski, SK, et al.. Head Computed tomography during emergency department treat-and-release visit for headache is associated with increased risk of subsequent cerebrovascular disease hospitalization. Diagnosis (Berl) 2021;8:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0082.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Haukoos, JS, Lewis, RJ. The propensity score. JAMA 2015;314:1637–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.13480.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Vaillancourt, S, Guttmann, A, Li, Q, Chan, IY, Vermeulen, MJ, Schull, MJ. Repeated emergency department visits among children admitted with meningitis or septicemia: a population-based study. Ann Emerg Med 2015;65:625–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.022.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Kowalski, RG, Claassen, J, Kreiter, KT, Bates, JE, Ostapkovich, ND, Connolly, ES, et al.. Initial misdiagnosis and outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. JAMA 2004;291:866–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.7.866.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Ois, A, Vivas, E, Figueras-Aguirre, G, Guimaraens, L, Cuadrado-Godia, E, Avellaneda, C, et al.. Misdiagnosis worsens prognosis in subarachnoid hemorrhage with good Hunt and hess score. Stroke 2019;50:3072–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.119.025520.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-11-28
Accepted: 2023-03-06
Published Online: 2023-04-05

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Cognitive biases in internal medicine: a scoping review
  4. Opinion Papers
  5. “Pivot and Cluster Strategy” in the light of Kahneman’s “Decision Hygiene” template
  6. Developing a European longitudinal and interprofessional curriculum for clinical reasoning
  7. Optimizing measurement of misdiagnosis-related harms using symptom-disease pair analysis of diagnostic error (SPADE): comparison groups to maximize SPADE validity
  8. Reframing context specificity in team diagnosis using the theory of distributed cognition
  9. Original Articles
  10. Promoting clinical reasoning with meta-memory techniques to teach broad differential diagnosis generation in a pediatric core clerkship
  11. Semantic competence and prototypical verbalizations are associated with higher OSCE and global medical degree scores: a multi-theory pilot study on year 6 medical student verbalizations
  12. Influence of comorbid depression and diagnostic workup on diagnosis of physical illness: a randomized experiment
  13. Recognition, diagnostic practices, and cancer outcomes among patients with unintentional weight loss (UWL) in primary care
  14. Quantitation of neurofilament light chain protein in serum and cerebrospinal fluid from patients with multiple sclerosis using the MSD R-PLEX NfL assay
  15. Analysis of common biomarkers in capillary blood in routine clinical laboratory. Preanalytical and analytical comparison with venous blood
  16. Comparison between cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for differential diagnosis of acute meningitis
  17. Short Communications
  18. Exploring relationships between physician stress, burnout, and diagnostic elements in clinician notes
  19. Development of a student-created internal medicine frameworks website for healthcare trainees
  20. Case Report - Lessons in Clinical Reasoning
  21. Lessons in clinical reasoning – pitfalls, myths, and pearls: a case of crushing, substernal chest pain
  22. Letters to the Editor
  23. Ample room for cognitive bias in diagnosing accidental hypothermia
  24. Auscultation order of lung and heart sounds and autonomous noise cancellation
  25. Reliability of a single-nostril nasopharyngeal swab for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection
Heruntergeladen am 5.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2022-0130/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen